³ÉÈË´óƬ

During this stage, the proposal proponents obtain advice and endorsements from relevant areas across the University to prepare a Concept Proposal document.

The Concept Proposal must be submitted to the Faculty Executive DeanÌýwith a cc toÌýAPEAC (subject line: Concept proposal for Executive Dean Approval for consideration).

Following endorsement from the Executive Dean of each involved Faculty, the Business Case stage will commence. Endorsement should be sought through internal Faculty governance structures and approval processes.

Notes:

• If the proposal involves a University partner, approvals need to be sought from the relevant governance bodies.
• Proposals can be commenced by Faculties or a combination of areas across the University. Furthermore, the University may elect to propose a new program in consultation with third parties (including industry bodies).
• Selected proposals may be eligible to use a fast-tracked version of the process, if previously agreed or identified as a priority and approved by the Deputy Vice-Chancellor and Vice-President (Academic). These proposals would proceed directly to the Business Case stage.
• New program development for implementation in 2026 will require approval through .

This stage applies to new coursework programs and only.

During this stage proponents, including the coordinating Faculty, work alongside areas across the University such as Planning and Analytics, Finance, Marketing, Recruitment, and other areas as required, to prepare a Business Case document.

Following completion of the Business Case, proponents must submit this toÌýthe relevant Executive DeanÌýwith a cc toÌýAPEAC (subject line: Business Case for consideration by the Executive Dean of each involed Faculty). Should the Executive Dean endorse the Business Case, the proponents will need to use Faculty governance structures and approval processes to obtain endorsement from the Executive Dean of each involved Faculty prior to commencing the Academic Design and Implementation stage.

This stage applies to new programs and specific major revisions only.

During this stage the proponents, including the coordinating Faculty, will arrange a series of workshops to complete the relevantÌýProgram Proposal.

Specific program proposals forms are available for and . ÌýÌý

The workshops will include consultation sessions with stakeholders across the University, to both determine the academic elements of the proposal and ensure it can be made operational in the anticipated timeframe.

Stakeholders across the University include:

• Admissions (for domestic and international student cohorts as required)
• Education Quality
• Education Transformation
• Educational Policy and Compliance
• University Finance
• International Compliance
• Learning Enhancement and Innovation
• Marketing
• Planning and Analytics
• Recruitment (student recruitment)
• Student Administration
  • Includes: Student Data Collection; as a PeopleSoft proforma will need to be completed prior to submission at APEAC.

It is anticipated that the Program Proposal would be populated either during or as a result of these workshops throughout the Academic Design and Implementation stage.ÌýTeaching Excellence and Education Quality have created a set of resources to support coordinating Faculties in organising workshops and completing the corresponding sections of the relevant proposal form.

This stage applies to new programs, major revisions, revisions to entry requirements and program inactivations.

During this stage, the finalised proposals, and any required supporting documents, are submitted to APEAC for consideration. Proposals endorsed by APEAC* will be sent to Academic Board for recommendation and subsequent approval by the Vice-Chancellor and President.

*Proposals to revise entry requirements will be sent to the Deputy Vice-Chancellor and Vice-President (Academic) for approval, upon recommendation by APEAC.

TheÌýRevision of Entry Requirements formÌýis endorsed by the Deputy Dean (Learning and Teaching) (DDLT), the Executive Dean (and, if any other faculties are involved, the relevant DDLT and Executive Dean) and Executive Director, Future Students. It is then submitted toÌýthe Admissions Committee for consideration. Subsequent to endorsement by the Admissions Committee, it will be considered by the Academic Program Entry and Approval CommitteeÌý(APEAC)Ìý(as per theÌýAPEACÌýsubmission deadlines).

APEAC will consider the recommendations based on the proposal’s merits and decide whether a recommendation for approval is to be made to the DVC&VP(A).

Revisions to entry requirements will be communicated to Adelaide University to support transition. Ìý

For further advice on entry requirements, refer to program structure and entry requirements.

The is endorsed by the Deputy Dean (Learning and Teaching) (DDLT), the Executive Dean (including the relevant DDLT and Executive Dean for any other faculties involved) and will require endorsement of the Executive Director, Future Students and the Deputy Vice-Chancellor (External Engagement). It is then submitted to APEAC (as per APEAC submission deadlines) for consideration.

Approval of Program Suspension is delegated to the Deputy Vice-Chancellor and Vice-President (Academic) on recommendation of APEAC.

Program suspensions will be communicated to Adelaide University to support transition.

TheÌýProgram Inactivation formÌýis endorsed by the Deputy Dean (Learning and Teaching) (DDLT), the Executive Dean (including the relevant DDLT and Executive Dean for any other faculties involved) and will require endorsement of the Deputy Vice-Chancellor (External Engagement). It is then submitted toÌýAPEACÌý(as perÌýAPEACÌýsubmission deadlines) for consideration.

APEAC will consider the recommendations based on the proposal’s merits and decide whether the proposal will be sent to Academic Board for recommendation and subsequent approval by the Vice-Chancellor and President.

Program Inactivations will be communicated to Adelaide University to support transition.

APEACÌýwill notify stakeholders of the Vice-Chancellor and President’s decision, or in the case of entry requirement revisions, the Deputy Vice-Chancellor and Vice-President (Academic)’s decision.

Once approved the proposal commences implementation.

Adelaide University will also be advised of approval outcomes to support student transition.

Further information regarding the APEAC process is available on ourÌýFAQsÌýpage.