%PDF-1.2 % 12 0 obj << /Length 13 0 R >> stream BT 297.75 754.5 TD 0 0 0 rg /F0 15.75 Tf 0 Tc -0.1875 Tw ( ) Tj 0 -19.5 TD ( ) Tj T* ( ) Tj T* ( ) Tj T* ( ) Tj T* ( ) Tj T* ( ) Tj T* ( ) Tj T* ( ) Tj T* ( ) Tj T* ( ) Tj -224.25 -22.5 TD /F0 20.25 Tf 0.1417 Tc 0.0458 Tw (Provincial Cities Association of South Australia) Tj 448.5 0 TD 0 Tc 0.1875 Tw ( ) Tj -450.75 -16.5 TD /F1 11.25 Tf ( ) Tj 0 -14.25 TD ( ) Tj T* ( ) Tj T* ( ) Tj T* ( ) Tj T* ( ) Tj T* ( ) Tj 66 -21.75 TD /F0 20.25 Tf 0.2026 Tc -0.0151 Tw (Supplementary Submission to the) Tj 321.75 0 TD 0 Tc 0.1875 Tw ( ) Tj -259.5 -24 TD 0.1774 Tc 0.0101 Tw (IGA Inquiry into the) Tj 196.5 0 TD 0 Tc 0.1875 Tw ( ) Tj -262.5 -24 TD 0.2029 Tc -0.0154 Tw (Management of Machine Numbers) Tj 329.25 0 TD 0 Tc 0.1875 Tw ( ) Tj -391.5 -21 TD /F0 15.75 Tf -0.1875 Tw ( ) Tj 0 -18.75 TD /F1 15.75 Tf ( ) Tj 0 -19.5 TD ( ) Tj 192 -33 TD /F2 30 Tf -0.204 Tc 0 Tw (Final) Tj 69 0 TD 0 Tc ( ) Tj -261 -23.25 TD /F1 15.75 Tf -0.1875 Tw ( ) Tj 0 -19.5 TD ( ) Tj T* ( ) Tj T* ( ) Tj T* ( ) Tj T* ( ) Tj T* ( ) Tj 183.75 -18 TD /F0 14.25 Tf 0.1993 Tc -0.0118 Tw (August, 2003) Tj 85.5 0 TD 0 Tc 0.1875 Tw ( ) Tj ET endstream endobj 13 0 obj 1165 endobj 4 0 obj << /Type /Page /Parent 5 0 R /Resources << /Font << /F0 6 0 R /F1 8 0 R /F2 10 0 R >> /ProcSet 2 0 R >> /Contents 12 0 R >> endobj 15 0 obj << /Length 16 0 R >> stream BT 71.25 804 TD 0 0 0 rg /F0 9 Tf -0.0282 Tc 0.0282 Tw (Supplementary Submission to the Inquiry Into the Management of Machine) Tj 312 0 TD 0.0724 Tc -0.0724 Tw ( Numbers) Tj 40.5 0 TD 0 Tc 0 Tw ( ) Tj 64.5 0 TD -0.03 Tc (Contents) Tj 36.75 0 TD 0 Tc ( ) Tj -453.75 -12.75 TD ( ) Tj ET 69.75 786.75 456.75 0.75 re f BT 71.25 777 TD ( ) Tj 0 -720 TD /F1 9 Tf ( ) Tj 0 -12.75 TD ( ) Tj ET 69.75 54 456.75 0.75 re f BT 71.25 32.25 TD /F0 9 Tf -0.0451 Tc 0.0451 Tw (A Supplementary Submission by the Provincial Cities Association of SA) Tj 295.5 0 TD 0 Tc 0 Tw ( ) Tj 51.75 0 TD -0 Tc (FINAL) Tj 28.5 0 TD 0 Tc ( ) Tj 26.25 0 TD -0.0679 Tc 0.0679 Tw (August, 2003) Tj 51.75 0 TD /F1 9 Tf 0 Tc 0 Tw ( ) Tj -256.5 724.5 TD /F0 14.25 Tf 0.0853 Tc (Contents) Tj 59.25 0 TD 0 Tc 0.1875 Tw ( ) Tj -256.5 -15 TD /F1 11.25 Tf ( ) Tj 0 -14.25 TD /F0 11.25 Tf 0.0705 Tc 0.117 Tw (Executive Summary) Tj 102.75 0 TD 0 Tc 0.1875 Tw ( ) Tj 339.75 0 TD 0.0038 Tc 0 Tw (\(i\)) Tj 11.25 0 TD 0 Tc 0.1875 Tw ( ) Tj -453.75 -14.25 TD ( ) Tj 0 -14.25 TD 0.0942 Tc 0 Tw (Preamble) Tj 49.5 0 TD 0 Tc 0.1875 Tw ( ) Tj 7.5 0 TD ( ) Tj 27.75 0 TD ( ) Tj 363 0 TD 0.375 Tc 0 Tw (1) Tj 6 0 TD 0 Tc 0.1875 Tw ( ) Tj -453.75 -14.25 TD ( ) Tj 0 -14.25 TD 0.2813 Tc 0 Tw (1.) Tj 9 0 TD 0 Tc 0.1875 Tw ( ) Tj 19.5 0 TD -0.0311 Tc 0.2186 Tw (Introductory Comments) Tj 123 0 TD 0 Tc 0.1875 Tw ( ) Tj 296.25 0 TD 0.375 Tc 0 Tw (2) Tj 6 0 TD 0 Tc 0.1875 Tw ( ) Tj -453.75 -14.25 TD ( ) Tj 0 -14.25 TD 0.375 Tc 0 Tw (2) Tj 6 0 TD 0.1875 Tc (.) Tj 3 0 TD 0 Tc 0.1875 Tw ( ) Tj 19.5 0 TD 0.0522 Tc 0.1353 Tw (Options for the Management of EGMs) Tj 200.25 0 TD 0 Tc 0.1875 Tw ( ) Tj 219 0 TD 0.375 Tc 0 Tw (6) Tj 6 0 TD 0 Tc 0.1875 Tw ( ) Tj -453.75 -12 TD /F1 9.75 Tf -0.1875 Tw ( ) Tj 28.5 0 TD -0.0625 Tc 0 Tw (2.1) Tj 12.75 0 TD 0 Tc -0.1875 Tw ( ) Tj 15.75 0 TD -0.0025 Tc -0.185 Tw (Views on the Managed Number Option) Tj 171 0 TD 0 Tc -0.1875 Tw ( ) Tj 220.5 0 TD 0.375 Tc 0 Tw (7) Tj 5.25 0 TD 0 Tc -0.1875 Tw ( ) Tj -453.75 -12 TD ( ) Tj 28.5 0 TD -0.0625 Tc 0 Tw (2.2) Tj 12.75 0 TD 0 Tc -0.1875 Tw ( ) Tj 15.75 0 TD -0.0083 Tc -0.1792 Tw (History of Management of Machine Numbers) Tj 196.5 0 TD 0 Tc -0.1875 Tw ( ) Tj 195 0 TD 0.375 Tc 0 Tw (8) Tj 5.25 0 TD 0 Tc -0.1875 Tw ( ) Tj -453.75 -14.25 TD /F0 11.25 Tf 0.1875 Tw ( ) Tj 0 -14.25 TD 0.2813 Tc 0 Tw (3.) Tj 9 0 TD 0 Tc 0.1875 Tw ( ) Tj 19.5 0 TD 0.0546 Tc 0.1329 Tw (Harm Minimisation with regard to ToR \(1.1\)) Tj 230.25 0 TD 0 Tc 0.1875 Tw ( ) Tj 183 0 TD 0.375 Tc 0 Tw (11) Tj 12 0 TD 0 Tc 0.1875 Tw ( ) Tj -453.75 -12 TD /F1 9.75 Tf -0.1875 Tw ( ) Tj 28.5 0 TD -0.0625 Tc 0 Tw (3.1) Tj 12.75 0 TD 0 Tc -0.1875 Tw ( ) Tj 15.75 0 TD 0.0488 Tc -0.2363 Tw (Potential Harm Minimisation Measures) Tj 172.5 0 TD 0 Tc -0.1875 Tw ( ) Tj 213.75 0 TD 0.375 Tc 0 Tw (11) Tj 10.5 0 TD 0 Tc -0.1875 Tw ( ) Tj -453.75 -14.25 TD /F0 11.25 Tf 0.1875 Tw ( ) Tj 0 -14.25 TD 0.2813 Tc 0 Tw (4.) Tj 9 0 TD 0 Tc 0.1875 Tw ( ) Tj 19.5 0 TD 0.068 Tc 0.1195 Tw (Options for the Management o) Tj 159.75 0 TD 0.1013 Tc 0.0862 Tw (f Machine Numbers) Tj 105 0 TD 0 Tc 0.1875 Tw ( ) Tj 148.5 0 TD 0.375 Tc 0 Tw (13) Tj 12 0 TD 0 Tc 0.1875 Tw ( ) Tj -453.75 -12 TD /F1 9.75 Tf -0.1875 Tw ( ) Tj 28.5 0 TD -0.0625 Tc 0 Tw (4.1) Tj 12.75 0 TD 0 Tc -0.1875 Tw ( ) Tj 15.75 0 TD 0.0559 Tc -0.2434 Tw (Equalised Per Capita Formula) Tj 130.5 0 TD 0 Tc -0.1875 Tw ( ) Tj 255.75 0 TD 0.375 Tc 0 Tw (15) Tj 10.5 0 TD 0 Tc -0.1875 Tw ( ) Tj -453.75 -12 TD ( ) Tj 28.5 0 TD -0.0625 Tc 0 Tw (4.2) Tj 12.75 0 TD 0 Tc -0.1875 Tw ( ) Tj 15.75 0 TD 0.1233 Tc -0.3108 Tw (Variations on this Proposal) Tj 119.25 0 TD 0 Tc -0.1875 Tw ( ) Tj 267 0 TD 0.375 Tc 0 Tw (21) Tj 10.5 0 TD 0 Tc -0.1875 Tw ( ) Tj -453.75 -14.25 TD /F1 11.25 Tf 0.1875 Tw ( ) Tj 0 -14.25 TD ( ) Tj T* ( ) Tj T* ( ) Tj T* ( ) Tj T* ( ) Tj T* ( ) Tj T* ( ) Tj T* ( ) Tj T* ( ) Tj T* ( ) Tj T* ( ) Tj T* ( ) Tj T* ( ) Tj 34.5 -14.25 TD /F3 10.5 Tf -0.0833 Tc 0.4583 Tw (This submission was prepared by the following SA Centre for Economic Studies researchers) Tj 384.75 0 TD 0 Tc 0.375 Tw ( ) Tj -339 -14.25 TD -0.0347 Tc 0.4097 Tw (at the request of the Provincial Cities Association of Sout) Tj 242.25 0 TD -0.0792 Tc 0.4542 Tw (h Australia:) Tj 51 0 TD 0 Tc 0.375 Tw ( ) Tj -205.5 -16.5 TD /F2 10.5 Tf 0.0636 Tc 0.3114 Tw (Michael O\222Neil, Director) Tj 117.75 0 TD 0 Tc 0.375 Tw ( ) Tj -159.75 -13.5 TD -0.0037 Tc 0.3787 Tw (Steve Whetton, Senior Research Economist) Tj 201.75 0 TD 0 Tc 0.375 Tw ( ) Tj -327.75 -14.25 TD /F1 11.25 Tf 0.1875 Tw ( ) Tj 0 -14.25 TD ( ) Tj T* ( ) Tj T* ( ) Tj T* ( ) Tj T* ( ) Tj T* ( ) Tj T* ( ) Tj T* ( ) Tj T* ( ) Tj 0 -12.75 TD /F0 9 Tf 0.0016 Tc 0 Tw (Disclaimer:) Tj 47.25 0 TD 0 Tc ( ) Tj 9.75 0 TD /F1 9 Tf 0.03 Tc 0.5793 Tw (This submission, while embodying the best efforts of the investigators is but an expression of the ) Tj 0 -12 TD 0.0157 Tc 0.1718 Tw (issues considered most relevant, and neither the SA Cent) Tj 228.75 0 TD 0.0167 Tc -0.0167 Tw (re for Economic Studies, the investigators, ) Tj -228.75 -11.25 TD 0.0398 Tc 0.6661 Tw (nor the Universities can be held responsible for any consequences that ensue from the use of the ) Tj 0 -11.25 TD 0.018 Tc 0.182 Tw (information in this submission. Neither the SA Centre for Economic Studies, the investigators, nor ) Tj ET endstream endobj 16 0 obj 5596 endobj 14 0 obj << /Type /Page /Parent 5 0 R /Resources << /Font << /F0 6 0 R /F1 8 0 R /F2 10 0 R /F3 17 0 R >> /ProcSet 2 0 R >> /Contents 15 0 R >> endobj 20 0 obj << /Length 21 0 R >> stream BT 71.25 804.75 TD 0 0 0 rg /F1 8.25 Tf -0.0148 Tc 0.2023 Tw (Review of the Community Jobs Program Funding Model) Tj 207.75 0 TD /F1 9 Tf 0 Tc 0 Tw ( ) Tj 221.25 0 TD 0.0622 Tc -0.0622 Tw (Page ) Tj 21.75 0 TD 0 Tc 0 Tw (3) Tj 4.5 0 TD ( ) Tj -455.25 -11.25 TD ( ) Tj ET 69.75 789.75 456.75 0.75 re f BT 71.25 780.75 TD ( ) Tj 0 -721.5 TD /F0 9 Tf ( ) Tj 0 -14.25 TD ( ) Tj ET 69.75 55.5 456.75 0.75 re f BT 71.25 32.25 TD -0.034 Tc 0.034 Tw (The SA Centre for Economic Studies) Tj 149.25 0 TD 0 Tc 0 Tw ( ) Tj 251.25 0 TD -0.0747 Tc 0.0747 Tw (August 2002) Tj 49.5 0 TD 0 Tc 0 Tw ( ) Tj -393 729 TD /F1 9 Tf -0.078 Tc 1.578 Tw (the Universitie) Tj 60 0 TD 0.0837 Tc 0.9342 Tw (s make any warranty or guarantee regarding the contents of the report, and any ) Tj -60 -11.25 TD 0.0349 Tc -0.0349 Tw (warranty or guarantee is disavowed except to the extent that statute makes it unavoidable.) Tj 363 0 TD 0 Tc 0 Tw ( ) Tj ET endstream endobj 21 0 obj 968 endobj 19 0 obj << /Type /Page /Parent 5 0 R /Resources << /Font << /F0 6 0 R /F1 8 0 R >> /ProcSet 2 0 R >> /Contents 20 0 R >> endobj 23 0 obj << /Length 24 0 R >> stream BT 71.25 804 TD 0 0 0 rg /F0 9 Tf -0.0179 Tc 0.0179 Tw (Supplementary Submission to the Inquiry Into the Management of Machine Numbers) Tj 352.5 0 TD 0 Tc 0 Tw ( ) Tj 70.5 0 TD 0 Tc -0 Tw (Page \() Tj 24.75 0 TD 0.003 Tc 0 Tw (i) Tj 3 0 TD (\)) Tj 3 0 TD 0 Tc ( ) Tj -453.75 -12.75 TD ( ) Tj ET 69.75 786.75 456.75 0.75 re f BT 71.25 777 TD ( ) Tj 0 -720 TD /F1 9 Tf ( ) Tj 0 -12.75 TD ( ) Tj ET 69.75 54 456.75 0.75 re f BT 71.25 32.25 TD /F0 9 Tf -0.0451 Tc 0.0451 Tw (A Supplementary Submission by the Provincial Cities Association of SA) Tj 295.5 0 TD 0 Tc 0 Tw ( ) Tj 51.75 0 TD -0 Tc (FINAL) Tj 28.5 0 TD 0 Tc ( ) Tj 26.25 0 TD -0.0679 Tc 0.0679 Tw (August, 2003) Tj 51.75 0 TD /F1 9 Tf 0 Tc 0 Tw ( ) Tj -293.25 724.5 TD /F0 14.25 Tf 0.1019 Tc 0.0856 Tw (Executive Summary) Tj 132 0 TD 0 Tc 0.1875 Tw ( ) Tj -292.5 -15 TD /F1 11.25 Tf ( ) Tj 0 -14.25 TD -0.0418 Tc 0.9793 Tw (This supplementary submission to the Inquiry into the Management o) Tj 354 0 TD -0.0437 Tc 0.2312 Tw (f Machine Numbers ) Tj -354 -14.25 TD -0.0078 Tc 1.003 Tw (is principally concerned with a consideration of options for managing machine numbers. ) Tj 0 -14.25 TD 0.0273 Tc 5.5352 Tw (As a background to this, and because the Association was concerned with the) Tj 0 Tc 0.1875 Tw ( ) Tj T* -0.0189 Tc 2.4564 Tw (information, the logic of the argument and the conclusions presented in se) Tj 394.5 0 TD -0.033 Tc 1.2205 Tw (veral of the ) Tj -394.5 -14.25 TD -0.0338 Tc 4.8577 Tw (earlier submissions to the IGA, we provide Introductory Comments \(Section 1\); a) Tj 0 Tc 0.1875 Tw ( ) Tj 0 -14.25 TD -0.0622 Tc 2.5997 Tw (discussion of options \(proposed by others\); and a brief overview of the history of the ) Tj T* 0.021 Tc 0.1665 Tw (management of machine numbers in South Australia \(Section 2\).) Tj 323.25 0 TD 0 Tc 0.1875 Tw ( ) Tj -323.25 -14.25 TD ( ) Tj 0 -14.25 TD -0.0294 Tc 0.9669 Tw (The Associati) Tj 67.5 0 TD -0.0232 Tc 0.3261 Tw (on stresses its concerns with the objective of harm minimisation \(in Section 3\) ) Tj -67.5 -14.25 TD -0.0029 Tc 0.3668 Tw (and expresses a view that the emphasis by the IGA on the minimisation of harm and then, ) Tj 0 -14.25 TD -0.0604 Tc 0.2479 Tw (the sustainability of a responsible gaming industry, is the correct emphasis.) Tj 372.75 0 TD 0 Tc 0.1875 Tw ( ) Tj -372.75 -14.25 TD ( ) Tj 0 -14.25 TD 0.338 Tc 2.0995 Tw (Section 3) Tj 47.25 0 TD -0.0264 Tc 2.1178 Tw ( highlights the fact that several members of the Association have expressed a ) Tj -47.25 -14.25 TD -0.0226 Tc 0.8238 Tw (strong moral objection to electronic gaming machines, including very significant concerns ) Tj 0 -14.25 TD -0.0443 Tc 0.3 Tw (about their impact on individuals, families, local communities and some special, vulnera) Tj 439.5 0 TD -0.2112 Tc 0.3987 Tw (ble ) Tj -439.5 -14.25 TD -0.0345 Tc 1.072 Tw (groups within the local communities. There is a very strong view that electronic gaming ) Tj 0 -14.25 TD -0.0344 Tc 1.3469 Tw (machines should be phased out entirely, or at the very least, restricted to a single casino ) Tj T* -0.0261 Tc 0.2136 Tw (site. This view is not inconsistent with others who have contributed t) Tj 345.75 0 TD -0.1003 Tc 0.2878 Tw (o the Inquiry.) Tj 67.5 0 TD 0 Tc 0.1875 Tw ( ) Tj -413.25 -14.25 TD ( ) Tj 0 -14.25 TD 0.0161 Tc 1.6246 Tw (There are other views and these are taken up in Section 4 wherein the Association has ) Tj T* -0.1029 Tc 0 Tw (provided:) Tj 48 0 TD 0 Tc 0.1875 Tw ( ) Tj -48 -20.25 TD /F4 11.25 Tf 0.075 Tc 0 Tw (\267) Tj 4.5 0 TD /F1 11.25 Tf 0 Tc 0.1875 Tw ( ) Tj 38.25 0 TD -0.0119 Tc 0.1994 Tw (a context for our proposal;) Tj 132.75 0 TD 0 Tc 0.1875 Tw ( ) Tj -175.5 -20.25 TD /F4 11.25 Tf 0.075 Tc 0 Tw (\267) Tj 4.5 0 TD /F1 11.25 Tf 0 Tc 0.1875 Tw ( ) Tj 38.25 0 TD -0.0613 Tc 0.2488 Tw (principles underpinning our proposal;) Tj 190.5 0 TD 0 Tc 0.1875 Tw ( ) Tj -233.25 -20.25 TD /F4 11.25 Tf 0.075 Tc 0 Tw (\267) Tj 4.5 0 TD /F1 11.25 Tf 0 Tc 0.1875 Tw ( ) Tj 38.25 0 TD -0.0069 Tc 0.1944 Tw (a more rigorous platform to manage machine numbers; and) Tj 298.5 0 TD 0 Tc 0.1875 Tw ( ) Tj -341.25 -20.25 TD /F4 11.25 Tf 0.075 Tc 0 Tw (\267) Tj 4.5 0 TD /F1 11.25 Tf 0 Tc 0.1875 Tw ( ) Tj 38.25 0 TD -0.0126 Tc 0.2001 Tw (an outline of ) Tj 66 0 TD -0.0781 Tc 0.2656 Tw (the elements of our proposal.) Tj 144.75 0 TD 0 Tc 0.1875 Tw ( ) Tj -253.5 -14.25 TD ( ) Tj 0 -14.25 TD -0.0091 Tc 0.1966 Tw (The Association has set out:) Tj 138.75 0 TD 0 Tc 0.1875 Tw ( ) Tj -138.75 -20.25 TD /F4 11.25 Tf 0.075 Tc 0 Tw (\267) Tj 4.5 0 TD /F1 11.25 Tf 0 Tc 0.1875 Tw ( ) Tj 38.25 0 TD -0.0368 Tc 0.2243 Tw (an equalised per capita formula to distribute \(and redistribute\) machines;) Tj 364.5 0 TD 0 Tc 0.1875 Tw ( ) Tj -407.25 -20.25 TD /F4 11.25 Tf 0.075 Tc 0 Tw (\267) Tj 4.5 0 TD /F1 11.25 Tf 0 Tc 0.1875 Tw ( ) Tj 38.25 0 TD 0.0234 Tc 0.1641 Tw (a reduction in machine numbers to 10 machines per 1,000 adult persons;) Tj 363 0 TD 0 Tc 0.1875 Tw ( ) Tj -405.75 -20.25 TD /F4 11.25 Tf 0.075 Tc 0 Tw (\267) Tj 4.5 0 TD /F1 11.25 Tf 0 Tc 0.1875 Tw ( ) Tj 38.25 0 TD -0.0014 Tc 0.1889 Tw (a process of adjustment to machine numbers t) Tj 229.5 0 TD -0.0128 Tc 0.2003 Tw (o address changed circumstances;) Tj 169.5 0 TD 0 Tc 0.1875 Tw ( ) Tj -441.75 -20.25 TD /F4 11.25 Tf 0.075 Tc 0 Tw (\267) Tj 4.5 0 TD /F1 11.25 Tf 0 Tc 0.1875 Tw ( ) Tj 38.25 0 TD 0.0088 Tc 0.1787 Tw (a period of phased withdrawal;) Tj 158.25 0 TD 0 Tc 0.1875 Tw ( ) Tj -201 -20.25 TD /F4 11.25 Tf 0.075 Tc 0 Tw (\267) Tj 4.5 0 TD /F1 11.25 Tf 0 Tc 0.1875 Tw ( ) Tj 38.25 0 TD 0.0052 Tc 0.1823 Tw (the abolition of the \223needs test\224; and) Tj 183 0 TD 0 Tc 0.1875 Tw ( ) Tj -225.75 -20.25 TD /F4 11.25 Tf 0.075 Tc 0 Tw (\267) Tj 4.5 0 TD /F1 11.25 Tf 0 Tc 0.1875 Tw ( ) Tj 38.25 0 TD -0.0311 Tc 0.5647 Tw (the application of a community benefit levy to any situation or geographical basis ) Tj 0 -14.25 TD 0.0157 Tc 0.1718 Tw (where the baseline of 10 machines per 1,000 persons is exceeded.) Tj 324 0 TD 0 Tc 0.1875 Tw ( ) Tj -366.75 -14.25 TD ( ) Tj 0 -14.25 TD -0.0322 Tc 3.4697 Tw (A variation on the Association\222s proposal is also provided where the principles and) Tj 0 Tc 0.1875 Tw ( ) Tj T* -0.029 Tc 0.1629 Tw (objectives are unchanged \(i.e., regions would still have an upper limit on machine numbers ) Tj T* 0.0399 Tc 0.3207 Tw (based on their share of population\), but that an \223allocation pool\224 and a \223conte) Tj 394.5 0 TD -0.0583 Tc 0.2458 Tw (stable pool\224 ) Tj -394.5 -14.25 TD -0.0458 Tc 4.5458 Tw (are used together to distribute machine numbers. The contestable pool would be) Tj 0 Tc 0.1875 Tw ( ) Tj 0 -14.25 TD 0.039 Tc 0 Tw (auctioned.) Tj 52.5 0 TD 0 Tc 0.1875 Tw ( ) Tj -52.5 -14.25 TD ( ) Tj ET endstream endobj 24 0 obj 7005 endobj 22 0 obj << /Type /Page /Parent 5 0 R /Resources << /Font << /F0 6 0 R /F1 8 0 R /F4 25 0 R >> /ProcSet 2 0 R >> /Contents 23 0 R >> endobj 28 0 obj << /Length 29 0 R >> stream BT 71.25 804 TD 0 0 0 rg /F0 9 Tf -0.0318 Tc 0.0318 Tw (Supplementary Submission) Tj 113.25 0 TD 0.0059 Tc -0.0059 Tw ( to the Inquiry Into the Management of Machine Numbers) Tj 239.25 0 TD 0 Tc 0 Tw ( ) Tj 75 0 TD -0 Tc 0 Tw (Page ) Tj 21.75 0 TD 0 Tc 0 Tw (1) Tj 4.5 0 TD ( ) Tj -453.75 -12.75 TD ( ) Tj ET 69.75 786.75 456 0.75 re f BT 71.25 777 TD ( ) Tj 0 -720.75 TD /F1 9 Tf ( ) Tj 0 -12.75 TD ( ) Tj ET 69.75 53.25 456 0.75 re f BT 71.25 31.5 TD /F0 9 Tf -0.0451 Tc 0.0451 Tw (A Supplementary Submission by the Provincial Cities Association of SA) Tj 295.5 0 TD 0 Tc 0 Tw ( ) Tj 51.75 0 TD -0 Tc (FINAL) Tj 28.5 0 TD 0 Tc ( ) Tj 26.25 0 TD -0.0679 Tc 0.0679 Tw (August, 2003) Tj 51.75 0 TD /F1 9 Tf 0 Tc 0 Tw ( ) Tj -258.75 725.25 TD /F0 14.25 Tf 0.0631 Tc (Preamble) Tj 63 0 TD 0 Tc 0.1875 Tw ( ) Tj -258 -21 TD /F1 11.25 Tf ( ) Tj 0 -14.25 TD -0.0045 Tc 3.567 Tw (The Association commends the South Australian Government and the Authority for) Tj 0 Tc 0.1875 Tw ( ) Tj T* -0.0614 Tc 0.8322 Tw (initiating this Inquiry. The Association recognises this is ) Tj 289.5 0 TD 0.0059 Tc 0.7173 Tw (a very complex issue and that, a ) Tj -289.5 -14.25 TD -0.0288 Tc 0.3771 Tw (serious attempt is being made to introduce greater rigour into the management of machine ) Tj 0 -14.25 TD -0.0318 Tc 0.5693 Tw (numbers. The Association is therefore pleased to contribute further to the Inquiry into the ) Tj T* -0.0086 Tc 0.1961 Tw (Management of Machine Numbers. ) Tj 183 0 TD 0 Tc 0.1875 Tw ( ) Tj -183 -14.25 TD ( ) Tj 0 -14.25 TD -0.0387 Tc 4.7263 Tw (We unde) Tj 49.5 0 TD -0.0033 Tc 3.9408 Tw (rstand that the industry consistently states that it does not want problem) Tj 0 Tc 0.1875 Tw ( ) Tj -49.5 -14.25 TD -0.0184 Tc 4.3309 Tw (gamblers in venues; that it desires a sustainable industry; we understand that the) Tj 0 Tc 0.1875 Tw ( ) Tj 0 -14.25 TD -0.0194 Tc 3.2069 Tw (\223concerned sector\224 is not opposed to controlled, regulated, recreational gambling \(all) Tj 0 Tc -0.5625 Tw ( ) Tj T* -0.0307 Tc 2.4682 Tw (gambling an) Tj 64.5 0 TD -0.0187 Tc 2.2254 Tw (d wagering is regulated\); and that government does desire to have a fair, ) Tj -64.5 -14.25 TD -0.073 Tc 0.2605 Tw (equitable and progressive tax system.) Tj 185.25 0 TD 0 Tc 0.1875 Tw ( ) Tj -185.25 -14.25 TD ( ) Tj 0 -14.25 TD -0.0514 Tc 1.6708 Tw (Following presentation to the Independent Gambling Authority \(IGA\) of the submission ) Tj T* -0.0202 Tc 1.7077 Tw (forwarded by the Provincial Cities Association of South Au) Tj 307.5 0 TD 0.0323 Tc 0 Tw (stralia,) Tj 33.75 3 TD /F1 7.5 Tf 0 Tc (1) Tj 3.75 -3 TD /F1 11.25 Tf 0.0106 Tc 0.9269 Tw ( and an invitation by ) Tj -345 -14.25 TD -0.0313 Tc 3.2938 Tw (the IGA to submit further material in response to matters raised,) Tj 351 3 TD /F1 7.5 Tf 0 Tc 0 Tw (2) Tj 3.75 -3 TD /F1 11.25 Tf -0.038 Tc 3.2255 Tw ( the Association is) Tj 0 Tc -0.5625 Tw ( ) Tj -354.75 -14.25 TD -0.0524 Tc 0.2399 Tw (pleased to submit the following for consideration by the IGA:) Tj 304.5 0 TD 0 Tc 0.1875 Tw ( ) Tj -304.5 -14.25 TD ( ) Tj 0 -14.25 TD -0.063 Tc 0.2505 Tw (This submission is set out under the four headings shown below:) Tj 321.75 0 TD 0 Tc 0.1875 Tw ( ) Tj -321.75 -20.25 TD 0.2813 Tc 0 Tw (1.) Tj 9 0 TD 0 Tc 0.1875 Tw ( ) Tj 33.75 0 TD 0.0375 Tc 0 Tw (Introduct) Tj 47.25 0 TD -0.0858 Tc 1.8567 Tw (ory comments, including reference to selected submissions received by ) Tj -47.25 -14.25 TD 0.0295 Tc 0.158 Tw (the IGA;) Tj 42.75 0 TD 0 Tc 0.1875 Tw ( ) Tj -85.5 -20.25 TD 0.2813 Tc 0 Tw (2.) Tj 9 0 TD 0 Tc 0.1875 Tw ( ) Tj 33.75 0 TD -0.0468 Tc 2.1959 Tw (Options for the Management of EGMs including a discussion of the history of ) Tj 0 -14.25 TD -0.019 Tc 0.2065 Tw (management of machine numbers;) Tj 173.25 0 TD 0 Tc 0.1875 Tw ( ) Tj -216 -20.25 TD 0.2813 Tc 0 Tw (3.) Tj 9 0 TD 0 Tc 0.1875 Tw ( ) Tj 33.75 0 TD -0.0049 Tc 0.1924 Tw (Harm Minimisation with particular regard to) Tj 225.75 0 TD 0 Tc 0.1875 Tw ( ) Tj -225.75 -20.25 TD 0.0921 Tc 0.0954 Tw (ToR \(1.1\):) Tj 48.75 0 TD 0 Tc 0.1875 Tw ( ) Tj 36.75 0 TD 0.2137 Tc 2.2238 Tw (\223... reas) Tj 40.5 0 TD 0.0036 Tc 1.5768 Tw (onably practicable options for management of machine ) Tj -126 -14.25 TD -0.0208 Tc 0.2083 Tw (numbers ... [and] attention to strategies to minimise gambling related harm\224;) Tj 382.5 0 TD 0 Tc 0.1875 Tw ( ) Tj -425.25 -20.25 TD 0.2813 Tc 0 Tw (4.) Tj 9 0 TD 0 Tc 0.1875 Tw ( ) Tj 33.75 0 TD 0.0259 Tc 0.4116 Tw (Options for the Management of Machine Numbers, ToR \(1.3\)\(b\); ToR \(2.3\)\(c\); and ) Tj 0 -14.25 TD 0.0802 Tc 0.1073 Tw (ToR \(2.4\)) Tj 45.75 0 TD 0 Tc 0.1875 Tw ( ) Tj -88.5 -20.25 TD ( ) Tj 42.75 0 TD 0.0513 Tc 0.1362 Tw (ToR \(1.3\)\(b\):) Tj 62.25 0 TD 0 Tc 0.1875 Tw ( ) Tj 22.5 0 TD 0.0938 Tc 2.3437 Tw (\223measures which wo) Tj 110.25 0 TD -0.0158 Tc 1.7033 Tw (uld allow for the management of gaming ) Tj -110.25 -14.25 TD 0.0076 Tc 6.3049 Tw (machine turnover on both regional and state) Tj 259.5 0 TD 0.0038 Tc 0 Tw (-) Tj 3.75 0 TD -0.0506 Tc 6.2381 Tw (wide bases,) Tj 0 Tc 0.1875 Tw ( ) Tj -263.25 -14.25 TD 0.0038 Tc 0.1837 Tw (through the allocation of gambling machines\224;) Tj 232.5 0 TD 0 Tc 0.1875 Tw ( ) Tj -360 -20.25 TD ( ) Tj 42.75 0 TD 0.0909 Tc 0.0966 Tw (ToR \(2.3\)\(c\):) Tj 61.5 0 TD 0 Tc 0.1875 Tw ( ) Tj 23.25 0 TD -0.0056 Tc 8.9118 Tw (\223... options for reducing the number of machines or) Tj 0 Tc 0.1875 Tw ( ) Tj 0 -14.25 TD -0.0312 Tc 0.2187 Tw (redistributing them \(or both\); and) Tj 168 0 TD 0 Tc 0.1875 Tw ( ) Tj -295.5 -20.25 TD ( ) Tj 42.75 0 TD 0.0921 Tc 0.0954 Tw (ToR \(2.4\):) Tj 48.75 0 TD 0 Tc 0.1875 Tw ( ) Tj 36 0 TD 0.375 Tc 0 Tw (\223) Tj 6 0 TD 0.0091 Tc 2.345 Tw (The Authority must consider what would be an appropriate ) Tj -6 -14.25 TD 0.0155 Tc 2.3387 Tw (number of gaming machines for South Australia at particular ) Tj 0 -14.25 TD -0.0254 Tc 0.2129 Tw (future points in time, noting \(among other things\):) Tj 251.25 0 TD 0 Tc 0.1875 Tw ( ) Tj -378.75 -17.25 TD ( ) Tj 42.75 0 TD ( ) Tj 42.75 0 TD ( ) Tj 42.75 0 TD 0.1894 Tc 0 Tw (a\)) Tj 9.75 0 TD 0 Tc 0.1875 Tw ( ) Tj 33 0 TD -0.0876 Tc 0.2751 Tw (distribution geographically.) Tj 137.25 0 TD 0 Tc 0.1875 Tw ( ) Tj -308.25 -14.25 TD ( ) Tj 0 -14.25 TD ( ) Tj 0 -43.5 TD ( ) Tj 90 0 TD ( ) Tj ET 71.25 102 144 0.75 re f BT 215.25 99.75 TD ( ) Tj -144 -9 TD /F1 5.25 Tf 0.375 Tc 0 Tw (1) Tj 3 -2.25 TD /F1 8.25 Tf 0 Tc 0.1875 Tw ( ) Tj 2.25 0 TD ( ) Tj 37.5 0 TD 0.0555 Tc 0.132 Tw (Hereafter \223the Association\224.) Tj 105 0 TD 0 Tc 0.1875 Tw ( ) Tj -147.75 -8.25 TD /F1 5.25 Tf 0.375 Tc 0 Tw (2) Tj 3 -2.25 TD /F1 8.25 Tf 0 Tc 0.1875 Tw ( ) Tj 2.25 0 TD ( ) Tj 37.5 0 TD 0.0121 Tc 2.854 Tw (Within the Association\222s presentation, matters raised by others both in written submission and verbal ) Tj 0 -10.5 TD -0.0341 Tc 0 Tw (presentation.) Tj 48 0 TD 0 Tc 0.1875 Tw ( ) Tj ET endstream endobj 29 0 obj 7232 endobj 27 0 obj << /Type /Page /Parent 5 0 R /Resources << /Font << /F0 6 0 R /F1 8 0 R >> /ProcSet 2 0 R >> /Contents 28 0 R >> endobj 31 0 obj << /Length 32 0 R >> stream BT 71.25 804 TD 0 0 0 rg /F0 9 Tf -0.0179 Tc 0.0179 Tw (Supplementary Submission to the Inquiry Into the Management of Machine Numbers) Tj 352.5 0 TD 0 Tc 0 Tw ( ) Tj 75 0 TD -0 Tc 0 Tw (Page ) Tj 21.75 0 TD 0 Tc 0 Tw (2) Tj 4.5 0 TD ( ) Tj -453.75 -12.75 TD ( ) Tj ET 69.75 786.75 456 0.75 re f BT 71.25 777 TD ( ) Tj 0 -717 TD /F1 11.25 Tf 0.1875 Tw ( ) Tj 0 -15.75 TD ( ) Tj ET 69.75 56.25 456 0.75 re f BT 71.25 31.5 TD /F0 9 Tf -0.0451 Tc 0.0451 Tw (A Supplementary Submission by the Provincial Cities Association of SA) Tj 295.5 0 TD 0 Tc 0 Tw ( ) Tj 45 0 TD -0 Tc (FINAL) Tj 28.5 0 TD 0 Tc ( ) Tj 33 0 TD -0.0679 Tc 0.0679 Tw (August, 2003) Tj 51.75 0 TD /F1 11.25 Tf 0 Tc 0.1875 Tw ( ) Tj -453.75 725.25 TD /F0 14.25 Tf 0.2813 Tc 0 Tw (1.) Tj 11.25 0 TD 0 Tc 0.1875 Tw ( ) Tj 31.5 0 TD 0.0481 Tc 0.1394 Tw (Introductory Comments) Tj 157.5 0 TD /F1 14.25 Tf 0 Tc 0.1875 Tw ( ) Tj -200.25 -21 TD /F1 11.25 Tf -0.0332 Tc 3.9707 Tw (The Association has revi) Tj 132.75 0 TD -0.0203 Tc 2.9078 Tw (ewed all written submissions forwarded to the IGA, and in ) Tj -132.75 -14.25 TD 0.011 Tc 0.1765 Tw (particular, those that had some relevance to the situation in regional South Australia.) Tj 425.25 3 TD /F1 7.5 Tf 0 Tc 0 Tw (3) Tj 3.75 -3 TD /F1 11.25 Tf 0.1875 Tw ( ) Tj -429 -14.25 TD ( ) Tj 0 -14.25 TD -0.0515 Tc 0.6609 Tw (We also believe that, contrary to the views expressed in a number of submissions, the IGA ) Tj T* 0.0135 Tc 2.424 Tw (was correct to foc) Tj 95.25 0 TD -0.0607 Tc 1.6232 Tw (us on the issue of minimising the harms caused by electronic gaming ) Tj -95.25 -14.25 TD -0.0442 Tc 1.2161 Tw (machines. We believe that in criticising the IGA those submissions misread the act. The ) Tj 0 -14.25 TD 0.0419 Tc 1.8599 Tw (area in contention is Section 11 \(2a\) of the Independent Gaming Authority Act, which ) Tj T* -0.1106 Tc 0 Tw (reads:) Tj 30 0 TD 0 Tc 0.1875 Tw ( ) Tj 12.75 -20.25 TD 0.1894 Tc 0 Tw (\(2a\)) Tj 19.5 0 TD 0 Tc 0.1875 Tw ( ) Tj 9 0 TD -0.0412 Tc 0 Tw (I) Tj 3.75 0 TD -0.0249 Tc 0.4169 Tw (n performing its functions and exercising its powers under this Act ) Tj -3.75 -14.25 TD 0.002 Tc 4.9855 Tw (or a prescribed Act, the Authority must have regard to the) Tj 0 Tc 0.1875 Tw ( ) Tj 0 -14.25 TD -0.0875 Tc -0.475 Tw (following ) Tj 50.25 0 TD /F3 11.25 Tf 0.0487 Tc 0 Tw (objects) Tj 30.75 0 TD /F1 11.25 Tf 0.1875 Tc (:) Tj 3 0 TD 0 Tc 0.1875 Tw ( ) Tj -84 -14.25 TD 0.1894 Tc 0 Tw (a\)) Tj 9.75 0 TD 0 Tc 0.1875 Tw ( ) Tj 18 0 TD -0.0433 Tc 1.5641 Tw (the fostering of responsibility in gambling and, in particular, ) Tj 0 -14.25 TD -0.0621 Tc 1.5353 Tw (the minimising of harm caused by gambling, ) Tj 235.5 0 TD -0.0533 Tc 0.6158 Tw (recognising the ) Tj -235.5 -14.25 TD -0.0639 Tc 2.3139 Tw (positive and negative impacts of gambling on communities; ) Tj 0 -14.25 TD 0.1513 Tc 0 Tw (and) Tj 19.5 0 TD 0 Tc 0.1875 Tw ( ) Tj -47.25 -14.25 TD -0.1087 Tc 0 Tw (b\)) Tj 9.75 0 TD 0 Tc 0.1875 Tw ( ) Tj 18 0 TD 0.0435 Tc 1.769 Tw (the maintenance of a sustainable and ) Tj 200.25 0 TD /F0 11.25 Tf 0.0695 Tc 0 Tw (responsible) Tj 60.75 0 TD /F1 11.25 Tf -0.1106 Tc 0.6731 Tw ( gambling ) Tj -261 -14.25 TD -0.0286 Tc 0.2161 Tw (industry in this State [our emphasis].) Tj 183.75 0 TD 0 Tc 0.1875 Tw ( ) Tj -282.75 -14.25 TD ( ) Tj 0 -14.25 TD -0.0356 Tc 0.4959 Tw (The contention of several submissions was that the second object identified \() Tj 382.5 0 TD 0.0581 Tc 0.1294 Tw (b\) means, that ) Tj -382.5 -14.25 TD -0.0683 Tc 0.6777 Tw (the IGA is required to give equal weight to problem gamblers and the financial viability of ) Tj 0 -14.25 TD -0.0534 Tc 1.7409 Tw (the industry. We believe that in criticising the IGA those submissions misread the Act. ) Tj T* -0.0175 Tc 0.58 Tw (Given that ) Tj 57 0 TD /F2 11.25 Tf 0.0104 Tc 0.9271 Tw (object \(a\)) Tj 48 0 TD /F1 11.25 Tf -0.0691 Tc 0.4066 Tw ( relates exclusively to harm minimisat) Tj 188.25 0 TD 0.0611 Tc 0.1264 Tw (ion, and ) Tj 44.25 0 TD /F2 11.25 Tf 0.0342 Tc 0.1533 Tw (object \(b\)) Tj 47.25 0 TD /F1 11.25 Tf -0.0475 Tc 0.235 Tw ( refers to both ) Tj -384.75 -14.25 TD -0.0189 Tc 3.9564 Tw (industry sustainability and harm minimisation, the emphasis of the act is on harm) Tj 0 Tc 0.1875 Tw ( ) Tj 0 -14.25 TD -0.0635 Tc 0 Tw (minimisation.) Tj 68.25 0 TD 0 Tc 0.1875 Tw ( ) Tj -68.25 -14.25 TD ( ) Tj 0 -14.25 TD -0.0014 Tc 0.8065 Tw (It is important and, we believe necessary, to restate the fact that the Inquiry relates to the ) Tj T* -0.0462 Tc 0.2337 Tw (industry \(its structure, regu) Tj 136.5 0 TD -0.0035 Tc 0.191 Tw (lations, management of machine numbers\) in ) Tj 228.75 0 TD /F0 11.25 Tf 0.0458 Tc 0.1417 Tw (South Australia) Tj 81.75 0 TD /F1 11.25 Tf 0.1875 Tc 0 Tw (.) Tj 3 0 TD 0 Tc 0.1875 Tw ( ) Tj -450 -14.25 TD ( ) Tj 0 -14.25 TD -0.0675 Tc 1.4336 Tw (A number of submissions to the Inquiry have endeavoured to build arguments based on ) Tj T* -0.0155 Tc 0.5244 Tw (the experience of other jurisdictions which bear little resemblance to the situation in South ) Tj T* -0.0315 Tc 3.219 Tw (Australia. Lesso) Tj 88.5 0 TD 0.0104 Tc 2.4896 Tw (ns and insights can certainly be drawn from the experience of other ) Tj -88.5 -14.25 TD -0.009 Tc 1.2349 Tw (jurisdictions; however, great care needs to be exercised in drawing conclusions and then ) Tj 0 -14.25 TD 0.0083 Tc 0.1792 Tw (framing an argument that is, or purports to be, relevant to the situation in South Australia.) Tj 453 0 TD 0 Tc 0.1875 Tw ( ) Tj -453 -14.25 TD ( ) Tj 0 -14.25 TD 0.0263 Tc 0.1612 Tw (Two ) Tj 26.25 0 TD -0.0024 Tc 0.7899 Tw (examples should suffice. The AGMMA: Section 5.7 use largely USA Casino data to ) Tj -26.25 -14.25 TD 0.0219 Tc 0.9156 Tw (compare to the Australian and South Australian industry including the rate of change of ) Tj 0 -14.25 TD -0.0477 Tc 2.0814 Tw (problem gambling, when clearly the nature of accessibility to gaming machines is very ) Tj T* -0.1237 Tc 0 Tw (d) Tj 6.75 0 TD -0.0626 Tc 3.3183 Tw (ifferent. A single casino site is quite different to a multi) Tj 308.25 0 TD 0.0038 Tc 0 Tw (-) Tj 3.75 0 TD -0.0505 Tc 2.238 Tw (location, spatially diverse, ) Tj -318.75 -14.25 TD -0.0073 Tc 0.8042 Tw (industry in hotels and clubs as is the case in South Australia. The nature of ) Tj 388.5 0 TD /F3 11.25 Tf 0.0291 Tc 0 Tw (accessibility) Tj 54.75 0 TD /F1 11.25 Tf -0.2719 Tc 0.0844 Tw ( is ) Tj -443.25 -14.25 TD 0.0034 Tc 0.9966 Tw (very different. Indeed the argument put forward by the AGMMA could b) Tj 379.5 0 TD -0.0404 Tc 0.6029 Tw (e reinterpreted ) Tj -379.5 -14.25 TD -0.0308 Tc 0.3506 Tw (to support the case, that limiting EGMs to only the casino would have a positive impact on ) Tj 0 -14.25 TD -0.057 Tc 1.4231 Tw (reducing the number of problem gamblers through ) Tj 265.5 0 TD /F3 11.25 Tf 0.0114 Tc 0.9261 Tw (limiting accessibility) Tj 95.25 0 TD /F1 11.25 Tf -0.0983 Tc 0.6608 Tw ( by locating EGMs ) Tj -360.75 -14.25 TD 0.0406 Tc 1.3255 Tw (in one site. This in fact was not what the AGMMA sought to a) Tj 330.75 0 TD -0.0697 Tc 0.7572 Tw (rgue, but it is the logical ) Tj -330.75 -34.5 TD 0 Tc 0.1875 Tw ( ) Tj 90 0 TD ( ) Tj ET 71.25 99 144 0.75 re f BT 215.25 96.75 TD ( ) Tj -144 -9.75 TD /F1 5.25 Tf 0.375 Tc 0 Tw (3) Tj 3 -2.25 TD /F1 8.25 Tf 0 Tc 0.1875 Tw ( ) Tj 2.25 0 TD ( ) Tj 37.5 0 TD 0.1268 Tc 0 Tw (Include) Tj 27.75 0 TD -0.0156 Tc 1.4531 Tw (d here are submissions received from, ) Tj 149.25 0 TD /F3 8.25 Tf -0.0232 Tc 0.9607 Tw (inter alia) Tj 30.75 0 TD /F1 8.25 Tf 0.0383 Tc 0.7117 Tw (, Local Government bodies, OLGC, the AHA\(SA\), the ) Tj -207.75 -11.25 TD 0.0755 Tc 0.112 Tw (Manufacturers Association \(AGMMA\) and SA Treasury.) Tj 210.75 0 TD 0 Tc 0.1875 Tw ( ) Tj ET endstream endobj 32 0 obj 8065 endobj 30 0 obj << /Type /Page /Parent 5 0 R /Resources << /Font << /F0 6 0 R /F1 8 0 R /F2 10 0 R /F3 17 0 R >> /ProcSet 2 0 R >> /Contents 31 0 R >> endobj 35 0 obj << /Length 36 0 R >> stream BT 71.25 804 TD 0 0 0 rg /F0 9 Tf -0.0179 Tc 0.0179 Tw (Supplementary Submission to the Inquiry Into the Management of Machine Numbers) Tj 352.5 0 TD 0 Tc 0 Tw ( ) Tj 75 0 TD -0 Tc 0 Tw (Page ) Tj 21.75 0 TD 0 Tc 0 Tw (3) Tj 4.5 0 TD ( ) Tj -453.75 -12.75 TD ( ) Tj ET 69.75 786.75 456 0.75 re f BT 71.25 777 TD ( ) Tj 0 -717 TD /F1 11.25 Tf 0.1875 Tw ( ) Tj 0 -15.75 TD ( ) Tj ET 69.75 56.25 456 0.75 re f BT 71.25 31.5 TD /F0 9 Tf -0.0451 Tc 0.0451 Tw (A Supplementary Submission by the Provincial Cities Association of SA) Tj 295.5 0 TD 0 Tc 0 Tw ( ) Tj 45 0 TD -0 Tc (FINAL) Tj 28.5 0 TD 0 Tc ( ) Tj 33 0 TD -0.0679 Tc 0.0679 Tw (August, 2003) Tj 51.75 0 TD /F1 11.25 Tf 0 Tc 0.1875 Tw ( ) Tj -453.75 727.5 TD -0.0172 Tc 1.2225 Tw (extension/result based on the data they presented. The data supports the proposals put ) Tj 0 -14.25 TD -0.0102 Tc 0.1977 Tw (forward by the Adelaide Central Mission and the Churches Gambling Taskforce.) Tj 402.75 0 TD 0 Tc 0.1875 Tw ( ) Tj -402.75 -14.25 TD ( ) Tj 0 -14.25 TD -0.0207 Tc 4.9894 Tw (Second, the Victorian EGM industry, including the duopoly and) Tj 0 Tc 0.1875 Tw ( ) Tj 365.25 0 TD -0.1287 Tc 4.8162 Tw (relatively flexible) Tj 0 Tc 0.1875 Tw ( ) Tj -365.25 -14.25 TD -0.0068 Tc 3.252 Tw (locational choice available to the two principal agents, is again very different to the) Tj 0 Tc 0.1875 Tw ( ) Tj 0 -14.25 TD 0.0022 Tc 5.2478 Tw (structure of the industry in South Australia, and indeed New South Wales and) Tj 0 Tc 0.1875 Tw ( ) Tj T* -0.0041 Tc 0 Tw (Queensland) Tj 60 3 TD /F1 7.5 Tf 0 Tc (4) Tj 3.75 -3 TD /F1 11.25 Tf 0.0057 Tc 1.6818 Tw (. This is a major reason for the lower per capita number of) Tj 312.75 0 TD -0.027 Tc 0.9645 Tw ( EGMs and the ) Tj -376.5 -14.25 TD -0.0694 Tc 1.3403 Tw (greater intensity of play. The greater intensity of play is most likely due to the ability to ) Tj 0 -14.25 TD 0.0021 Tc 0.8885 Tw (locate the maximum number of machines in areas where it is known that the intensity of ) Tj T* -0.0256 Tc 1.5767 Tw (play will be greatest. It is \223known\224 because of the informa) Tj 308.25 0 TD -0.0576 Tc 0.6951 Tw (tion available to the duopoly ) Tj -308.25 -14.25 TD -0.0373 Tc 0.2248 Tw (operators. This is a situation \(outcome\) South Australia should seek to avoid.) Tj 385.5 0 TD 0 Tc 0.1875 Tw ( ) Tj -385.5 -14.25 TD ( ) Tj 0 -14.25 TD -0.0178 Tc 2.8553 Tw (The point to be made, is that greater care needs to be taken in simply \223transporting) Tj 0 Tc -0.5625 Tw ( ) Tj T* -0.0166 Tc 0.2041 Tw (experiences\224 across jurisdictions. ) Tj 170.25 0 TD 0 Tc 0.1875 Tw ( ) Tj -170.25 -14.25 TD ( ) Tj 0 -14.25 TD -0.03 Tc 0.9675 Tw (There were also numero) Tj 123 0 TD -0.0116 Tc 0.4491 Tw (us examples of faulty calculations and unsubstantiated assertions. ) Tj -123 -14.25 TD -0.0181 Tc 0.2056 Tw (Again, two examples should suffice.) Tj 180.75 0 TD 0 Tc 0.1875 Tw ( ) Tj -180.75 -14.25 TD ( ) Tj 0 -14.25 TD -0.0595 Tc 0.8607 Tw (The AGMMA submission used 1999 problem gambler expenditure/losses and related this ) Tj T* -0.0193 Tc 0.3799 Tw (to ABS 2002 Average Weekly Earnings. We suggest the use of either 1) Tj 352.5 0 TD 0.1486 Tc 0.0389 Tw (999 or 2002 for both ) Tj -352.5 -14.25 TD -0.0075 Tc 0.195 Tw (sets of data to perform the arithmetic, but do not mix them up.) Tj 312.75 0 TD 0 Tc 0.1875 Tw ( ) Tj -312.75 -14.25 TD ( ) Tj 0 -14.25 TD 0 Tc 0.5841 Tw (The claim is advanced that \223the number of gaming machines in any state bear little if any ) Tj T* -0.016 Tc 2.6142 Tw (relationship to the extent of the problem gambling problem ...\224 \(AGMMA, p. 5\). ) Tj 437.25 0 TD -0.0694 Tc 0.2569 Tw (We ) Tj -437.25 -14.25 TD 0.0206 Tc 0.34 Tw (respectfully suggest a comparison with Western Australian data with other State data and ) Tj 0 -14.25 TD -0.0301 Tc 2.6818 Tw (a review of the research conducted specifically on this issue shows a very significant ) Tj T* -0.0213 Tc 0 Tw (relationship.) Tj 62.25 0 TD 0 Tc 0.1875 Tw ( ) Tj -62.25 -14.25 TD ( ) Tj 0 -14.25 TD -0.0064 Tc 5.3367 Tw (Specifically, relating to regional South Australia, the claim) Tj 0 Tc 0.1875 Tw ( ) Tj 333.75 0 TD -0.0229 Tc 4.7104 Tw (is advanced regarding) Tj 0 Tc -0.5625 Tw ( ) Tj -333.75 -14.25 TD -0.0201 Tc 3.0076 Tw (inadequate gaming facilities in regional South Australia. This is not the case in the ) Tj 0 -14.25 TD 0.0244 Tc 1.7702 Tw (Provincial Cities, nor in selected \223tourism areas\224 such as Victor Harbor \(13.4 per 1,000 ) Tj T* 0.0693 Tc 4.8057 Tw (adult persons\) or the Alexandrina Council, \(20.4 per 1,000) Tj 329.25 0 TD -0.0162 Tc 4.7037 Tw ( adult persons\) as the) Tj 0 Tc 0.1875 Tw ( ) Tj -329.25 -14.25 TD -0.0483 Tc 0.5242 Tw (Association\222s submission highlights. Further information is included on these two areas in ) Tj 0 -14.25 TD -0.086 Tc 0.2735 Tw (this supplementary submission.) Tj 156.75 0 TD 0 Tc 0.1875 Tw ( ) Tj -156.75 -14.25 TD ( ) Tj 0 -14.25 TD -0.0059 Tc 1.5862 Tw (The Association notes that SA Treasury consider it \223more acceptable if it proposed that ) Tj T* -0.0982 Tc 1.7857 Tw (there be a minimum sh) Tj 120.75 0 TD 0.0052 Tc 1.6823 Tw (are of gaming machines in non) Tj 162 0 TD 0.0038 Tc 0 Tw (-) Tj 3.75 0 TD 0.0186 Tc 1.0689 Tw (metropolitan areas\224. The OLGC ) Tj -286.5 -14.25 TD -0.0477 Tc 1.1215 Tw (\(submission 15\) acknowledges the possibility that the lowest performing machines would ) Tj 0 -14.25 TD -0.0372 Tc 1.8319 Tw (be those machines most likely to be relocated \(traded\) to more attractive and profitable ) Tj T* -0.0474 Tc 0.2349 Tw (localities and venu) Tj 93 0 TD 0.0422 Tc 0.1453 Tw (es \(p. 3\).) Tj 42 0 TD 0 Tc 0.1875 Tw ( ) Tj -135 -14.25 TD ( ) Tj 0 -14.25 TD -0.0198 Tc 0.6895 Tw (Selective arguments are advanced about the economic impact of the hotel industry; this is ) Tj T* -0.0202 Tc 0.9577 Tw (a spurious argument as most of the gambling expenditure has occurred at the expense of ) Tj T* -0.0144 Tc 1.7019 Tw (expenditure on other products, switching of expenditure from other ) Tj 357 0 TD -0.0858 Tc 1.2733 Tw (forms of gambling, ) Tj -357 -14.25 TD 0.0059 Tc 3.1816 Tw (transfers from non) Tj 99 0 TD 0.0038 Tc 0 Tw (-) Tj 3.75 0 TD -0.0311 Tc 2.8436 Tw (gambling expenditure \(i.e., shifts in consumption patterns\) a small) Tj 0 Tc -0.5625 Tw ( ) Tj -102.75 -14.25 TD -0.0399 Tc 0.9774 Tw (amount from reduced households savings and from tourism. In fact, it is expenditure by ) Tj 0 -21 TD 0 Tc 0.1875 Tw ( ) Tj 90 0 TD ( ) Tj ET 71.25 99 144 0.75 re f BT 215.25 96.75 TD ( ) Tj -144 -9.75 TD /F1 6 Tf 0 Tw (4) Tj 3 -2.25 TD /F1 8.25 Tf 0.1875 Tw ( ) Tj 39.75 0 TD 0.0327 Tc 3.4762 Tw (Subject to the constraints of binding regional caps, a statewide binding cap, metropolitan and non) Tj 408 0 TD 0.2527 Tc 0 Tw (-) Tj -408 -11.25 TD 0.0587 Tc (metrop) Tj 27 0 TD 0.025 Tc 0.1625 Tw (olitan shares, and the test of social and economic impacts prior to the establishment of a new venue,) Tj 369.75 0 TD 0 Tc 0.1875 Tw ( ) Tj ET endstream endobj 36 0 obj 7268 endobj 33 0 obj << /Type /Page /Parent 34 0 R /Resources << /Font << /F0 6 0 R /F1 8 0 R >> /ProcSet 2 0 R >> /Contents 35 0 R >> endobj 38 0 obj << /Length 39 0 R >> stream BT 71.25 804 TD 0 0 0 rg /F0 9 Tf -0.0179 Tc 0.0179 Tw (Supplementary Submission to the Inquiry Into the Management of Machine Numbers) Tj 352.5 0 TD 0 Tc 0 Tw ( ) Tj 75 0 TD -0 Tc 0 Tw (Page ) Tj 21.75 0 TD 0 Tc 0 Tw (4) Tj 4.5 0 TD ( ) Tj -453.75 -12.75 TD ( ) Tj ET 69.75 786.75 456 0.75 re f BT 71.25 777 TD ( ) Tj 0 -717 TD /F1 11.25 Tf 0.1875 Tw ( ) Tj 0 -15.75 TD ( ) Tj ET 69.75 56.25 456 0.75 re f BT 71.25 31.5 TD /F0 9 Tf -0.0451 Tc 0.0451 Tw (A Supplementary Submission by the Provincial Cities Association of SA) Tj 295.5 0 TD 0 Tc 0 Tw ( ) Tj 45 0 TD -0 Tc (FINAL) Tj 28.5 0 TD 0 Tc ( ) Tj 33 0 TD -0.0679 Tc 0.0679 Tw (August, 2003) Tj 51.75 0 TD /F1 11.25 Tf 0 Tc 0.1875 Tw ( ) Tj -453.75 727.5 TD -0.0132 Tc 0.6507 Tw (tourists, and at least in the short run, through reduced savin) Tj 305.25 0 TD -0.0733 Tc 0.2608 Tw (gs that provides a net positive ) Tj -305.25 -14.25 TD -0.0213 Tc 4.7088 Tw (impact on jobs. The principal economic benefit of gaming machines is increased) Tj 0 Tc 0.1875 Tw ( ) Tj 0 -14.25 TD 0.036 Tc 0.1515 Tw (recreational choices, not job creation.) Tj 185.25 0 TD 0 Tc 0.1875 Tw ( ) Tj -185.25 -14.25 TD ( ) Tj 0 -14.25 TD -0.0412 Tc 0.3611 Tw (Thus, the net economic impact of the industry \(i.e., hotel industry\) is not simply the sum of ) Tj T* 0.1148 Tc 2.3227 Tw (wages pai) Tj 52.5 0 TD -0.0163 Tc 2.1038 Tw (d, jobs generated or revenue generated. In regard to the impact of EGMs a ) Tj -52.5 -14.25 TD -0.0377 Tc 0.2252 Tw (proper social cost/social benefit, economic cost/benefit analysis needs to be conducted.) Tj 434.25 0 TD 0 Tc 0.1875 Tw ( ) Tj -434.25 -14.25 TD ( ) Tj 0 -14.25 TD -0.0316 Tc 2.3083 Tw (The hotel industry is an important industry paying wages of some $450 million while ) Tj T* -0.1827 Tc 0 Tw (employi) Tj 39.75 0 TD -0.0231 Tc 0.4414 Tw (ng some 23,500 employees. Interestingly, and perhaps it is a sobering comparison, ) Tj -39.75 -14.25 TD -0.0557 Tc 1.1663 Tw (the number of employees equates almost exactly to the Productivity Commission and the ) Tj 0 -14.25 TD 0.0639 Tc 1.6236 Tw (SERCIS estimates of 22,500) Tj 140.25 0 TD 0.0038 Tc 0 Tw (-) Tj 3.75 0 TD -0.031 Tc 1.0623 Tw (23,000 problem gamblers \(with severe or moderate gambling ) Tj -144 -14.25 TD 0.0225 Tc 0 Tw (pr) Tj 11.25 0 TD -0.048 Tc 1.1521 Tw (oblems\). Obviously, not all these can be related to EGM use, but the point here is that ) Tj -11.25 -14.25 TD -0.0221 Tc 0.4775 Tw (the costs of gambling need to be deducted \(\223negatives\224\) and the benefits \(e.g., recreational ) Tj 0 -14.25 TD -0.0657 Tc 0.2532 Tw (use\) need to be included.) Tj 123.75 0 TD 0 Tc 0.1875 Tw ( ) Tj -123.75 -14.25 TD ( ) Tj 0 -14.25 TD -0.0627 Tc 1 Tw (Finally, there were notable omissions of inform) Tj 237.75 0 TD 0.0113 Tc 0.1762 Tw (ation that may have assisted the Authority. ) Tj -237.75 -14.25 TD -0.0402 Tc 2.4241 Tw (Several submissions assert that there is no evidence that the cap has assisted problem ) Tj 0 -14.25 TD -0.0237 Tc 2.1112 Tw (gamblers to any significant extent in South Australia. Firstly, if there is a relationship ) Tj T* 0.0413 Tc 0.8962 Tw (between a cap and harm minimisat) Tj 180.75 0 TD -0.0052 Tc 0.8802 Tw (ion it has not been tested by the freeze, as the \223freeze ) Tj -180.75 -14.25 TD 0.0019 Tc 0.8356 Tw (only becomes a cap\224 when all applications forwarded to the OLGC have been processed. ) Tj 0 -14.25 TD 0.0245 Tc 1.8395 Tw (That is to say, when the last application is processed then from that date, we have an ) Tj T* -0.0336 Tc 0.7836 Tw (effective ceiling or cap. ) Tj 120 0 TD -0.0012 Tc 0.1206 Tw ( Second, and more notably, by way of omission, the manufacturers ) Tj -120 -14.25 TD -0.0931 Tc 1.6198 Tw (representatives refer only to \223problem gamblers are more likely to be assisted by quality ) Tj 0 -14.25 TD 0.0271 Tc 1.6604 Tw (treatment and counselling) Tj 133.5 3 TD /F1 7.5 Tf 0 Tc 0 Tw (5) Tj 3.75 -3 TD /F1 11.25 Tf 0.0092 Tc 0.9283 Tw ( \(i.e., after the event\). It is in our view, most unfortunate that ) Tj -137.25 -14.25 TD -0.0137 Tc 1.7012 Tw (the AGM) Tj 48 0 TD -0.0192 Tc 1.0103 Tw (MA do not refer to possible gaming machine features that could contribute to a ) Tj -48 -14.25 TD -0.0634 Tc 1.0509 Tw (reduction in problem gambling in the first instance. This is a glaring omission, especially ) Tj 0 -14.25 TD 0.035 Tc 0.1525 Tw (as the machine manufacturers basic position is to do away with the freeze and any ca) Tj 428.25 0 TD 0.0881 Tc 0 Tw (p.) Tj 9.75 0 TD 0 Tc 0.1875 Tw ( ) Tj -438 -14.25 TD ( ) Tj 0 -14.25 TD -0.0283 Tc 0.6158 Tw (It is also unfortunate that the AGMMA chose to focus its discussion of harm minimisation ) Tj T* 0.0249 Tc 3.3769 Tw (to treatment alone, rather than on factors that that will reduce the risk of problem) Tj 0 Tc 0.1875 Tw ( ) Tj T* -0.0325 Tc 1.5155 Tw (gambling behaviour developing, and of reducing the extent of harms caused whil) Tj 420 0 TD -0.0494 Tc 0.2369 Tw (st they ) Tj -420 -14.25 TD -0.0285 Tc 1.8767 Tw (are gambling. This ignores both the harms caused between when a person\222s gambling ) Tj 0 -14.25 TD -0.0112 Tc 1.8141 Tw (becomes problematic and when they seek treatment, and the difficulties faced in many ) Tj T* -0.023 Tc 1.3014 Tw (cases of bringing gambling under control even when receiving treatment. Unfortu) Tj 423 0 TD -0.0012 Tc -0.5613 Tw (nately ) Tj -423 -14.25 TD -0.0199 Tc 2.5574 Tw (data on the experience of clients of Break Even Counsellors in South Australia is not ) Tj 0 -14.25 TD -0.0143 Tc 2.5518 Tw (available, however data of this type is available for Victoria. Data on those problem ) Tj T* -0.0289 Tc 1.8414 Tw (gamblers receiving counselling in Victoria in 1999) Tj 257.25 0 TD 0.0038 Tc 0 Tw (-) Tj 3.75 0 TD 0.0579 Tc 1.6296 Tw (2000 from Gamblers Help c) Tj 142.5 0 TD -0.1286 Tc -0.4339 Tw (ounsellors ) Tj -403.5 -14.25 TD -0.0324 Tc 2.0608 Tw (includes some significant indicators of the extent of economic and social/psychological ) Tj 0 -14.25 TD -0.0084 Tc 1.9459 Tw (harms that can occur before gambling is brought under control. In terms of economic ) Tj T* -0.0853 Tc 0.2728 Tw (harms, those receiving counselling for problem gambling:) Tj 285 0 TD 0 Tc 0.1875 Tw ( ) Tj -285 -104.25 TD ( ) Tj 90 0 TD ( ) Tj ET 71.25 87 144 0.75 re f BT 215.25 84.75 TD ( ) Tj -144 -9 TD /F1 5.25 Tf 0.375 Tc 0 Tw (5) Tj 3 -2.25 TD /F1 11.25 Tf 0 Tc 0.1875 Tw ( ) Tj 39.75 0 TD /F1 8.25 Tf 0.124 Tc 0.0635 Tw (AGMMA, p. 57.) Tj 60 0 TD 0 Tc 0.1875 Tw ( ) Tj ET endstream endobj 39 0 obj 6763 endobj 37 0 obj << /Type /Page /Parent 34 0 R /Resources << /Font << /F0 6 0 R /F1 8 0 R >> /ProcSet 2 0 R >> /Contents 38 0 R >> endobj 41 0 obj << /Length 42 0 R >> stream BT 71.25 804 TD 0 0 0 rg /F0 9 Tf -0.0179 Tc 0.0179 Tw (Supplementary Submission to the Inquiry Into the Management of Machine Numbers) Tj 352.5 0 TD 0 Tc 0 Tw ( ) Tj 75 0 TD -0 Tc 0 Tw (Page ) Tj 21.75 0 TD 0 Tc 0 Tw (5) Tj 4.5 0 TD ( ) Tj -453.75 -12.75 TD ( ) Tj ET 69.75 786.75 456 0.75 re f BT 71.25 777 TD ( ) Tj 0 -717 TD /F1 11.25 Tf 0.1875 Tw ( ) Tj 0 -15.75 TD ( ) Tj ET 69.75 56.25 456 0.75 re f BT 71.25 31.5 TD /F0 9 Tf -0.0451 Tc 0.0451 Tw (A Supplementary Submission by the Provincial Cities Association of SA) Tj 295.5 0 TD 0 Tc 0 Tw ( ) Tj 45 0 TD -0 Tc (FINAL) Tj 28.5 0 TD 0 Tc ( ) Tj 33 0 TD -0.0679 Tc 0.0679 Tw (August, 2003) Tj 51.75 0 TD /F1 11.25 Tf 0 Tc 0.1875 Tw ( ) Tj -453.75 721.5 TD -0.0675 Tc 0 Tw (\225) Tj 6 0 TD 0 Tc 0.1875 Tw ( ) Tj 36.75 0 TD 0.0686 Tc 0.1189 Tw (had a median) Tj 69 0 TD -0.0246 Tc 0.2121 Tw ( expenditure of $860 per month \(for EGM problem gamblers\);) Tj 306.75 0 TD 0 Tc 0.1875 Tw ( ) Tj -418.5 -20.25 TD -0.0675 Tc 0 Tw (\225) Tj 6 0 TD 0 Tc 0.1875 Tw ( ) Tj 36.75 0 TD 0.047 Tc 2.0443 Tw (had median gambling related debts of $2,000, and mean debts of $11,763 \(for ) Tj 0 -14.25 TD -0.1117 Tc 0.2992 Tw (EGM problem gamblers\);) Tj 124.5 0 TD 0 Tc 0.1875 Tw ( ) Tj -167.25 -20.25 TD -0.0675 Tc 0 Tw (\225) Tj 6 0 TD 0 Tc 0.1875 Tw ( ) Tj 36.75 0 TD -0.0221 Tc 0.2096 Tw (53.7 per cent spent savings on gambling;) Tj 202.5 0 TD 0 Tc 0.1875 Tw ( ) Tj -245.25 -20.25 TD -0.0675 Tc 0 Tw (\225) Tj 6 0 TD 0 Tc 0.1875 Tw ( ) Tj 36.75 0 TD 0.0112 Tc 0.1763 Tw (35.7 per cent borrowed from friends or family; and) Tj 254.25 0 TD 0 Tc 0.1875 Tw ( ) Tj -297 -20.25 TD -0.0675 Tc 0 Tw (\225) Tj 6 0 TD 0 Tc 0.1875 Tw ( ) Tj 36.75 0 TD -0.0428 Tc 0.2303 Tw (12.1 per cent committed illegal activities to fund their gambling.) Tj 318 0 TD 0 Tc 0.1875 Tw ( ) Tj -360.75 -14.25 TD ( ) Tj 0 -14.25 TD -0.038 Tc 3.6755 Tw (In terms of social/psychological harms, information is also collected on maladaptive) Tj 0 Tc 0.1875 Tw ( ) Tj T* -0.0752 Tc 0.2627 Tw (behaviours of EGM problem gamblers receiving treatment:) Tj 291 0 TD 0 Tc 0.1875 Tw ( ) Tj -291 -20.25 TD -0.0675 Tc 0 Tw (\225) Tj 6 0 TD 0 Tc 0.1875 Tw ( ) Tj 36.75 0 TD 0.0248 Tc 0.1627 Tw (78.7 per cent reported unsuccessful attempt) Tj 218.25 0 TD -0.0916 Tc 0.2791 Tw (s to control gambling;) Tj 108 0 TD 0 Tc 0.1875 Tw ( ) Tj -369 -20.25 TD -0.0675 Tc 0 Tw (\225) Tj 6 0 TD 0 Tc 0.1875 Tw ( ) Tj 36.75 0 TD 0.0181 Tc 0.1694 Tw (81.7 per cent reported that they \221chased losses\222;) Tj 235.5 0 TD 0 Tc 0.1875 Tw ( ) Tj -278.25 -20.25 TD -0.0675 Tc 0 Tw (\225) Tj 6 0 TD 0 Tc 0.1875 Tw ( ) Tj 36.75 0 TD 0.0019 Tc 1.4548 Tw (16.8 per cent reported that they had committed illegal acts related to gambling; ) Tj 0 -14.25 TD 0.1513 Tc 0 Tw (and) Tj 19.5 0 TD 0 Tc 0.1875 Tw ( ) Tj -62.25 -20.25 TD -0.0675 Tc 0 Tw (\225) Tj 6 0 TD 0 Tc 0.1875 Tw ( ) Tj 36.75 0 TD 0.0102 Tc 3.5939 Tw (51.4 per cent indicated that they had jeopardised relationships, employment) Tj 0 Tc 0.1875 Tw ( ) Tj 0 -14.25 TD 0.0335 Tc 0.154 Tw (and/or education) Tj 89.25 3 TD /F1 7.5 Tf 0 Tc 0 Tw (6) Tj 3.75 -3 TD /F1 11.25 Tf 0.1875 Tc (.) Tj 3 0 TD 0 Tc 0.1875 Tw ( ) Tj -138.75 -14.25 TD ( ) Tj 0 -14.25 TD 0.003 Tc 2.997 Tw (In the recent report on the Evaluation of Self) Tj 244.5 0 TD 0.0038 Tc 0 Tw (-) Tj 3.75 0 TD 0.001 Tc 1.9865 Tw (Exclusion Programs in Victoria, SACES ) Tj -248.25 -14.25 TD -0.014 Tc 5.3015 Tw (referenced studies wherein it was reported, that for Gamblers Anonymous \223total) Tj 0 Tc -0.5625 Tw ( ) Tj 0 -14.25 TD 0.031 Tc 0.6253 Tw (abstinence after two years was found to be about 7 per cent, comparable to the total rat) Tj 444 0 TD -0.2044 Tc -0.3581 Tw (es ) Tj -444 -14.25 TD -0.0335 Tc 2.6317 Tw (in the alcohol field\224 \(p26\). That report also referenced studies providing evidence of ) Tj 0 -14.25 TD -0.0157 Tc 0.7032 Tw (gamblers debts. International evidence indicated that 71 per cent of clients signing up for ) Tj T* -0.1697 Tc 0 Tw (self) Tj 16.5 0 TD 0.0038 Tc (-) Tj 3.75 0 TD -0.0397 Tc 0.2272 Tw (exclusion programs reported having gambling debts. \(p29) Tj 288 0 TD /F0 11.25 Tf 0.0038 Tc 0.1837 Tw (\) ) Tj 6.75 0 TD 0 Tc 0.1875 Tw ( ) Tj -315 -14.25 TD ( ) Tj 0 -14.25 TD /F1 11.25 Tf 0.0321 Tc 0.9054 Tw (Thus, th) Tj 42 0 TD -0.0405 Tc 0.328 Tw (ere is no evidence to support the view of the AGMMA that \223problem gamblers are ) Tj -42 -14.25 TD -0.0615 Tc 3.374 Tw (more likely to be assisted by quality treatment and counselling\224, effectively after the) Tj 0 Tc 0.1875 Tw ( ) Tj 0 -14.25 TD -0.0383 Tc 0.507 Tw (damage has been done. This is akin to saying that government should reduce the policing ) Tj T* -0.0573 Tc 2.0948 Tw (of drink driving and excessive speed on the roads and invest more heavily in casualty ) Tj T* -0.0269 Tc 0.2144 Tw (wards in public hospitals. ) Tj 140.25 0 TD 0 Tc 0.1875 Tw ( ) Tj -140.25 -14.25 TD ( ) Tj 0 -14.25 TD -0.0328 Tc 0.2672 Tw (Finally, what is also clear from an analysis of the submissions is that individual authors are ) Tj T* -0.0297 Tc 0.8734 Tw (not operating from a single, shared set of ) Tj 213 0 TD -0.0127 Tc 0.6502 Tw (data relevant to the purposes of the Inquiry. In ) Tj -213 -14.25 TD -0.0167 Tc 0.6454 Tw (hindsight, it would have been of great value if the IGA presented the relevant data on the ) Tj 0 -14.25 TD -0.0027 Tc 1.5235 Tw (South Australian industry \(i.e., venues, location, machine numbers, turnover, pre) Tj 417 0 TD 0.0038 Tc 0 Tw (-) Tj 3.75 0 TD 0.0295 Tc 0.158 Tw (freeze, ) Tj -420.75 -14.25 TD 0.0656 Tc 0.1219 Tw (and end) Tj 41.25 0 TD 0.0038 Tc 0 Tw (-) Tj 3.75 0 TD 0.0263 Tc (freeze\).) Tj 36.75 0 TD 0 Tc 0.1875 Tw ( ) Tj -81.75 -14.25 TD ( ) Tj 0 -14.25 TD ( ) Tj 0 -100.5 TD ( ) Tj 90 0 TD ( ) Tj ET 71.25 108 144 0.75 re f BT 215.25 105.75 TD ( ) Tj -144 -9 TD /F1 5.25 Tf 0.375 Tc 0 Tw (6) Tj 3 -2.25 TD /F1 8.25 Tf 0 Tc 0.1875 Tw ( ) Tj 39.75 0 TD 0.0621 Tc 1.9754 Tw (Jackson, A.C., SA Thomas and L. Kearney \(2000\), \223Analysis of Clients Presenting to Problem Gambling ) Tj 0 -10.5 TD 0.0693 Tc 0.8682 Tw (Counselling Services, July 1999 to J) Tj 133.5 0 TD 0.0162 Tc 0.3759 Tw (une 2000\224, Client and Service Analysis Report No. 6, Melbourne: Victorian ) Tj -133.5 -10.5 TD 0.0509 Tc 0.1366 Tw (Department of Human Services.) Tj 119.25 0 TD 0 Tc 0.1875 Tw ( ) Tj ET endstream endobj 42 0 obj 6677 endobj 40 0 obj << /Type /Page /Parent 34 0 R /Resources << /Font << /F0 6 0 R /F1 8 0 R >> /ProcSet 2 0 R >> /Contents 41 0 R >> endobj 44 0 obj << /Length 45 0 R >> stream BT 71.25 804 TD 0 0 0 rg /F0 9 Tf -0.0179 Tc 0.0179 Tw (Supplementary Submission to the Inquiry Into the Management of Machine Numbers) Tj 352.5 0 TD 0 Tc 0 Tw ( ) Tj 75 0 TD -0 Tc 0 Tw (Page ) Tj 21.75 0 TD 0 Tc 0 Tw (6) Tj 4.5 0 TD ( ) Tj -453.75 -12.75 TD ( ) Tj ET 69.75 786.75 456 0.75 re f BT 71.25 777 TD ( ) Tj 0 -717 TD /F1 11.25 Tf 0.1875 Tw ( ) Tj 0 -15.75 TD ( ) Tj ET 69.75 56.25 456 0.75 re f BT 71.25 31.5 TD /F0 9 Tf -0.0451 Tc 0.0451 Tw (A Supplementary Submission by the Provincial Cities Association of SA) Tj 295.5 0 TD 0 Tc 0 Tw ( ) Tj 45 0 TD -0 Tc (FINAL) Tj 28.5 0 TD 0 Tc ( ) Tj 33 0 TD -0.0679 Tc 0.0679 Tw (August, 2003) Tj 51.75 0 TD /F1 11.25 Tf 0 Tc 0.1875 Tw ( ) Tj -453.75 725.25 TD /F0 14.25 Tf 0.2813 Tc 0 Tw (2.) Tj 11.25 0 TD 0 Tc 0.1875 Tw ( ) Tj 31.5 0 TD 0.2115 Tc 0 Tw (Op) Tj 21 0 TD 0.0869 Tc 0.1006 Tw (tions for the Management of EGMs) Tj 233.25 0 TD 0 Tc 0.1875 Tw ( ) Tj -297 -21 TD /F1 11.25 Tf -0.0498 Tc 0.7529 Tw (In this discussion we briefly consider the three options as outlined by the Authority in the ) Tj 0 -14.25 TD 0.0474 Tc 4.3276 Tw (Information Sheet \(12 August, 2002\). The Authority at that time considered that) Tj 0 Tc 0.1875 Tw ( ) Tj T* -0.0975 Tc 0.285 Tw (submissions should focus upon:) Tj 157.5 0 TD 0 Tc 0.1875 Tw ( ) Tj -157.5 -20.25 TD /F4 11.25 Tf 0.075 Tc 0 Tw (\267) Tj 4.5 0 TD /F1 11.25 Tf 0 Tc 0.1875 Tw ( ) Tj 38.25 0 TD -0.0712 Tc 0.2587 Tw (status quo optio) Tj 79.5 0 TD 0.195 Tc 0 Tw (n:) Tj 9.75 0 TD 0 Tc 0.1875 Tw ( ) Tj 52.5 0 TD 0.0313 Tc 0.1562 Tw (continuation of the freeze;) Tj 131.25 0 TD 0 Tc 0.1875 Tw ( ) Tj -315.75 -20.25 TD /F4 11.25 Tf 0.075 Tc 0 Tw (\267) Tj 4.5 0 TD /F1 11.25 Tf 0 Tc 0.1875 Tw ( ) Tj 38.25 0 TD -0.0147 Tc 0.2022 Tw (default option:) Tj 73.5 0 TD 0 Tc 0.1875 Tw ( ) Tj 68.25 0 TD -0.0184 Tc 1.2372 Tw (present freeze provisions lapse and return to \223need\224 ) Tj 0 -14.25 TD -0.018 Tc 0.2055 Tw (based application system; and) Tj 150 0 TD 0 Tc 0.1875 Tw ( ) Tj -334.5 -20.25 TD /F4 11.25 Tf 0.075 Tc 0 Tw (\267) Tj 4.5 0 TD /F1 11.25 Tf 0 Tc 0.1875 Tw ( ) Tj 38.25 0 TD -0.0082 Tc 0.1957 Tw (managed number option:) Tj 126.75 0 TD 0 Tc 0.1875 Tw ( ) Tj 15 0 TD -0.01 Tc 2.8225 Tw (a set of principles for the allocation or transfer of ) Tj 0 -14.25 TD -0.0027 Tc 0.1902 Tw (gaming machines is enacted.) Tj 143.25 0 TD 0 Tc 0.1875 Tw ( ) Tj -327.75 -14.25 TD ( ) Tj 0 -14.25 TD 0.0332 Tc 0.9043 Tw (The Provincial C) Tj 84.75 0 TD -0.0672 Tc 0.5672 Tw (ities submission outlined a number of salient points relevant to the \221status ) Tj -84.75 -14.25 TD -0.0323 Tc 0.1126 Tw (quo option\222 and the \221default option\222, including ) Tj 234 0 TD /F3 11.25 Tf -0.0696 Tc 0.2571 Tw (inter alia) Tj 41.25 0 TD /F1 11.25 Tf -0.0726 Tc 0.2601 Tw (, the following:) Tj 75 0 TD 0 Tc 0.1875 Tw ( ) Tj -350.25 -20.25 TD /F4 11.25 Tf 0.075 Tc 0 Tw (\267) Tj 4.5 0 TD /F1 11.25 Tf 0 Tc 0.1875 Tw ( ) Tj 38.25 0 TD 0.0351 Tc 3.2206 Tw (that the current freeze, including the announcement effect of each freeze, is) Tj 0 Tc -0.5625 Tw ( ) Tj 0 -14.25 TD 0 Tc -0.0629 Tw (unsustainable and lacks ) Tj 122.25 0 TD -0.0385 Tc 0.226 Tw (policy credibility \(Section 4.1\)) Tj 147 3 TD /F1 7.5 Tf 0 Tc 0 Tw (7) Tj 3.75 -3 TD /F1 11.25 Tf 0.1875 Tc (;) Tj 3 0 TD 0 Tc 0.1875 Tw ( ) Tj -318.75 -20.25 TD /F4 11.25 Tf 0.075 Tc 0 Tw (\267) Tj 4.5 0 TD /F1 11.25 Tf 0 Tc 0.1875 Tw ( ) Tj 38.25 0 TD -0.0235 Tc 1.7646 Tw (the argument that the present freeze is ineffective is obvious, due to the actual ) Tj 0 -14.25 TD -0.0145 Tc 1.9327 Tw (significant increase in the number of EGMs. The debate concerning the freeze ) Tj T* -0 Tc 0.938 Tw (\(especially given the manner in which it has been introduce) Tj 303.75 0 TD 0.0165 Tc 0.7335 Tw (d in South Australia\) ) Tj -303.75 -14.25 TD -0.005 Tc 0.1925 Tw (is irrelevant to the argument over a cap of some form \(Section 4.1\);) Tj 332.25 0 TD 0 Tc 0.1875 Tw ( ) Tj -375 -20.25 TD /F4 11.25 Tf 0.075 Tc 0 Tw (\267) Tj 4.5 0 TD /F1 11.25 Tf 0 Tc 0.1875 Tw ( ) Tj 38.25 0 TD 0.0288 Tc 0.2525 Tw (the implementation of the current freeze midway through 2000) Tj 317.25 0 TD 0.0038 Tc 0 Tw (-) Tj 3.75 0 TD 0.0246 Tc 0.1629 Tw (01 led to a rush of ) Tj -321 -14.25 TD 0.0013 Tc 2.1862 Tw (applications which facilitated the largest year on year rise in gaming machine ) Tj 0 -14.25 TD 0.015 Tc 0 Tw (exp) Tj 18 0 TD 0.0534 Tc 2.0091 Tw (enditure since 1995) Tj 100.5 0 TD 0.0038 Tc 0 Tw (-) Tj 3.75 0 TD -0.0136 Tc 1.4965 Tw (96. In the Provincial Cities both the number of gaming ) Tj -122.25 -14.25 TD -0.0105 Tc 1.2365 Tw (machines and total net gaming expenditure rose by 11.2 per cent respectively in ) Tj 0 -14.25 TD 0.375 Tc 0 Tw (2000) Tj 24 0 TD 0.0038 Tc (-) Tj 3.75 0 TD 0.1308 Tc 0.0567 Tw (01 \(Section 3.4\);) Tj 79.5 0 TD 0 Tc 0.1875 Tw ( ) Tj -150 -20.25 TD /F4 11.25 Tf 0.075 Tc 0 Tw (\267) Tj 4.5 0 TD /F1 11.25 Tf 0 Tc 0.1875 Tw ( ) Tj 38.25 0 TD -0.0061 Tc 1.1579 Tw (the freeze on gaming licences has had little impact on the growth in net ga) Tj 385.5 0 TD -0.1275 Tc -0.435 Tw (ming ) Tj -385.5 -14.25 TD -0.0326 Tc 1.0201 Tw (expenditure so far; it is too early to determine whether it will ultimately have an ) Tj 0 -14.25 TD 0.0362 Tc 1.0743 Tw (impact ... [in part] because of the \223announcement effect\224 which ensures there is ) Tj T* 0.0064 Tc 0.1811 Tw (never a binding ceiling or cap \(Section 3.4\);) Tj 215.25 0 TD 0 Tc 0.1875 Tw ( ) Tj -258 -20.25 TD /F4 11.25 Tf 0.075 Tc 0 Tw (\267) Tj 4.5 0 TD /F1 11.25 Tf 0 Tc 0.1875 Tw ( ) Tj 38.25 0 TD -0.0211 Tc 0.6586 Tw (the default option could potentially g) Tj 187.5 0 TD -0.0043 Tc 0.1918 Tw (ive rise, for example, to 740 machines in Port ) Tj -187.5 -14.25 TD -0.0249 Tc 3.5874 Tw (Augusta. Certainly if all hotels currently below the maximum of 40 EGMs) Tj 0 Tc -0.5625 Tw ( ) Tj 0 -14.25 TD -0.0016 Tc 3.8027 Tw (increased to the maximum, this would see Port Augusta increase from 317) Tj 0 Tc 0.1875 Tw ( ) Tj T* 0.0743 Tc 0.1132 Tw (machines currently, to 455 machines \(45 machines per 1,000 adult) Tj 330.75 0 TD -0.0263 Tc 0 Tw (s\);) Tj 11.25 0 TD 0 Tc 0.1875 Tw ( ) Tj -384.75 -20.25 TD /F4 11.25 Tf 0.075 Tc 0 Tw (\267) Tj 4.5 0 TD /F1 11.25 Tf 0 Tc 0.1875 Tw ( ) Tj 38.25 0 TD -0.0019 Tc 2.1269 Tw (the default option leaves South Australia with the historical legacy \(Section 4\) ) Tj 0 -14.25 TD -0.0112 Tc 3.4987 Tw (which has determined \(at the very least, significantly influenced\) the spatial) Tj 0 Tc -0.5625 Tw ( ) Tj T* -0.0018 Tc 2.1268 Tw (distribution of gaming machines, such that there is no practical mechanism to ) Tj T* -0.0337 Tc 0.9712 Tw (determine th) Tj 64.5 0 TD 0.0032 Tc 0.5593 Tw (e relative balance between metropolitan and non) Tj 246 0 TD 0.0038 Tc 0 Tw (-) Tj 3.75 0 TD 0.0121 Tc 0.1754 Tw (metropolitan areas, ) Tj -314.25 -14.25 TD -0.0077 Tc 0.8046 Tw (the optimal number of EGMs, and so some areas have a ratio of 31 machines per ) Tj 0 -14.25 TD 0.0749 Tc 4.7792 Tw (1,000 persons \(Port Augusta\), Alexandrina 20 per 1,000 and metropolitan) Tj 0 Tc 0.1875 Tw ( ) Tj T* 0.0413 Tc 0.1462 Tw (Adelaide 12.2 with no real justificati) Tj 181.5 0 TD -0.0844 Tc 0.2719 Tw (on for this.) Tj 54 0 TD 0 Tc 0.1875 Tw ( ) Tj -278.25 -14.25 TD ( ) Tj 0 -14.25 TD -0.0022 Tc 1.2612 Tw (The managed number option, which incorporates a set of principles for the allocation of ) Tj T* -0.0287 Tc 0.9126 Tw (gaming machines, appears to be the only reasonable policy choice. The question remains ) Tj T* 0.0383 Tc 0.1492 Tw (as to \223the actual number\224 and managing the process to arrive at th) Tj 335.25 0 TD 0.0363 Tc 0.1512 Tw (at number.) Tj 54.75 0 TD 0 Tc 0.1875 Tw ( ) Tj -390 -27 TD ( ) Tj 90 0 TD ( ) Tj ET 71.25 87 144 0.75 re f BT 215.25 84.75 TD ( ) Tj -144 -9 TD /F1 5.25 Tf 0.375 Tc 0 Tw (7) Tj 3 -2.25 TD /F1 8.25 Tf 0 Tc 0.1875 Tw ( ) Tj 2.25 0 TD ( ) Tj 37.5 0 TD 0.0414 Tc 0.1461 Tw (Sections refer to our earlier submission \(June 2003\)..) Tj 192 0 TD 0 Tc 0.1875 Tw ( ) Tj ET endstream endobj 45 0 obj 8415 endobj 43 0 obj << /Type /Page /Parent 34 0 R /Resources << /Font << /F0 6 0 R /F1 8 0 R /F3 17 0 R /F4 25 0 R >> /ProcSet 2 0 R >> /Contents 44 0 R >> endobj 47 0 obj << /Length 48 0 R >> stream BT 71.25 804 TD 0 0 0 rg /F0 9 Tf -0.0179 Tc 0.0179 Tw (Supplementary Submission to the Inquiry Into the Management of Machine Numbers) Tj 352.5 0 TD 0 Tc 0 Tw ( ) Tj 75 0 TD -0 Tc 0 Tw (Page ) Tj 21.75 0 TD 0 Tc 0 Tw (7) Tj 4.5 0 TD ( ) Tj -453.75 -12.75 TD ( ) Tj ET 69.75 786.75 456 0.75 re f BT 71.25 777 TD ( ) Tj 0 -717 TD /F1 11.25 Tf 0.1875 Tw ( ) Tj 0 -15.75 TD ( ) Tj ET 69.75 56.25 456 0.75 re f BT 71.25 31.5 TD /F0 9 Tf -0.0451 Tc 0.0451 Tw (A Supplementary Submission by the Provincial Cities Association of SA) Tj 295.5 0 TD 0 Tc 0 Tw ( ) Tj 45 0 TD -0 Tc (FINAL) Tj 28.5 0 TD 0 Tc ( ) Tj 33 0 TD -0.0679 Tc 0.0679 Tw (August, 2003) Tj 51.75 0 TD /F1 11.25 Tf 0 Tc 0.1875 Tw ( ) Tj -453.75 726 TD /F0 12.75 Tf -0.0625 Tc 0 Tw (2.1) Tj 16.5 0 TD 0 Tc -0.1875 Tw ( ) Tj 26.25 0 TD -0.002 Tc -0.1855 Tw (Views on the Managed Number Option) Tj 230.25 0 TD 0 Tc -0.1875 Tw ( ) Tj -273 -21 TD /F1 11.25 Tf 0.0024 Tc 0.3851 Tw (The Authority was presented with a range of views on managing the number of machines ) Tj 0 -14.25 TD -0.0397 Tc 1.0241 Tw (and the number of venues. We note in passing, that some submissions have adopted the ) Tj T* -0.0032 Tc 3.1907 Tw (view that because a hotel or club) Tj 0 Tc -0.5625 Tw ( ) Tj 187.5 0 TD -0.0147 Tc 2.1188 Tw (holds a liquor licence, that it is then automatically ) Tj -187.5 -14.25 TD 0.0161 Tc 0.3589 Tw (entitled to access electronic gaming machines \(up to the maximum of 40\) and that a freeze ) Tj 0 -14.25 TD -0.0108 Tc 1.0273 Tw (or a cap is somehow an infringement of this right. This is not a view that the Provincial ) Tj T* 0.001 Tc 0.1865 Tw (Cities accepts, while) Tj 101.25 0 TD -0.0232 Tc 0.2107 Tw ( it shows the danger of reverting to the default option.) Tj 270 0 TD 0 Tc 0.1875 Tw ( ) Tj -371.25 -14.25 TD ( ) Tj 0 -14.25 TD -0.0411 Tc 2.1036 Tw (Suggestions contained in other submissions included the abolition of the cap \(although ) Tj T* -0.0156 Tc 1.2031 Tw (there is, as yet, no true cap\) while allowing the transferability of machines between sites ) Tj T* 0.0509 Tc 0.8866 Tw (and open market tra) Tj 105 0 TD 0.006 Tc 0.1815 Tw (ding \(AHA: SA\); abolition of the cap or failing this, increasing the cap ) Tj -105 -14.25 TD -0.007 Tc 4.8676 Tw (by a modest 0.6 per cent, exempting all venues in regional South Australia and) Tj 0 Tc 0.1875 Tw ( ) Tj 0 -14.25 TD 0.0053 Tc 0.1822 Tw (introducing an exemption for venues with less than 10 machines \(AGMMA\). ) Tj 389.25 0 TD 0 Tc 0.1875 Tw ( ) Tj -389.25 -14.25 TD ( ) Tj 0 -14.25 TD -0.0519 Tc 0.6894 Tw (The AGMMA\222s second option of ) Tj 167.25 0 TD 0.0259 Tc 0.1616 Tw (converting the freeze to a cap and increasing it by 0.6 per ) Tj -167.25 -14.25 TD -0.0176 Tc 1.7587 Tw (cent per year \(including backdated increases from the date the freeze was legislated\) is ) Tj 0 -14.25 TD -0.0133 Tc 1.3727 Tw (based on the idea that the increase is needed to allow for population increases since the ) Tj T* -0.0177 Tc 3.2052 Tw (introduction of ) Tj 3.0825 Tc 0 Tw (t) Tj 87.75 0 TD -0.0208 Tc 2.8333 Tw (he freeze. What their analysis ignores is the significant increases in ) Tj -87.75 -14.25 TD 0.0495 Tc 0.6674 Tw (machine numbers that have occurred under the freeze. In the year to June 2002 with the ) Tj 0 -14.25 TD 0.0196 Tc 3.2929 Tw (freeze in place, the number of electronic gaming machines increased from 14,096 to) Tj 0 Tc 0.1875 Tw ( ) Tj T* 0.1824 Tc 0.7551 Tw (14,647, an in) Tj 66 0 TD 0.0475 Tc 0.2338 Tw (crease of 551 machines installed or 3.9 per cent.) Tj 238.5 3 TD /F1 7.5 Tf 0 Tc 0 Tw (8) Tj 3.75 -3 TD /F1 11.25 Tf -0.038 Tc 0.2255 Tw ( In the corresponding period ) Tj -308.25 -14.25 TD 0.0021 Tc 0.2854 Tw (South Australia\222s population increased by 0.7 per cent. Under our proposal the number of ) Tj 0 -14.25 TD 0.0321 Tc 1.5554 Tw (machines would have increased by 8 machines compared to the actual increase of 551. ) Tj T* -0.1237 Tc 0 Tw (E) Tj 6.75 0 TD 0.0105 Tc 2.477 Tw (ven under the AGMMA\222s proposal, of allowing a 0.6 per cent increase to reflect an ) Tj -6.75 -14.25 TD -0.016 Tc 1.4989 Tw (increasing population, the number of machines would have increased by approximately ) Tj 0 -14.25 TD -0.0032 Tc 1.3574 Tw (85. This would seem to suggest that if the freeze were converted to a cap, no increases ) Tj T* 0.3675 Tc 0 Tw (w) Tj 9.75 0 TD -0.0553 Tc 0.2428 Tw (ould be required at the state level on the basis of population changes for some time.) Tj 414 0 TD 0 Tc 0.1875 Tw ( ) Tj -423.75 -14.25 TD ( ) Tj 0 -14.25 TD -0.0133 Tc 0.7303 Tw (There is also a significant contradiction in the analysis of the impact of the removal of the ) Tj T* 0.006 Tc 0.6637 Tw (freeze in the AGMMA submission. On the one had they argue that machine num) Tj 414.75 0 TD -0.0402 Tc 0.2277 Tw (bers are ) Tj -414.75 -14.25 TD 0.0248 Tc 1.6627 Tw (at, or close to, saturation) Tj 129 3 TD /F1 7.5 Tf 0 Tc 0 Tw (9) Tj 3.75 -3 TD /F1 11.25 Tf 0.0218 Tc 1.0888 Tw ( and on the other they argue that the current freeze imposes a ) Tj -132.75 -14.25 TD -0.0302 Tc 1.6106 Tw (social harm by restricting government revenue \(implying that in the absence of a freeze ) Tj 0 -14.25 TD -0.0221 Tc 0.2096 Tw (expenditure would be much higher\).) Tj 183 0 TD 0 Tc 0.1875 Tw ( ) Tj -183 -14.25 TD ( ) Tj 0 -14.25 TD 0.0225 Tc 0.665 Tw (Clubs SA maintain that there is ) Tj 164.25 0 TD -0.0241 Tc 0.3616 Tw (a distinction between clubs and hotels and stress the need ) Tj -164.25 -14.25 TD -0.0041 Tc 1.6916 Tw (to adopt a community benefit approach to increase the access of clubs to EGMs and to ) Tj 0 -14.25 TD -0 Tc 0.188 Tw (constrain that of hotels.) Tj 117.75 0 TD 0 Tc 0.1875 Tw ( ) Tj -117.75 -14.25 TD ( ) Tj 0 -14.25 TD -0.0253 Tc 0.8128 Tw (Treasury consider it would be \223more acceptable if it is proposed that there be a mini) Tj 427.5 0 TD -0.1337 Tc 0.3212 Tw (mum ) Tj -427.5 -14.25 TD 0.007 Tc 4.6805 Tw (share of gaming machines in the non) Tj 211.5 0 TD 0.0038 Tc 0 Tw (-) Tj 3.75 0 TD -0.0117 Tc 4.5742 Tw (metropolitan areas as it would prevent the) Tj 0 Tc 0.1875 Tw ( ) Tj -215.25 -14.25 TD -0.0189 Tc 0.9029 Tw (significant drift of machines to the metropolitan area, where bid process would be higher ) Tj 0 -14.25 TD 0.0028 Tc 0.1847 Tw (through a transferability system\224 \(p. 4\).) Tj 197.25 0 TD 0 Tc 0.1875 Tw ( ) Tj -197.25 -14.25 TD ( ) Tj 0 -14.25 TD -0.0161 Tc 0.9536 Tw (The Adelaide Central Mission concludes t) Tj 211.5 0 TD -0.0437 Tc 0.5646 Tw (hat EGMs be limited to the Casino and Licensed ) Tj -211.5 -14.25 TD -0.0336 Tc 0.9711 Tw (Clubs \(those currently in possession of a licence\) so that there would be 81 venues across ) Tj 0 -18 TD 0 Tc 0.1875 Tw ( ) Tj 90 0 TD ( ) Tj ET 71.25 108 144 0.75 re f BT 215.25 105.75 TD ( ) Tj -144 -9 TD /F1 5.25 Tf 0.375 Tc 0 Tw (8) Tj 3 -2.25 TD /F1 8.25 Tf 0 Tc 0.1875 Tw ( ) Tj 2.25 0 TD ( ) Tj 37.5 0 TD 0.0463 Tc 0.2295 Tw (On 17 July 2003 we were provided with figures from the OLGC that a potential increase of 5.) Tj 345.75 0 TD 0.062 Tc 0.1255 Tw (3 per cent, from 7 ) Tj -345.75 -10.5 TD 0.0451 Tc 0.1424 Tw (December 2000. A further 779 machines could be approved pending applications unaffected by the freeze.) Tj 396 0 TD 0 Tc 0.1875 Tw ( ) Tj -438.75 -8.25 TD /F1 5.25 Tf 0.375 Tc 0 Tw (9) Tj 3 -2.25 TD /F1 8.25 Tf 0 Tc 0.1875 Tw ( ) Tj 2.25 0 TD ( ) Tj 37.5 0 TD 0.0167 Tc 0.1708 Tw (In which case there would seem to be no negative impacts of a permanent cap with limited trading.) Tj 366.75 0 TD 0 Tc 0.1875 Tw ( ) Tj ET endstream endobj 48 0 obj 7830 endobj 46 0 obj << /Type /Page /Parent 34 0 R /Resources << /Font << /F0 6 0 R /F1 8 0 R >> /ProcSet 2 0 R >> /Contents 47 0 R >> endobj 50 0 obj << /Length 51 0 R >> stream BT 71.25 804 TD 0 0 0 rg /F0 9 Tf -0.0179 Tc 0.0179 Tw (Supplementary Submission to the Inquiry Into the Management of Machine Numbers) Tj 352.5 0 TD 0 Tc 0 Tw ( ) Tj 75 0 TD -0 Tc 0 Tw (Page ) Tj 21.75 0 TD 0 Tc 0 Tw (8) Tj 4.5 0 TD ( ) Tj -453.75 -12.75 TD ( ) Tj ET 69.75 786.75 456 0.75 re f BT 71.25 777 TD ( ) Tj 0 -717 TD /F1 11.25 Tf 0.1875 Tw ( ) Tj 0 -15.75 TD ( ) Tj ET 69.75 56.25 456 0.75 re f BT 71.25 31.5 TD /F0 9 Tf -0.0451 Tc 0.0451 Tw (A Supplementary Submission by the Provincial Cities Association of SA) Tj 295.5 0 TD 0 Tc 0 Tw ( ) Tj 45 0 TD -0 Tc (FINAL) Tj 28.5 0 TD 0 Tc ( ) Tj 33 0 TD -0.0679 Tc 0.0679 Tw (August, 2003) Tj 51.75 0 TD /F1 11.25 Tf 0 Tc 0.1875 Tw ( ) Tj -453.75 727.5 TD 0.0335 Tc 1.7611 Tw (the State with a cap of 3,301 machines. The Churches Gambling Taskforce\222s preferred ) Tj 0 -14.25 TD -0.0966 Tc 3.5341 Tw (position is to restrict EGMs to ) Tj 3.0825 Tc 0 Tw (t) Tj 172.5 0 TD -0.0371 Tc 2.8912 Tw (he Casino; second and third best options involved a ) Tj -172.5 -14.25 TD -0.0301 Tc 0.5926 Tw (reduction in the number of machines and venues; the GTF proposed four venue allocation ) Tj 0 -14.25 TD 0.0715 Tc 0.116 Tw (methods \(8.5.1) Tj 73.5 0 TD 0.0038 Tc 0 Tw (-) Tj 3.75 0 TD -0.0133 Tc 0.2008 Tw (8.5.4\) including measures to increase the returns to players.) Tj 296.25 0 TD 0 Tc 0.1875 Tw ( ) Tj -373.5 -14.25 TD ( ) Tj 0 -14.25 TD -0.0852 Tc 0.5227 Tw (While the submission supplied by the As) Tj 203.25 0 TD 0 Tc 0.1868 Tw (sociation did not contain any recommendations, it ) Tj -203.25 -14.25 TD 0.0043 Tc 4.2217 Tw (pointed to the higher number of machines per capita in certain regions and non) Tj 450 0 TD 0.0038 Tc 0 Tw (-) Tj -450 -14.25 TD -0.0076 Tc 1.1059 Tw (metropolitan centres relative to the metropolitan area. The thrust of the argument could ) Tj 0 -14.25 TD -0.0152 Tc 0.9527 Tw (be understood to infer that there nee) Tj 186.75 0 TD -0.1249 Tc 1.0624 Tw (ded to be some re) Tj 90 0 TD 0.0038 Tc 0 Tw (-) Tj 3.75 0 TD 0.0088 Tc 0.6287 Tw (balancing on a geographical basis; ) Tj -280.5 -14.25 TD -0.022 Tc 0.2095 Tw (some way of managing or limiting the high concentrations of machines.) Tj 357.75 0 TD 0 Tc 0.1875 Tw ( ) Tj -357.75 -14.25 TD ( ) Tj 0 -14.25 TD ( ) Tj 0 -15.75 TD /F0 12.75 Tf -0.0625 Tc 0 Tw (2.2) Tj 16.5 0 TD 0 Tc -0.1875 Tw ( ) Tj 26.25 0 TD 0.0564 Tc -0.2439 Tw (History of Management of Machine Numbers) Tj 267 0 TD 0 Tc -0.1875 Tw ( ) Tj -309.75 -21 TD /F1 11.25 Tf -0.0206 Tc 1.2465 Tw (The management of machine numbers has a relatively chequered history, where it could ) Tj 0 -14.25 TD -0.2213 Tc 0 Tw (b) Tj 6 0 TD -0.0037 Tc 2.0127 Tw (e argued that insufficient attention was given to certain aspects of the legislation, the ) Tj -6 -14.25 TD -0.0195 Tc 0.8416 Tw (method of introduction, the likely consequences from the manner of introduction and not ) Tj 0 -14.25 TD -0.0344 Tc 2.0344 Tw (enough consideration given to the potential negative impacts. To some extent ) Tj 414 0 TD 0.007 Tc 0.5555 Tw (this has ) Tj -414 -14.25 TD -0.0253 Tc 0.5128 Tw (given voice to an \223us and them\224 mentality, attempts to rein) Tj 299.25 0 TD 0.0038 Tc 0 Tw (-) Tj 3.75 0 TD 0.0153 Tc 0.1722 Tw (in the industry, concern about ) Tj -303 -14.25 TD -0.0499 Tc 1.3912 Tw (the regressivity of EGMs; concern that consumer protection is still relatively weak, while ) Tj 0 -14.25 TD -0.0605 Tc 0.248 Tw (insufficient attention is given to early intervention strategies.) Tj 300.75 0 TD 0 Tc 0.1875 Tw ( ) Tj -300.75 -14.25 TD ( ) Tj 0 -14.25 TD -0.016 Tc 0.8035 Tw (A review of the history of the management of machine numbers and the establishment of ) Tj T* -0.0052 Tc 4.0927 Tw (the industry is particularly instructive. In 1991 a discussion paper) Tj 369 3 TD /F1 7.5 Tf 0 Tc 0 Tw (10) Tj 7.5 -3 TD /F1 11.25 Tf 0.1308 Tc 3.8067 Tw ( on \223how\224 to) Tj 0 Tc 0.1875 Tw ( ) Tj -376.5 -14.25 TD 0.0146 Tc 0.1729 Tw (introduce machines was released, wherein it was noted:) Tj 279.75 0 TD 0 Tc 0.1875 Tw ( ) Tj -279.75 -20.25 TD /F4 11.25 Tf 0.075 Tc 0 Tw (\267) Tj 4.5 0 TD /F1 11.25 Tf 0 Tc 0.1875 Tw ( ) Tj 38.25 0 TD -0.0195 Tc 0.957 Tw (\223the Hotel and Hospitality I) Tj 141.75 0 TD -0.0451 Tc 0.6612 Tw (ndustry Association \(HHIA\) proposed a maximum of ) Tj -141.75 -14.25 TD -0.0219 Tc 3.9594 Tw (30 machines for any eligible establishment. [It was stated] This may be a) Tj 0 Tc 0.1875 Tw ( ) Tj 0 -14.25 TD -0.0046 Tc 0.1921 Tw (somewhat ambitious proposal for hotels\224 \(p. 26\);) Tj 243.75 0 TD 0 Tc 0.1875 Tw ( ) Tj -286.5 -20.25 TD /F4 11.25 Tf 0.075 Tc 0 Tw (\267) Tj 4.5 0 TD /F1 11.25 Tf 0 Tc 0.1875 Tw ( ) Tj 38.25 0 TD 0.0177 Tc 0.5736 Tw (an anticipated figure of $230 per capita [was] derived for expenditure on gaming ) Tj 0 -14.25 TD -0.0066 Tc 0.3672 Tw (machines in licensed premises, of which $62 reflected a transfer from lotteries and ) Tj T* 0.0119 Tc 0.1756 Tw (the casino and $168 comes from other sources;) Tj 232.5 0 TD 0 Tc 0.1875 Tw ( ) Tj -275.25 -20.25 TD /F4 11.25 Tf 0.075 Tc 0 Tw (\267) Tj 4.5 0 TD /F1 11.25 Tf 0 Tc 0.1875 Tw ( ) Tj 38.25 0 TD -0.0234 Tc 1.3359 Tw (\223it was estimated the equivalent of $5 per capita or $5 million would be lost by ) Tj 0 -14.25 TD 0.022 Tc 4.0405 Tw (charities and community groups for which co) Tj 251.25 0 TD -0.0523 Tc 3.9898 Tw (mpensation might need to be) Tj 0 Tc 0.1875 Tw ( ) Tj -251.25 -14.25 TD 0.0074 Tc 0.1801 Tw (provided\224 \(p. 39\). Recall this estimate is based on $230 per capita expenditure per ) Tj 0 -14.25 TD 0.1172 Tc 1.5703 Tw (annum, whereas by 2000) Tj 130.5 0 TD 0.0038 Tc 0 Tw (-) Tj 3.75 0 TD 0.0759 Tc 1.2366 Tw (01 for South Australia the figure was $472 per capita ) Tj -134.25 -14.25 TD 0.0073 Tc 0.1802 Tw (and $590 per capita for the Provincial Cities overall;) Tj 259.5 0 TD 0 Tc 0.1875 Tw ( ) Tj -302.25 -20.25 TD /F4 11.25 Tf 0.075 Tc 0 Tw (\267) Tj 4.5 0 TD /F1 11.25 Tf 0 Tc 0.1875 Tw ( ) Tj 38.25 0 TD 0.0707 Tc 1.6168 Tw (\223it is as) Tj 39.75 0 TD -0.0436 Tc 1.5003 Tw (sumed that sporting clubs and the like will not need to be compensated ) Tj -39.75 -14.25 TD -0.04 Tc 4.4547 Tw (because they will be the direct beneficiaries of the introduction of gaming) Tj 0 Tc -0.5625 Tw ( ) Tj 0 -14.25 TD 0.0912 Tc 0.0963 Tw (machines\224; and) Tj 78.75 0 TD 0 Tc 0.1875 Tw ( ) Tj -121.5 -104.25 TD ( ) Tj 90 0 TD ( ) Tj ET 71.25 97.5 144 0.75 re f BT 215.25 95.25 TD ( ) Tj -144 -9 TD /F1 5.25 Tf 0.375 Tc 0 Tw (10) Tj 6 -2.25 TD /F1 8.25 Tf 0 Tc 0.1875 Tw ( ) Tj 2.25 0 TD ( ) Tj 34.5 0 TD 0.0048 Tc 0.9327 Tw (The Introduction of Coin Oper) Tj 115.5 0 TD 0.0329 Tc 0.4431 Tw (ated Gaming Machines into Licensed Clubs and Hotels in South Australia: An ) Tj -115.5 -10.5 TD 0.0561 Tc 0.1314 Tw (Options Paper, June 1991, author unknown.) Tj 163.5 0 TD 0 Tc 0.1875 Tw ( ) Tj ET endstream endobj 51 0 obj 7155 endobj 49 0 obj << /Type /Page /Parent 34 0 R /Resources << /Font << /F0 6 0 R /F1 8 0 R /F4 25 0 R >> /ProcSet 2 0 R >> /Contents 50 0 R >> endobj 54 0 obj << /Length 55 0 R >> stream BT 71.25 804 TD 0 0 0 rg /F0 9 Tf -0.0179 Tc 0.0179 Tw (Supplementary Submission to the Inquiry Into the Management of Machine Numbers) Tj 352.5 0 TD 0 Tc 0 Tw ( ) Tj 75 0 TD -0 Tc 0 Tw (Page ) Tj 21.75 0 TD 0 Tc 0 Tw (9) Tj 4.5 0 TD ( ) Tj -453.75 -12.75 TD ( ) Tj ET 69.75 786.75 456 0.75 re f BT 71.25 777 TD ( ) Tj 0 -717 TD /F1 11.25 Tf 0.1875 Tw ( ) Tj 0 -15.75 TD ( ) Tj ET 69.75 56.25 456 0.75 re f BT 71.25 31.5 TD /F0 9 Tf -0.0451 Tc 0.0451 Tw (A Supplementary Submission by the Provincial Cities Association of SA) Tj 295.5 0 TD 0 Tc 0 Tw ( ) Tj 45 0 TD -0 Tc (FINAL) Tj 28.5 0 TD 0 Tc ( ) Tj 33 0 TD -0.0679 Tc 0.0679 Tw (August, 2003) Tj 51.75 0 TD /F1 11.25 Tf 0 Tc 0.1875 Tw ( ) Tj -453.75 721.5 TD /F4 11.25 Tf 0.075 Tc 0 Tw (\267) Tj 4.5 0 TD /F1 11.25 Tf 0 Tc 0.1875 Tw ( ) Tj 38.25 0 TD 0.0138 Tc 1.1283 Tw (\223Although experience in New South Wales and the Australian Capital Territory ) Tj 0 -14.25 TD -0.0556 Tc 1.3681 Tw (suggests that ) Tj 72 0 TD -0.0354 Tc 1.7229 Tw (the potential exists for up to $244 million in revenue to be raised ) Tj -72 -14.25 TD -0.0547 Tc 0.7614 Tw (from the introduction of gaming machines in licensed premises, this is very much ) Tj 0 -14.25 TD 0.0506 Tc 0.1369 Tw (an upper limit\224 \(p. 45\).) Tj 115.5 0 TD 0 Tc 0.1875 Tw ( ) Tj -158.25 -14.25 TD ( ) Tj 0 -14.25 TD 0.024 Tc 1.5028 Tw (Ten years on, from 1991 to 2001/02, based on the estimates above this would equat) Tj 435 0 TD -0.0662 Tc 0.6287 Tw (e to ) Tj -435 -14.25 TD -0.0179 Tc 0.6907 Tw ($2.4 billion net gaming revenue \(NGR\), when in fact the real figure is $3.8 billion over ten ) Tj 0 -14.25 TD 0.1076 Tc 0.0799 Tw (years; $606 million in 2001/02 and $670 million in 2002/03.) Tj 300.75 0 TD 0 Tc 0.1875 Tw ( ) Tj -300.75 -14.25 TD ( ) Tj 0 -14.25 TD 0.0069 Tc 3.9931 Tw (The \223somewhat ambitious proposal\224 of a maximum of 30 machines per hotel was) Tj 0 Tc -0.5625 Tw ( ) Tj T* -0.0604 Tc 2.8729 Tw (relatively easily acc) Tj 101.25 0 TD 0.0158 Tc 2.2342 Tw (ommodated with 270 venues out of 609 \(44 per cent\) possessing a ) Tj -101.25 -14.25 TD 0.0746 Tc 0.6129 Tw (licence for more than 30 machines. The $230 per capita NGR is now $570 per capita, the ) Tj 0 -14.25 TD 0.0104 Tc 2.5878 Tw (estimated dividend to venue owners of $55 million was $283 million in 2001/02; the ) Tj T* -0.0429 Tc 0.2304 Tw (estimated loss to cha) Tj 102.75 0 TD -0.022 Tc 0.2095 Tw (rities would be in the order of $80) Tj 168.75 0 TD 0.0038 Tc 0 Tw (-) Tj 3.75 0 TD -0.0076 Tc 0.1951 Tw ($120 million over the 10 years.) Tj 152.25 0 TD 0 Tc 0.1875 Tw ( ) Tj -427.5 -14.25 TD ( ) Tj 0 -14.25 TD -0.0062 Tc 1.4629 Tw (Did the South Australian Parliament intend to achieve these outcomes in approving the ) Tj T* -0.0331 Tc 0.2206 Tw (relevant legislation? We think not.) Tj 173.25 0 TD 0 Tc 0.1875 Tw ( ) Tj -173.25 -14.25 TD ( ) Tj 0 -14.25 TD -0.0084 Tc 0.9459 Tw (Did it intend to return a dividend to venue owners \(after tax\) ) Tj 318 0 TD 0.1024 Tc 0.6851 Tw (of $283 million in 2001/02 ) Tj -318 -14.25 TD 0.035 Tc 0 Tw (alone,) Tj 30 3 TD /F1 7.5 Tf 0 Tc (11) Tj 7.5 -3 TD /F1 11.25 Tf -0.0431 Tc 1.1537 Tw ( while being required to compensate charities, and having to assist sporting clubs ) Tj -37.5 -14.25 TD -0.0397 Tc 2.0801 Tw (and community clubs for the loss of revenue? It certainly did expect to have to assist ) Tj 0 -14.25 TD -0.0499 Tc 5.4874 Tw (problem gamblers, because it acknowledged that some) Tj 303 0 TD -0.0804 Tc 5.0179 Tw ( individuals will experience) Tj 0 Tc 0.1875 Tw ( ) Tj -303 -14.25 TD -0.0921 Tc 0.2796 Tw (gambling problems due to the introduction of EGMs.) Tj 262.5 0 TD 0 Tc 0.1875 Tw ( ) Tj -262.5 -14.25 TD ( ) Tj 0 -14.25 TD -0.0458 Tc 0.6333 Tw (The hotel industry lobbied strongly for the introduction of EGMs, in part citing the impact ) Tj T* -0.0562 Tc 1.8062 Tw (on the viability of hotels of tougher drink driving legislation that was introduced) Tj 419.25 0 TD 0.015 Tc 1.1725 Tw ( in the ) Tj -419.25 -14.25 TD 0.0368 Tc 0.6664 Tw (early 1990s. A frank and honest appraisal would acknowledge this as a fact; EGMs were ) Tj 0 -14.25 TD -0.0438 Tc 0.7313 Tw (a partial offset for tougher drink driver legislation. Other elements of the debate included ) Tj T* -0.0227 Tc 1.7102 Tw (the need to compete with Victoria following the introduction of EGM) Tj 360 0 TD 0.0769 Tc 0.8606 Tw (s in that State, the ) Tj -360 -14.25 TD -0.0138 Tc 1.3263 Tw (potential impact of the Crown Casino, the tourism argument and the desire to minimise ) Tj 0 -14.25 TD -0.0316 Tc 1.7659 Tw (the \223gambling dollar leaving the State\224. With the benefit of hindsight, it might also be ) Tj T* 0 Tc 0.7493 Tw (reasonable to argue that the relative balance between clubs) Tj 298.5 0 TD -0.0164 Tc 0.0789 Tw ( and hotels was not sufficiently ) Tj -298.5 -14.25 TD 0.0293 Tc 0.1582 Tw (thought through.) Tj 86.25 0 TD 0 Tc 0.1875 Tw ( ) Tj -86.25 -14.25 TD ( ) Tj 0 -14.25 TD -0.0066 Tc 2.8191 Tw (Notwithstanding, it is reasonably clear that the South Australian Parliament seriously) Tj 0 Tc -0.5625 Tw ( ) Tj T* -0.0162 Tc 0.2037 Tw (underestimated the:) Tj 99.75 0 TD 0 Tc 0.1875 Tw ( ) Tj -99.75 -20.25 TD /F4 11.25 Tf 0.075 Tc 0 Tw (\267) Tj 4.5 0 TD /F1 11.25 Tf 0 Tc 0.1875 Tw ( ) Tj 38.25 0 TD -0.0303 Tc 0.2178 Tw (taxation revenue flowing to Treasury;) Tj 188.25 0 TD 0 Tc 0.1875 Tw ( ) Tj -231 -20.25 TD /F4 11.25 Tf 0.075 Tc 0 Tw (\267) Tj 4.5 0 TD /F1 11.25 Tf 0 Tc 0.1875 Tw ( ) Tj 38.25 0 TD -0.0927 Tc 0.2802 Tw (income streams flowing to licensed premises;) Tj 223.5 0 TD 0 Tc 0.1875 Tw ( ) Tj -266.25 -20.25 TD /F4 11.25 Tf 0.075 Tc 0 Tw (\267) Tj 4.5 0 TD /F1 11.25 Tf 0 Tc 0.1875 Tw ( ) Tj 38.25 0 TD 0.0417 Tc 0.1458 Tw (per capit) Tj 44.25 0 TD -0.0079 Tc 0.1954 Tw (a gaming expenditure;) Tj 112.5 0 TD 0 Tc 0.1875 Tw ( ) Tj -199.5 -20.25 TD /F4 11.25 Tf 0.075 Tc 0 Tw (\267) Tj 4.5 0 TD /F1 11.25 Tf 0 Tc 0.1875 Tw ( ) Tj 38.25 0 TD -0.0666 Tc 0.2541 Tw (loss to charities through established fund raising methods;) Tj 289.5 0 TD 0 Tc 0.1875 Tw ( ) Tj -332.25 -20.25 TD /F4 11.25 Tf 0.075 Tc 0 Tw (\267) Tj 4.5 0 TD /F1 11.25 Tf 0 Tc 0.1875 Tw ( ) Tj 38.25 0 TD 0.015 Tc 1.9225 Tw (the potential for concentration of ownership within the hotel industry and the ) Tj 0 -14.25 TD -0.042 Tc 0.2295 Tw (unintended consequences for clubs, including future trends; and it follows,) Tj 372.75 0 TD 0 Tc 0.1875 Tw ( ) Tj -415.5 -20.25 TD /F4 11.25 Tf 0.075 Tc 0 Tw (\267) Tj 4.5 0 TD /F1 11.25 Tf 0 Tc 0.1875 Tw ( ) Tj 38.25 0 TD -0.0283 Tc 5.4658 Tw (the number of) Tj 81 0 TD -0.0349 Tc 5.2849 Tw ( problem gamblers, the potential family impacts and other) Tj 0 Tc 0.1875 Tw ( ) Tj -81 -14.25 TD -0.0619 Tc 0.2494 Tw (consequences were also seriously underestimated.) Tj 248.25 0 TD 0 Tc 0.1875 Tw ( ) Tj -291 -19.5 TD ( ) Tj 90 0 TD ( ) Tj ET 71.25 87 144 0.75 re f BT 215.25 84.75 TD ( ) Tj -144 -9 TD /F1 5.25 Tf 0.375 Tc 0 Tw (11) Tj 6 -2.25 TD /F1 8.25 Tf 0 Tc 0.1875 Tw ( ) Tj 2.25 0 TD ( ) Tj 34.5 0 TD 0.0957 Tc 0.0918 Tw (Since 1994/95, venue share after state taxes is estimated at $2.34 billion.) Tj 269.25 0 TD 0 Tc 0.1875 Tw ( ) Tj ET endstream endobj 55 0 obj 7486 endobj 52 0 obj << /Type /Page /Parent 53 0 R /Resources << /Font << /F0 6 0 R /F1 8 0 R /F4 25 0 R >> /ProcSet 2 0 R >> /Contents 54 0 R >> endobj 57 0 obj << /Length 58 0 R >> stream BT 71.25 804 TD 0 0 0 rg /F0 9 Tf -0.0179 Tc 0.0179 Tw (Supplementary Submission to the Inquiry Into the Management of Machine Numbers) Tj 352.5 0 TD 0 Tc 0 Tw ( ) Tj 70.5 0 TD -0 Tc 0 Tw (Page ) Tj 21.75 0 TD 0 Tc 0 Tw (10) Tj 9 0 TD ( ) Tj -453.75 -12.75 TD ( ) Tj ET 69.75 786.75 456 0.75 re f BT 71.25 777 TD ( ) Tj 0 -717 TD /F1 11.25 Tf 0.1875 Tw ( ) Tj 0 -15.75 TD ( ) Tj ET 69.75 56.25 456 0.75 re f BT 71.25 31.5 TD /F0 9 Tf -0.0451 Tc 0.0451 Tw (A Supplementary Submission by the Provincial Cities Association of SA) Tj 295.5 0 TD 0 Tc 0 Tw ( ) Tj 45 0 TD -0 Tc (FINAL) Tj 28.5 0 TD 0 Tc ( ) Tj 33 0 TD -0.0679 Tc 0.0679 Tw (August, 2003) Tj 51.75 0 TD /F1 11.25 Tf 0 Tc 0.1875 Tw ( ) Tj -453.75 727.5 TD -0.0264 Tc 0.4014 Tw (It is not possible to have a serious, thoughtful and honest debate about the management of ) Tj 0 -14.25 TD 0.0122 Tc 2.7467 Tw (machine numbers without acknowledging the fact that publi) Tj 321.75 0 TD -0.0071 Tc 2.0696 Tw (c policy was wide of the ) Tj -321.75 -14.25 TD -0.0136 Tc 0.5293 Tw (mark. Put simply, while it \223got a lot right\224, including the purchase, supply and electronic ) Tj 0 -14.25 TD -0.0165 Tc 0.204 Tw (surveillance of machines, it could be argued to also have got \223a lot wrong\224.) Tj 375 0 TD 0 Tc 0.1875 Tw ( ) Tj -375 -14.25 TD ( ) Tj ET endstream endobj 58 0 obj 1370 endobj 56 0 obj << /Type /Page /Parent 53 0 R /Resources << /Font << /F0 6 0 R /F1 8 0 R >> /ProcSet 2 0 R >> /Contents 57 0 R >> endobj 60 0 obj << /Length 61 0 R >> stream BT 71.25 804 TD 0 0 0 rg /F0 9 Tf -0.0179 Tc 0.0179 Tw (Supplementary Submission to the Inquiry Into the Management of Machine Numbers) Tj 352.5 0 TD 0 Tc 0 Tw ( ) Tj 70.5 0 TD -0 Tc 0 Tw (Page ) Tj 21.75 0 TD 0 Tc 0 Tw (11) Tj 9 0 TD ( ) Tj -453.75 -12.75 TD ( ) Tj ET 69.75 786.75 456 0.75 re f BT 71.25 777 TD ( ) Tj 0 -717 TD /F1 11.25 Tf 0.1875 Tw ( ) Tj 0 -15.75 TD ( ) Tj ET 69.75 56.25 456 0.75 re f BT 71.25 31.5 TD /F0 9 Tf -0.0451 Tc 0.0451 Tw (A Supplementary Submission by the Provincial Cities Association of SA) Tj 295.5 0 TD 0 Tc 0 Tw ( ) Tj 45 0 TD -0 Tc (FINAL) Tj 28.5 0 TD 0 Tc ( ) Tj 33 0 TD -0.0679 Tc 0.0679 Tw (August, 2003) Tj 51.75 0 TD /F1 11.25 Tf 0 Tc 0.1875 Tw ( ) Tj -453.75 725.25 TD /F0 14.25 Tf 0.2813 Tc 0 Tw (3.) Tj 11.25 0 TD 0 Tc 0.1875 Tw ( ) Tj 31.5 0 TD 0.0802 Tc 0.1073 Tw (Harm Minimisation with regard to ToR \(1.1\)) Tj 291 0 TD 0 Tc 0.1875 Tw ( ) Tj -291 -27 TD /F3 11.25 Tf 0.155 Tc 3.0325 Tw (\223... reasonab) Tj 61.5 0 TD 0.0845 Tc 2.6863 Tw (ly practicable options for management of machine numbers ... ) Tj -61.5 -14.25 TD 0.0941 Tc 0.0934 Tw ([and] attention to strategies to minimise gambling related harm\224.) Tj 303 0 TD 0 Tc 0.1875 Tw ( ) Tj -345.75 -14.25 TD /F1 11.25 Tf ( ) Tj 0 -14.25 TD -0.055 Tc 1.1079 Tw (Several elected members of the Provincial Cities Association have stressed the primacy of ) Tj T* -0.0217 Tc 1.2092 Tw (the harm minimisation element of ToR \() Tj 204.75 0 TD 0.0345 Tc 0.8197 Tw (1.1\). They consider that the harm outweighs the ) Tj -204.75 -14.25 TD -0.0133 Tc 0.529 Tw (benefit of the EGM gaming industry and have put forward a strong moral objection to the ) Tj 0 -14.25 TD -0.0237 Tc 1.5706 Tw (industry in its current form. Essentially, this view can be summarised that harm to the ) Tj T* -0.0318 Tc 1.4693 Tw (individual, families and local) Tj 147.75 0 TD -0.0384 Tc 0.8093 Tw ( communities outweighs any benefit from gaming machines. ) Tj -147.75 -14.25 TD -0.0381 Tc 2.7881 Tw (Elected members are concerned about the prevalence of problem gamblers, effects on ) Tj 0 -14.25 TD -0.0424 Tc 4.1845 Tw (indigenous communities \(both within the Provincial Cities and in localities such as) Tj 0 Tc -0.5625 Tw ( ) Tj T* 0.0638 Tc 0.8737 Tw (Ceduna\), the high concentration) Tj 165 0 TD 0.0302 Tc 0.6573 Tw ( of machines in certain area and the wide range of social ) Tj -165 -14.25 TD -0.0384 Tc 2.9134 Tw (impacts witnessed by Council members. Elected members note the South Australian ) Tj 0 -14.25 TD -0.0157 Tc 0.2032 Tw (Centre for Economic Studies research that showed unambiguously negative impacts, in the ) Tj T* 0.0145 Tc 0.173 Tw (range of ) Tj 44.25 0 TD 0.0038 Tc 0 Tw (-) Tj 3.75 0 TD 0.0026 Tc 0.1849 Tw ($0.6 million to ) Tj 74.25 0 TD 0.0038 Tc 0 Tw (-) Tj 3.75 0 TD 0.375 Tc ($4) Tj 12 0 TD -0.0428 Tc 0.2303 Tw (3.6 million, across the Provincial Cities.) Tj 195 0 TD 0 Tc 0.1875 Tw ( ) Tj -333 -14.25 TD ( ) Tj 0 -14.25 TD -0.0313 Tc 0.3126 Tw (There is a strong view that electronic gaming machines should be phased out entirely. The ) Tj T* -0.0281 Tc 1.7156 Tw (manner in which this should be accomplished is to provide a write) Tj 348.75 0 TD 0.0038 Tc 0 Tw (-) Tj 3.75 0 TD -0.0067 Tc 1.3192 Tw (down period \(say 4 ) Tj -352.5 -14.25 TD -0.0397 Tc 0.9772 Tw (years\) with provision to buy back th) Tj 184.5 0 TD -0.0239 Tc 0.7884 Tw (e machines at the end of this period. There is a view ) Tj -184.5 -14.25 TD -0.0242 Tc 1.2951 Tw (that licence holders would not have to be fully compensated, if at all. We note the GTF ) Tj 0 -14.25 TD -0.083 Tc 2.1455 Tw (provides an opinion on this issue. However, the view of some elected members is not ) Tj T* 0.0246 Tc 3.9129 Tw (based on the technical \223how) Tj 157.5 0 TD -0.0562 Tc 3.6604 Tw ( to\224 of removing machines but removing them per se.) Tj 0 Tc 0.1875 Tw ( ) Tj -157.5 -14.25 TD -0.0177 Tc 0.6091 Tw (\223Reasonably practicable options\224 could involve a phased reduction over time in a manner ) Tj 0 -14.25 TD -0.0471 Tc 0.2346 Tw (that provides some certainty to venue owners. The end point is total removal.) Tj 388.5 0 TD 0 Tc 0.1875 Tw ( ) Tj -388.5 -14.25 TD ( ) Tj 0 -14.25 TD 0.009 Tc 2.4285 Tw (There is another view that conclude) Tj 190.5 0 TD -0.0082 Tc 1.9003 Tw (s there is far too high a concentration of EGMs in ) Tj -190.5 -14.25 TD -0.0147 Tc 2.7983 Tw (certain localities and that this needs to be addressed, principally through the phased ) Tj 0 -14.25 TD 0.0027 Tc 2.917 Tw (withdrawal of machines, down to an acceptable level. This is considered further in ) Tj T* -0.0136 Tc 1.2725 Tw (Section 4. A number of elected me) Tj 180.75 0 TD -0.0344 Tc 0.8781 Tw (mbers recognise the recreational and social benefits of ) Tj -180.75 -14.25 TD -0.0369 Tc 1.8975 Tw (EGMs, while stating their concerns regarding problem gambling, the greater loss of tax ) Tj 0 -14.25 TD -0.0173 Tc 1.3548 Tw (revenue from the individual cities due to the concentration of machines and the need to ) Tj T* -0.1236 Tc 1.5611 Tw (improve gambler\222s help se) Tj 133.5 0 TD -0.0715 Tc 0.859 Tw (rvices. Essentially, this view asserts that, to minimise gambling ) Tj -133.5 -14.25 TD -0.0224 Tc 0.2099 Tw (related harm, the number of machines needs to be substantially reduced.) Tj 362.25 0 TD 0 Tc 0.1875 Tw ( ) Tj -362.25 -14.25 TD /F0 11.25 Tf ( ) Tj 0 -14.25 TD ( ) Tj 0 -15.75 TD /F0 12.75 Tf -0.0625 Tc 0 Tw (3.1) Tj 16.5 0 TD 0 Tc -0.1875 Tw ( ) Tj 26.25 0 TD 0.124 Tc -0.3115 Tw (Potential Harm Minimisation Measures) Tj 234.75 0 TD /F1 12.75 Tf 0 Tc -0.1875 Tw ( ) Tj -277.5 -21 TD /F1 11.25 Tf -0.015 Tc 2.0434 Tw (Despite the contention of the industry, there is evidence both that expend) Tj 386.25 0 TD 0.0266 Tc 1.1609 Tw (iture and the ) Tj -386.25 -14.25 TD -0.0623 Tc 2.339 Tw (numbers of problem gamblers vary from region to region \(see for example the SACES ) Tj 0 -14.25 TD -0.0288 Tc 1.133 Tw (report \223The Impact of Gaming Machines on Small Regional Economies\224) Tj 366.75 3 TD /F1 7.5 Tf 0 Tc 0 Tw (12) Tj 7.5 -3 TD /F1 11.25 Tf -0.0107 Tc 0.7607 Tw (\). For example, ) Tj -374.25 -14.25 TD 0.0535 Tc 0.884 Tw (based on an analysis of 1998) Tj 146.25 0 TD 0.0038 Tc 0 Tw (-) Tj 3.75 0 TD 0.0493 Tc 0.5132 Tw (99 expenditure and demographic data, the Centre) Tj 252.75 0 TD -0.0654 Tc 0.2529 Tw ( estimated ) Tj -402.75 -14.25 TD -0.0279 Tc 3.9654 Tw (that the prevalence rate for problem gambling in Berri) Tj 299.25 0 TD 0.0038 Tc 0 Tw (-) Tj 3.75 0 TD 0.1226 Tc 3.6274 Tw (Barmera was 4.68 per cent,) Tj 0 Tc 0.1875 Tw ( ) Tj -303 -14.25 TD 0.0187 Tc 1.9969 Tw (compared to a state average of 2.04 per cent. The regional expenditure data makes it ) Tj 0 -14.25 TD -0.0099 Tc 0.1974 Tw (highly unlikely that national prevalence rates apply in each council region. ) Tj 375.75 0 TD 0 Tc 0.1875 Tw ( ) Tj 3 0 TD ( ) Tj -378.75 -14.25 TD ( ) Tj 0 -27.75 TD ( ) Tj 90 0 TD ( ) Tj ET 71.25 97.5 144 0.75 re f BT 215.25 95.25 TD ( ) Tj -144 -9 TD /F1 5.25 Tf 0.375 Tc 0 Tw (12) Tj 6 -2.25 TD /F1 8.25 Tf 0 Tc 0.1875 Tw ( ) Tj 2.25 0 TD ( ) Tj 34.5 0 TD 0.0242 Tc 5.1633 Tw (See the report for full details of the calculation metho) Tj 241.5 0 TD 0.0149 Tc 4.6726 Tw (dology used, report available on) Tj 137.25 0 TD 0.2527 Tc 0 Tw (-) Tj 3 0 TD 0.0098 Tc 4.6778 Tw (line at:) Tj 0 Tc 0.1875 Tw ( ) Tj -381.75 -10.5 TD 0.0603 Tc 0 Tw (www.adelaide.edu.au/saces/publications/other/GamingMachines.pdf) Tj 267 0 TD 0 Tc 0.1875 Tw ( ) Tj ET endstream endobj 61 0 obj 7798 endobj 59 0 obj << /Type /Page /Parent 53 0 R /Resources << /Font << /F0 6 0 R /F1 8 0 R /F3 17 0 R >> /ProcSet 2 0 R >> /Contents 60 0 R >> endobj 63 0 obj << /Length 64 0 R >> stream BT 71.25 804 TD 0 0 0 rg /F0 9 Tf -0.0179 Tc 0.0179 Tw (Supplementary Submission to the Inquiry Into the Management of Machine Numbers) Tj 352.5 0 TD 0 Tc 0 Tw ( ) Tj 70.5 0 TD -0 Tc 0 Tw (Page ) Tj 21.75 0 TD 0 Tc 0 Tw (12) Tj 9 0 TD ( ) Tj -453.75 -12.75 TD ( ) Tj ET 69.75 786.75 456 0.75 re f BT 71.25 777 TD ( ) Tj 0 -717 TD /F1 11.25 Tf 0.1875 Tw ( ) Tj 0 -15.75 TD ( ) Tj ET 69.75 56.25 456 0.75 re f BT 71.25 31.5 TD /F0 9 Tf -0.0451 Tc 0.0451 Tw (A Supplementary Submission by the Provincial Cities Association of SA) Tj 295.5 0 TD 0 Tc 0 Tw ( ) Tj 45 0 TD -0 Tc (FINAL) Tj 28.5 0 TD 0 Tc ( ) Tj 33 0 TD -0.0679 Tc 0.0679 Tw (August, 2003) Tj 51.75 0 TD /F1 11.25 Tf 0 Tc 0.1875 Tw ( ) Tj -453.75 727.5 TD -0.0021 Tc 2.4396 Tw (In the case of Berri) Tj 102 0 TD 0.0038 Tc 0 Tw (-) Tj 3.75 0 TD -0.0228 Tc 2.0853 Tw (Barmera, applying national prevalence rates for problem gambling ) Tj -105.75 -14.25 TD -0.023 Tc 0.2105 Tw (would imply that either:) Tj 121.5 0 TD 0 Tc 0.1875 Tw ( ) Tj -121.5 -20.25 TD /F4 11.25 Tf 0.075 Tc 0 Tw (\267) Tj 4.5 0 TD /F1 11.25 Tf 0 Tc 0.1875 Tw ( ) Tj 38.25 0 TD 0.0121 Tc 0.2331 Tw (the average problem gambler would have to have spent $22,000 per annum \(more ) Tj 0 -14.25 TD 0.0967 Tc 0.8408 Tw (than twice the national average of $10,650\) if non) Tj 255 0 TD 0.0038 Tc 0 Tw (-) Tj 3.75 0 TD -0.0229 Tc 0.2104 Tw (problem gam) Tj 66 0 TD -0.0731 Tc 0.2606 Tw (blers expenditure ) Tj -324.75 -14.25 TD 0.0378 Tc 0.1497 Tw (was average; or) Tj 78.75 0 TD 0 Tc 0.1875 Tw ( ) Tj -121.5 -20.25 TD /F4 11.25 Tf 0.075 Tc 0 Tw (\267) Tj 4.5 0 TD /F1 11.25 Tf 0 Tc 0.1875 Tw ( ) Tj 38.25 0 TD 0.0251 Tc 0.5374 Tw (the average non) Tj 81 0 TD 0.0038 Tc 0 Tw (-) Tj 3.75 0 TD -0.0519 Tc 0.2394 Tw (problem gambler, some of whom only gamble once a year, would ) Tj -84.75 -14.25 TD 0.0565 Tc 2.2079 Tw (have spent $1,240 per annum \(when the national average is $710\) if problem ) Tj 0 -14.25 TD -0.0403 Tc 0.2278 Tw (gambler\222s spending was average.) Tj 165 0 TD 0 Tc 0.1875 Tw ( ) Tj -207.75 -14.25 TD ( ) Tj 0 -14.25 TD -0.0107 Tc 3.9482 Tw (Again, we believe that neither expl) Tj 192.75 0 TD -0.0036 Tc 3.3161 Tw (anation nor some intermediate point where both) Tj 0 Tc 0.1875 Tw ( ) Tj -192.75 -14.25 TD -0.042 Tc 3.2295 Tw (problem gambler and non) Tj 138.75 0 TD 0.0038 Tc 0 Tw (-) Tj 3.75 0 TD -0.0401 Tc 3.2276 Tw (problem gambler expenditures are well above the national) Tj 0 Tc -0.5625 Tw ( ) Tj -142.5 -14.25 TD -0.0096 Tc 3.3702 Tw (average seems credible given that the average after tax income for the Council was) Tj 0 Tc -0.5625 Tw ( ) Tj 0 -14.25 TD 0.3482 Tc 0 Tw ($13,720) Tj 39 3 TD /F1 7.5 Tf 0 Tc (13) Tj 7.5 -3 TD /F1 11.25 Tf -0.0022 Tc 0.1897 Tw (, well below the national average of ) Tj 180.75 0 TD 0.3281 Tc 0 Tw ($21,679.) Tj 42 0 TD 0 Tc 0.1875 Tw ( ) Tj -269.25 -14.25 TD ( ) Tj 0 -14.25 TD -0.0346 Tc 1.8221 Tw (Assuming that access to electronic gaming machines is to be retained, it should also be ) Tj T* -0.0336 Tc 0.5711 Tw (noted that restrictions on accessibility are only one type of harm minimisation measure. It ) Tj T* -0.0734 Tc 0.9484 Tw (is likely that optimal social outcomes will require the use of a ) Tj 314.25 0 TD -0.0201 Tc 0.2076 Tw (range of harm minimisation ) Tj -314.25 -14.25 TD -0.0362 Tc 0.36 Tw (measures. Potential harm minimisation measures for electronic gaming machine gambling ) Tj 0 -14.25 TD -0.0478 Tc 0.2353 Tw (that could be used in addition to restrictions on accessibility include:) Tj 339.75 0 TD 0 Tc 0.1875 Tw ( ) Tj -339.75 -20.25 TD -0.0675 Tc 0 Tw (\225) Tj 6 0 TD 0 Tc 0.1875 Tw ( ) Tj 36.75 0 TD -0.0356 Tc 0.564 Tw (bans on allowing intoxicated persons to gamble, as this has been sh) Tj 339 0 TD 0.0133 Tc 0.1742 Tw (own to lead to ) Tj -339 -14.25 TD -0.0348 Tc 0.2223 Tw (irrational gambling behaviour, even in non) Tj 213.75 0 TD 0.0038 Tc 0 Tw (-) Tj 3.75 0 TD -0.1493 Tc 0.3368 Tw (problem gamblers;) Tj 92.25 3 TD /F1 7.5 Tf 0 Tc 0 Tw (14) Tj 7.5 -3 TD /F1 11.25 Tf 0.1875 Tw ( ) Tj -360 -20.25 TD -0.0675 Tc 0 Tw (\225) Tj 6 0 TD 0 Tc 0.1875 Tw ( ) Tj 36.75 0 TD -0.1221 Tc 0.3096 Tw (maximum betting limits;) Tj 121.5 0 TD 0 Tc 0.1875 Tw ( ) Tj -164.25 -20.25 TD -0.0675 Tc 0 Tw (\225) Tj 6 0 TD 0 Tc 0.1875 Tw ( ) Tj 36.75 0 TD -0.0375 Tc 0.225 Tw (restrictions on machine \221spin\222 speed;) Tj 180.75 0 TD 0 Tc 0.1875 Tw ( ) Tj -223.5 -20.25 TD -0.0675 Tc 0 Tw (\225) Tj 6 0 TD 0 Tc 0.1875 Tw ( ) Tj 36.75 0 TD -0.0244 Tc 4.2119 Tw (smoking bans, or other restrictions \(such as bans on eating or drinking at) Tj 0 Tc 0.1875 Tw ( ) Tj 0 -14.25 TD 0.0742 Tc 2.3633 Tw (machines\) which cause patrons to tak) Tj 200.25 0 TD -0.0333 Tc 1.3458 Tw (e breaks from their machines, potentially ) Tj -200.25 -14.25 TD -0.0575 Tc 3.245 Tw (leading to a return of \221normal\222 cognitive processes outside of the stimulating) Tj 0 Tc -0.5625 Tw ( ) Tj 0 -14.25 TD -0.0406 Tc 0.2281 Tw (environment of the gaming room;) Tj 168 0 TD 0 Tc 0.1875 Tw ( ) Tj -210.75 -20.25 TD -0.0675 Tc 0 Tw (\225) Tj 6 0 TD 0 Tc 0.1875 Tw ( ) Tj 36.75 0 TD 0.0176 Tc 0.1699 Tw (restrictions on the number of \223rows\224 that can be played at any one time;) Tj 362.25 0 TD 0 Tc 0.1875 Tw ( ) Tj -405 -20.25 TD -0.0675 Tc 0 Tw (\225) Tj 6 0 TD 0 Tc 0.1875 Tw ( ) Tj 36.75 0 TD -0.024 Tc 0.2115 Tw (restrictions on maximum cr) Tj 137.25 0 TD -0.0876 Tc 0.2751 Tw (edit values; ) Tj 59.25 0 TD 0 Tc 0.1875 Tw ( ) Tj -239.25 -20.25 TD -0.0675 Tc 0 Tw (\225) Tj 6 0 TD 0 Tc 0.1875 Tw ( ) Tj 36.75 0 TD -0.0216 Tc 0.3822 Tw (restrictions on the accessibility of cash near venues \(e.g. bans or withdrawal limits ) Tj 0 -14.25 TD 0.0099 Tc 0.1776 Tw (on machines near gaming rooms\); and) Tj 192 0 TD 0 Tc 0.1875 Tw ( ) Tj -234.75 -20.25 TD -0.0675 Tc 0 Tw (\225) Tj 6 0 TD 0 Tc 0.1875 Tw ( ) Tj 36.75 0 TD -0.0297 Tc 0.2172 Tw (restrictions on how winnings can be paid to gamblers.) Tj 270 0 TD 0 Tc 0.1875 Tw ( ) Tj -312.75 -14.25 TD ( ) Tj 0 -14.25 TD ( ) Tj T* ( ) Tj 0 -86.25 TD ( ) Tj 90 0 TD ( ) Tj ET 71.25 130.5 144 0.75 re f BT 215.25 128.25 TD ( ) Tj -144 -9 TD /F1 5.25 Tf 0.375 Tc 0 Tw (13) Tj 6 -2.25 TD /F1 8.25 Tf 0 Tc 0.1875 Tw ( ) Tj 2.25 0 TD ( ) Tj 34.5 0 TD 0.0526 Tc 2.1349 Tw (Income data calculated on the basis of total income, minus net tax, divided by the number of persons ) Tj 0 -10.5 TD 0.0739 Tc 1.2922 Tw (submitting a tax return, or adults recorded as) Tj 177.75 0 TD -0.1628 Tc 1.1003 Tw ( \221non) Tj 18.75 0 TD 0.2527 Tc 0 Tw (-) Tj 3 0 TD 0.1142 Tc 0.5733 Tw (taxables\222; source, Australian Taxation Office, \223Taxation ) Tj -199.5 -10.5 TD 0.2332 Tc -0.0457 Tw (Statistics 1998) Tj 54 0 TD 0.2527 Tc 0 Tw (-) Tj 3 0 TD 0.3281 Tc (99\224.) Tj 15.75 0 TD 0 Tc 0.1875 Tw ( ) Tj -115.5 -8.25 TD /F1 5.25 Tf 0.375 Tc 0 Tw (14) Tj 6 -2.25 TD /F1 8.25 Tf 0 Tc 0.1875 Tw ( ) Tj 2.25 0 TD ( ) Tj 34.5 0 TD 0.0516 Tc 0.3859 Tw (Kyngton, A. and M. Dickerson \(1999\), \223An experimental study of the effect of prior alcohol consumption on a ) Tj 0 -11.25 TD 0.0734 Tc 0.1141 Tw (simulated gambling activity\224, ) Tj 113.25 0 TD /F3 8.25 Tf 0.0668 Tc 0 Tw (Addiction) Tj 33.75 0 TD /F1 8.25 Tf 0.2986 Tc -0.1111 Tw (, 94:5, pp. 607) Tj 53.25 0 TD 0.2527 Tc 0 Tw (-) Tj 3 0 TD 0.3281 Tc (707.) Tj 15.75 0 TD 0 Tc 0.1875 Tw ( ) Tj ET endstream endobj 64 0 obj 7686 endobj 62 0 obj << /Type /Page /Parent 53 0 R /Resources << /Font << /F0 6 0 R /F1 8 0 R /F3 17 0 R /F4 25 0 R >> /ProcSet 2 0 R >> /Contents 63 0 R >> endobj 66 0 obj << /Length 67 0 R >> stream BT 71.25 804 TD 0 0 0 rg /F0 9 Tf -0.0179 Tc 0.0179 Tw (Supplementary Submission to the Inquiry Into the Management of Machine Numbers) Tj 352.5 0 TD 0 Tc 0 Tw ( ) Tj 70.5 0 TD -0 Tc 0 Tw (Page ) Tj 21.75 0 TD 0 Tc 0 Tw (13) Tj 9 0 TD ( ) Tj -453.75 -12.75 TD ( ) Tj ET 69.75 786.75 456 0.75 re f BT 71.25 777 TD ( ) Tj 0 -717 TD /F1 11.25 Tf 0.1875 Tw ( ) Tj 0 -15.75 TD ( ) Tj ET 69.75 56.25 456 0.75 re f BT 71.25 31.5 TD /F0 9 Tf -0.0451 Tc 0.0451 Tw (A Supplementary Submission by the Provincial Cities Association of SA) Tj 295.5 0 TD 0 Tc 0 Tw ( ) Tj 45 0 TD -0 Tc (FINAL) Tj 28.5 0 TD 0 Tc ( ) Tj 33 0 TD -0.0679 Tc 0.0679 Tw (August, 2003) Tj 51.75 0 TD /F1 11.25 Tf 0 Tc 0.1875 Tw ( ) Tj -453.75 725.25 TD /F0 14.25 Tf 0.2813 Tc 0 Tw (4.) Tj 11.25 0 TD 0 Tc 0.1875 Tw ( ) Tj 31.5 0 TD 0.1154 Tc 5.6436 Tw (Options for the Management of Machine Numbers, ToR) Tj 0 Tc 0.1875 Tw ( ) Tj 0 -17.25 TD 0.1731 Tc 0 Tw (\(1.3) Tj 23.25 0 TD 0.1174 Tc 0.0701 Tw (\)\(b\); ToR \(2.3\)\(c\); and ToR \(2.4\)) Tj 201.75 0 TD 0 Tc 0.1875 Tw ( ) Tj -267.75 -21 TD /F3 11.25 Tf ( ) Tj 42.75 0 TD 0.1091 Tc 0.0784 Tw (ToR \(1.3\)\(b\):) Tj 60.75 0 TD 0 Tc 0.1875 Tw ( ) Tj 24 0 TD 0.1155 Tc 0.072 Tw (\223measures which would allow for the management of gaming ) Tj 0 -14.25 TD 0.087 Tc 3.4755 Tw (machine turnover on both regional and state) Tj 225 0 TD 0.0038 Tc 0 Tw (-) Tj 3.75 0 TD 0.1354 Tc 1.5521 Tw (wide bases, ) Tj -228.75 -14.25 TD 0.105 Tc 0.0825 Tw (through the allocation of gambling machines\224;) Tj 214.5 0 TD 0 Tc 0.1875 Tw ( ) Tj -342 -20.25 TD ( ) Tj 42.75 0 TD 0.0991 Tc 0.0884 Tw (ToR \(2.3\)\(c\):) Tj 60 0 TD 0 Tc 0.1875 Tw ( ) Tj 24.75 0 TD 0.0568 Tc 6.1307 Tw (\223... options for reducing the num) Tj 182.25 0 TD 0.0972 Tc 5.8403 Tw (ber of machines or) Tj 0 Tc 0.1875 Tw ( ) Tj -182.25 -14.25 TD 0.0675 Tc 0.12 Tw (redistributing them \(or both\); and) Tj 156.75 0 TD 0 Tc 0.1875 Tw ( ) Tj -284.25 -20.25 TD ( ) Tj 42.75 0 TD 0.14 Tc 0.0475 Tw (ToR \(2.4\):) Tj 48 0 TD 0 Tc 0.1875 Tw ( ) Tj 36.75 0 TD 0.1169 Tc 0.2372 Tw (\223The Authority must consider what would be an appropriate ) Tj 0 -14.25 TD 0.0637 Tc 0.1238 Tw (number of gaming machines for South Australia at particular ) Tj T* 0.0565 Tc 0.131 Tw (future points in time, noting \(among other things\):) Tj 234.75 0 TD 0 Tc 0.1875 Tw ( ) Tj -362.25 -17.25 TD ( ) Tj 156 0 TD 0.1294 Tc 0 Tw (a\)) Tj 9 0 TD 0 Tc 0.1875 Tw ( ) Tj 6 0 TD 0.0525 Tc 0.135 Tw (distribution geo) Tj 72.75 0 TD 0.155 Tc 0 Tw (graphically.) Tj 55.5 0 TD 0 Tc 0.1875 Tw ( ) Tj -299.25 -14.25 TD /F1 11.25 Tf ( ) Tj 0 -14.25 TD -0.0217 Tc 0.477 Tw (The three Terms of Reference above refer to management of gaming machine turnover \(on ) Tj T* -0.0382 Tc 2.8166 Tw (a regional and statewide basis\), options for reducing or redistributing \(i.e., potentially) Tj 0 Tc -0.5625 Tw ( ) Tj T* -0.0226 Tc 0.9601 Tw (increasing the number in some localities\) and a method of allocat) Tj 331.5 0 TD -0.0288 Tc 0.5913 Tw (ing machine numbers in ) Tj -331.5 -14.25 TD 0.027 Tc 0.1605 Tw (the future.) Tj 52.5 0 TD 0 Tc 0.1875 Tw ( ) Tj -52.5 -14.25 TD ( ) Tj 0 -14.25 TD -0.05 Tc 0.5589 Tw (Taken together, the Terms of Reference imply some rational, ordered, method or system to ) Tj T* -0.0234 Tc 2.0859 Tw (distribute or adjust \(upwards or downwards\) gaming machine numbers. This is to be ) Tj T* 0.001 Tc 0.1865 Tw (considered against the current system that has e) Tj 240 0 TD 0.0584 Tc 0.1291 Tw (xisted since 1991.) Tj 87 0 TD 0 Tc 0.1875 Tw ( ) Tj -327 -14.25 TD ( ) Tj 0 -14.25 TD -0.0344 Tc 0.2219 Tw (The context for the proposal is as follows, specifically that there is:) Tj 330 0 TD 0 Tc 0.1875 Tw ( ) Tj -330 -20.25 TD /F4 11.25 Tf 0.075 Tc 0 Tw (\267) Tj 4.5 0 TD /F1 11.25 Tf 0 Tc 0.1875 Tw ( ) Tj 38.25 0 TD -0.0332 Tc 1.1071 Tw (a gross maldistribution of electronic gaming machines across the state, including ) Tj 0 -14.25 TD 0.0146 Tc 0.1729 Tw (between metropolitan and non) Tj 154.5 0 TD 0.0038 Tc 0 Tw (-) Tj 3.75 0 TD -0.0296 Tc 0.2171 Tw (metropolitan areas;) Tj 96.75 0 TD 0 Tc 0.1875 Tw ( ) Tj -297.75 -20.25 TD /F4 11.25 Tf 0.075 Tc 0 Tw (\267) Tj 4.5 0 TD /F1 11.25 Tf 0 Tc 0.1875 Tw ( ) Tj 38.25 0 TD -0.0323 Tc 6.2198 Tw (legitimate community concern) Tj 0 Tc 0.1875 Tw ( ) Tj 172.5 0 TD -0.022 Tc 6.0595 Tw (regarding the existing platform to allocate) Tj 0 Tc 0.1875 Tw ( ) Tj -172.5 -14.25 TD -0.0104 Tc 0.4025 Tw (electronic gaming machines, including that \223need\224 does not equate to community ) Tj 0 -14.25 TD -0.0314 Tc 0.2189 Tw (need, nor is it conditional on community need;) Tj 232.5 0 TD 0 Tc 0.1875 Tw ( ) Tj -275.25 -20.25 TD /F4 11.25 Tf 0.075 Tc 0 Tw (\267) Tj 4.5 0 TD /F1 11.25 Tf 0 Tc 0.1875 Tw ( ) Tj 38.25 0 TD -0.0068 Tc 3.3307 Tw (a substantial argument \(presented in Section 2, in earlier documents and by) Tj 0 Tc -0.5625 Tw ( ) Tj 0 -14.25 TD -0.0295 Tc 0.217 Tw (others\) ) Tj 37.5 0 TD -0.0286 Tc 0.2161 Tw (that the existing freeze is unsustainable and lacks policy credibility; and) Tj 357 0 TD 0 Tc 0.1875 Tw ( ) Tj -437.25 -20.25 TD /F4 11.25 Tf 0.075 Tc 0 Tw (\267) Tj 4.5 0 TD /F1 11.25 Tf 0 Tc 0.1875 Tw ( ) Tj 38.25 0 TD 0.0046 Tc 2.0044 Tw (a history and we have provided a synopsis of that history \(Section 2.2\) which ) Tj 0 -14.25 TD -0.0247 Tc 2.0583 Tw (provides a clear illustration of the application of public policy which has been ) Tj T* -0.0241 Tc 6.2116 Tw (shown to have serio) Tj 117.75 0 TD -0.0381 Tc 5.4756 Tw (usly underestimated the impact of electronic gaming) Tj 0 Tc -0.5625 Tw ( ) Tj -117.75 -14.25 TD -0.0437 Tc 0 Tw (machines.) Tj 50.25 0 TD 0 Tc 0.1875 Tw ( ) Tj -93 -14.25 TD ( ) Tj 0 -14.25 TD -0.0196 Tc 4.3662 Tw (Overall, we conclude that there needs to be a significantly improved management) Tj 0 Tc 0.1875 Tw ( ) Tj T* -0.0221 Tc 0.3346 Tw (framework in relation to electronic gaming machines, for all parties including government, ) Tj T* 0.0141 Tc 0.1734 Tw (industry, the \221concern) Tj 109.5 0 TD -0.0088 Tc 0.1963 Tw (ed sector\222 and the South Australian community.) Tj 240 0 TD 0 Tc 0.1875 Tw ( ) Tj -349.5 -14.25 TD ( ) Tj 0 -14.25 TD -0.0699 Tc 0.2574 Tw (Our proposal is based on the following:) Tj 196.5 0 TD 0 Tc 0.1875 Tw ( ) Tj -196.5 -20.25 TD /F4 11.25 Tf 0.075 Tc 0 Tw (\267) Tj 4.5 0 TD /F1 11.25 Tf 0 Tc 0.1875 Tw ( ) Tj 38.25 0 TD /F0 11.25 Tf -0.0251 Tc 0 Tw (Compromise) Tj 66 0 TD /F1 11.25 Tf -0.0616 Tc 2.7241 Tw (: it recognises the serious competing interests of government, the ) Tj -66 -14.25 TD -0.0175 Tc 0.205 Tw (industry, the \221concerned sector\222 and the wider community;) Tj 293.25 0 TD 0 Tc 0.1875 Tw ( ) Tj -336 -20.25 TD /F4 11.25 Tf 0.075 Tc 0 Tw (\267) Tj 4.5 0 TD /F1 11.25 Tf 0 Tc 0.1875 Tw ( ) Tj 38.25 0 TD /F0 11.25 Tf -0.0335 Tc 0 Tw (Benchmarking:) Tj 78.75 0 TD /F1 11.25 Tf -0.0094 Tc 0.5719 Tw ( it sets a bench) Tj 74.25 0 TD 0.0143 Tc 0.1732 Tw (mark for the management of machine numbers and ) Tj -153 -14.25 TD -0.0327 Tc 1.9248 Tw (a basis for future management and decision making, thereby providing greater ) Tj 0 -14.25 TD 0.0332 Tc 0.1543 Tw (transparency and certainty across all sectors; ) Tj 227.25 0 TD 0 Tc 0.1875 Tw ( ) Tj ET endstream endobj 67 0 obj 7512 endobj 65 0 obj << /Type /Page /Parent 53 0 R /Resources << /Font << /F0 6 0 R /F1 8 0 R /F3 17 0 R /F4 25 0 R >> /ProcSet 2 0 R >> /Contents 66 0 R >> endobj 69 0 obj << /Length 70 0 R >> stream BT 71.25 804 TD 0 0 0 rg /F0 9 Tf -0.0179 Tc 0.0179 Tw (Supplementary Submission to the Inquiry Into the Management of Machine Numbers) Tj 352.5 0 TD 0 Tc 0 Tw ( ) Tj 70.5 0 TD -0 Tc 0 Tw (Page ) Tj 21.75 0 TD 0 Tc 0 Tw (14) Tj 9 0 TD ( ) Tj -453.75 -12.75 TD ( ) Tj ET 69.75 786.75 456 0.75 re f BT 71.25 777 TD ( ) Tj 0 -717 TD /F1 11.25 Tf 0.1875 Tw ( ) Tj 0 -15.75 TD ( ) Tj ET 69.75 56.25 456 0.75 re f BT 71.25 31.5 TD /F0 9 Tf -0.0451 Tc 0.0451 Tw (A Supplementary Submission by the Provincial Cities Association of SA) Tj 295.5 0 TD 0 Tc 0 Tw ( ) Tj 45 0 TD -0 Tc (FINAL) Tj 28.5 0 TD 0 Tc ( ) Tj 33 0 TD -0.0679 Tc 0.0679 Tw (August, 2003) Tj 51.75 0 TD /F1 11.25 Tf 0 Tc 0.1875 Tw ( ) Tj -453.75 727.5 TD /F4 11.25 Tf 0.075 Tc 0 Tw (\267) Tj 4.5 0 TD /F1 11.25 Tf 0 Tc 0.1875 Tw ( ) Tj 38.25 0 TD /F0 11.25 Tf -0.028 Tc 0 Tw (Pragmatism:) Tj 64.5 0 TD /F1 11.25 Tf -0.0159 Tc 0.8852 Tw ( there is legitimate concern regarding the very high concentration of ) Tj -64.5 -14.25 TD -0.1387 Tc 0 Tw (e) Tj 5.25 0 TD -0.0287 Tc 1.5662 Tw (lectronic gaming machines in several areas and vulnerable communities across ) Tj -5.25 -14.25 TD 0.0091 Tc 1.1427 Tw (the state, while the high concentration of machines is related to the incidence of ) Tj 0 -14.25 TD -0.1008 Tc 0.2883 Tw (problem gambling; ) Tj 96.75 0 TD 0 Tc 0.1875 Tw ( ) Tj -139.5 -20.25 TD /F4 11.25 Tf 0.075 Tc 0 Tw (\267) Tj 4.5 0 TD /F1 11.25 Tf 0 Tc 0.1875 Tw ( ) Tj 38.25 0 TD /F0 11.25 Tf -0.011 Tc 1.6985 Tw (Current Inequity:) Tj 92.25 0 TD /F1 11.25 Tf -0.0276 Tc 1.1317 Tw ( we acknowledge the inequity of the current system, includ) Tj 303 0 TD -0.1087 Tc -0.4538 Tw (ing ) Tj -395.25 -14.25 TD -0.0406 Tc 0.6031 Tw (that it reinforces the privileged position of a few relative to the wider community; ) Tj 0 -14.25 TD 0.1513 Tc 0 Tw (and) Tj 19.5 0 TD 0 Tc 0.1875 Tw ( ) Tj -62.25 -20.25 TD /F4 11.25 Tf 0.075 Tc 0 Tw (\267) Tj 4.5 0 TD /F1 11.25 Tf 0 Tc 0.1875 Tw ( ) Tj 38.25 0 TD /F0 11.25 Tf -0.0402 Tc 2.1027 Tw (Need For Equity:) Tj 91.5 0 TD /F1 11.25 Tf -0.0487 Tc 1.5112 Tw ( that there should be relatively equal provision of recreational ) Tj -91.5 -14.25 TD -0.012 Tc 0.1995 Tw (facilities and options across the state.) Tj 184.5 0 TD 0 Tc 0.1875 Tw ( ) Tj -227.25 -14.25 TD ( ) Tj 0 -14.25 TD -0.0543 Tc 0.2418 Tw (Our proposal establishes: ) Tj 128.25 0 TD 0 Tc 0.1875 Tw ( ) Tj -128.25 -20.25 TD /F4 11.25 Tf 0.075 Tc 0 Tw (\267) Tj 4.5 0 TD /F1 11.25 Tf 0 Tc 0.1875 Tw ( ) Tj 38.25 0 TD 0.1828 Tc 1.5047 Tw (a framewo) Tj 55.5 0 TD -0.0064 Tc 1.1314 Tw (rk for government, an on) Tj 129 0 TD 0.0038 Tc 0 Tw (-) Tj 3.75 0 TD -0.029 Tc 0.8593 Tw (going management system and a method to ) Tj -188.25 -14.25 TD 0.0213 Tc 0.1662 Tw (respond to change;) Tj 95.25 0 TD 0 Tc 0.1875 Tw ( ) Tj -138 -20.25 TD /F4 11.25 Tf 0.075 Tc 0 Tw (\267) Tj 4.5 0 TD /F1 11.25 Tf 0 Tc 0.1875 Tw ( ) Tj 38.25 0 TD -0.028 Tc 0.528 Tw (a system of distribution \(and redistribution\) at a constant level that acknowledges ) Tj 0 -14.25 TD 0.0203 Tc 0.1672 Tw (community concern;) Tj 102.75 0 TD 0 Tc 0.1875 Tw ( ) Tj -145.5 -20.25 TD /F4 11.25 Tf 0.075 Tc 0 Tw (\267) Tj 4.5 0 TD /F1 11.25 Tf 0 Tc 0.1875 Tw ( ) Tj 38.25 0 TD -0.021 Tc 2.0418 Tw (greater certainty across the industry, with the flexibility to re) Tj 318.75 0 TD 0.008 Tc 1.1795 Tw (spond to changed ) Tj -318.75 -14.25 TD 0.0356 Tc 0.1519 Tw (circumstances; ) Tj 76.5 0 TD 0 Tc 0.1875 Tw ( ) Tj -119.25 -20.25 TD /F4 11.25 Tf 0.075 Tc 0 Tw (\267) Tj 4.5 0 TD /F1 11.25 Tf 0 Tc 0.1875 Tw ( ) Tj 38.25 0 TD -0.0269 Tc 0.2144 Tw (a phased program of reductions including redistribution; and) Tj 306 0 TD 0 Tc 0.1875 Tw ( ) Tj -348.75 -20.25 TD /F4 11.25 Tf 0.075 Tc 0 Tw (\267) Tj 4.5 0 TD /F1 11.25 Tf 0 Tc 0.1875 Tw ( ) Tj 38.25 0 TD -0.0303 Tc 1.9321 Tw (the use of a Community Benefit Levy in special circumstances based on a true ) Tj 0 -14.25 TD -0.0511 Tc 0.2386 Tw (community benefit test. ) Tj 120 0 TD 0 Tc 0.1875 Tw ( ) Tj -162.75 -14.25 TD ( ) Tj 0 -14.25 TD -0.0294 Tc 0.2169 Tw (The specific elements of the our proposal include that:) Tj 269.25 0 TD 0 Tc 0.1875 Tw ( ) Tj -269.25 -20.25 TD /F4 11.25 Tf 0.075 Tc 0 Tw (\267) Tj 4.5 0 TD /F1 11.25 Tf 0 Tc 0.1875 Tw ( ) Tj 38.25 0 TD -0.0149 Tc 0.2601 Tw (there should be set number of electronic gaming machines per 1,000 adult persons ) Tj 0 -14.25 TD 0.0185 Tc 0.169 Tw (across the entire state \(a machine to person ratio\); ) Tj 251.25 0 TD 0 Tc 0.1875 Tw ( ) Tj -294 -20.25 TD /F4 11.25 Tf 0.075 Tc 0 Tw (\267) Tj 4.5 0 TD /F1 11.25 Tf 0 Tc 0.1875 Tw ( ) Tj 38.25 0 TD -0.0366 Tc 2.6241 Tw (the current geographical distribution of machines should be redistributed and ) Tj 0 -14.25 TD -0 Tc 0.1882 Tw (phased down to achieve the set ratio o) Tj 192 0 TD -0.0092 Tc 0.1967 Tw (ver a two year period; ) Tj 113.25 0 TD 0 Tc 0.1875 Tw ( ) Tj -348 -20.25 TD /F4 11.25 Tf 0.075 Tc 0 Tw (\267) Tj 4.5 0 TD /F1 11.25 Tf 0 Tc 0.1875 Tw ( ) Tj 38.25 0 TD 0.0312 Tc 1.9688 Tw (any adjustment to changed circumstances would take place one year after the ) Tj 0 -14.25 TD 0.0092 Tc 0.1783 Tw (release of the next ABS Population and Housing Census \(i.e. 2007\); ) Tj 336.75 0 TD 0 Tc 0.1875 Tw ( ) Tj -379.5 -20.25 TD /F4 11.25 Tf 0.075 Tc 0 Tw (\267) Tj 4.5 0 TD /F1 11.25 Tf 0 Tc 0.1875 Tw ( ) Tj 38.25 0 TD -0.0353 Tc 2.8478 Tw (the government should seek the voluntary co) Tj 240 0 TD 0.0038 Tc 0 Tw (-) Tj 3.75 0 TD -0.0194 Tc 2.0819 Tw (operation of the industry in the ) Tj -243.75 -14.25 TD -0.0873 Tc 0 Tw (redistr) Tj 32.25 0 TD -0.0032 Tc 0.9407 Tw (ibution and phase) Tj 91.5 0 TD 0.0038 Tc 0 Tw (-) Tj 3.75 0 TD -0.0245 Tc 0.6807 Tw (down period \(and beyond\), but that government should ) Tj -127.5 -14.25 TD -0.0121 Tc 3.745 Tw (indicate its intention to reduce the aggregate number of machines in South) Tj 0 Tc 0.1875 Tw ( ) Tj 0 -14.25 TD 0.0473 Tc 0.1402 Tw (Australia; ) Tj 55.5 0 TD 0 Tc 0.1875 Tw ( ) Tj -98.25 -20.25 TD /F4 11.25 Tf 0.075 Tc 0 Tw (\267) Tj 4.5 0 TD /F1 11.25 Tf 0 Tc 0.1875 Tw ( ) Tj 38.25 0 TD -0.0505 Tc 2.1418 Tw (the \221needs\222 test should be abolished, the freeze should be discontinued, but an ) Tj 0 -14.25 TD 0.1947 Tc 2.2428 Tw (effective and b) Tj 77.25 0 TD -0.0349 Tc 1.9952 Tw (inding cap based on the number of adult persons would follow ) Tj -77.25 -14.25 TD -0.0204 Tc 0.8329 Tw (from setting the permissible, upper ratio of electronic gaming machines per 1,000 ) Tj 0 -14.25 TD 0.0059 Tc 0.1816 Tw (adult persons; and ) Tj 96 0 TD 0 Tc 0.1875 Tw ( ) Tj -138.75 -20.25 TD /F4 11.25 Tf 0.075 Tc 0 Tw (\267) Tj 4.5 0 TD /F1 11.25 Tf 0 Tc 0.1875 Tw ( ) Tj 38.25 0 TD 0.0076 Tc 1.2183 Tw (in all circumstances where the machine per capita ratio is exceeded the revenue ) Tj 0 -14.25 TD 0.0979 Tc 3.0896 Tw (from the ad) Tj 64.5 0 TD -0.0417 Tc 2.2917 Tw (ditional machines is to be tied \(i.e. conditional on meeting\) to the ) Tj -64.5 -14.25 TD -0.0293 Tc 0.2168 Tw (provision of that need. Examples are provided later in this paper.) Tj 327.75 0 TD 0 Tc 0.1875 Tw ( ) Tj ET endstream endobj 70 0 obj 7398 endobj 68 0 obj << /Type /Page /Parent 53 0 R /Resources << /Font << /F0 6 0 R /F1 8 0 R /F4 25 0 R >> /ProcSet 2 0 R >> /Contents 69 0 R >> endobj 73 0 obj << /Length 74 0 R >> stream BT 71.25 804 TD 0 0 0 rg /F0 9 Tf -0.0179 Tc 0.0179 Tw (Supplementary Submission to the Inquiry Into the Management of Machine Numbers) Tj 352.5 0 TD 0 Tc 0 Tw ( ) Tj 70.5 0 TD -0 Tc 0 Tw (Page ) Tj 21.75 0 TD 0 Tc 0 Tw (15) Tj 9 0 TD ( ) Tj -453.75 -12.75 TD ( ) Tj ET 69.75 786.75 456 0.75 re f BT 71.25 777 TD ( ) Tj 0 -717 TD /F1 11.25 Tf 0.1875 Tw ( ) Tj 0 -15.75 TD ( ) Tj ET 69.75 56.25 456 0.75 re f BT 71.25 31.5 TD /F0 9 Tf -0.0451 Tc 0.0451 Tw (A Supplementary Submission by the Provincial Cities Association of SA) Tj 295.5 0 TD 0 Tc 0 Tw ( ) Tj 45 0 TD -0 Tc (FINAL) Tj 28.5 0 TD 0 Tc ( ) Tj 33 0 TD -0.0679 Tc 0.0679 Tw (August, 2003) Tj 51.75 0 TD /F1 11.25 Tf 0 Tc 0.1875 Tw ( ) Tj -453.75 726 TD /F0 12.75 Tf -0.0625 Tc 0 Tw (4.1) Tj 16.5 0 TD 0 Tc -0.1875 Tw ( ) Tj 26.25 0 TD 0.0576 Tc -0.2451 Tw (Equalised Per Capita Formula) Tj 174.75 0 TD 0 Tc -0.1875 Tw ( ) Tj -217.5 -21 TD /F1 11.25 Tf -0.0044 Tc 2.8458 Tw (The Association has provided information to the IGA, and the OLGC could conduct ) Tj 0 -14.25 TD 0.0623 Tc 0 Tw (furth) Tj 25.5 0 TD -0.0091 Tc 1.2875 Tw (er analysis, that demonstrates the significant variation in gaming machine numbers ) Tj -25.5 -14.25 TD 0.0245 Tc 0.9706 Tw (per 1,000 adults across the Provincial Cities, Victor Harbor, Alexandrina Council and for ) Tj 0 -14.25 TD 0.0921 Tc 0.0954 Tw (the State.) Tj 46.5 0 TD 0 Tc 0.1875 Tw ( ) Tj -46.5 -14.25 TD ( ) Tj 0 -14.25 TD 0.0773 Tc 1.8245 Tw (Table 4.1 shows the latest data for 2001) Tj 209.25 0 TD 0.0038 Tc 0 Tw (-) Tj 3.75 0 TD 0.1098 Tc 1.5777 Tw (02, based on the June 2001 Cen) Tj 165.75 0 TD -0.0617 Tc 0.9992 Tw (sus population ) Tj -378.75 -14.25 TD 0.0375 Tc 0.5 Tw (data. The South Australian average is 12.6 \(per 1,000 adults\), the metropolitan average is ) Tj 0 -14.25 TD 0.0329 Tc 0.1546 Tw (10.8, the Provincial Cities 19.9, ranging across the Cities and Riverland Towns from 30.1 in ) Tj T* 0.0197 Tc 0.1678 Tw (Port Augusta to 12.6 in Murray Bridge.) Tj 195.75 0 TD 0 Tc 0.1875 Tw ( ) Tj -195.75 -14.25 TD ( ) Tj 204.75 -14.25 TD /F0 10.5 Tf 0.0887 Tc 0.2863 Tw (Table 4.1) Tj 43.5 0 TD 0 Tc 0.375 Tw ( ) Tj -117.75 -14.25 TD 0.1115 Tc 0 Tw (Gaming) Tj 39.75 0 TD 0.1014 Tc 0.2736 Tw ( Venues and Machines, 2001) Tj 138.75 0 TD 0.2535 Tc 0 Tw (-) Tj 3.75 0 TD 0 Tc (02) Tj 10.5 0 TD 0.375 Tw ( ) Tj -318 -24.75 TD /F0 9 Tf 0 Tw ( ) Tj 114.75 0 TD -0.1241 Tc 0.1241 Tw (Venues at) Tj 39.75 0 TD 0 Tc 0 Tw ( ) Tj -45 -12.75 TD -0.0249 Tc 0.0249 Tw (30 June 2002) Tj 50.25 0 TD 0 Tc 0 Tw ( ) Tj 18 12.75 TD -0.0984 Tc 0.0984 Tw (Machines at) Tj 48.75 0 TD 0 Tc 0 Tw ( ) Tj -49.5 -12.75 TD -0.0249 Tc 0.0249 Tw (30 June 2002) Tj 50.25 0 TD 0 Tc 0 Tw ( ) Tj 31.5 12.75 TD -0.1488 Tc 0.1488 Tw (Adult ) Tj -12.75 -12.75 TD -0.0674 Tc 0 Tw (Population*) Tj 48.75 0 TD 0 Tc ( ) Tj 22.5 12.75 TD -0.11 Tc 0.11 Tw (Adults per) Tj 42.75 0 TD 0 Tc 0 Tw ( ) Tj -34.5 -12.75 TD -0.15 Tc (Venue) Tj 26.25 0 TD 0 Tc ( ) Tj 27.75 12.75 TD -0.0897 Tc 0.0897 Tw (Machines per ) Tj 3.75 -12.75 TD -0.0671 Tc 0.0671 Tw (1,000 adults) Tj 47.25 0 TD 0 Tc 0 Tw ( ) Tj ET 68.25 568.5 0.75 2.25 re f 68.25 570 2.25 0.75 re f 69.75 568.5 0.75 0.75 re f 69.75 568.5 0.75 0.75 re f 70.5 570 106.5 0.75 re f 70.5 568.5 106.5 0.75 re f 177 570 2.25 0.75 re f 177 568.5 2.25 0.75 re f 179.25 570 65.25 0.75 re f 179.25 568.5 65.25 0.75 re f 244.5 570 2.25 0.75 re f 244.5 568.5 2.25 0.75 re f 246.75 570 66 0.75 re f 246.75 568.5 66 0.75 re f 312.75 570 2.25 0.75 re f 312.75 568.5 2.25 0.75 re f 315 570 66 0.75 re f 315 568.5 66 0.75 re f 381 570 2.25 0.75 re f 381 568.5 2.25 0.75 re f 383.25 570 66 0.75 re f 383.25 568.5 66 0.75 re f 449.25 570 2.25 0.75 re f 449.25 568.5 2.25 0.75 re f 451.5 570 64.5 0.75 re f 451.5 568.5 64.5 0.75 re f 517.5 568.5 0.75 2.25 re f 516 570 2.25 0.75 re f 516 568.5 0.75 0.75 re f 516 568.5 0.75 0.75 re f 69.75 535.5 0.75 33 re f 68.25 535.5 0.75 33 re f 177 535.5 0.75 33 re f 244.5 535.5 0.75 33 re f 312.75 535.5 0.75 33 re f 381 535.5 0.75 33 re f 449.25 535.5 0.75 33 re f 517.5 535.5 0.75 33 re f 516 535.5 0.75 33 re f BT 76.5 525 TD /F1 9 Tf 0.0878 Tc -0.0878 Tw (Victor Harbor \(DC\)) Tj 78.75 0 TD 0 Tc 0 Tw ( ) Tj 57 0 TD (4) Tj 4.5 0 TD ( ) Tj 63 0 TD (122) Tj 13.5 0 TD ( ) Tj 53.25 0 TD (9,136) Tj 20.25 0 TD ( ) Tj 42.75 0 TD (2,284) Tj 20.25 0 TD ( ) Tj 45.75 0 TD (13.4) Tj 15.75 0 TD ( ) Tj ET 69.75 534.75 0.75 0.75 re f 68.25 534.75 0.75 0.75 re f 70.5 534.75 106.5 0.75 re f 177 534.75 0.75 0.75 re f 177.75 534.75 66.75 0.75 re f 244.5 534.75 0.75 0.75 re f 245.25 534.75 67.5 0.75 re f 312.75 534.75 0.75 0.75 re f 313.5 534.75 67.5 0.75 re f 381 534.75 0.75 0.75 re f 381.75 534.75 67.5 0.75 re f 449.25 534.75 0.75 0.75 re f 450 534.75 66 0.75 re f 517.5 534.75 0.75 0.75 re f 516 534.75 0.75 0.75 re f 69.75 522 0.75 12.75 re f 68.25 522 0.75 12.75 re f 177 522 0.75 12.75 re f 244.5 522 0.75 12.75 re f 312.75 522 0.75 12.75 re f 381 522 0.75 12.75 re f 449.25 522 0.75 12.75 re f 517.5 522 0.75 12.75 re f 516 522 0.75 12.75 re f BT 76.5 512.25 TD -0.0544 Tc 0.0544 Tw (Alexandrina \(DC\)) Tj 70.5 0 TD 0 Tc 0 Tw ( ) Tj 60.75 0 TD (13) Tj 9 0 TD ( ) Tj 63 0 TD (287) Tj 13.5 0 TD ( ) Tj 48.75 0 TD (14,045) Tj 24.75 0 TD ( ) Tj 42.75 0 TD (1,080) Tj 20.25 0 TD ( ) Tj 45.75 0 TD (20.4) Tj 15.75 0 TD ( ) Tj ET 69.75 509.25 0.75 12.75 re f 68.25 509.25 0.75 12.75 re f 177 509.25 0.75 12.75 re f 244.5 509.25 0.75 12.75 re f 312.75 509.25 0.75 12.75 re f 381 509.25 0.75 12.75 re f 449.25 509.25 0.75 12.75 re f 517.5 509.25 0.75 12.75 re f 516 509.25 0.75 12.75 re f BT 76.5 499.5 TD -0.0632 Tc 0.0632 Tw (Provincial Cities) Tj 64.5 0 TD 0 Tc 0 Tw ( ) Tj 66.75 0 TD (73) Tj 9 0 TD ( ) Tj 56.25 0 TD (2,079) Tj 20.25 0 TD ( ) Tj 44.25 0 TD (10) Tj 9 0 TD (4,541) Tj 20.25 0 TD ( ) Tj 42.75 0 TD (1,432) Tj 20.25 0 TD ( ) Tj 45.75 0 TD (19.9) Tj 15.75 0 TD ( ) Tj ET 69.75 496.5 0.75 12.75 re f 68.25 496.5 0.75 12.75 re f 177 496.5 0.75 12.75 re f 244.5 496.5 0.75 12.75 re f 312.75 496.5 0.75 12.75 re f 381 496.5 0.75 12.75 re f 449.25 496.5 0.75 12.75 re f 517.5 496.5 0.75 12.75 re f 516 496.5 0.75 12.75 re f BT 76.5 486.75 TD 0.0032 Tc (Metropolitan) Tj 52.5 0 TD 0 Tc ( ) Tj 74.25 0 TD (303) Tj 13.5 0 TD ( ) Tj 56.25 0 TD (9,311) Tj 20.25 0 TD ( ) Tj 44.25 0 TD (858,629) Tj 29.25 0 TD ( ) Tj 42.75 0 TD (2,834) Tj 20.25 0 TD ( ) Tj 45.75 0 TD (10.8) Tj 15.75 0 TD ( ) Tj ET 69.75 483.75 0.75 12.75 re f 68.25 483.75 0.75 12.75 re f 177 483.75 0.75 12.75 re f 244.5 483.75 0.75 12.75 re f 312.75 483.75 0.75 12.75 re f 381 483.75 0.75 12.75 re f 449.25 483.75 0.75 12.75 re f 517.5 483.75 0.75 12.75 re f 516 483.75 0.75 12.75 re f BT 76.5 474 TD 0.123 Tc (Non) Tj 18 0 TD 0.003 Tc (-) Tj 3 0 TD 0.0505 Tc (metropolitan) Tj 52.5 0 TD 0 Tc ( ) Tj 53.25 0 TD (289) Tj 13.5 0 TD ( ) Tj 58.5 0 TD (5336) Tj 18 0 TD ( ) Tj 44.25 0 TD (300,924) Tj 29.25 0 TD ( ) Tj 42.75 0 TD (1,041) Tj 20.25 0 TD ( ) Tj 45.75 0 TD (17.7) Tj 15.75 0 TD ( ) Tj ET 69.75 471 0.75 12.75 re f 68.25 471 0.75 12.75 re f 177 471 0.75 12.75 re f 244.5 471 0.75 12.75 re f 312.75 471 0.75 12.75 re f 381 471 0.75 12.75 re f 449.25 471 0.75 12.75 re f 517.5 471 0.75 12.75 re f 516 471 0.75 12.75 re f BT 76.5 461.25 TD -0.0686 Tc 0.0686 Tw (South Australia) Tj 61.5 0 TD 0 Tc 0 Tw ( ) Tj 65.25 0 TD (592) Tj 13.5 0 TD ( ) Tj 51.75 0 TD (14,647) Tj 24.75 0 TD ( ) Tj 37.5 0 TD (1,159,553) Tj 36 0 TD ( ) Tj 42.75 0 TD (1,959) Tj 20.25 0 TD ( ) Tj 45.75 0 TD (12.6) Tj 15.75 0 TD ( ) Tj ET 69.75 458.25 0.75 12.75 re f 68.25 458.25 0.75 12.75 re f 177 458.25 0.75 12.75 re f 244.5 458.25 0.75 12.75 re f 312.75 458.25 0.75 12.75 re f 381 458.25 0.75 12.75 re f 449.25 458.25 0.75 12.75 re f 517.5 458.25 0.75 12.75 re f 516 458.25 0.75 12.75 re f BT 76.5 446.25 TD /F0 9 Tf 0.25 Tc (Non) Tj 18 0 TD 0.003 Tc (-) Tj 3 0 TD 0.1494 Tc (metro) Tj 24.75 0 TD 0 Tc ( ) Tj 61.5 0.75 TD /F1 9 Tf ( ) Tj 67.5 0 TD ( ) Tj 68.25 0 TD ( ) Tj 68.25 0 TD ( ) Tj 98.25 0 TD ( ) Tj ET 69.75 442.5 0.75 15.75 re f 68.25 442.5 0.75 15.75 re f 177 442.5 0.75 15.75 re f 244.5 442.5 0.75 15.75 re f 312.75 442.5 0.75 15.75 re f 381 442.5 0.75 15.75 re f 449.25 442.5 0.75 15.75 re f 517.5 442.5 0.75 15.75 re f 516 442.5 0.75 15.75 re f BT 76.5 432.75 TD 0.0372 Tc -0.0372 Tw (Mount Gambier) Tj 64.5 0 TD 0 Tc 0 Tw ( ) Tj 66.75 0 TD (13) Tj 9 0 TD ( ) Tj 63 0 TD (434) Tj 13.5 0 TD ( ) Tj 48.75 0 TD (17,357) Tj 24.75 0 TD ( ) Tj 42.75 0 TD (1,335) Tj 20.25 0 TD ( ) Tj 45.75 0 TD (25.0) Tj 15.75 0 TD ( ) Tj ET 69.75 429.75 0.75 12.75 re f 68.25 429.75 0.75 12.75 re f 177 429.75 0.75 12.75 re f 244.5 429.75 0.75 12.75 re f 312.75 429.75 0.75 12.75 re f 381 429.75 0.75 12.75 re f 449.25 429.75 0.75 12.75 re f 517.5 429.75 0.75 12.75 re f 516 429.75 0.75 12.75 re f BT 76.5 420 TD -0.0035 Tc 0.0035 Tw (Murray Bridge) Tj 59.25 0 TD 0 Tc 0 Tw ( ) Tj 76.5 0 TD (6) Tj 4.5 0 TD ( ) Tj 63 0 TD (160) Tj 13.5 0 TD ( ) Tj 48.75 0 TD (12,665) Tj 24.75 0 TD ( ) Tj 42.75 0 TD (2,111) Tj 20.25 0 TD ( ) Tj 45.75 0 TD (12.6) Tj 15.75 0 TD ( ) Tj ET 69.75 417 0.75 12.75 re f 68.25 417 0.75 12.75 re f 177 417 0.75 12.75 re f 244.5 417 0.75 12.75 re f 312.75 417 0.75 12.75 re f 381 417 0.75 12.75 re f 449.25 417 0.75 12.75 re f 517.5 417 0.75 12.75 re f 516 417 0.75 12.75 re f BT 76.5 407.25 TD 0.1028 Tc -0.1028 Tw (Port ) Tj 19.5 0 TD -0.0514 Tc 0 Tw (Augusta) Tj 33.75 0 TD 0 Tc ( ) Tj 78 0 TD (12) Tj 9 0 TD ( ) Tj 63 0 TD (305) Tj 13.5 0 TD ( ) Tj 48.75 0 TD (10,117) Tj 24.75 0 TD ( ) Tj 49.5 0 TD (843) Tj 13.5 0 TD ( ) Tj 45.75 0 TD (30.1) Tj 15.75 0 TD ( ) Tj ET 69.75 404.25 0.75 12.75 re f 68.25 404.25 0.75 12.75 re f 177 404.25 0.75 12.75 re f 244.5 404.25 0.75 12.75 re f 312.75 404.25 0.75 12.75 re f 381 404.25 0.75 12.75 re f 449.25 404.25 0.75 12.75 re f 517.5 404.25 0.75 12.75 re f 516 404.25 0.75 12.75 re f BT 76.5 394.5 TD -0.0977 Tc 0.0977 Tw (Port Pirie) Tj 37.5 0 TD 0 Tc 0 Tw ( ) Tj 98.25 0 TD (7) Tj 4.5 0 TD ( ) Tj 63 0 TD (247) Tj 13.5 0 TD ( ) Tj 48.75 0 TD (13,132) Tj 24.75 0 TD ( ) Tj 42.75 0 TD (1,876) Tj 20.25 0 TD ( ) Tj 45.75 0 TD (18.8) Tj 15.75 0 TD ( ) Tj ET 69.75 391.5 0.75 12.75 re f 68.25 391.5 0.75 12.75 re f 177 391.5 0.75 12.75 re f 244.5 391.5 0.75 12.75 re f 312.75 391.5 0.75 12.75 re f 381 391.5 0.75 12.75 re f 449.25 391.5 0.75 12.75 re f 517.5 391.5 0.75 12.75 re f 516 391.5 0.75 12.75 re f BT 76.5 381.75 TD -0.0686 Tc (Whyalla) Tj 33 0 TD 0 Tc ( ) Tj 102.75 0 TD (7) Tj 4.5 0 TD ( ) Tj 63 0 TD (216) Tj 13.5 0 TD ( ) Tj 48.75 0 TD (16,241) Tj 24.75 0 TD ( ) Tj 42.75 0 TD (2,320) Tj 20.25 0 TD ( ) Tj 45.75 0 TD (13.3) Tj 15.75 0 TD ( ) Tj ET 69.75 378.75 0.75 12.75 re f 68.25 378.75 0.75 12.75 re f 177 378.75 0.75 12.75 re f 244.5 378.75 0.75 12.75 re f 312.75 378.75 0.75 12.75 re f 381 378.75 0.75 12.75 re f 449.25 378.75 0.75 12.75 re f 517.5 378.75 0.75 12.75 re f 516 378.75 0.75 12.75 re f BT 76.5 369 TD -0.1102 Tc 0.1102 Tw (Port Lincoln) Tj 48.75 0 TD 0 Tc 0 Tw ( ) Tj 87 0 TD (7) Tj 4.5 0 TD ( ) Tj 63 0 TD (225) Tj 13.5 0 TD ( ) Tj 48.75 0 TD (10,095) Tj 24.75 0 TD ( ) Tj 42.75 0 TD (1,442) Tj 20.25 0 TD ( ) Tj 45.75 0 TD (22.3) Tj 15.75 0 TD ( ) Tj ET 69.75 366 0.75 12.75 re f 68.25 366 0.75 12.75 re f 177 366 0.75 12.75 re f 244.5 366 0.75 12.75 re f 312.75 366 0.75 12.75 re f 381 366 0.75 12.75 re f 449.25 366 0.75 12.75 re f 517.5 366 0.75 12.75 re f 516 366 0.75 12.75 re f BT 76.5 356.25 TD -0.0487 Tc (Riverland) Tj 39 0 TD 0 Tc ( ) Tj 92.25 0 TD (21) Tj 9 0 TD ( ) Tj 63 0 TD (492) Tj 13.5 0 TD ( ) Tj 48.75 0 TD (24,933) Tj 24.75 0 TD ( ) Tj 42.75 0 TD (1,187) Tj 20.25 0 TD ( ) Tj 45.75 0 TD (19.7) Tj 15.75 0 TD ( ) Tj ET 69.75 348 0.75 18 re f 68.25 348 0.75 18 re f 177 348 0.75 18 re f 244.5 348 0.75 18 re f 312.75 348 0.75 18 re f 381 348 0.75 18 re f 449.25 348 0.75 18 re f 517.5 348 0.75 18 re f 516 348 0.75 18 re f BT 76.5 336 TD /F0 9 Tf 0.0129 Tc -0.0129 Tw (Total Provincial Cities) Tj 92.25 0 TD 0 Tc 0 Tw ( ) Tj 39 2.25 TD /F1 9 Tf (73) Tj 9 0 TD ( ) Tj 58.5 0 TD (2079) Tj 18 0 TD ( ) Tj 44.25 0 TD (104,541) Tj 29.25 0 TD ( ) Tj 42.75 0 TD (1,432) Tj 20.25 0 TD ( ) Tj 45.75 0 TD (19.9) Tj 15.75 0 TD ( ) Tj ET 69.75 332.25 0.75 15.75 re f 68.25 332.25 0.75 15.75 re f 177 332.25 0.75 15.75 re f 244.5 332.25 0.75 15.75 re f 312.75 332.25 0.75 15.75 re f 381 332.25 0.75 15.75 re f 449.25 332.25 0.75 15.75 re f 517.5 332.25 0.75 15.75 re f 516 332.25 0.75 15.75 re f BT 76.5 322.5 TD 0.0495 Tc -0.0495 Tw (Berri Barmera) Tj 56.25 0 TD 0 Tc 0 Tw ( ) Tj 79.5 0 TD (7) Tj 4.5 0 TD ( ) Tj 63 0 TD (184) Tj 13.5 0 TD ( ) Tj 53.25 0 TD (8,498) Tj 20.25 0 TD ( ) Tj 42.75 0 TD (1,2) Tj 11.25 0 TD (14) Tj 9 0 TD ( ) Tj 45.75 0 TD (21.7) Tj 15.75 0 TD ( ) Tj ET 69.75 319.5 0.75 12.75 re f 68.25 319.5 0.75 12.75 re f 177 319.5 0.75 12.75 re f 244.5 319.5 0.75 12.75 re f 312.75 319.5 0.75 12.75 re f 381 319.5 0.75 12.75 re f 449.25 319.5 0.75 12.75 re f 517.5 319.5 0.75 12.75 re f 516 319.5 0.75 12.75 re f BT 76.5 309.75 TD 0.0594 Tc -0.0594 Tw (Renmark Paringa) Tj 70.5 0 TD 0 Tc 0 Tw ( ) Tj 65.25 0 TD (7) Tj 4.5 0 TD ( ) Tj 63 0 TD (160) Tj 13.5 0 TD ( ) Tj 53.25 0 TD (7,309) Tj 20.25 0 TD ( ) Tj 42.75 0 TD (1,044) Tj 20.25 0 TD ( ) Tj 45.75 0 TD (21.9) Tj 15.75 0 TD ( ) Tj ET 69.75 306.75 0.75 12.75 re f 68.25 306.75 0.75 12.75 re f 177 306.75 0.75 12.75 re f 244.5 306.75 0.75 12.75 re f 312.75 306.75 0.75 12.75 re f 381 306.75 0.75 12.75 re f 449.25 306.75 0.75 12.75 re f 517.5 306.75 0.75 12.75 re f 516 306.75 0.75 12.75 re f BT 76.5 297 TD -0.0223 Tc 0.0223 Tw (Loxton Waikerie) Tj 66.75 0 TD 0 Tc 0 Tw ( ) Tj 69 0 TD (7) Tj 4.5 0 TD ( ) Tj 63 0 TD (148) Tj 13.5 0 TD ( ) Tj 53.25 0 TD (9,127) Tj 20.25 0 TD ( ) Tj 42.75 0 TD (1,304) Tj 20.25 0 TD ( ) Tj 45.75 0 TD (16.2) Tj 15.75 0 TD ( ) Tj ET 69.75 294 0.75 12.75 re f 68.25 294 0.75 12.75 re f 68.25 291.75 0.75 2.25 re f 68.25 291.75 2.25 0.75 re f 69.75 293.25 0.75 0.75 re f 69.75 293.25 0.75 0.75 re f 70.5 291.75 106.5 0.75 re f 70.5 293.25 106.5 0.75 re f 177 294 0.75 12.75 re f 177 293.25 2.25 0.75 re f 177 291.75 2.25 0.75 re f 179.25 291.75 65.25 0.75 re f 179.25 293.25 65.25 0.75 re f 244.5 294 0.75 12.75 re f 244.5 293.25 2.25 0.75 re f 244.5 291.75 2.25 0.75 re f 246.75 291.75 66 0.75 re f 246.75 293.25 66 0.75 re f 312.75 294 0.75 12.75 re f 312.75 293.25 2.25 0.75 re f 312.75 291.75 2.25 0.75 re f 315 291.75 66 0.75 re f 315 293.25 66 0.75 re f 381 294 0.75 12.75 re f 381 293.25 2.25 0.75 re f 381 291.75 2.25 0.75 re f 383.25 291.75 66 0.75 re f 383.25 293.25 66 0.75 re f 449.25 294 0.75 12.75 re f 449.25 293.25 2.25 0.75 re f 449.25 291.75 2.25 0.75 re f 451.5 291.75 64.5 0.75 re f 451.5 293.25 64.5 0.75 re f 517.5 294 0.75 12.75 re f 516 294 0.75 12.75 re f 517.5 291.75 0.75 2.25 re f 516 291.75 2.25 0.75 re f 516 293.25 0.75 0.75 re f 516 293.25 0.75 0.75 re f BT 71.25 277.5 TD /F1 8.25 Tf 0.1871 Tc (Note) Tj ET 71.25 276 18 0.75 re f BT 89.25 277.5 TD 0.1875 Tc (:) Tj 2.25 0 TD 0 Tc 0.1875 Tw ( ) Tj 22.5 0 TD -0.2092 Tc 0 Tw (*) Tj 3 0 TD 0 Tc 0.1875 Tw ( ) Tj 11.25 0 TD 0.1806 Tc 0.0069 Tw (Adult population at 30 June 2001.) Tj 128.25 0 TD 0 Tc 0.1875 Tw ( ) Tj -185.25 -10.5 TD 0.011 Tc 0 Tw (Source) Tj ET 71.25 265.5 24.75 0.75 re f BT 96 267 TD 0.1875 Tc (:) Tj 2.25 0 TD 0 Tc 0.1875 Tw ( ) Tj 15.75 0 TD 0.0869 Tc 1.3506 Tw (Office of the Liquor and Gambling Commissioner and ABS, AusStats, Data Cubs, Population Trends and ) Tj -42.75 -10.5 TD 0.1759 Tc 0 Tw (Estimates.) Tj 39 0 TD /F1 11.25 Tf 0 Tc 0.1875 Tw ( ) Tj -39 -13.5 TD ( ) Tj 0 -14.25 TD -0.081 Tc 0.2685 Tw (Table ) Tj 36.75 0 TD 0.0038 Tc 6.2774 Tw (4.2 shows the population for the Provincial Cities, non) Tj 320.25 0 TD 0.0038 Tc 0 Tw (-) Tj 3.75 0 TD 0.0058 Tc 6.1818 Tw (metropolitan and) Tj 0 Tc 0.1875 Tw ( ) Tj -360.75 -14.25 TD 0.0121 Tc 1.9254 Tw (metropolitan South Australia, the current allocation of gaming machines \(in column 2\) ) Tj 0 -14.25 TD 0.01 Tc 2.251 Tw (and the share of total population \(in column 3\). The last column shows the share of ) Tj T* -0.017 Tc 0.9545 Tw (machines rel) Tj 63.75 0 TD -0.0029 Tc 0.607 Tw (ative to the share of population. It is difficult to see how this in any way can ) Tj -63.75 -14.25 TD -0.0438 Tc 0.7 Tw (be justified on some \221needs\222 basis. Table 4.2 illustrates the spatial inequality of the current ) Tj 0 -14.25 TD -0.0097 Tc 3.2549 Tw (system and indicates the magnitude of the adjustment that needs to be made, ) Tj 3.4763 Tc 0 Tw (i) Tj 431.25 0 TD 0.1938 Tc 1.4937 Tw (f an ) Tj -431.25 -14.25 TD -0.0078 Tc 2.0953 Tw (equalised per capita number of machines were to be allocated across the State. These ) Tj 0 -14.25 TD -0.0216 Tc 0.2091 Tw (initial calculations are based on no reduction in the total number of existing machines.) Tj 429.75 0 TD 0 Tc 0.1875 Tw ( ) Tj ET endstream endobj 74 0 obj 17192 endobj 71 0 obj << /Type /Page /Parent 72 0 R /Resources << /Font << /F0 6 0 R /F1 8 0 R >> /ProcSet 2 0 R >> /Contents 73 0 R >> endobj 76 0 obj << /Length 77 0 R >> stream BT 71.25 804 TD 0 0 0 rg /F0 9 Tf -0.0179 Tc 0.0179 Tw (Supplementary Submission to the Inquiry Into the Management of Machine Numbers) Tj 352.5 0 TD 0 Tc 0 Tw ( ) Tj 70.5 0 TD -0 Tc 0 Tw (Page ) Tj 21.75 0 TD 0 Tc 0 Tw (16) Tj 9 0 TD ( ) Tj -453.75 -12.75 TD ( ) Tj ET 69.75 786.75 456 0.75 re f BT 71.25 777 TD ( ) Tj 0 -717 TD /F1 11.25 Tf 0.1875 Tw ( ) Tj 0 -15.75 TD ( ) Tj ET 69.75 56.25 456 0.75 re f BT 71.25 31.5 TD /F0 9 Tf -0.0451 Tc 0.0451 Tw (A Supplementary Submission by the Provincial Cities Association of SA) Tj 295.5 0 TD 0 Tc 0 Tw ( ) Tj 45 0 TD -0 Tc (FINAL) Tj 28.5 0 TD 0 Tc ( ) Tj 33 0 TD -0.0679 Tc 0.0679 Tw (August, 2003) Tj 51.75 0 TD /F1 11.25 Tf 0 Tc 0.1875 Tw ( ) Tj -249 727.5 TD /F0 10.5 Tf 0.0887 Tc 0.2863 Tw (Table 4.2) Tj 43.5 0 TD 0 Tc 0.375 Tw ( ) Tj -152.25 -14.25 TD 0.085 Tc 0.29 Tw (Population by Region, Machine Numbers and Shares) Tj 261 0 TD 0 Tc 0.375 Tw ( ) Tj -313.5 -24.75 TD /F0 9 Tf 0 Tw ( ) Tj 60 0 TD 0.0255 Tc (Population) Tj 45 0 TD 0 Tc ( ) Tj 24 0 TD -0.1237 Tc (Mach) Tj 22.5 0 TD 0.0261 Tc -0.0261 Tw (ine Numbers) Tj 53.25 0 TD 0 Tc 0 Tw ( ) Tj 17.25 0 TD 0.0295 Tc -0.0295 Tw (Share of Population) Tj 81.75 0 TD 0 Tc 0 Tw ( ) Tj 17.25 0 TD -0.0494 Tc 0.0494 Tw (Share of Machines) Tj 75.75 0 TD 0 Tc 0 Tw ( ) Tj ET 64.5 733.5 0.75 2.25 re f 64.5 735 2.25 0.75 re f 66 733.5 0.75 0.75 re f 66 733.5 0.75 0.75 re f 66.75 735 91.5 0.75 re f 66.75 733.5 91.5 0.75 re f 158.25 735 2.25 0.75 re f 158.25 733.5 2.25 0.75 re f 160.5 735 74.25 0.75 re f 160.5 733.5 74.25 0.75 re f 234.75 735 2.25 0.75 re f 234.75 733.5 2.25 0.75 re f 237 735 90.75 0.75 re f 237 733.5 90.75 0.75 re f 327.75 735 2.25 0.75 re f 327.75 733.5 2.25 0.75 re f 330 735 96.75 0.75 re f 330 733.5 96.75 0.75 re f 426.75 735 2.25 0.75 re f 426.75 733.5 2.25 0.75 re f 429 735 90 0.75 re f 429 733.5 90 0.75 re f 520.5 733.5 0.75 2.25 re f 519 735 2.25 0.75 re f 519 733.5 0.75 0.75 re f 519 733.5 0.75 0.75 re f 66 713.25 0.75 20.25 re f 64.5 713.25 0.75 20.25 re f 158.25 713.25 0.75 20.25 re f 234.75 713.25 0.75 20.25 re f 327.75 713.25 0.75 20.25 re f 426.75 713.25 0.75 20.25 re f 520.5 713.25 0.75 20.25 re f 519 713.25 0.75 20.25 re f BT 77.25 701.25 TD /F1 9 Tf -0.0632 Tc 0.0632 Tw (Provincial Cities) Tj 64.5 0 TD 0 Tc 0 Tw ( ) Tj 45 0 TD (104,541) Tj 29.25 0 TD ( ) Tj 58.5 0 TD (2,079) Tj 20.25 0 TD ( ) Tj 82.5 0 TD (9.0) Tj 11.25 0 TD ( ) Tj 77.25 0 TD (14.1) Tj 15.75 0 TD ( ) Tj ET 66 712.5 0.75 0.75 re f 64.5 712.5 0.75 0.75 re f 66.75 712.5 91.5 0.75 re f 158.25 712.5 0.75 0.75 re f 159 712.5 75.75 0.75 re f 234.75 712.5 0.75 0.75 re f 235.5 712.5 92.25 0.75 re f 327.75 712.5 0.75 0.75 re f 328.5 712.5 98.25 0.75 re f 426.75 712.5 0.75 0.75 re f 427.5 712.5 91.5 0.75 re f 520.5 712.5 0.75 0.75 re f 519 712.5 0.75 0.75 re f 66 696.75 0.75 15.75 re f 64.5 696.75 0.75 15.75 re f 158.25 696.75 0.75 15.75 re f 234.75 696.75 0.75 15.75 re f 327.75 696.75 0.75 15.75 re f 426.75 696.75 0.75 15.75 re f 520.5 696.75 0.75 15.75 re f 519 696.75 0.75 15.75 re f BT 77.25 685.5 TD 0.123 Tc (Non) Tj 18 0 TD 0.003 Tc (-) Tj 3 0 TD 0.0032 Tc (Metropolitan) Tj 52.5 0 TD 0 Tc ( ) Tj 36 0 TD (300,924) Tj 29.25 0 TD ( ) Tj 58.5 0 TD (5,386) Tj 20.25 0 TD ( ) Tj 78 0 TD (26.0) Tj 15.75 0 TD ( ) Tj 77.25 0 TD (36.6) Tj 15.75 0 TD ( ) Tj ET 66 681 0.75 15.75 re f 64.5 681 0.75 15.75 re f 158.25 681 0.75 15.75 re f 234.75 681 0.75 15.75 re f 327.75 681 0.75 15.75 re f 426.75 681 0.75 15.75 re f 520.5 681 0.75 15.75 re f 519 681 0.75 15.75 re f BT 77.25 669.75 TD 0.0032 Tc (Metropolitan) Tj 52.5 0 TD 0 Tc ( ) Tj 57 0 TD (858,629) Tj 29.25 0 TD ( ) Tj 58.5 0 TD (9,311) Tj 20.25 0 TD ( ) Tj 78 0 TD (74.0) Tj 15.75 0 TD ( ) Tj 77.25 0 TD (63.4) Tj 15.75 0 TD ( ) Tj ET 66 665.25 0.75 15.75 re f 64.5 665.25 0.75 15.75 re f 64.5 663 0.75 2.25 re f 64.5 663 2.25 0.75 re f 66 664.5 0.75 0.75 re f 66 664.5 0.75 0.75 re f 66.75 663 91.5 0.75 re f 66.75 664.5 91.5 0.75 re f 158.25 665.25 0.75 15.75 re f 158.25 664.5 2.25 0.75 re f 158.25 663 2.25 0.75 re f 160.5 663 74.25 0.75 re f 160.5 664.5 74.25 0.75 re f 234.75 665.25 0.75 15.75 re f 234.75 664.5 2.25 0.75 re f 234.75 663 2.25 0.75 re f 237 663 90.75 0.75 re f 237 664.5 90.75 0.75 re f 327.75 665.25 0.75 15.75 re f 327.75 664.5 2.25 0.75 re f 327.75 663 2.25 0.75 re f 330 663 96.75 0.75 re f 330 664.5 96.75 0.75 re f 426.75 665.25 0.75 15.75 re f 426.75 664.5 2.25 0.75 re f 426.75 663 2.25 0.75 re f 429 663 90 0.75 re f 429 664.5 90 0.75 re f 520.5 665.25 0.75 15.75 re f 519 665.25 0.75 15.75 re f 520.5 663 0.75 2.25 re f 519 663 2.25 0.75 re f 519 664.5 0.75 0.75 re f 519 664.5 0.75 0.75 re f BT 71.25 648.75 TD /F1 8.25 Tf 0.1871 Tc (Note) Tj ET 71.25 647.25 18 0.75 re f BT 89.25 648.75 TD 0.1875 Tc (:) Tj 2.25 0 TD 0 Tc 0.1875 Tw ( ) Tj 22.5 0 TD -0.2092 Tc 0 Tw (*) Tj 3 0 TD 0 Tc 0.1875 Tw ( ) Tj 11.25 0 TD 0.1806 Tc 0.0069 Tw (Adult population at 30 June 2001.) Tj 128.25 0 TD 0 Tc 0.1875 Tw ( ) Tj -185.25 -13.5 TD /F1 11.25 Tf ( ) Tj 0 -14.25 TD -0.0408 Tc 0.764 Tw (For the purposes of the argument, using ) Tj 207.75 0 TD 0.0352 Tc 0.5273 Tw (the situation in Victoria where 20 per cent of the ) Tj -207.75 -14.25 TD 0.0156 Tc 1.6719 Tw (machines are in regional, non) Tj 153.75 0 TD 0.0038 Tc 0 Tw (-) Tj 3.75 0 TD 0.026 Tc 0.8177 Tw (metropolitan Victoria, if South Australia followed a 26/74 ) Tj -157.5 -14.25 TD 0.0211 Tc 4.7914 Tw (per cent per capita formula \(based on our current population shares\), then non) Tj 450 0 TD 0.0038 Tc 0 Tw (-) Tj -450 -14.25 TD 0.0239 Tc 2.7886 Tw (metropolitan South Australia \(with th) Tj 200.25 0 TD 0.02 Tc 2.1362 Tw (e existing state total of 14,697 machines\) should ) Tj -200.25 -14.25 TD 0.1152 Tc 0.9223 Tw (expect to have 3,821 machines \(26 per cent of 14,697\) and metropolitan areas 10,876 \(74 ) Tj 0 -14.25 TD 0.0157 Tc 1.0218 Tw (per cent of 14,697\). This implies that on current machine and population numbers some ) Tj T* -0.0018 Tc 1.3143 Tw (1,565 machines should be remove) Tj 172.5 0 TD -0.0159 Tc 0.9534 Tw (d from non) Tj 57.75 0 TD 0.0038 Tc 0 Tw (-) Tj 3.75 0 TD 0.0187 Tc 0.7688 Tw (metropolitan South Australia and allocated ) Tj -234 -14.25 TD 0.0261 Tc 0.1614 Tw (to the metropolitan area.) Tj 123.75 0 TD 0 Tc 0.1875 Tw ( ) Tj -123.75 -14.25 TD ( ) Tj 0 -14.25 TD -0.0079 Tc 0.4871 Tw (For the Provincial Cities taken as a whole, with 9 per cent of the population, this implies a ) Tj T* 0.0681 Tc 0.1194 Tw (loss \(removal\) of 756 machines, down from 2,079 to 1,323.) Tj 291 0 TD 0 Tc 0.1875 Tw ( ) Tj -291 -14.25 TD ( ) Tj 0 -14.25 TD -0.1115 Tc 1.049 Tw (This result would equa) Tj 116.25 0 TD 0.0287 Tc 0.3896 Tw (lise the ratio of persons to machines \(i.e., State : 14,697 machines to ) Tj -116.25 -14.25 TD 0.024 Tc 0.1635 Tw (1.1 million adults\) across the State to 1 : 79. It would lift the ratio from the current:) Tj 414.75 0 TD 0 Tc 0.1875 Tw ( ) Tj -414.75 -20.25 TD /F4 11.25 Tf 0.075 Tc 0 Tw (\267) Tj 4.5 0 TD /F1 11.25 Tf 0 Tc 0.1875 Tw ( ) Tj 38.25 0 TD -0.0097 Tc 0.1972 Tw (1 : 50 in the Provincial Cities;) Tj 145.5 0 TD 0 Tc 0.1875 Tw ( ) Tj -188.25 -20.25 TD /F4 11.25 Tf 0.075 Tc 0 Tw (\267) Tj 4.5 0 TD /F1 11.25 Tf 0 Tc 0.1875 Tw ( ) Tj 38.25 0 TD 0.1671 Tc 0.0204 Tw (1 : 55 in non) Tj 62.25 0 TD 0.0038 Tc 0 Tw (-) Tj 3.75 0 TD 0.0195 Tc 0.168 Tw (metropolitan South Australia, and reduce t) Tj 215.25 0 TD 0.0025 Tc 0.185 Tw (he ratio of) Tj 51 0 TD 0 Tc 0.1875 Tw ( ) Tj -375 -20.25 TD /F4 11.25 Tf 0.075 Tc 0 Tw (\267) Tj 4.5 0 TD /F1 11.25 Tf 0 Tc 0.1875 Tw ( ) Tj 38.25 0 TD 0.0721 Tc 0.1154 Tw (1 : 92 in the metropolitan area.) Tj 153.75 0 TD 0 Tc 0.1875 Tw ( ) Tj -196.5 -14.25 TD ( ) Tj 0 -14.25 TD -0.0373 Tc 0.1671 Tw (This is consistent with the harm minimisation objective and supported by research findings ) Tj T* -0.0419 Tc 1.4794 Tw (provided to the IGA, showing a statistically significant positive relationship between the ) Tj T* -0.0075 Tc 4.695 Tw (number of machines per adu) Tj 162 0 TD -0.0504 Tc 4.2692 Tw (lt in a jurisdiction and the overall problem gambling) Tj 0 Tc -0.5625 Tw ( ) Tj -162 -14.25 TD 0.0263 Tc 0.1612 Tw (prevalence rate.) Tj 79.5 0 TD 0 Tc 0.1875 Tw ( ) Tj -79.5 -14.25 TD ( ) Tj 0 -14.25 TD -0.0504 Tc 1.7955 Tw (This result is also consistent with the research finding \(of the Productivity Commission, ) Tj T* -0.0149 Tc 0.8948 Tw (SACES, and Delfabbro\) of a positive correlation between the density of gaming machines ) Tj T* 0.2775 Tc 1.035 Tw (in a ju) Tj 33.75 0 TD -0.0198 Tc 0.8502 Tw (risdiction and average gaming expenditure per capita. It would also go some way ) Tj -33.75 -14.25 TD -0.006 Tc 0.1935 Tw (to assist in equalising the \223tax take\224.) Tj 181.5 0 TD 0 Tc 0.1875 Tw ( ) Tj -181.5 -14.25 TD ( ) Tj 0 -14.25 TD -0.0253 Tc 1.4784 Tw (The effect of this change is to provide to the government and the industry a population ) Tj T* -0.0144 Tc 4.2519 Tw (based formula which translates into equivalent) Tj 254.25 0 TD 0.0121 Tc 3.9254 Tw ( shares across the State, in order to) Tj 0 Tc 0.1875 Tw ( ) Tj -254.25 -14.25 TD -0.0443 Tc 0.8087 Tw (distribute gaming machines geographically \(ToR: 2.4\). In addition, it effectively provides ) Tj 0 -14.25 TD -0.0089 Tc 1.1071 Tw (for a statewide, regional and metropolitan cap based on relative population shares \(ToR: ) Tj T* 0.0923 Tc 0.0952 Tw (\(1.3\) \(b\)\).) Tj 45.75 0 TD 0 Tc 0.1875 Tw ( ) Tj -45.75 -14.25 TD ( ) Tj 0 -14.25 TD -0.0111 Tc 1.6986 Tw (An additional benefit ) Tj 116.25 0 TD 0.0156 Tc 2.081 Tw (of this approach is that it provides for an automatic adjustment ) Tj -116.25 -14.25 TD -0.0318 Tc 1.0229 Tw (process to account for population distribution factors every five years, with the release of ) Tj 0 -14.25 TD -0.0162 Tc 0.793 Tw (the ABS Population and Housing Census. The \223needs basis criterion\224 would, under such ) Tj ET endstream endobj 77 0 obj 10143 endobj 75 0 obj << /Type /Page /Parent 72 0 R /Resources << /Font << /F0 6 0 R /F1 8 0 R /F4 25 0 R >> /ProcSet 2 0 R >> /Contents 76 0 R >> endobj 79 0 obj << /Length 80 0 R >> stream BT 71.25 804 TD 0 0 0 rg /F0 9 Tf -0.0179 Tc 0.0179 Tw (Supplementary Submission to the Inquiry Into the Management of Machine Numbers) Tj 352.5 0 TD 0 Tc 0 Tw ( ) Tj 70.5 0 TD -0 Tc 0 Tw (Page ) Tj 21.75 0 TD 0 Tc 0 Tw (17) Tj 9 0 TD ( ) Tj -453.75 -12.75 TD ( ) Tj ET 69.75 786.75 456 0.75 re f BT 71.25 777 TD ( ) Tj 0 -717 TD /F1 11.25 Tf 0.1875 Tw ( ) Tj 0 -15.75 TD ( ) Tj ET 69.75 56.25 456 0.75 re f BT 71.25 31.5 TD /F0 9 Tf -0.0451 Tc 0.0451 Tw (A Supplementary Submission by the Provincial Cities Association of SA) Tj 295.5 0 TD 0 Tc 0 Tw ( ) Tj 45 0 TD -0 Tc (FINAL) Tj 28.5 0 TD 0 Tc ( ) Tj 33 0 TD -0.0679 Tc 0.0679 Tw (August, 2003) Tj 51.75 0 TD /F1 11.25 Tf 0 Tc 0.1875 Tw ( ) Tj -453.75 727.5 TD 0.0143 Tc 1.2982 Tw (a proposal, ) Tj 63 0 TD -0.0098 Tc 1.9281 Tw (be supported or contested by the actual changes in population and not by ) Tj -63 -14.25 TD -0.0675 Tc 0.255 Tw (other largely subjective arguments.) Tj 174 0 TD 0 Tc 0.1875 Tw ( ) Tj -174 -14.25 TD ( ) Tj 0 -14.25 TD -0.0222 Tc 0.2097 Tw (For simplicity, the Adelaide metropolitan area would be treated as one region and the non) Tj 450 0 TD 0.0038 Tc 0 Tw (-) Tj -450 -14.25 TD -0.0352 Tc 0.9727 Tw (metropolitan area as a second region. It is possible th) Tj 273.75 0 TD 0.0319 Tc 0.2806 Tw (at a more sophisticated approach to ) Tj -273.75 -14.25 TD -0.0141 Tc 3.9516 Tw (\223regions/areas\224 could be used, certainly in non) Tj 259.5 0 TD 0.0038 Tc 0 Tw (-) Tj 3.75 0 TD 0.0151 Tc 3.4224 Tw (metropolitan South Australia where) Tj 0 Tc 0.1875 Tw ( ) Tj -263.25 -14.25 TD -0.028 Tc 0.2155 Tw (council areas could be used.) Tj 139.5 0 TD 0 Tc 0.1875 Tw ( ) Tj -139.5 -14.25 TD ( ) Tj 0 -14.25 TD -0.0177 Tc 1.0552 Tw (In support of the Association\222s proposal to set a baseline number of machines per capita, ) Tj T* 0.0863 Tc 1.2262 Tw (we note that the ) Tj 90.75 0 TD 0.0072 Tc 0.7428 Tw (Victorian Casino and Gaming Authority when considering applications ) Tj -90.75 -14.25 TD 0.0318 Tc 3.2057 Tw (for a licence, takes into account the impact of a new application on the number of) Tj 0 Tc 0.1875 Tw ( ) Tj 0 -14.25 TD 0.0347 Tc 0.1528 Tw (machines per capita in a region or council area. ) Tj 243 0 TD 0 Tc 0.1875 Tw ( ) Tj -243 -14.25 TD ( ) Tj 0 -14.25 TD 0.0155 Tc 2.1407 Tw (Additional indicators taken into account by the VCGA ) Tj 294 0 TD -0.0462 Tc 1.6087 Tw (include the EGM density in an ) Tj -294 -14.25 TD -0.0141 Tc 1.6016 Tw (area, the number of persons per venue in a council area, average player losses, average ) Tj 0 -14.25 TD 0.0084 Tc 3.1255 Tw (player losses per machine and the rating of the council area against the ABS Socio) Tj 450 0 TD 0.0038 Tc 0 Tw (-) Tj -450 -14.25 TD 0.0019 Tc 1.5918 Tw (Economic Index for Areas \(SEIFA\). Taken in combination) Tj 300.75 0 TD -0.0273 Tc 0.8576 Tw (, the use of these indicators or ) Tj -300.75 -14.25 TD -0.0112 Tc 2.7987 Tw (data sources represent an attempt to provide a measure of equality of access and to ) Tj 0 -14.25 TD -0.0625 Tc 2.0313 Tw (minimise the possibility of any area having an over) Tj 267.75 0 TD 0.0038 Tc 0 Tw (-) Tj 3.75 0 TD -0.0299 Tc 1.1549 Tw (endowment of machines. Providing ) Tj -271.5 -14.25 TD -0.0188 Tc 3.2063 Tw (protection in this way seeks to ensure that harm minim) Tj 302.25 0 TD -0.0162 Tc 2.0037 Tw (isation is addressed and that ) Tj -302.25 -14.25 TD -0.0531 Tc 0.2406 Tw (vulnerable communities are not exploited.) Tj 209.25 0 TD 0 Tc 0.1875 Tw ( ) Tj -209.25 -14.25 TD ( ) Tj 0 -14.25 TD -0.0339 Tc 2.0214 Tw (The decision of the Victorian Government to impose regional caps in five areas and to ) Tj T* -0.0202 Tc 2.3171 Tw (reduce the number of machines over three years, in four of these areas is one further ) Tj T* -0.035 Tc 3.9725 Tw (example of) Tj 0 Tc 0.1875 Tw ( ) Tj 65.25 0 TD -0.0346 Tc 3.9721 Tw (a policy initiative to ensure greater equality in the spatial allocation of) Tj 0 Tc 0.1875 Tw ( ) Tj -65.25 -14.25 TD -0.0196 Tc 3.2071 Tw (machines, using) Tj 0 Tc -0.5625 Tw ( ) Tj 89.25 0 TD /F3 11.25 Tf -0.0696 Tc 3.2571 Tw (inter alia) Tj 44.25 0 TD /F1 11.25 Tf -0.0155 Tc 2.1197 Tw (, adult population and machine numbers as decision making ) Tj -133.5 -14.25 TD -0.129 Tc 0 Tw (variables.) Tj 47.25 0 TD 0 Tc 0.1875 Tw ( ) Tj -47.25 -14.25 TD ( ) Tj 0 -15 TD /F2 12 Tf -0.0299 Tc 0.0299 Tw (Consideration of the Appropriate Number and a Reduction in Machine Numbers) Tj 425.25 0 TD 0 Tc 0 Tw ( ) Tj -425.25 -20.25 TD /F1 11.25 Tf -0.0164 Tc 0.9539 Tw (This leav) Tj 45 0 TD -0.0384 Tc 0.7713 Tw (es to be considered two important questions, specifically the appropriate number ) Tj -45 -14.25 TD -0.012 Tc 5.762 Tw (of gaming machines and options for reducing the number of machines \(as the) Tj 0 Tc 0.1875 Tw ( ) Tj 0 -14.25 TD -0.076 Tc 0.2635 Tw (redistribution issue has been addressed\).) Tj 201 0 TD 0 Tc 0.1875 Tw ( ) Tj -201 -14.25 TD ( ) Tj 0 -14.25 TD -0.0162 Tc 0.681 Tw (The number of gaming machines has also been shown to be a) Tj 311.25 0 TD -0.1055 Tc 0.293 Tw ( driver of problem gambling. ) Tj -311.25 -14.25 TD -0.0143 Tc 0.4518 Tw (The second component of the Association\222s proposal is that there be a phased reduction in ) Tj 0 -14.25 TD 0.0055 Tc 0.8383 Tw (the number of machines \(and thus an increase in the ratio of adult population to number ) Tj T* 0.0184 Tc 0.1691 Tw (of machines\).) Tj 66.75 0 TD 0 Tc 0.1875 Tw ( ) Tj -66.75 -14.25 TD ( ) Tj 0 -14.25 TD -0.0319 Tc 3.2194 Tw (Any reduction in the number of ma) Tj 195.75 0 TD -0.0217 Tc 2.4592 Tw (chines will increase the ratio of adult persons to ) Tj -195.75 -14.25 TD 0.0058 Tc 3.3067 Tw (machine numbers. Table 4.3 summarises our proposal, that a reduction in machine) Tj 0 Tc 0.1875 Tw ( ) Tj 0 -14.25 TD 0.0073 Tc 1.2114 Tw (numbers occurs, to a level that would results in 10 machines per 1,000 adult persons, or ) Tj T* 0.0289 Tc 1.5086 Tw (equivalently, 1 machine per 100 adu) Tj 188.25 0 TD -0.0357 Tc 0.905 Tw (lts \(i.e., effectively this would raise the ratio from 1 : ) Tj -188.25 -14.25 TD 0.0364 Tc 0.1511 Tw (79 discussed earlier to 1 : 100\).) Tj 152.25 0 TD 0 Tc 0.1875 Tw ( ) Tj -152.25 -14.25 TD ( ) Tj 0 -14.25 TD 0.0398 Tc 1.9156 Tw (The argument for 10 machines per 1,000 adults is based on international and national ) Tj T* 0.0501 Tc 1.2374 Tw (comparisons. In Nova Scotia the ratio of machines per 1,000 adults is 5.1 i) Tj 390.75 0 TD 0.0116 Tc 0.6759 Tw (n hotels and ) Tj -390.75 -14.25 TD 0.0281 Tc 1.5271 Tw (clubs with the ratio for casino shown in brackets \(6.3\), while in Victoria the ratio is 7.5 ) Tj 0 -14.25 TD 0.0943 Tc 0.4682 Tw (\(8.1\), Tasmania 5.2 \(8.5\), Northern Territory 5.1 \(9.7\), while South Australia is 12.2 \(12.9\), ) Tj ET endstream endobj 80 0 obj 6971 endobj 78 0 obj << /Type /Page /Parent 72 0 R /Resources << /Font << /F0 6 0 R /F1 8 0 R /F2 10 0 R /F3 17 0 R >> /ProcSet 2 0 R >> /Contents 79 0 R >> endobj 82 0 obj << /Length 83 0 R >> stream BT 71.25 804 TD 0 0 0 rg /F0 9 Tf -0.0179 Tc 0.0179 Tw (Supplementary Submission to the Inquiry Into the Management of Machine Numbers) Tj 352.5 0 TD 0 Tc 0 Tw ( ) Tj 70.5 0 TD -0 Tc 0 Tw (Page ) Tj 21.75 0 TD 0 Tc 0 Tw (18) Tj 9 0 TD ( ) Tj -453.75 -12.75 TD ( ) Tj ET 69.75 786.75 456 0.75 re f BT 71.25 777 TD ( ) Tj 0 -717 TD /F1 11.25 Tf 0.1875 Tw ( ) Tj 0 -15.75 TD ( ) Tj ET 69.75 56.25 456 0.75 re f BT 71.25 31.5 TD /F0 9 Tf -0.0451 Tc 0.0451 Tw (A Supplementary Submission by the Provincial Cities Association of SA) Tj 295.5 0 TD 0 Tc 0 Tw ( ) Tj 45 0 TD -0 Tc (FINAL) Tj 28.5 0 TD 0 Tc ( ) Tj 33 0 TD -0.0679 Tc 0.0679 Tw (August, 2003) Tj 51.75 0 TD /F1 11.25 Tf 0 Tc 0.1875 Tw ( ) Tj -453.75 727.5 TD 0.1157 Tc 1.4885 Tw (Queensland 13.0 \(14.2\) and NSW 20.2 \(20.5\). While furth) Tj 302.25 0 TD -0.0504 Tc 0.8629 Tw (er statistical tests to assess the ) Tj -302.25 -14.25 TD -0.0019 Tc 2.2787 Tw (level of significance could be conducted on the data analysed by Delfabbro \(2003\), he ) Tj 0 -14.25 TD -0.0207 Tc 0.6698 Tw (concludes that the critical density of EGMs with areas containing higher problem gambler ) Tj T* -0.0155 Tc 0.203 Tw (numbers is 10 EGMs per 1,000 adults.) Tj 188.25 0 TD 0 Tc 0.1875 Tw ( ) Tj -188.25 -14.25 TD ( ) Tj 204.75 -14.25 TD /F0 10.5 Tf -0.0058 Tc 0.3808 Tw (Table 4.) Tj 38.25 0 TD 0 Tc 0 Tw (3) Tj 5.25 0 TD 0.375 Tw ( ) Tj -155.25 -14.25 TD 0.0753 Tc 0.2997 Tw (Reduction of Machines, 10 Machines per 1,000 Adults*) Tj 267 0 TD 0 Tc 0.375 Tw ( ) Tj -354.75 -24 TD /F0 9 Tf 0 Tw ( ) Tj 127.5 0 TD -0.1241 Tc 0.1241 Tw (Venues at) Tj 39.75 0 TD 0 Tc 0 Tw ( ) Tj -45 -12.75 TD -0.0249 Tc 0.0249 Tw (30 June 2002) Tj 50.25 0 TD 0 Tc 0 Tw ( ) Tj 33 12.75 TD -0.0984 Tc 0.0984 Tw (Machines at) Tj 48.75 0 TD 0 Tc 0 Tw ( ) Tj -49.5 -12.75 TD -0.0249 Tc 0.0249 Tw (30 June 2002) Tj 50.25 0 TD 0 Tc 0 Tw ( ) Tj 31.5 12.75 TD -0.0738 Tc 0.0738 Tw (10 machines) Tj 49.5 0 TD 0 Tc 0 Tw ( ) Tj -57 -12.75 TD -0.0707 Tc 0.0707 Tw (per 1,000 Adults) Tj 65.25 0 TD 0 Tc 0 Tw ( ) Tj 36 12.75 TD -0.1235 Tc (Actual) Tj 26.25 0 TD 0 Tc ( ) Tj -33.75 -12.75 TD 0.029 Tc (Reduction) Tj 42 0 TD 0 Tc ( ) Tj ET 68.25 662.25 0.75 2.25 re f 68.25 663.75 2.25 0.75 re f 69.75 662.25 0.75 0.75 re f 69.75 662.25 0.75 0.75 re f 70.5 663.75 111.75 0.75 re f 70.5 662.25 111.75 0.75 re f 182.25 663.75 2.25 0.75 re f 182.25 662.25 2.25 0.75 re f 184.5 663.75 80.25 0.75 re f 184.5 662.25 80.25 0.75 re f 264.75 663.75 2.25 0.75 re f 264.75 662.25 2.25 0.75 re f 267 663.75 79.5 0.75 re f 267 662.25 79.5 0.75 re f 346.5 663.75 2.25 0.75 re f 346.5 662.25 2.25 0.75 re f 348.75 663.75 80.25 0.75 re f 348.75 662.25 80.25 0.75 re f 429 663.75 2.25 0.75 re f 429 662.25 2.25 0.75 re f 431.25 663.75 79.5 0.75 re f 431.25 662.25 79.5 0.75 re f 512.25 662.25 0.75 2.25 re f 510.75 663.75 2.25 0.75 re f 510.75 662.25 0.75 0.75 re f 510.75 662.25 0.75 0.75 re f 69.75 630.75 0.75 31.5 re f 68.25 630.75 0.75 31.5 re f 182.25 630.75 0.75 31.5 re f 264.75 630.75 0.75 31.5 re f 346.5 630.75 0.75 31.5 re f 429 630.75 0.75 31.5 re f 512.25 630.75 0.75 31.5 re f 510.75 630.75 0.75 31.5 re f BT 76.5 620.25 TD /F1 9 Tf 0.0722 Tc -0.0722 Tw (Victor Harbour \(DC\)) Tj 84 0 TD 0 Tc 0 Tw ( ) Tj 68.25 0 TD (4) Tj 4.5 0 TD ( ) Tj 72 0 TD (122) Tj 13.5 0 TD ( ) Tj 69.75 0 TD (91) Tj 9 0 TD ( ) Tj 72.75 0 TD (31) Tj 9 0 TD ( ) Tj ET 69.75 630 0.75 0.75 re f 68.25 630 0.75 0.75 re f 70.5 630 111.75 0.75 re f 182.25 630 0.75 0.75 re f 183 630 81.75 0.75 re f 264.75 630 0.75 0.75 re f 265.5 630 81 0.75 re f 346.5 630 0.75 0.75 re f 347.25 630 81.75 0.75 re f 429 630 0.75 0.75 re f 429.75 630 81 0.75 re f 512.25 630 0.75 0.75 re f 510.75 630 0.75 0.75 re f 69.75 617.25 0.75 12.75 re f 68.25 617.25 0.75 12.75 re f 182.25 617.25 0.75 12.75 re f 264.75 617.25 0.75 12.75 re f 346.5 617.25 0.75 12.75 re f 429 617.25 0.75 12.75 re f 512.25 617.25 0.75 12.75 re f 510.75 617.25 0.75 12.75 re f BT 76.5 607.5 TD -0.0544 Tc 0.0544 Tw (Alexandrina \(DC\)) Tj 70.5 0 TD 0 Tc 0 Tw ( ) Tj 77.25 0 TD (13) Tj 9 0 TD ( ) Tj 72 0 TD (287) Tj 13.5 0 TD ( ) Tj 65.25 0 TD (140) Tj 13.5 0 TD ( ) Tj 68.25 0 TD (147) Tj 13.5 0 TD ( ) Tj ET 69.75 604.5 0.75 12.75 re f 68.25 604.5 0.75 12.75 re f 182.25 604.5 0.75 12.75 re f 264.75 604.5 0.75 12.75 re f 346.5 604.5 0.75 12.75 re f 429 604.5 0.75 12.75 re f 512.25 604.5 0.75 12.75 re f 510.75 604.5 0.75 12.75 re f BT 76.5 594.75 TD -0.0632 Tc 0.0632 Tw (Provincial Cities) Tj 64.5 0 TD 0 Tc 0 Tw ( ) Tj 83.25 0 TD (73) Tj 9 0 TD ( ) Tj 65.25 0 TD (2,079) Tj 20.25 0 TD ( ) Tj 58.5 0 TD (1,045) Tj 20.25 0 TD ( ) Tj 61.5 0 TD (1,034) Tj 20.25 0 TD ( ) Tj ET 69.75 591.75 0.75 12.75 re f 68.25 591.75 0.75 12.75 re f 182.25 591.75 0.75 12.75 re f 264.75 591.75 0.75 12.75 re f 346.5 591.75 0.75 12.75 re f 429 591.75 0.75 12.75 re f 512.25 591.75 0.75 12.75 re f 510.75 591.75 0.75 12.75 re f BT 76.5 582 TD 0.0032 Tc (Metropolitan) Tj 52.5 0 TD 0 Tc ( ) Tj 90.75 0 TD (303) Tj 13.5 0 TD ( ) Tj 65.25 0 TD (9,311) Tj 20.25 0 TD ( ) Tj 58.5 0 TD (8,586) Tj 20.25 0 TD ( ) Tj 68.25 0 TD (725) Tj 13.5 0 TD ( ) Tj ET 69.75 579 0.75 12.75 re f 68.25 579 0.75 12.75 re f 182.25 579 0.75 12.75 re f 264.75 579 0.75 12.75 re f 346.5 579 0.75 12.75 re f 429 579 0.75 12.75 re f 512.25 579 0.75 12.75 re f 510.75 579 0.75 12.75 re f BT 76.5 569.25 TD 0.123 Tc (Non) Tj 18 0 TD 0.003 Tc (-) Tj 3 0 TD 0.0505 Tc (metropolitan) Tj 52.5 0 TD 0 Tc ( ) Tj 69.75 0 TD (289) Tj 13.5 0 TD ( ) Tj 67.5 0 TD (5336) Tj 18 0 TD ( ) Tj 58.5 0 TD (3,009) Tj 20.25 0 TD ( ) Tj 61.5 0 TD (2,327) Tj 20.25 0 TD ( ) Tj ET 69.75 566.25 0.75 12.75 re f 68.25 566.25 0.75 12.75 re f 182.25 566.25 0.75 12.75 re f 264.75 566.25 0.75 12.75 re f 346.5 566.25 0.75 12.75 re f 429 566.25 0.75 12.75 re f 512.25 566.25 0.75 12.75 re f 510.75 566.25 0.75 12.75 re f BT 76.5 556.5 TD -0.0686 Tc 0.0686 Tw (South Australia) Tj 61.5 0 TD 0 Tc 0 Tw ( ) Tj 81.75 0 TD (592) Tj 13.5 0 TD ( ) Tj 60.75 0 TD (14,647) Tj 24.75 0 TD ( ) Tj 54 0 TD (11,596) Tj 24.75 0 TD ( ) Tj 61.5 0 TD (3,051) Tj 20.25 0 TD ( ) Tj ET 69.75 553.5 0.75 12.75 re f 68.25 553.5 0.75 12.75 re f 182.25 553.5 0.75 12.75 re f 264.75 553.5 0.75 12.75 re f 346.5 553.5 0.75 12.75 re f 429 553.5 0.75 12.75 re f 512.25 553.5 0.75 12.75 re f 510.75 553.5 0.75 12.75 re f BT 76.5 541.5 TD /F0 9 Tf 0.25 Tc (Non) Tj 18 0 TD 0.003 Tc (-) Tj 3 0 TD 0.1494 Tc (metro) Tj 24.75 0 TD 0 Tc ( ) Tj 66.75 0.75 TD /F1 9 Tf ( ) Tj 82.5 0 TD ( ) Tj 164.25 0 TD ( ) Tj ET 69.75 537.75 0.75 15.75 re f 68.25 537.75 0.75 15.75 re f 182.25 537.75 0.75 15.75 re f 264.75 537.75 0.75 15.75 re f 346.5 537.75 0.75 15.75 re f 429 537.75 0.75 15.75 re f 512.25 537.75 0.75 15.75 re f 510.75 537.75 0.75 15.75 re f BT 76.5 528 TD 0.0372 Tc -0.0372 Tw (Mount Gambier) Tj 64.5 0 TD 0 Tc 0 Tw ( ) Tj 83.25 0 TD (13) Tj 9 0 TD ( ) Tj 72 0 TD (434) Tj 13.5 0 TD ( ) Tj 65.25 0 TD (174) Tj 13.5 0 TD ( ) Tj 68.25 0 TD (260) Tj 13.5 0 TD ( ) Tj ET 69.75 525 0.75 12.75 re f 68.25 525 0.75 12.75 re f 182.25 525 0.75 12.75 re f 264.75 525 0.75 12.75 re f 346.5 525 0.75 12.75 re f 429 525 0.75 12.75 re f 512.25 525 0.75 12.75 re f 510.75 525 0.75 12.75 re f BT 76.5 515.25 TD -0.0035 Tc 0.0035 Tw (Murray Bridge) Tj 59.25 0 TD 0 Tc 0 Tw ( ) Tj 93 0 TD (6) Tj 4.5 0 TD ( ) Tj 72 0 TD (160) Tj 13.5 0 TD ( ) Tj 65.25 0 TD (127) Tj 13.5 0 TD ( ) Tj 72.75 0 TD (33) Tj 9 0 TD ( ) Tj ET 69.75 512.25 0.75 12.75 re f 68.25 512.25 0.75 12.75 re f 182.25 512.25 0.75 12.75 re f 264.75 512.25 0.75 12.75 re f 346.5 512.25 0.75 12.75 re f 429 512.25 0.75 12.75 re f 512.25 512.25 0.75 12.75 re f 510.75 512.25 0.75 12.75 re f BT 76.5 502.5 TD 0.0046 Tc -0.0046 Tw (Port Augusta) Tj 53.25 0 TD 0 Tc 0 Tw ( ) Tj 94.5 0 TD (12) Tj 9 0 TD ( ) Tj 72 0 TD (305) Tj 13.5 0 TD ( ) Tj 65.25 0 TD (101) Tj 13.5 0 TD ( ) Tj 68.25 0 TD (204) Tj 13.5 0 TD ( ) Tj ET 69.75 499.5 0.75 12.75 re f 68.25 499.5 0.75 12.75 re f 182.25 499.5 0.75 12.75 re f 264.75 499.5 0.75 12.75 re f 346.5 499.5 0.75 12.75 re f 429 499.5 0.75 12.75 re f 512.25 499.5 0.75 12.75 re f 510.75 499.5 0.75 12.75 re f BT 76.5 489.75 TD -0.0977 Tc 0.0977 Tw (Port Pirie) Tj 37.5 0 TD 0 Tc 0 Tw ( ) Tj 114.75 0 TD (7) Tj 4.5 0 TD ( ) Tj 72 0 TD (247) Tj 13.5 0 TD ( ) Tj 65.25 0 TD (131) Tj 13.5 0 TD ( ) Tj 68.25 0 TD (116) Tj 13.5 0 TD ( ) Tj ET 69.75 486.75 0.75 12.75 re f 68.25 486.75 0.75 12.75 re f 182.25 486.75 0.75 12.75 re f 264.75 486.75 0.75 12.75 re f 346.5 486.75 0.75 12.75 re f 429 486.75 0.75 12.75 re f 512.25 486.75 0.75 12.75 re f 510.75 486.75 0.75 12.75 re f BT 76.5 477 TD -0.0686 Tc (Whyalla) Tj 33 0 TD 0 Tc ( ) Tj 119.25 0 TD (7) Tj 4.5 0 TD ( ) Tj 72 0 TD (216) Tj 13.5 0 TD ( ) Tj 65.25 0 TD (162) Tj 13.5 0 TD ( ) Tj 72.75 0 TD (54) Tj 9 0 TD ( ) Tj ET 69.75 474 0.75 12.75 re f 68.25 474 0.75 12.75 re f 182.25 474 0.75 12.75 re f 264.75 474 0.75 12.75 re f 346.5 474 0.75 12.75 re f 429 474 0.75 12.75 re f 512.25 474 0.75 12.75 re f 510.75 474 0.75 12.75 re f BT 76.5 464.25 TD -0.1102 Tc 0.1102 Tw (Port Lincoln) Tj 48.75 0 TD 0 Tc 0 Tw ( ) Tj 103.5 0 TD (7) Tj 4.5 0 TD ( ) Tj 72 0 TD (225) Tj 13.5 0 TD ( ) Tj 65.25 0 TD (101) Tj 13.5 0 TD ( ) Tj 68.25 0 TD (124) Tj 13.5 0 TD ( ) Tj ET 69.75 461.25 0.75 12.75 re f 68.25 461.25 0.75 12.75 re f 182.25 461.25 0.75 12.75 re f 264.75 461.25 0.75 12.75 re f 346.5 461.25 0.75 12.75 re f 429 461.25 0.75 12.75 re f 512.25 461.25 0.75 12.75 re f 510.75 461.25 0.75 12.75 re f BT 76.5 451.5 TD -0.0487 Tc (Riverland) Tj 39 0 TD 0 Tc ( ) Tj 108.75 0 TD (21) Tj 9 0 TD ( ) Tj 72 0 TD (492) Tj 13.5 0 TD ( ) Tj 65.25 0 TD (249) Tj 13.5 0 TD ( ) Tj 68.25 0 TD (243) Tj 13.5 0 TD ( ) Tj ET 69.75 448.5 0.75 12.75 re f 68.25 448.5 0.75 12.75 re f 182.25 448.5 0.75 12.75 re f 264.75 448.5 0.75 12.75 re f 346.5 448.5 0.75 12.75 re f 429 448.5 0.75 12.75 re f 512.25 448.5 0.75 12.75 re f 510.75 448.5 0.75 12.75 re f BT 76.5 436.5 TD /F0 9 Tf 0.0129 Tc -0.0129 Tw (Total Provincial Cities) Tj 92.25 0 TD 0 Tc 0 Tw ( ) Tj 55.5 0 TD (73) Tj 9 0 TD ( ) Tj 65.25 0 TD (2,079) Tj 20.25 0 TD ( ) Tj 58.5 0 TD (1,045) Tj 20.25 0 TD ( ) Tj 61.5 0 TD (1,034) Tj 20.25 0 TD ( ) Tj ET 69.75 432.75 0.75 15.75 re f 68.25 432.75 0.75 15.75 re f 182.25 432.75 0.75 15.75 re f 264.75 432.75 0.75 15.75 re f 346.5 432.75 0.75 15.75 re f 429 432.75 0.75 15.75 re f 512.25 432.75 0.75 15.75 re f 510.75 432.75 0.75 15.75 re f BT 76.5 423 TD /F1 9 Tf 0.0495 Tc -0.0495 Tw (Berri Barmera) Tj 56.25 0 TD 0 Tc 0 Tw ( ) Tj 96 0 TD (7) Tj 4.5 0 TD ( ) Tj 72 0 TD (184) Tj 13.5 0 TD ( ) Tj 69.75 0 TD (85) Tj 9 0 TD ( ) Tj 72.75 0 TD (99) Tj 9 0 TD ( ) Tj ET 69.75 420 0.75 12.75 re f 68.25 420 0.75 12.75 re f 182.25 420 0.75 12.75 re f 264.75 420 0.75 12.75 re f 346.5 420 0.75 12.75 re f 429 420 0.75 12.75 re f 512.25 420 0.75 12.75 re f 510.75 420 0.75 12.75 re f BT 76.5 410.25 TD 0.0594 Tc -0.0594 Tw (Renmark Paringa) Tj 70.5 0 TD 0 Tc 0 Tw ( ) Tj 81.75 0 TD (7) Tj 4.5 0 TD ( ) Tj 72 0 TD (160) Tj 13.5 0 TD ( ) Tj 69.75 0 TD (73) Tj 9 0 TD ( ) Tj 72.75 0 TD (87) Tj 9 0 TD ( ) Tj ET 69.75 407.25 0.75 12.75 re f 68.25 407.25 0.75 12.75 re f 182.25 407.25 0.75 12.75 re f 264.75 407.25 0.75 12.75 re f 346.5 407.25 0.75 12.75 re f 429 407.25 0.75 12.75 re f 512.25 407.25 0.75 12.75 re f 510.75 407.25 0.75 12.75 re f BT 76.5 397.5 TD -0.0223 Tc 0.0223 Tw (Loxton Waikerie) Tj 66.75 0 TD 0 Tc 0 Tw ( ) Tj 85.5 0 TD (7) Tj 4.5 0 TD ( ) Tj 72 0 TD (148) Tj 13.5 0 TD ( ) Tj 69.75 0 TD (91) Tj 9 0 TD ( ) Tj 72.75 0 TD (57) Tj 9 0 TD ( ) Tj ET 69.75 394.5 0.75 12.75 re f 68.25 394.5 0.75 12.75 re f 68.25 392.25 0.75 2.25 re f 68.25 392.25 2.25 0.75 re f 69.75 393.75 0.75 0.75 re f 69.75 393.75 0.75 0.75 re f 70.5 392.25 111.75 0.75 re f 70.5 393.75 111.75 0.75 re f 182.25 394.5 0.75 12.75 re f 182.25 393.75 2.25 0.75 re f 182.25 392.25 2.25 0.75 re f 184.5 392.25 80.25 0.75 re f 184.5 393.75 80.25 0.75 re f 264.75 394.5 0.75 12.75 re f 264.75 393.75 2.25 0.75 re f 264.75 392.25 2.25 0.75 re f 267 392.25 79.5 0.75 re f 267 393.75 79.5 0.75 re f 346.5 394.5 0.75 12.75 re f 346.5 393.75 2.25 0.75 re f 346.5 392.25 2.25 0.75 re f 348.75 392.25 80.25 0.75 re f 348.75 393.75 80.25 0.75 re f 429 394.5 0.75 12.75 re f 429 393.75 2.25 0.75 re f 429 392.25 2.25 0.75 re f 431.25 392.25 79.5 0.75 re f 431.25 393.75 79.5 0.75 re f 512.25 394.5 0.75 12.75 re f 510.75 394.5 0.75 12.75 re f 512.25 392.25 0.75 2.25 re f 510.75 392.25 2.25 0.75 re f 510.75 393.75 0.75 0.75 re f 510.75 393.75 0.75 0.75 re f BT 71.25 381 TD /F1 8.25 Tf 0.1871 Tc (Note) Tj ET 71.25 379.5 18 0.75 re f BT 89.25 381 TD 0.1875 Tc (:) Tj 2.25 0 TD 0 Tc 0.1875 Tw ( ) Tj 22.5 0 TD -0.2092 Tc 0 Tw (*) Tj 3 0 TD 0 Tc 0.1875 Tw ( ) Tj 11.25 0 TD 0.1806 Tc 0.0069 Tw (Adult population at 30 June 2001.) Tj 128.25 0 TD 0 Tc 0.1875 Tw ( ) Tj -185.25 -10.5 TD 0.011 Tc 0 Tw (Source) Tj ET 71.25 369 24.75 0.75 re f BT 96 370.5 TD 0.1875 Tc (:) Tj 2.25 0 TD 0 Tc 0.1875 Tw ( ) Tj 15.75 0 TD 0.1513 Tc 2.2862 Tw (Office of th) Tj 46.5 0 TD 0.0915 Tc 1.7691 Tw (e Liquor and Gambling Commissioner and ABS, AusStats, Data Cubs, Population Trends & ) Tj -46.5 -10.5 TD 0.1759 Tc 0 Tw (Estimates.) Tj 39 0 TD 0 Tc 0.1875 Tw ( ) Tj -81.75 -13.5 TD /F1 11.25 Tf ( ) Tj 0 -14.25 TD 0.0106 Tc 1.7769 Tw (As shown in Table 4.3 this implies a reduction of 1,034 machines across the Provincial ) Tj T* 0.0669 Tc 1.5629 Tw (Cities and a total reduction in 3,051 for South Australia. The actual r) Tj 365.25 0 TD 0.0293 Tc 0.6582 Tw (eduction for each ) Tj -365.25 -14.25 TD -0.0018 Tc 0.1893 Tw (city and the Riverland towns is shown in the last column.) Tj 287.25 0 TD 0 Tc 0.1875 Tw ( ) Tj -287.25 -14.25 TD ( ) Tj 0 -14.25 TD 0.0201 Tc 1.2924 Tw (Table 4.4 contrasts the average per venue now and the average per venue to achieve 10 ) Tj T* 0.0557 Tc 0.1318 Tw (machine per 1,000 adults.) Tj 129 0 TD 0 Tc 0.1875 Tw ( ) Tj -129 -14.25 TD ( ) Tj 0 -14.25 TD 0.0737 Tc 0.9215 Tw (This is not a dramatic reduction, given that as at 30 June 2002, t) Tj 329.25 0 TD -0.0317 Tc 0.5942 Tw (he prevalence of gaming ) Tj -329.25 -14.25 TD 0.0505 Tc 0.787 Tw (machines for the whole of South Australia was 12.5 machines per 1,000 adults, a density ) Tj 0 -14.25 TD -0.0745 Tc 0.262 Tw (only slightly above the recommended benchmark.) Tj 248.25 0 TD 0 Tc 0.1875 Tw ( ) Tj -248.25 -14.25 TD ( ) Tj 0 -14.25 TD -0.0479 Tc 0.2854 Tw (In order to minimise dislocation to the industry it is recommended that a five year phase) Tj 440.25 0 TD 0.0038 Tc 0 Tw (-) Tj 3.75 0 TD -0.0356 Tc 0.2231 Tw (in ) Tj -444 -14.25 TD -0.0313 Tc 0 Tw (per) Tj 16.5 0 TD -0.0294 Tc 1.8575 Tw (iod be allowed. This period has been chosen to enable a fair adjustment period for ) Tj -16.5 -14.25 TD -0.0229 Tc 3.2104 Tw (industry to substantially reduce or pay) Tj 207.75 0 TD 0.0038 Tc 0 Tw (-) Tj 3.75 0 TD -0 Tc 2.8128 Tw (off capital borrowings, to write) Tj 165.75 0 TD 0.0038 Tc 0 Tw (-) Tj 3.75 0 TD -0.0356 Tc 0.9731 Tw (down existing ) Tj -381 -14.25 TD -0.0008 Tc 0.5922 Tw (machines and to provide for the gradual relocation of machines across and within regi) Tj 436.5 0 TD -0.07 Tc -0.4925 Tw (ons ) Tj -436.5 -14.25 TD -0.0186 Tc 0.2061 Tw (\(as approved by the OLGC\).) Tj 141 0 TD 0 Tc 0.1875 Tw ( ) Tj ET endstream endobj 83 0 obj 15591 endobj 81 0 obj << /Type /Page /Parent 72 0 R /Resources << /Font << /F0 6 0 R /F1 8 0 R >> /ProcSet 2 0 R >> /Contents 82 0 R >> endobj 85 0 obj << /Length 86 0 R >> stream BT 71.25 804 TD 0 0 0 rg /F0 9 Tf -0.0179 Tc 0.0179 Tw (Supplementary Submission to the Inquiry Into the Management of Machine Numbers) Tj 352.5 0 TD 0 Tc 0 Tw ( ) Tj 70.5 0 TD -0 Tc 0 Tw (Page ) Tj 21.75 0 TD 0 Tc 0 Tw (19) Tj 9 0 TD ( ) Tj -453.75 -12.75 TD ( ) Tj ET 69.75 786.75 456 0.75 re f BT 71.25 777 TD ( ) Tj 0 -717 TD /F1 11.25 Tf 0.1875 Tw ( ) Tj 0 -15.75 TD ( ) Tj ET 69.75 56.25 456 0.75 re f BT 71.25 31.5 TD /F0 9 Tf -0.0451 Tc 0.0451 Tw (A Supplementary Submission by the Provincial Cities Association of SA) Tj 295.5 0 TD 0 Tc 0 Tw ( ) Tj 45 0 TD -0 Tc (FINAL) Tj 28.5 0 TD 0 Tc ( ) Tj 33 0 TD -0.0679 Tc 0.0679 Tw (August, 2003) Tj 51.75 0 TD /F1 11.25 Tf 0 Tc 0.1875 Tw ( ) Tj -249 727.5 TD /F0 10.5 Tf 0.0887 Tc 0.2863 Tw (Table 4.4) Tj 43.5 0 TD 0 Tc 0.375 Tw ( ) Tj -181.5 -14.25 TD 0.0553 Tc 0.3197 Tw (New Average Per Venue \(Based on 10 Machines per 1,000 Adults\)) Tj 320.25 0 TD 0 Tc 0.375 Tw ( ) Tj -379.5 -24 TD /F0 9 Tf 0 Tw ( ) Tj 171.75 0 TD -0.1241 Tc 0.1241 Tw (Venues at ) Tj 42 0 TD 0 Tc 0 Tw ( ) Tj -47.25 -12.75 TD -0.0249 Tc 0.0249 Tw (30 June 2002) Tj 50.25 0 TD 0 Tc 0 Tw ( ) Tj 40.5 12.75 TD 0.0489 Tc -0.0489 Tw (Average per) Tj 50.25 0 TD 0 Tc 0 Tw ( ) Tj -47.25 -12.75 TD -0.0315 Tc 0.0315 Tw (venue now) Tj 45 0 TD 0 Tc 0 Tw ( ) Tj 36.75 12.75 TD -0.0174 Tc 0.0174 Tw (Average per Venue) Tj 78.75 0 TD 0 Tc 0 Tw ( ) Tj -82.5 -12.75 TD -0.0548 Tc 0.0548 Tw (at 10 per 1,000 Adults) Tj 86.25 0 TD 0 Tc 0 Tw ( ) Tj ET 68.25 733.5 0.75 2.25 re f 68.25 735 2.25 0.75 re f 69.75 733.5 0.75 0.75 re f 69.75 733.5 0.75 0.75 re f 70.5 735 154.5 0.75 re f 70.5 733.5 154.5 0.75 re f 225 735 2.25 0.75 re f 225 733.5 2.25 0.75 re f 227.25 735 88.5 0.75 re f 227.25 733.5 88.5 0.75 re f 315.75 735 2.25 0.75 re f 315.75 733.5 2.25 0.75 re f 318 735 88.5 0.75 re f 318 733.5 88.5 0.75 re f 406.5 735 2.25 0.75 re f 406.5 733.5 2.25 0.75 re f 408.75 735 104.25 0.75 re f 408.75 733.5 104.25 0.75 re f 514.5 733.5 0.75 2.25 re f 513 735 2.25 0.75 re f 513 733.5 0.75 0.75 re f 513 733.5 0.75 0.75 re f 69.75 702 0.75 31.5 re f 68.25 702 0.75 31.5 re f 225 702 0.75 31.5 re f 315.75 702 0.75 31.5 re f 406.5 702 0.75 31.5 re f 514.5 702 0.75 31.5 re f 513 702 0.75 31.5 re f BT 78.75 691.5 TD /F1 9 Tf 0.0722 Tc -0.0722 Tw (Victor Harbour \(DC\)) Tj 84 0 TD 0 Tc 0 Tw ( ) Tj 111.75 0 TD (4) Tj 4.5 0 TD ( ) Tj 81.75 0 TD (31) Tj 9 0 TD ( ) Tj 98.25 0 TD (23) Tj 9 0 TD ( ) Tj ET 69.75 701.25 0.75 0.75 re f 68.25 701.25 0.75 0.75 re f 70.5 701.25 154.5 0.75 re f 225 701.25 0.75 0.75 re f 225.75 701.25 90 0.75 re f 315.75 701.25 0.75 0.75 re f 316.5 701.25 90 0.75 re f 406.5 701.25 0.75 0.75 re f 407.25 701.25 105.75 0.75 re f 514.5 701.25 0.75 0.75 re f 513 701.25 0.75 0.75 re f 69.75 688.5 0.75 12.75 re f 68.25 688.5 0.75 12.75 re f 225 688.5 0.75 12.75 re f 315.75 688.5 0.75 12.75 re f 406.5 688.5 0.75 12.75 re f 514.5 688.5 0.75 12.75 re f 513 688.5 0.75 12.75 re f BT 78.75 678.75 TD -0.0544 Tc 0.0544 Tw (Alexandrina \(DC\)) Tj 70.5 0 TD 0 Tc 0 Tw ( ) Tj 120.75 0 TD (13) Tj 9 0 TD ( ) Tj 81.75 0 TD (22) Tj 9 0 TD ( ) Tj 98.25 0 TD (11) Tj 9 0 TD ( ) Tj ET 69.75 675.75 0.75 12.75 re f 68.25 675.75 0.75 12.75 re f 225 675.75 0.75 12.75 re f 315.75 675.75 0.75 12.75 re f 406.5 675.75 0.75 12.75 re f 514.5 675.75 0.75 12.75 re f 513 675.75 0.75 12.75 re f BT 78.75 666 TD -0.0133 Tc (Provinc) Tj 30.75 0 TD -0.102 Tc 0.102 Tw (ial Cities) Tj 33.75 0 TD 0 Tc 0 Tw ( ) Tj 126.75 0 TD (73) Tj 9 0 TD ( ) Tj 81.75 0 TD (28) Tj 9 0 TD ( ) Tj 98.25 0 TD (14) Tj 9 0 TD ( ) Tj ET 69.75 663 0.75 12.75 re f 68.25 663 0.75 12.75 re f 225 663 0.75 12.75 re f 315.75 663 0.75 12.75 re f 406.5 663 0.75 12.75 re f 514.5 663 0.75 12.75 re f 513 663 0.75 12.75 re f BT 78.75 653.25 TD 0.0032 Tc (Metropolitan) Tj 52.5 0 TD 0 Tc ( ) Tj 134.25 0 TD (303) Tj 13.5 0 TD ( ) Tj 81.75 0 TD (31) Tj 9 0 TD ( ) Tj 98.25 0 TD (28) Tj 9 0 TD ( ) Tj ET 69.75 650.25 0.75 12.75 re f 68.25 650.25 0.75 12.75 re f 225 650.25 0.75 12.75 re f 315.75 650.25 0.75 12.75 re f 406.5 650.25 0.75 12.75 re f 514.5 650.25 0.75 12.75 re f 513 650.25 0.75 12.75 re f BT 78.75 640.5 TD 0.123 Tc (Non) Tj 18 0 TD 0.003 Tc (-) Tj 3 0 TD 0.0505 Tc (metropolitan) Tj 52.5 0 TD 0 Tc ( ) Tj 113.25 0 TD (289) Tj 13.5 0 TD ( ) Tj 81.75 0 TD (18) Tj 9 0 TD ( ) Tj 98.25 0 TD (10) Tj 9 0 TD ( ) Tj ET 69.75 637.5 0.75 12.75 re f 68.25 637.5 0.75 12.75 re f 225 637.5 0.75 12.75 re f 315.75 637.5 0.75 12.75 re f 406.5 637.5 0.75 12.75 re f 514.5 637.5 0.75 12.75 re f 513 637.5 0.75 12.75 re f BT 78.75 627.75 TD -0.0686 Tc 0.0686 Tw (South Australia) Tj 61.5 0 TD 0 Tc 0 Tw ( ) Tj 125.25 0 TD (592) Tj 13.5 0 TD ( ) Tj 81.75 0 TD (25) Tj 9 0 TD ( ) Tj 98.25 0 TD (20) Tj 9 0 TD ( ) Tj ET 69.75 624.75 0.75 12.75 re f 68.25 624.75 0.75 12.75 re f 225 624.75 0.75 12.75 re f 315.75 624.75 0.75 12.75 re f 406.5 624.75 0.75 12.75 re f 514.5 624.75 0.75 12.75 re f 513 624.75 0.75 12.75 re f BT 78.75 612.75 TD /F0 9 Tf 0.25 Tc (Non) Tj 18 0 TD 0.003 Tc (-) Tj 3 0 TD 0.1494 Tc (metro) Tj 24.75 0 TD 0 Tc ( ) Tj 101.25 0 TD /F1 9 Tf ( ) Tj 90.75 0 TD ( ) Tj 90.75 0 TD ( ) Tj ET 69.75 609 0.75 15.75 re f 68.25 609 0.75 15.75 re f 225 609 0.75 15.75 re f 315.75 609 0.75 15.75 re f 406.5 609 0.75 15.75 re f 514.5 609 0.75 15.75 re f 513 609 0.75 15.75 re f BT 78.75 599.25 TD 0.0372 Tc -0.0372 Tw (Mount Gambier) Tj 64.5 0 TD 0 Tc 0 Tw ( ) Tj 126.75 0 TD (13) Tj 9 0 TD ( ) Tj 81.75 0 TD (33) Tj 9 0 TD ( ) Tj 98.25 0 TD (13) Tj 9 0 TD ( ) Tj ET 69.75 596.25 0.75 12.75 re f 68.25 596.25 0.75 12.75 re f 225 596.25 0.75 12.75 re f 315.75 596.25 0.75 12.75 re f 406.5 596.25 0.75 12.75 re f 514.5 596.25 0.75 12.75 re f 513 596.25 0.75 12.75 re f BT 78.75 586.5 TD -0.0035 Tc 0.0035 Tw (Murray Bridge) Tj 59.25 0 TD 0 Tc 0 Tw ( ) Tj 136.5 0 TD (6) Tj 4.5 0 TD ( ) Tj 81.75 0 TD (27) Tj 9 0 TD ( ) Tj 98.25 0 TD (21) Tj 9 0 TD ( ) Tj ET 69.75 583.5 0.75 12.75 re f 68.25 583.5 0.75 12.75 re f 225 583.5 0.75 12.75 re f 315.75 583.5 0.75 12.75 re f 406.5 583.5 0.75 12.75 re f 514.5 583.5 0.75 12.75 re f 513 583.5 0.75 12.75 re f BT 78.75 573.75 TD 0.0046 Tc -0.0046 Tw (Port Augusta) Tj 53.25 0 TD 0 Tc 0 Tw ( ) Tj 138 0 TD (12) Tj 9 0 TD ( ) Tj 81.75 0 TD (25) Tj 9 0 TD ( ) Tj 102.75 0 TD (8) Tj 4.5 0 TD ( ) Tj ET 69.75 570.75 0.75 12.75 re f 68.25 570.75 0.75 12.75 re f 225 570.75 0.75 12.75 re f 315.75 570.75 0.75 12.75 re f 406.5 570.75 0.75 12.75 re f 514.5 570.75 0.75 12.75 re f 513 570.75 0.75 12.75 re f BT 78.75 561 TD -0.0977 Tc 0.0977 Tw (Port Pirie) Tj 37.5 0 TD 0 Tc 0 Tw ( ) Tj 158.25 0 TD (7) Tj 4.5 0 TD ( ) Tj 81.75 0 TD (35) Tj 9 0 TD ( ) Tj 98.25 0 TD (19) Tj 9 0 TD ( ) Tj ET 69.75 558 0.75 12.75 re f 68.25 558 0.75 12.75 re f 225 558 0.75 12.75 re f 315.75 558 0.75 12.75 re f 406.5 558 0.75 12.75 re f 514.5 558 0.75 12.75 re f 513 558 0.75 12.75 re f BT 78.75 548.25 TD -0.0686 Tc (Whyalla) Tj 33 0 TD 0 Tc ( ) Tj 162.75 0 TD (7) Tj 4.5 0 TD ( ) Tj 81.75 0 TD (31) Tj 9 0 TD ( ) Tj 98.25 0 TD (23) Tj 9 0 TD ( ) Tj ET 69.75 545.25 0.75 12.75 re f 68.25 545.25 0.75 12.75 re f 225 545.25 0.75 12.75 re f 315.75 545.25 0.75 12.75 re f 406.5 545.25 0.75 12.75 re f 514.5 545.25 0.75 12.75 re f 513 545.25 0.75 12.75 re f BT 78.75 535.5 TD -0.1102 Tc 0.1102 Tw (Port Lincoln) Tj 48.75 0 TD 0 Tc 0 Tw ( ) Tj 147 0 TD (7) Tj 4.5 0 TD ( ) Tj 81.75 0 TD (32) Tj 9 0 TD ( ) Tj 98.25 0 TD (14) Tj 9 0 TD ( ) Tj ET 69.75 532.5 0.75 12.75 re f 68.25 532.5 0.75 12.75 re f 225 532.5 0.75 12.75 re f 315.75 532.5 0.75 12.75 re f 406.5 532.5 0.75 12.75 re f 514.5 532.5 0.75 12.75 re f 513 532.5 0.75 12.75 re f BT 78.75 522.75 TD -0.0487 Tc (Riverland) Tj 39 0 TD 0 Tc ( ) Tj 152.25 0 TD (21) Tj 9 0 TD ( ) Tj 81.75 0 TD (2) Tj 4.5 0 TD (3) Tj 4.5 0 TD ( ) Tj 98.25 0 TD (12) Tj 9 0 TD ( ) Tj ET 69.75 519.75 0.75 12.75 re f 68.25 519.75 0.75 12.75 re f 225 519.75 0.75 12.75 re f 315.75 519.75 0.75 12.75 re f 406.5 519.75 0.75 12.75 re f 514.5 519.75 0.75 12.75 re f 513 519.75 0.75 12.75 re f BT 78.75 507.75 TD /F0 9 Tf 0.0129 Tc -0.0129 Tw (Total Provincial Cities) Tj 92.25 0 TD 0 Tc 0 Tw ( ) Tj 99 1.5 TD (73) Tj 9 0 TD ( ) Tj 81.75 0 TD (28) Tj 9 0 TD ( ) Tj 98.25 0 TD (14) Tj 9 0 TD ( ) Tj ET 69.75 504 0.75 15.75 re f 68.25 504 0.75 15.75 re f 225 504 0.75 15.75 re f 315.75 504 0.75 15.75 re f 406.5 504 0.75 15.75 re f 514.5 504 0.75 15.75 re f 513 504 0.75 15.75 re f BT 78.75 494.25 TD /F1 9 Tf 0.0495 Tc -0.0495 Tw (Berri Barmera) Tj 56.25 0 TD 0 Tc 0 Tw ( ) Tj 139.5 0 TD (7) Tj 4.5 0 TD ( ) Tj 81.75 0 TD (26) Tj 9 0 TD ( ) Tj 98.25 0 TD (12) Tj 9 0 TD ( ) Tj ET 69.75 491.25 0.75 12.75 re f 68.25 491.25 0.75 12.75 re f 225 491.25 0.75 12.75 re f 315.75 491.25 0.75 12.75 re f 406.5 491.25 0.75 12.75 re f 514.5 491.25 0.75 12.75 re f 513 491.25 0.75 12.75 re f BT 78.75 481.5 TD 0.0594 Tc -0.0594 Tw (Renmark Paringa) Tj 70.5 0 TD 0 Tc 0 Tw ( ) Tj 125.25 0 TD (7) Tj 4.5 0 TD ( ) Tj 81.75 0 TD (23) Tj 9 0 TD ( ) Tj 98.25 0 TD (10) Tj 9 0 TD ( ) Tj ET 69.75 478.5 0.75 12.75 re f 68.25 478.5 0.75 12.75 re f 225 478.5 0.75 12.75 re f 315.75 478.5 0.75 12.75 re f 406.5 478.5 0.75 12.75 re f 514.5 478.5 0.75 12.75 re f 513 478.5 0.75 12.75 re f BT 78.75 468.75 TD -0.0223 Tc 0.0223 Tw (Loxton Waikerie) Tj 66.75 0 TD 0 Tc 0 Tw ( ) Tj 129 0 TD (7) Tj 4.5 0 TD ( ) Tj 81.75 0 TD (21) Tj 9 0 TD ( ) Tj 98.25 0 TD (13) Tj 9 0 TD ( ) Tj ET 69.75 465.75 0.75 12.75 re f 68.25 465.75 0.75 12.75 re f 68.25 463.5 0.75 2.25 re f 68.25 463.5 2.25 0.75 re f 69.75 465 0.75 0.75 re f 69.75 465 0.75 0.75 re f 70.5 463.5 154.5 0.75 re f 70.5 465 154.5 0.75 re f 225 465.75 0.75 12.75 re f 225 465 2.25 0.75 re f 225 463.5 2.25 0.75 re f 227.25 463.5 88.5 0.75 re f 227.25 465 88.5 0.75 re f 315.75 465.75 0.75 12.75 re f 315.75 465 2.25 0.75 re f 315.75 463.5 2.25 0.75 re f 318 463.5 88.5 0.75 re f 318 465 88.5 0.75 re f 406.5 465.75 0.75 12.75 re f 406.5 465 2.25 0.75 re f 406.5 463.5 2.25 0.75 re f 408.75 463.5 104.25 0.75 re f 408.75 465 104.25 0.75 re f 514.5 465.75 0.75 12.75 re f 513 465.75 0.75 12.75 re f 514.5 463.5 0.75 2.25 re f 513 463.5 2.25 0.75 re f 513 465 0.75 0.75 re f 513 465 0.75 0.75 re f BT 71.25 452.25 TD /F1 8.25 Tf 0.1871 Tc (Note) Tj ET 71.25 450.75 18 0.75 re f BT 89.25 452.25 TD 0.1875 Tc (:) Tj 2.25 0 TD 0 Tc 0.1875 Tw ( ) Tj 22.5 0 TD -0.2092 Tc 0 Tw (*) Tj 3 0 TD 0 Tc 0.1875 Tw ( ) Tj 11.25 0 TD 0.1806 Tc 0.0069 Tw (Adult population at 30 June 2001.) Tj 128.25 0 TD 0 Tc 0.1875 Tw ( ) Tj -185.25 -10.5 TD 0.011 Tc 0 Tw (Source) Tj ET 71.25 440.25 24.75 0.75 re f BT 96 441.75 TD 0.1875 Tc (:) Tj 2.25 0 TD 0 Tc 0.1875 Tw ( ) Tj 15.75 0 TD 0.0752 Tc 2.0161 Tw (Office of the Liquor and Gambling Commissioner and ABS, AusStats, Data Cubs, Population Trend) Tj 396.75 0 TD 0.2918 Tc 0.6457 Tw (s & ) Tj -396.75 -10.5 TD 0.1759 Tc 0 Tw (Estimates.) Tj 39 0 TD 0 Tc 0.1875 Tw ( ) Tj -81.75 -13.5 TD /F1 11.25 Tf ( ) Tj 0 -14.25 TD -0.0256 Tc 3.2131 Tw (An additional benefit of this re) Tj 168 0 TD 0.0038 Tc 0 Tw (-) Tj 3.75 0 TD -0.0469 Tc 2.3177 Tw (allocation process is that it redistributes the profits of ) Tj -171.75 -14.25 TD 0.0157 Tc 3.3449 Tw (machines to a greater number of licence holders, whereas the current freeze or cap) Tj 0 Tc 0.1875 Tw ( ) Tj 0 -14.25 TD -0.0374 Tc 1.7249 Tw (reinforces the entrenched position of existing licence holders. ) Tj 321.75 0 TD -0.1021 Tc 0.6646 Tw (The proposal also resolves ) Tj -321.75 -14.25 TD -0.0234 Tc 1.2109 Tw (the issue of transferability rights, which should not be entertained in any case unless the ) Tj 0 -14.25 TD -0.0236 Tc 2.7826 Tw (licence holder has previously paid for the licence \(and the expected stream of future ) Tj T* 0.0294 Tc 0.9081 Tw (income\), which is not the case in South Australia. ) Tj 258 0 TD 0.0127 Tc 0.8177 Tw ( Under this proposal, machines can be ) Tj -258 -14.25 TD 0.0042 Tc 0.1833 Tw (given up at any time, but not transferred. Machines can be reassigned or reallocated at the ) Tj 0 -14.25 TD -0.0076 Tc 0.1951 Tw (time the population/machine number ratio is recalculated.) Tj 293.25 0 TD 0 Tc 0.1875 Tw ( ) Tj -293.25 -14.25 TD ( ) Tj 0 -14.25 TD -0.0784 Tc 0.2659 Tw (This proposal, therefore addresses a number of issues:) Tj 267.75 0 TD 0 Tc 0.1875 Tw ( ) Tj -267.75 -20.25 TD /F4 11.25 Tf 0.075 Tc 0 Tw (\267) Tj 4.5 0 TD /F1 11.25 Tf 0 Tc 0.1875 Tw ( ) Tj 38.25 0 TD 0.037 Tc 1.2755 Tw (it does a) Tj 43.5 0 TD 0.0118 Tc 0.868 Tw (way with the freeze, imposes a population to machine ratio \(which is in ) Tj -43.5 -14.25 TD -0.0184 Tc 2.1881 Tw (effect a cap\) and assists to redistribute the profits from gaming machines to a ) Tj 0 -14.25 TD -0.0742 Tc 0.2617 Tw (wider group of licence holders;) Tj 154.5 0 TD 0 Tc 0.1875 Tw ( ) Tj -197.25 -20.25 TD /F4 11.25 Tf 0.075 Tc 0 Tw (\267) Tj 4.5 0 TD /F1 11.25 Tf 0 Tc 0.1875 Tw ( ) Tj 38.25 0 TD -0.0117 Tc 0.5742 Tw (the proposal has an in) Tj 112.5 0 TD 0.0038 Tc 0 Tw (-) Tj 3.75 0 TD 0.0593 Tc 0.1282 Tw (built, 5 year adjustment mechanism, which can a) Tj 246 0 TD -0.0896 Tc -0.4729 Tw (dequately ) Tj -362.25 -14.25 TD 0.0066 Tc 0.1809 Tw (deal with the transfer of machines;) Tj 174 0 TD 0 Tc 0.1875 Tw ( ) Tj -216.75 -20.25 TD /F4 11.25 Tf 0.075 Tc 0 Tw (\267) Tj 4.5 0 TD /F1 11.25 Tf 0 Tc 0.1875 Tw ( ) Tj 38.25 0 TD -0.0082 Tc 0.4684 Tw (treats all South Australian\222s equally, while allowing for adjustment based on non) Tj 407.25 0 TD 0.0038 Tc 0 Tw (-) Tj -407.25 -14.25 TD 0.0156 Tc 4.9219 Tw (contentious, population data and trends and thus is able to deal with a) Tj 0 Tc 0.1875 Tw ( ) Tj 0 -14.25 TD -0.0063 Tc 0.1938 Tw (population increase or decrease;) Tj 160.5 0 TD 0 Tc 0.1875 Tw ( ) Tj -203.25 -20.25 TD /F4 11.25 Tf 0.075 Tc 0 Tw (\267) Tj 4.5 0 TD /F1 11.25 Tf 0 Tc 0.1875 Tw ( ) Tj 38.25 0 TD -0.0024 Tc 2.4399 Tw (it protects against) Tj 93 0 TD -0.0516 Tc 2.1557 Tw ( potentially vulnerable regions maintaining a high density of ) Tj -93 -14.25 TD -0.0437 Tc 0 Tw (machines;) Tj 50.25 0 TD 0 Tc 0.1875 Tw ( ) Tj ET endstream endobj 86 0 obj 14356 endobj 84 0 obj << /Type /Page /Parent 72 0 R /Resources << /Font << /F0 6 0 R /F1 8 0 R /F4 25 0 R >> /ProcSet 2 0 R >> /Contents 85 0 R >> endobj 88 0 obj << /Length 89 0 R >> stream BT 71.25 804 TD 0 0 0 rg /F0 9 Tf -0.0179 Tc 0.0179 Tw (Supplementary Submission to the Inquiry Into the Management of Machine Numbers) Tj 352.5 0 TD 0 Tc 0 Tw ( ) Tj 70.5 0 TD -0 Tc 0 Tw (Page ) Tj 21.75 0 TD 0 Tc 0 Tw (20) Tj 9 0 TD ( ) Tj -453.75 -12.75 TD ( ) Tj ET 69.75 786.75 456 0.75 re f BT 71.25 777 TD ( ) Tj 0 -717 TD /F1 11.25 Tf 0.1875 Tw ( ) Tj 0 -15.75 TD ( ) Tj ET 69.75 56.25 456 0.75 re f BT 71.25 31.5 TD /F0 9 Tf -0.0451 Tc 0.0451 Tw (A Supplementary Submission by the Provincial Cities Association of SA) Tj 295.5 0 TD 0 Tc 0 Tw ( ) Tj 45 0 TD -0 Tc (FINAL) Tj 28.5 0 TD 0 Tc ( ) Tj 33 0 TD -0.0679 Tc 0.0679 Tw (August, 2003) Tj 51.75 0 TD /F1 11.25 Tf 0 Tc 0.1875 Tw ( ) Tj -453.75 727.5 TD /F4 11.25 Tf 0.075 Tc 0 Tw (\267) Tj 4.5 0 TD /F1 11.25 Tf 0 Tc 0.1875 Tw ( ) Tj 38.25 0 TD -0.0252 Tc 1.3089 Tw (it potentially could allow for a \223tourism clause or exemption\224 whereby a region ) Tj 0 -14.25 TD -0.0313 Tc 0.9063 Tw (\(i.e., Councils, licence hotels and interested parties together\) argued for a slightly ) Tj T* -0.0317 Tc 0.2192 Tw (higher ratio su) Tj 72.75 0 TD 0.0782 Tc 0.1093 Tw (ch as 11 machines per 1,000 adults;) Tj 177 0 TD 0 Tc 0.1875 Tw ( ) Tj -292.5 -20.25 TD /F4 11.25 Tf 0.075 Tc 0 Tw (\267) Tj 4.5 0 TD /F1 11.25 Tf 0 Tc 0.1875 Tw ( ) Tj 38.25 0 TD -0.0079 Tc 3.8204 Tw (in such a situation the revenue from the additional machine would not be) Tj 0 Tc 0.1875 Tw ( ) Tj 0 -14.25 TD -0.0437 Tc 1.5437 Tw (allocated to the venue, but be distributed between Treasury for general revenue ) Tj T* -0.0237 Tc 1.1658 Tw (and the local Council for tourism development. The venue would r) Tj 346.5 0 TD -0.0494 Tc 0.7369 Tw (eceive a host ) Tj -346.5 -14.25 TD -0.0227 Tc 0.2102 Tw (fee from the Council) Tj 102 3 TD /F1 7.5 Tf 0 Tc 0 Tw (15) Tj 7.5 -3 TD /F1 11.25 Tf 0.1603 Tc 0.0272 Tw (; and) Tj 25.5 0 TD 0 Tc 0.1875 Tw ( ) Tj -177.75 -20.25 TD /F4 11.25 Tf 0.075 Tc 0 Tw (\267) Tj 4.5 0 TD /F1 11.25 Tf 0 Tc 0.1875 Tw ( ) Tj 38.25 0 TD -0.0261 Tc 0.7905 Tw (metropolitan Adelaide would be treated as one region \(with only the Casino able ) Tj 0 -14.25 TD -0.011 Tc 0.1985 Tw (to apply for the \223tourism clause\224 if such were to exist\).) Tj 273 0 TD 0 Tc 0.1875 Tw ( ) Tj -315.75 -14.25 TD ( ) Tj 0 -14.25 TD -0.0096 Tc 0.1971 Tw (There is one additional component of the proposal worthy of elaboration an) Tj 378.75 0 TD -0.0947 Tc 0.2822 Tw (d discussion.) Tj 63.75 0 TD 0 Tc 0.1875 Tw ( ) Tj -442.5 -14.25 TD ( ) Tj 0 -14.25 TD ( ) Tj 0 -15 TD /F2 12 Tf -0.0265 Tc 0.0265 Tw (Application of A Community Benefit Levy) Tj 225 0 TD 0 Tc 0 Tw ( ) Tj -225 -20.25 TD /F1 11.25 Tf -0.0097 Tc 0.7266 Tw (In setting a base number \(10 machines per 1,000 adults\) it is likely that debate will ensure ) Tj 0 -14.25 TD -0.0142 Tc 1.1517 Tw (about the appropriateness of the base number. The base number has been nominated to ) Tj T* -0.0669 Tc 1.0044 Tw (provide some certainty) Tj 115.5 0 TD -0.0241 Tc 0.4616 Tw ( for industry and for government. However, we recognise that this ) Tj -115.5 -14.25 TD -0.1108 Tc 0.2983 Tw (is likely to be contested.) Tj 117 0 TD 0 Tc 0.1875 Tw ( ) Tj -117 -14.25 TD ( ) Tj 0 -14.25 TD 0.0174 Tc 1.188 Tw (However, we recommend that the base number of 10 machines per 1,000 adults become ) Tj T* -0.0285 Tc 0.216 Tw (binding. It is the basis of a transparent system.) Tj 234 0 TD 0 Tc 0.1875 Tw ( ) Tj -234 -14.25 TD ( ) Tj 0 -14.25 TD 0.0043 Tc 4.6832 Tw (In a situation where a spec) Tj 156.75 0 TD -0.018 Tc 3.9555 Tw (ial case is advanced, perhaps on the basis of tourism,) Tj 0 Tc 0.1875 Tw ( ) Tj -156.75 -14.25 TD 0.0042 Tc 1.7369 Tw (demographic characteristics such as age or the lack of entertainment facilities, and it is ) Tj 0 -14.25 TD 0.026 Tc 0.3022 Tw (considered that the ratio should be increased to say 11 machines per 1,000 adults, then the ) Tj T* -0.0848 Tc 0.2723 Tw (licensee should on) Tj 90.75 0 TD -0.0358 Tc 0.2233 Tw (ly be paid a fee to host the additional machines.) Tj 237.75 0 TD 0 Tc 0.1875 Tw ( ) Tj -328.5 -14.25 TD ( ) Tj 0 -14.25 TD -0.0319 Tc 0.9225 Tw (This is because any case, which would need to be established by the Council, the licensee ) Tj T* -0.0444 Tc 2.078 Tw (and community representatives, would be based not on \223need\224 \(for ostensibly a liquor ) Tj T* -0.0186 Tc 1.4061 Tw (licence and gambling\), but on ) Tj 158.25 0 TD -0.056 Tc 1.2435 Tw (a true community benefit test. The first element of this is ) Tj -158.25 -14.25 TD -0.0293 Tc 1.5762 Tw (that the three parties must be involved. The second element is, that in consideration of ) Tj 0 -14.25 TD 0.0102 Tc 0.1773 Tw (granting what we call \221exemptions\222, the exemption has a local and specific purpose.) Tj 417.75 0 TD 0 Tc 0.1875 Tw ( ) Tj -417.75 -14.25 TD ( ) Tj 0 -14.25 TD -0.0352 Tc 0.9727 Tw (The additional reven) Tj 105 0 TD -0.0308 Tc 0.2183 Tw (ue from the granting of any additional machines would be distributed ) Tj -105 -14.25 TD -0.044 Tc 0.693 Tw (to Treasury, the relevant local council and thirdly, for problem gambling services \(because ) Tj 0 -14.25 TD -0.0503 Tc 0.2378 Tw (of the higher density of machines\). The licensee would be paid a host fee only.) Tj 391.5 0 TD 0 Tc 0.1875 Tw ( ) Tj -391.5 -14.25 TD ( ) Tj 0 -14.25 TD -0.0177 Tc 0.2052 Tw (Examples of a) Tj 69.75 0 TD -0.0519 Tc 0.2394 Tw ( true community benefit test might include:) Tj 215.25 0 TD 0 Tc 0.1875 Tw ( ) Tj -285 -20.25 TD /F4 11.25 Tf 0.075 Tc 0 Tw (\267) Tj 4.5 0 TD /F1 11.25 Tf 0 Tc 0.1875 Tw ( ) Tj 38.25 0 TD -0 Tc 2.3803 Tw (it might be argued that in a regional community there are few entertainment ) Tj 0 -14.25 TD -0.0211 Tc 0.2503 Tw (options for young people and that is why they attend the local hotels. If this is the ) Tj T* -0.0163 Tc 1.7038 Tw (case, then even leaving aside community concern) Tj 255 0 TD -0.052 Tc 0.9895 Tw (s relating to young people and ) Tj -255 -14.25 TD -0.0654 Tc 3.5654 Tw (drink driving, the high rate of young males \(especially\) injured or killed on) Tj 0 Tc 0.1875 Tw ( ) Tj 0 -14.25 TD -0 Tc 3.9378 Tw (country roads, and community concern regarding young males and alcohol) Tj 0 Tc -0.5625 Tw ( ) Tj T* -0.0098 Tc 1.6973 Tw (consumption; then the need is not for more poker machines, but for alternati) Tj 399.75 0 TD -0.2475 Tc 0.435 Tw (ve ) Tj -442.5 -36.75 TD 0 Tc 0.1875 Tw ( ) Tj 90 0 TD ( ) Tj ET 71.25 87 144 0.75 re f BT 215.25 84.75 TD ( ) Tj -144 -9 TD /F1 5.25 Tf 0.375 Tc 0 Tw (15) Tj 6 -2.25 TD /F1 8.25 Tf 0 Tc 0.1875 Tw ( ) Tj 2.25 0 TD ( ) Tj 34.5 0 TD -0.0103 Tc 0.1978 Tw (In practice, the revenue would be the average of all machines.) Tj 226.5 0 TD 0 Tc 0.1875 Tw ( ) Tj ET endstream endobj 89 0 obj 6988 endobj 87 0 obj << /Type /Page /Parent 72 0 R /Resources << /Font << /F0 6 0 R /F1 8 0 R /F2 10 0 R /F4 25 0 R >> /ProcSet 2 0 R >> /Contents 88 0 R >> endobj 92 0 obj << /Length 93 0 R >> stream BT 71.25 804 TD 0 0 0 rg /F0 9 Tf -0.0179 Tc 0.0179 Tw (Supplementary Submission to the Inquiry Into the Management of Machine Numbers) Tj 352.5 0 TD 0 Tc 0 Tw ( ) Tj 70.5 0 TD -0 Tc 0 Tw (Page ) Tj 21.75 0 TD 0 Tc 0 Tw (21) Tj 9 0 TD ( ) Tj -453.75 -12.75 TD ( ) Tj ET 69.75 786.75 456 0.75 re f BT 71.25 777 TD ( ) Tj 0 -717 TD /F1 11.25 Tf 0.1875 Tw ( ) Tj 0 -15.75 TD ( ) Tj ET 69.75 56.25 456 0.75 re f BT 71.25 31.5 TD /F0 9 Tf -0.0451 Tc 0.0451 Tw (A Supplementary Submission by the Provincial Cities Association of SA) Tj 295.5 0 TD 0 Tc 0 Tw ( ) Tj 45 0 TD -0 Tc (FINAL) Tj 28.5 0 TD 0 Tc ( ) Tj 33 0 TD -0.0679 Tc 0.0679 Tw (August, 2003) Tj 51.75 0 TD /F1 11.25 Tf 0 Tc 0.1875 Tw ( ) Tj -411 727.5 TD -0.0188 Tc 2.2956 Tw (recreation options. The real need, and the true community benefit test, is for ) Tj 0 -14.25 TD -0.0223 Tc 0.2098 Tw (alternative entertainment options;) Tj 169.5 0 TD 0 Tc 0.1875 Tw ( ) Tj -212.25 -20.25 TD /F4 11.25 Tf 0.075 Tc 0 Tw (\267) Tj 4.5 0 TD /F1 11.25 Tf 0 Tc 0.1875 Tw ( ) Tj 38.25 0 TD -0.001 Tc 0.5385 Tw (it might be argued, that for example, Victor Harbor has a higher aged and retired ) Tj 0 -14.25 TD -0.0324 Tc 0.5949 Tw (population who have a higher demand for gambling servi) Tj 291.75 0 TD -0.0846 Tc 0.1471 Tw (ces. The need is equally ) Tj -291.75 -14.25 TD -0.0379 Tc 0.6629 Tw (for improved services for the aged and specific infrastructure to enhance mobility ) Tj 0 -14.25 TD -0.0154 Tc 0.9529 Tw (\(from ramped pavements to community bus services\). The Census data for 1996 ) Tj T* -0.0089 Tc 0.1964 Tw (and 2001 provide evidence of these demographic shifts. The City of Vi) Tj 352.5 0 TD 0.0015 Tc 0.186 Tw (ctor Harbor ) Tj -352.5 -14.25 TD -0.0496 Tc 1.6794 Tw (would be required to allocate additional revenue to aged services and facilities. ) Tj 0 -14.25 TD -0.0384 Tc 2.7066 Tw (The basis of \221need\222 is not for additional gaming machines but because Victor ) Tj T* -0.0294 Tc 0.4513 Tw (Harbor has a higher aged or retired population. This is the true community need. ) Tj T* -0.0412 Tc 0 Tw (I) Tj 3.75 0 TD -0.0097 Tc 3.465 Tw (t is the basis on which any increase in the number of machines would be) Tj 0 Tc 0.1875 Tw ( ) Tj -3.75 -14.25 TD 0.0912 Tc 0.0963 Tw (countenanced; ) Tj 76.5 0 TD 0 Tc 0.1875 Tw ( ) Tj -119.25 -20.25 TD /F4 11.25 Tf 0.075 Tc 0 Tw (\267) Tj 4.5 0 TD /F1 11.25 Tf 0 Tc 0.1875 Tw ( ) Tj 38.25 0 TD -0.0301 Tc 1.2176 Tw (the case might be argued that a region is a \221special tourism region\222 for interstate ) Tj 0 -14.25 TD -0.0272 Tc 0.7504 Tw (and international visitors. Again, it follows if the case of a special tourism reg) Tj 395.25 0 TD -0.0712 Tc 0.2587 Tw (ion ) Tj -395.25 -14.25 TD 0.0051 Tc 2.9097 Tw (can be substantiated, that tourism facilities and infrastructure to support the ) Tj 0 -14.25 TD -0.0328 Tc 4.8036 Tw (industry represent the true community benefit test, both economically and) Tj 0 Tc 0.1875 Tw ( ) Tj T* -0.0472 Tc 2.9463 Tw (socially. Tourists are not visiting the region to access gaming machines, but ) Tj T* 0.026 Tc 1.1615 Tw (rather, the region ) Tj 94.5 0 TD -0.0259 Tc 1.5634 Tw (has some intrinsic value or special characteristics. Hotels are ) Tj -94.5 -14.25 TD -0.0141 Tc 0.2016 Tw (but one part of the tourism industry; and) Tj 204.75 0 TD 0 Tc 0.1875 Tw ( ) Tj -247.5 -20.25 TD /F4 11.25 Tf 0.075 Tc 0 Tw (\267) Tj 4.5 0 TD /F1 11.25 Tf 0 Tc 0.1875 Tw ( ) Tj 38.25 0 TD -0.0507 Tc 2.0109 Tw (in outer metropolitan Adelaide a newly established community or suburb may ) Tj 0 -14.25 TD -0.0243 Tc 1.3709 Tw (consist of young families, perhaps with both partners working. The comm) Tj 384.75 0 TD -0.0555 Tc -0.507 Tw (unity ) Tj -384.75 -14.25 TD -0.0794 Tc 1.6305 Tw (benefit test is likely to be related to the need for child) Tj 276.75 0 TD 0.0038 Tc 0 Tw (-) Tj 3.75 0 TD -0.0017 Tc 0.5642 Tw (care facilities, after school ) Tj -280.5 -14.25 TD -0.0125 Tc 4.1 Tw (care, recreation facilities and a community bus to access regional shopping) Tj 0 Tc -0.5625 Tw ( ) Tj 0 -14.25 TD -0.0514 Tc 1.9697 Tw (facilities. The experience of newly established suburbs such as Seaford Rise or ) Tj T* -0.1247 Tc 0 Tw (befo) Tj 21 0 TD -0.0183 Tc 2.0183 Tw (re that, Golden Grove and even Elizabeth, demonstrates the need for such ) Tj -21 -14.25 TD -0.0279 Tc 1.0335 Tw (facilities. Additional electronic gaming machines above some per capita formula ) Tj 0 -14.25 TD -0.0274 Tc 2.6257 Tw (cannot reasonably be argued to be meeting the need of the community or to ) Tj T* -0.012 Tc 0.1995 Tw (represent a true community n) Tj 148.5 0 TD -0.0534 Tc 0 Tw (eed.) Tj 20.25 0 TD 0 Tc 0.1875 Tw ( ) Tj -211.5 -14.25 TD ( ) Tj 0 -14.25 TD ( ) Tj 0 -15.75 TD /F0 12.75 Tf -0.0625 Tc 0 Tw (4.2) Tj 16.5 0 TD 0 Tc -0.1875 Tw ( ) Tj 26.25 0 TD 0.053 Tc -0.2405 Tw (Variations on this Proposal) Tj 159 0 TD 0 Tc -0.1875 Tw ( ) Tj -201.75 -21 TD /F1 11.25 Tf -0.0418 Tc 0.4058 Tw (One variation to the proposal outlined above is set out here. The proposal is based around ) Tj 0 -14.25 TD -0.0457 Tc 0.5861 Tw (the idea that gaming licenses should be issued for a fixed period of time \(perhaps 5 years\), ) Tj T* 0.0235 Tc 0.289 Tw (and that at the license period t) Tj 153 0 TD -0.0349 Tc 0.139 Tw (here would be an opportunity for redistribution of machines ) Tj -153 -14.25 TD -0.0044 Tc 1.4919 Tw (between venues in each region, and for machine numbers to be adjusted for changes in ) Tj 0 -14.25 TD -0.0341 Tc 0.2216 Tw (regional population numbers. The essential elements of this proposal are that: ) Tj 392.25 0 TD 0 Tc 0.1875 Tw ( ) Tj -392.25 -20.25 TD 0.1275 Tc 0 Tw (\(1\)) Tj 13.5 0 TD 0 Tc 0.1875 Tw ( ) Tj 29.25 0 TD -0.0593 Tc 1.7468 Tw (regions have an upper limi) Tj 139.5 0 TD -0.0053 Tc 0.9428 Tw (t on machine numbers based on population share \(as ) Tj -139.5 -14.25 TD -0.0669 Tc 0.2544 Tw (per our previous discussion\); and ) Tj 168.75 0 TD 0 Tc 0.1875 Tw ( ) Tj -211.5 -20.25 TD 0.1275 Tc 0 Tw (\(2\)) Tj 13.5 0 TD 0 Tc 0.1875 Tw ( ) Tj 29.25 0 TD -0.0029 Tc 0.1904 Tw (there are two \221pools\222 to allocate the available machines. ) Tj 281.25 0 TD 0 Tc 0.1875 Tw ( ) Tj -324 -14.25 TD ( ) Tj 0 -14.25 TD -0.0246 Tc 3.9621 Tw (The two pools are comprised firstly; of a \221fixed allocation pool\222 and the second; a) Tj 0 Tc 0.1875 Tw ( ) Tj T* -0.0233 Tc 0.9608 Tw (\221contestable pool\222 wh) Tj 107.25 0 TD 0.006 Tc 0.3958 Tw (ere machines are allocated on an auction basis. This is a mechanism ) Tj -107.25 -14.25 TD -0.0127 Tc 3.3073 Tw (to address the current situation where some hotels and clubs are not able to access) Tj 0 Tc -0.5625 Tw ( ) Tj 0 -14.25 TD -0.0298 Tc 4.0827 Tw (machines. Through the fixed allocation pool, all hotels and clubs seeking to have) Tj 0 Tc 0.1875 Tw ( ) Tj T* 0.0035 Tc 0.934 Tw (electronic gaming m) Tj 102.75 0 TD 0.0054 Tc 0.2571 Tw (achines would be allocated machines based on an application process, ) Tj -102.75 -14.25 TD -0.0406 Tc 0.3888 Tw (subject to their satisfying certain basic \(largely existing\) requirements. In effect, all suitable ) Tj ET endstream endobj 93 0 obj 7365 endobj 90 0 obj << /Type /Page /Parent 91 0 R /Resources << /Font << /F0 6 0 R /F1 8 0 R /F4 25 0 R >> /ProcSet 2 0 R >> /Contents 92 0 R >> endobj 95 0 obj << /Length 96 0 R >> stream BT 71.25 804 TD 0 0 0 rg /F0 9 Tf -0.0179 Tc 0.0179 Tw (Supplementary Submission to the Inquiry Into the Management of Machine Numbers) Tj 352.5 0 TD 0 Tc 0 Tw ( ) Tj 70.5 0 TD -0 Tc 0 Tw (Page ) Tj 21.75 0 TD 0 Tc 0 Tw (22) Tj 9 0 TD ( ) Tj -453.75 -12.75 TD ( ) Tj ET 69.75 786.75 456 0.75 re f BT 71.25 777 TD ( ) Tj 0 -717 TD /F1 11.25 Tf 0.1875 Tw ( ) Tj 0 -15.75 TD ( ) Tj ET 69.75 56.25 456 0.75 re f BT 71.25 31.5 TD /F0 9 Tf -0.0451 Tc 0.0451 Tw (A Supplementary Submission by the Provincial Cities Association of SA) Tj 295.5 0 TD 0 Tc 0 Tw ( ) Tj 45 0 TD -0 Tc (FINAL) Tj 28.5 0 TD 0 Tc ( ) Tj 33 0 TD -0.0679 Tc 0.0679 Tw (August, 2003) Tj 51.75 0 TD /F1 11.25 Tf 0 Tc 0.1875 Tw ( ) Tj -453.75 727.5 TD -0.0399 Tc 0.3774 Tw (venues in the region which apply would be guaranteed to receive the minimum number of ) Tj 0 -14.25 TD -0.1837 Tc 0 Tw (m) Tj 9.75 0 TD -0.0344 Tc 2.4719 Tw (achines. A minimum number of machines per venue \(eg, ten per venue\) would be ) Tj -9.75 -14.25 TD -0.0257 Tc 0.919 Tw (allocated in this way. This result would address the situation of the smaller hotel, that is ) Tj 0 -14.25 TD -0.017 Tc 0.517 Tw (not able to access gaming machines \(AHA: 2003\), plus provide a redistributive compon) Tj 438 0 TD 0.0488 Tc 0.1387 Tw (ent ) Tj -438 -14.25 TD -0.018 Tc 0.2055 Tw (of the revenue from machines. ) Tj 157.5 0 TD 0 Tc 0.1875 Tw ( ) Tj -157.5 -14.25 TD ( ) Tj 0 -14.25 TD -0.026 Tc 1.2135 Tw (Any machine licenses available in the region \(the number of machines set for the region, ) Tj T* 0.0108 Tc 2.2124 Tw (perhaps based on 10 per 1,000 adults\) which were still available after the distribution ) Tj T* -0.02 Tc 0.9575 Tw (through the \221fixed allocation pool\222, would) Tj 211.5 0 TD -0.0134 Tc 0.2947 Tw ( then be made available through the \221contestable ) Tj -211.5 -14.25 TD -0.0484 Tc 0.9859 Tw (pool\222. The \221contestable pool\222 would be auctioned to the highest bidder. This would have ) Tj 0 -14.25 TD 0.011 Tc 3.9842 Tw (the effect of transferring any economic rents that related to these machines to the) Tj 0 Tc 0.1875 Tw ( ) Tj T* 0.0176 Tc 3.3574 Tw (government \(rather than the venue) Tj 188.25 0 TD 0.0032 Tc 3.1843 Tw ( owner\), which could spend them on community) Tj 0 Tc -0.5625 Tw ( ) Tj -188.25 -14.25 TD 0.0061 Tc 1.7314 Tw (services. The operations of the market would ensure that the auction price meant that ) Tj 0 -14.25 TD -0.0482 Tc 3.2982 Tw (venues could still make a \221normal\222 return on their investment from machine licenses) Tj 0 Tc -0.5625 Tw ( ) Tj T* -0.0123 Tc 0.1998 Tw (purchased through the \221contestable pool\222) Tj 204 0 TD 0.1875 Tc 0 Tw (.) Tj 3 0 TD 0 Tc 0.1875 Tw ( ) Tj -207 -14.25 TD ( ) Tj 0 -14.25 TD ( ) Tj T* ( ) Tj T* ( ) Tj T* ( ) Tj T* ( ) Tj T* ( ) Tj T* ( ) Tj T* ( ) Tj T* ( ) Tj T* ( ) Tj T* ( ) Tj T* ( ) Tj T* ( ) Tj T* ( ) Tj T* ( ) Tj T* ( ) Tj T* ( ) Tj T* ( ) Tj T* ( ) Tj T* ( ) Tj T* ( ) Tj T* ( ) Tj T* ( ) Tj T* ( ) Tj T* ( ) Tj T* ( ) Tj T* ( ) Tj T* ( ) Tj T* ( ) Tj T* ( ) Tj T* ( ) Tj 0 -8.25 TD /F1 5.25 Tf 0.0109 Tc 0 Tw (u:) Tj 4.5 0 TD -0.1815 Tc (\\) Tj 3 0 TD -0.0134 Tc (projects) Tj 18 0 TD -0.1815 Tc (\\) Tj 3 0 TD 0.0196 Tc (ProvCitiesIGA2003) Tj 45 0 TD -0.1815 Tc (\\) Tj 3 0 TD -0.0342 Tc (FollowupsubmissiontoIGA.doc) Tj 72 0 TD -0.1815 Tc (\\) Tj 3 0 TD -0.2205 Tc (D\262) Tj 5.25 0 TD 0 Tc 0.1875 Tw ( ) Tj ET endstream endobj 96 0 obj 3504 endobj 94 0 obj << /Type /Page /Parent 91 0 R /Resources << /Font << /F0 6 0 R /F1 8 0 R >> /ProcSet 2 0 R >> /Contents 95 0 R >> endobj 6 0 obj << /Type /Font /Subtype /TrueType /Name /F0 /BaseFont /COIJCF+BookAntiqua,Bold /FirstChar 32 /LastChar 255 /Widths [ 250 278 402 606 500 889 833 227 333 333 444 606 250 333 250 296 500 500 500 500 500 500 500 500 500 500 250 250 606 606 606 444 747 778 667 722 833 611 556 833 833 389 389 778 611 1000 833 833 611 833 722 611 667 778 778 1000 667 667 667 333 606 333 606 500 333 500 611 444 611 500 389 556 611 333 333 611 333 889 611 556 611 611 389 444 333 611 556 833 500 556 500 310 606 310 606 750 500 750 333 500 500 1000 500 500 333 1000 611 389 1000 750 667 750 750 278 278 500 500 606 500 1000 333 998 444 389 833 750 500 667 250 278 500 500 606 500 606 500 333 747 438 500 606 333 747 500 400 549 361 361 333 576 641 250 333 361 488 500 889 890 889 444 778 778 778 778 778 778 1000 722 611 611 611 611 389 389 389 389 833 833 833 833 833 833 833 606 833 778 778 778 778 667 611 611 500 500 500 500 500 500 778 444 500 500 500 500 333 333 333 333 556 611 556 556 556 556 556 549 556 611 611 611 611 556 611 556 ] /Encoding /WinAnsiEncoding /FontDescriptor 7 0 R >> endobj 7 0 obj << /Type /FontDescriptor /FontName /COIJCF+BookAntiqua,Bold /Flags 16418 /FontBBox [ -250 -265 1199 1000 ] /MissingWidth 333 /StemV 146 /StemH 146 /ItalicAngle 0 /CapHeight 923 /XHeight 462 /Ascent 923 /Descent -265 /Leading 188 /MaxWidth 999 /AvgWidth 459 /FontFile2 97 0 R >> endobj 97 0 obj << /Filter /FlateDecode /Length 98 0 R /Length1 100 0 R >> stream HVXUG-T*>HHXPAF# U(` j$D`%E%BF]=뚍ɢfcA{@?Mܽw̜9?sAZ "Gzr\㲎  6]Xq{[RVrzmН@$MOnYa 8oBRDf[m윚*=Nˌkэ{ rl8^ɈKOLyZuHht99;rL`N-6%kRbV̀E- 8H,@ʼ v=S-gZEY%@X{ffdBR'k:^P kMQ/rjlAQml^oŵU6m۹C=TC]vÿgޯ'7?`C5"ݑ=1q2>uBZzFfIL3}FnY̝WP8EEŋ,]V|V~zu?xCMlݶ}';?-ߵ{?p/#_=v7'+*:us/\rkoTm@qf1f ҄*`gEbqxA¥1RܽJqWASz*JOlQ+:Yk :X*;nz}}7@}>StԩP^uT]նjKV{Aj JuZSG zQ1 ob $ÄZZ6u52e-# RqDRKi4V*qw(m ҧ? +iF_ '4!P^`X3Lٌ #$RkPG4Wm5<+kpmpipnp7Wכ巎ފxNOKRXC?Yr,?juOM/syzMG}>sYuibz{,zbu a)i 5 034L]LzwCcmSrbH<9CIF6'q6: QQC`l4[I{56IPaH*NZ]wg=aHOwOFf3o/;feZXu?q=͗Pׅu;ȅ +0{/^$dmlssC\b<15s Y:f׈Nvv)"lvBR/qgZ/ Bo_SXvdQ8!s9#E K걘s~hm!g9r.G!4y#1B] TLQ^[4_Yr缊j;"r0јn G6{^8 1R0LCėS. / I*)9"\ʀBLm5mR]&HcR&}U>Q*δѭ߱znX(>Ո#Cd(Ը<.0D^!80 +JwjJz.%u~WtRiu:%5s[tEL.CWWUfkTe(;mR!B6\<}>y;,.rEv"`HKMb&MA/Zk1UɤESa "b1ML36jqe&iZvgw5i?8es8ʩ&߬Jo{Mڞc ,~%>Ryvw(OAv)v ~@26L)Ƌq#7}D d{arGĄh |'V]bE~KnMї%)ʆQ:#h<Y4jKSZY5;j5T~]fT*һq_;SϾ+nZ=w}Vi?$%~@ހ Ra1ߺZ\gNlwZ?!r]P؆4ĆʐAax@܃YHeu`?cQ#O x&!FO`aՓvD,R)]Y(T^\"B`Kb2Zd#ihLZ'B]LRrzm +vd 0eނˠ#LVR A]xޗi|j#1f6^o8c6bx^@X}HX=!XM=2)7" W$=`6f\|k殣5Fse켅~SM=WV6nm{Į]GͬUKMK7))oՏh밿&  ׀o/*FJV>S*v&KCcfd+b(OO,>rr0GȌdKZ`C#Ӻ1P(n9rioH&* 㦐\J(L^@dua)>Z}?64"zM0p9ӑfH1-bIo m&s o⿍;׼nږ>皱t ع&ǝ3ҿfcecäY]˲4\#iΚ']f7)UlG~=IѷG8A.$(r|{ [tȮ3"*PQW1< CЍeuL,4VJjшdLF8B 6ҠRǙ|4XBa E qe@vғ9qkAWl-^=,sch[Wn ,ZS]B\i79Foݿo#nlŏ_)S4h-ͩגɟD7]".'gĒE.Peuvd)&JiZQHtPjFhꂺ2 j[=bHLy:Qa8 gO>&jDb 6I&ކ} $2)n$~nQތC{_wy]0DzbKstLyeo\kU9 l>jN'0[D٨cbjƘAp[ތ!Z2*Ņ B+{ȱ<ȎX(NFܭJT_piy*VtM r$qR㬖U>xٖW*>وõ5kZZ,u^\b;ԋy׳sKG>N~}ƥ !u. Fȫ g"Ci)h'!^W'ckƻ$Ӏ,q |FX٠f ;I (&L>27L\h-&?r1Χgh{c) D_M(UsrӘi9CjcA~DCC z_^IBݸș扩:ھZ _++B8'U a@qE$B7K<׌|#nHiA䷐˲rmq]&lϸ8O]O`Oou>3߆:2_.n>ٸ< -[XȱiH f|& aj.b01%gjm}>}>;rb$9RŠPP#(Jx$ʫQȠR˲ ,*Z!jacF+S /ݙ0IY统m}})MS$% AK Vh3AI}%Naإdn#G..QkqS7.wPģ8KCX |I떸,Ӗ'-'stCl`/.߿Yw֮f+zlmP\IjTAjPw 2~ewV:*YjK%:=nȀ0Wg]&e ṖVv_ہN#boWuxӆJ'ERhLπZ3:J#cSȣSc>(N'j>GE.Qgfrq#DDŽXtxSݝU#}@o˾^`^Jm Ysv[x9&'H~}Kв 7I,8Jÿo[N{[jJ}MyIz/xLjzďP&ݰTP yb1HQ8fgwX:%9@u3RW !A- *(L_{!|dJJ͓\{sP޺%&6ZؾܧRYp?s WWKBʲؖc9O[wwߜ }:HA4GZ ,1!j5׼}4F7:ŁxiœI0V3ޥsYNt s)hE0_O6qǺk6 n= &,9jϢHT80džgc9k1k͛w^u=p3RIz-j@_(&Kpox4X &i/E؀7Wlt&p\2c>SGDmOeo+DLcbR7ڜ Hߠ\R~$[\*3Xv<=[J+4A75BMi.@cz4$T2 *O%TRqkJ;Ol `2M/>ѻ|F30#J>̈V0b%}_ FϥMvjɮ,p hzkdIJU.KԢHՉoܣ[m1F k\=ioβFp*n@*Ҿxݙ??; ^s `mz+_cES`su`ٳK=z|ڜ#|egf-kZ S2;ISb C5hXM<quȏ|g5ˋϓh*\[Qr<:_,|3@T\a0hM>kj}d&.tA *k$ jjkw@tdxj*ڕhnclK~ebxisy)(ۛE1P,Cs{65vy[!;n`i-0‡E3qZxFp,}m>MU&W +j͑!BRӜ5x Eի[ZMcyqG(v) l͏ .[wwkvW1SRFa1g`o,=FYGURs8Mh+'5}jygR`qu]]>Xu[qN 8#99 uzkp:<8I6;\ 1?dW{TSܼn AH "i*ih;hPRng2Gu^WbW_` p6 "#h ^ԟh}D)y,sd&Z˰}h^jAK08CtulY_7touS,cݨ^D4.Mw}m"@?PDwgK ?`ser䴲a0z /(o)?{Gtm zL}2ؠu06b[S1~.[eyK$f"-"VkD嵸& X!?B"C -&|,V3 KrkX:7Mb{'rϥzv$hs9jڄwjW,!/Wk6sp&?4=HC"E4ܤvX  i{+!raga`rT*ו?DϿq[S9pYoQڕz뇕Gy @ׁF? YGaޤv3wap= `8mцQZ IdL[>rA215?NڱՆ:锷N\ݴٴڑ 3?48Zy aibD+?JE1H wewo6 la.`Ov4Y ]Bž@_S KtP?@hאJ9/.x3iMgkG-m0@d[oggV)ӌWՍ㌧(J V|ZqaP&VoRkUX;/9WBN͑wa(iQ~tR:^o8IfJ)7U-/6t9([3"A&=VZZK-,|| x0H6 IL8b':t &2n MIQ Za2:L :L(};}$mN{ =(hTB z^gd:Rq PpsN-z6OC} vL-cyGk:1{ ay?]y vxs$7)X&yfȞ Pp\u}Ij2o8sdk3wiyXlk鹰DmYH vRUa͏ t("bI8jQmfh5n>m<1@ͧYb#4PVܬ@-E1 PN0|~FK_受7o'p-U*A؄\.jғ&mT{/FbQB10vDZ)ddЍ֪oUm+Ab,nPI9!ځa-k^[jS0nnں efEa+DFo>')$ sLy:B1?ҝuŹ>+_(IIzDB=12؍pϚ X,>\j&'a ȍwAFk@)vyYVjd)䀥8Ӏsf?vC_,򎺎 -Cw2sE6-xTp d(nKi֗pX UÑqSoUĈl@Sgv qYҏJY J+SVگYkO L1qrV8\C'3 XSB4ͯx-1WoXbғ #TdhCChxsKobA81sF7G=`EAQeW;_ Ybb{$Mjv"CA.36+ 4?B=BF\qKMeJޔB~0|6< ȼ74 5K/gGos}f<+6nݭѹ P(=VO%>u吿Uï{en3 y |tm_5u(NP=Äge`a4!yNW |G!zZKȪi>A Mz/eN8.׿ʉNw2'+|IMTRX PXDEQ eB`Ic*5|פu5}RR0 bʎ.=Ǣ|]T=G5iL[|-_۸M]_{YGfڶf-T͞fGv⒔  KE&>ô#0l ~5, ZK!ʘ3Ba-]VPWMVc1Emh/B< apk8@GB1!DIǛcya͡yŦD~XlҏAp4L"b*C2>m>rNC/:դ76W_AҢ8fhqElIXDU8.S-XŐ,XHq+-Ffrdc=`2b~+YQuFR2"~F'S$1UҾ7/`z}jTY$C K3^cYm9ckYUkg}1Sң"NCޱcMMq0hĊuR[Dg>9c֊5cv: /`:jEF1SykRrakUΝ[rElP)Rcȝ;8 5)w>2~`VrMgpp>/|IM~s=RSed锋Z'nau$,xMߖNZ"A +*kj9W+x`0~6RT(Lu˩RKя|;~oֱ:_iOrC 7R#SFIH_Ѽ_h3Agl$+|Di4 tLPql(,t + I O<ߴFʊdCk/D2oUo:ֆ,mAܧoMUE aͿ&|Ws_ep}vVÜu|-7O&l}56qh;*'Z&Q!ҷ*]H}݂#x.,SEޘ`L) h5qdKHx"$'Ӳ>nm)i!+YyS7)Jƒ]˲1ş4ӔaOlI Գ6{Urx2Cv@3*VjMHo/Ɉ`kdYo7vi)*X]/sXU?;[*Q7'SbalD6:O(((hF.!&A"G]Tp1PF2\{,~OTZ; @s#d'_ӿCu{CO};f߅7`I0:D1Vj |M6żR0/2w3m/Wơfͨu-œ*U}UXf[jFͼCAlgo!g l𱞥p?%b˫.P>j^(I|fl*nq!DΣvEwG wUnһ/Vӗm=q {`b(zfW WnM{ӛgU*c2f _LL J)/Wʽ2Ô506^Ќi&4SR\ػ c~+)Ͱ](r.^טk5\ V(2 _]WfxsA)4Ua!"2xx87|O%HqBެsɎ|lņΙמeo;;ύpbfDN⳱^.5r^㬠{ F98:5WHaDs&K=vwti/tW\9²FϹm &oru<223h'RϤ=5R/-|q w\eßW@YdTJ輳KR8dtL[WY}>+q iJUdMIݺp.s:ZA >OSɾ[ELˤ :[zsmK6sYZgA8$C73/&ZM,UN8y'O$~Ŀ4)-ɑ` ~7'x}L 儤5Ļ%wJY;Qn@R $5ƐȨ-بu$긚-MbT<LiD24CÉqx(3B<"@15+R##i8V*:kghkߑ%etB3jSK]n\.8㗾;^ Z*xq:Y\@͓O,&Mh ÎxQ̫݀2u 5xxU 5ٗ7II!yaBbG|`?3A6a| ?y`ʞk0( ,ufY6T@$SjI ر$A|i»?]jO@_x>ŮuԷ6t.Ca)Zr]O_ZM蹨0( dgr6P$&ޟnRH u]>F&i^Ax % nWqCqP*PEFGiA)E;͑s,"StB -=h\|Ei0[pbqa{#J;Ʊm=~I*HwEDD뾂l#|^J|o5hC˱OL%>Giibo݆&]*AτBB~3߯0?2>̦f#Ӛ& ^ aX/guפa* `sՈ+A-gR;,ᷠQ;_ w/7׍HȽW^ qC&q&-$h+ۈ'md 2ԝ$8W- 6\g!Wܣ_z1^n|5^584f{DJWF/X (=~ xQw,Fx53yθ6;x|FG9Iq;#7]5;7r<'8G ոKXG`3MqXix - u1<&feJ\a8Z3:m_-bb dtB߀nFC8zЌ 0-6E#h3:(F?G'mndx߆7aMgQoD&`;o"^Y5LF#.ğOQB5(?} g"!%>')R>/UY^xmi&$8vǹZ۱s8 qNUƻc{vf TB(RPA#@UUr(UU!p+@ty}ovG8RAB7[X{bʗ˗#O/ǞPRuM_{ŠbLX\o*/=n(lOba8<.vԻ_<IG{؟wƋس>bE# 5OnX~N!moŵtuS~{%7XO@doH/O?c;c]bCKЋcXِvawaLviuXMOq܃XePyC; =zr OGldtMu'bk7'Wk-:3X۵YwZiُ꿳7Mߝ~.\jCg_[q۟\ٱrq=uuݺW_+ NC°sB4WSW7r E`)): \:iBG! J ӡ5IBk dUMU:1!3G~"Mhf:TxThO0DSV rN#Oh\kx.Ɛq ;!i *V!򌛒26+)<{+,+z^"c }Cu*-c 2t36+WZYA9fG#{ 5/>)FŲXCu/t88)>blUL6Ҡ%*>cs`%ø.w|_ZVBaѯ"2}H˾)_]g3mJs$y-,í`ΞeK=*$?2ԕhP=VYhU'Ú*gKX"lZІ_`Z6?:1d; g$V7%aB<Ȉf9U=XY/nDB.U{/09GN^2w1Qsk,-p(H_+UоU?:~Z(bE'3E أ2o,wC5YJY=ʶrIUvFeFא5ٯ^FU|x_2!2wC\/AL^$!sb1UIt];]g "'@䫱PqlEF֒]FbK.e襮siϊ-N o{R}ϪDHyR7h~_δe- uYGn𯞱/Q5?;2L٭m9ٲ:f}ͻ@ykhQH}y&Mى3j̗77 -=ZUjyfi2hGEQwA;v|nMx\~^w"g=hsy;#x>Kg~/nyq .LS) Uom4AFSeiVZ7WjDٴgΧ!Jw#? !*k3Vc5rr$IT_ v2sƺٽIk\.Jh0g Le˽ʑ*~T))6}O]($3Au[N@2DQPPPUPP5PPuPP M-m]=}09\L$LL4L ,<̇<B>"(XQ"pGX"c bcVbVc bc6b6c bcvbvcb,8< p!.Ÿ2\+p%ո:\p#n͸6܎;p'ݸ>܏ x1<'$x9<"^x57&x=!>8>_+|o-8p?'_+~ AR裟f0Af1eYYYYUYY5YYuYـ ولMٌق-ينmَفىم]ٍك=ًه}ُ9A!aQ1qxNDNdNTNtLl\|jca*3\4I1.Mq&X,b1p)q9Wp%Wq5p-q=7p#7q3p+q;wp'wq7p/q? 0(1sx."^Kx)/异W*^kx-7&[x+ow.{x/|!>G(|O)>g,|/%W*_|o-w.#~O)3~/%;~'#7?E'~ HdJP$[J9)/TREJ5.5ԒRGJ=/ 4DJ3i.-FJ;i/tEJ7.=GJ?/d ,Cd 2BF(-cd\/dL2E4.3d̒2GXԁ 4ΖӶM׿a{;C*lq |s%Ԧn8ه-6&i mtLxK&ܨ hAd=hԦ,6K6:L !s  N"ԕCj |Oo mơbFٖ6ŎNuc k#؈}7݌E\P2s:7P@7mRVu5{5ݺB_:C^{a/y,Ъk L0[( uX^XHh"-8cCk-.y -fX99mPbǐƨr3 ʹ4pm.5jFϫ5c{r[(D0.jO$yC? |8Y!7&H;b9InEH o6B7pHKYZ: $9+]{d@r]ovGVm.p?pv#+ws[Oo9/.^Ӎ{4]}{ֆ㔲BE\ m(LdA?#,wrGݸhRĚC;3 Y8l@-˵=Hrr8 \(߇SoG|UM|(&<:ƷƷ&z\5Tm#j \i4-q < 9?0< Y8—:ۦ.ve|H ]~lʌNwυDbڕ$ ZhpzK!_8Q.~rȥa(wpC"@ҾWC|'a;t JXD*-N:|Piy`)Qe[ivT?;V/Xj .Qj'zv7:@OVlcϰn ku#19D9^m@¾z.w}}% m LiEѥT=͔h& !eCe hɮ<0m:&2S肇 *GSob`.^^w`mb`Zjo`(4ȁ0A&ZAQ1pO}˔ M&l./Y1K,GlR[ V$V"V&V!6'Yi(I˒,iɒiɑy#r/GHs4Hs4Is4i d#O6d#O6d#O6 d@6 d@6 dc2.Q Q3(Q(Q(WeLɗ2i.2i.2i [!Q!Q!Q!1G6٘#sdcl̑I-pbYbvg ĊJ*FlL|.NbkYom{q7Az7;Ҏ!&\B|c$+,$9I T$$IY ''ԜzrlzՂlnH9O*HY2*5礫j,5?Kj.E ?p4]iI .#Qաmf{e|Gp'8u r0UƵ㎷o=.Vˆapu(}і4 ?X=8㒽`(}(0Н:Ŗ(2qR ,Z`$E%(ꗔiTma=SdwP;-)'ᛅ4|QECbՇk畈vn|9Pzf̭Z ;e^RʤH 'Q>)B>&\Yp@;Ҏ*SzLH@oOg>Poo)yy *M. .t&q>buJ=PN(}->fj"rByF&Ǫ:^fq&47_NpGoJ\0y_:YEQTn+wFl ^D|180?7G|;ѝtu^}90g? ˈG*?@|ۨ[@*euE,b+q%]MuF?B-E@|q!>ɥ?x݈*#)ٍa仈o".!."̜>h5t5725;^Ű<޿N~"y9쫯++Jy`{jiog@w|no>zGNj']ʞQ±l󰨰;:5_ݷɾ0/1JC:z'S?$צ峾À2'l< EYR3S8I Cp~I7/srMկ,Yz5blh_օU ߎFkBwy$HlBv쎀 x *e}6|fK/g J3RxT0]#ׄG m6FB$7L!N·t$炑?hPG(m]G6Ah;NFC)ZihimСŸaJk(h@C> &Tr5`$lEw܊uܽ̽;9v!EpPpT𕚰QUT;}goF[* >6ڙպϊ߿Q٨[پ>=ҳ_Лh{} '.|}n{=޼kLvNiꖺY,j`U8!He&΄]WXFd|iQA[@ѳ|z64.D];'*h[ZT8\==ܥ'.(jnU endstream endobj 98 0 obj 26773 endobj 100 0 obj 43557 endobj 99 0 obj 0 endobj 101 0 obj 0 endobj 8 0 obj << /Type /Font /Subtype /TrueType /Name /F1 /BaseFont /DOIJCF+BookAntiqua /FirstChar 32 /LastChar 255 /Widths [ 250 278 371 606 500 840 778 208 333 333 389 606 250 333 250 606 500 500 500 500 500 500 500 500 500 500 250 250 606 606 606 444 747 778 611 709 774 611 556 763 832 337 333 726 611 946 831 786 604 786 668 525 613 778 722 1000 667 667 667 333 606 333 606 500 333 500 553 444 611 479 333 556 582 291 234 556 291 883 582 546 601 560 395 424 326 603 565 834 516 556 500 333 606 333 606 750 750 750 278 500 500 1000 500 500 333 1144 525 331 998 750 750 750 750 278 278 500 500 606 500 1000 333 979 424 331 827 750 750 667 250 278 500 500 606 500 606 500 333 747 333 500 606 333 747 750 400 549 310 310 333 576 628 250 333 310 333 500 787 787 787 444 778 778 778 778 778 778 944 709 611 611 611 611 337 337 337 337 774 831 786 786 786 786 786 606 833 778 778 778 778 667 604 556 500 500 500 500 500 500 758 444 479 479 479 479 287 287 287 287 546 582 546 546 546 546 546 549 556 603 603 603 603 556 601 556 ] /Encoding /WinAnsiEncoding /FontDescriptor 9 0 R >> endobj 9 0 obj << /Type /FontDescriptor /FontName /DOIJCF+BookAntiqua /Flags 34 /FontBBox [ -250 -282 1370 1000 ] /MissingWidth 332 /StemV 81 /StemH 81 /ItalicAngle 0 /CapHeight 960 /XHeight 480 /Ascent 960 /Descent -282 /Leading 243 /MaxWidth 1142 /AvgWidth 445 /FontFile2 102 0 R >> endobj 102 0 obj << /Filter /FlateDecode /Length 103 0 R /Length1 105 0 R >> stream HtVTUW>(*pK>&X Q+& BQQѨK{hPcɸƘl&q9﬷>w=}4&@C.=νę|;ń?(ZO@ `J!ӑQ15k2:ҁ9t ytDh@(DoFtLB-YܣpJ ^3Ƅ&J%{klhLđnyF|S4@yOwNs}#s`b,1C_yHU^t[˸82r aCji/ZKZn pDIR8-WkſUr\j5j֪]W?ߠa#ƾ6kڬy>/;ڭ{A˿ˇݳٻ6yY̝7”E_d+VZ懵oH1m?glٺm2w9k:|$'N:}9.^ʽ|%7nߺ}"&` 8b<~N@zH$~ׅ>F#4w4ye?%3Mv yx2GT+%d.R jj#qNQ]ɧ1&RuJ0RI_TpE%^M Gϰ"wVdSEs>T& g">_%?KJW$(N+|DTLbۃ]q5]t*U×xU ֆQ7UJQo/xKbDSi J5vL+Mʉyg XZLz#R"TxkeԡVcu9!*[7&+|]i%˲-Fb-!Q0~b9v+%ؖ C: h7ڬݖfOҙHI!T@84aN'bM;Ԓ{V GwWssssaߗ)@q܌]9fdKGxijlwuZmUOU7URjJŪ"(+EhK2e[$t$H,tED^}R͝4Ga(va86ƀAb&Oi-ϔc6\>bE`bN}bU N.RY p  RWb \HrAq8 Kqp;7%"[:*(7#AQ7ؔkYXL3h*Tv$D*lb{.whL, 1]D}볩P(.Ycs)!\XAcףǥnWH^sEVH,?x).o'>i Osa'nnFؓ`mD4rrnSq fg;\<L!a{yIەbtSCB]81H^o@%^H΂'1N$VLjp1 KLXaA"pI>졭*H)]7hLQ!YGou>24Ab0l4VY4e>g\$ I!1I ɣ |p7Jۣ1gEl?OMVa8fK f[BXCh"!±!!$SpB_NlL)` Pbi0FI@3w#"cC;9D+.߸@QHEx]"}E И?QE|;j`dV3d -: jdx9be˒=z+u&y+xMB^U0T]cM5L=L`8?u>^.V6MZYkwiIW2| @ 5iG&24Af|WZVUקܻE%[ɒ=bے|~X2 66;[24^&`+񥌹k}S>HJ%21Pz"./1]7DgW2mf%{ۨ.&0pcޯQ?f2Y D&Ѥ'-m^{3D+8fUCM+h͋5c2J;@zN˞{c4wֶ֫=?Gf~ij{rͱd{w㱁NQc|mDŽJU@__UUQG{ƶSv|w,~ZAx2rJ@mHY hwf@H7<{GS5[s8.![Pc$oD^l O4tbx m^ZaWZ \ v[k -ВMmm-vݦa6ӆ2lh3.e/\PLǚuK׾}|_3݁do<;ˋ 5/.;|=~ryvR}{񹆒3[~3wGi4a>RoUW~߶sg4_q Cռ=J/J̭+YHFHM z=9y+<=aPN&w_Y#^!r$KvTaH `GR&ok e(mz}k !vϛ G_)+_s.30+;u0ToMHv}@{==M0zǍTՉ;+TWuܟY\4L,jh?LTѪG5pY(;ؽۻvփOǩo&"pbE'**Ҍ m6&cP㉉Pcf2ũ&A"tv0S=h8v徟+m>GX$к(eȃᱹL簿8׸2l˾쳾}Ҭ<DzwFuuqCKCFU 4(H%&NoYk142N.&Bg]M[>R( Ap"c_ޑv쁔:S*H[$= 9 J8>[~k{R9kFݜ* O5>ANCGJx@n`+U"(V:&{`kZkmeZ:zq4ljh!D0=dt1 dĺ!MkgG'?Xw!}s|7z\˖֧z]ޜOhvL B(oMʼnu,s2mGniF4NKb] 5h[U(.m&7]׮hr!Uxjc qd#(LtTB:K(;LYa!0U>8}^bj?]|;}ÿ5(dde`#k:_Vq̛]~qɖ1zKCC*]X[ڴ--E;RK0 rB7䃦 r!7YL^bXO;|N[H"jon u ȧw[R=?B >Jخn=V9_ɝ9Jp,*/MS>lX"]xR?͋eƯN\Y~7-zLrE͇:ȱUy?yܛ+Mԥ_={dϡrau>M#c.>$B.,)"iX PGr [4"Mp(e$-RHf $h'#Xy({tFAƿD# U|q0W"A/5(>n,۰6uDW0^3ԧFt#ăxDžC3h ?4l9CTSÒovu@ b6+Gp"<pcJD'?=ބĜ#Ў翼fdX7CO_s~_CSW;l0!h;3 8H*HPb"2M)ePSr 0xϾF:ɉ,Z"wUrBTU&lNlx7g+СqҹbVus ǾrT8 m,ٜiۉy-ݲư9+ǿ<מY(U}(fx&52dFwSy?#^"eUfd(J mFhypydyɪ6Mk Y5[fZآ^~ɂI)P] 8_<|@j, é/qC_kfeN!5f9j"Tmu1fp g0>>4<Ҳs} 7v7q}ou@%$[e]t`Y62Z@@EdX1@sS; mBJJ۔Pm&ԅRFa`$<=xz/U| ?CF$}i/յnXڰuewt=ٶwM2BBX2 R(63LoRqBB.w>|fkk?wImC1 I|3_UOLg(9UGj(Ztbfmxp`IBՆMN?7oq ON9n8~'>k+>͒Qf"Mu.B@Nmn"ن5J.(MʷI/N%.9 s>j2ab%*^"8߸cR6ʁi;W/0-0ina޾ܑk׀XSS1 })sq~6<٨Fvxw=䆃;LQ-|nv?OZc~T읿ڪڞK)okQdOפX ,^7)/l_NɵR=t{Ӹ|禢N)=PO9ޡc[J3"pWleFFI:]]4tA^ARXFA_I?Kq2(ɛM$4]ِrj) FYEnNU8u IY$ 7YIzHgH"$ G~q\^@9ynߠCqQ:aK`u0}~< L3`&z\LTTIk2wތܚ5K}kO8de4"iP,s}mSL$KUj!,V_1KYK||0.r> : 8eËM=n(W^M(+ Iq0P? sJ<)͑B>}Џ)" pU7N_s sU͟@:yAų V縼?E{^G߽o, IӔCP tۋk3;f TY5{?!o)g\LTfMtXLBDX3- hH᳍ѥ™t446  UO Ztci-0gki IXe30m6(g#ȐO3]9VtBQ p`v4k|ՌPC"jѥϱKjxhbϟZ|N wzQb 4JrM?~w%KW]zu c=(q YҪPUB{^YV $ "Ј+|d1+X^>/^swt]T03>`a{ŴS!WΪYr l>n ʤW V,~ٻX*iv)%WelvFj19*WV_ya-E96c.bяXx5Jc~lfB3 Fht *$Ph^U* (qV>P$ĠBAW$ h.*DjpDp781TP~ *>n-HCH Q|S1C8eP^Sےlus&&6^|j}Z/[37M^4N Tc5[߻b8ACRxk͐/#ݥpx -|$?ao pn;/70J JjLlzc3og=9姏v +dF|uW?} N;9axV`? aE&{-0W;ox4g)ӀⓈSqE= ȃr|qy,@TB"f>N( {s%])$G(aSZ{*-fQ&sAT_a=sN {vū^izѭ{tofl&ωKocmd~aFFwv_ahٱeO [9Ôl )\E=##KFӬ,-M*`/`g@ta#<(Zj(J옡F{?lW Pooonn9w!&DğS?Hpb$&R8tڤfĨ8LZth͈1SόZmw!mggwvyyy)K"`$LMM;AOjr$$zR*XCCYܡJJhH8-!m'fn.mygEڟN3˳ALۻ12;b)i+xޟpMGjuSI໻U( }=n `27Pc`?3x-uHeAio%DuF_D=S{:F1FG#9(n7_'Nĥq}}i'5dx+>b,yY}*&XPZ,,d79sҞnVvw  s ?-uMK89-jQST.bA)e? ^SgP f4T82sOWYpSޒsWk^GcWu'̊iV_Qr'+ @_KfK>}^ 8~">泈ӱ9ߟ~2,(7+?>N< lLrnFDJǾ_l ^y\Vϭg#F.ozea. X^;~hWU+hPJkӲ Ap:] d?FCi;;MKX #gC< i')9<鬩 L|^(n|݋rw6nzVkop}xTݿsr:w`m]lDj:9M/EY_6{8ǫ3l ;IkIMn;H7әirȮ]7^6fˆ als cӐl"8,/{](V<Q&lb2\R%ZKFGx[1m7ڮ&O\u]5i>0XHNLPmÊ1XH!z‚N#κMGW]،o5/NnHlEcv"MV$ ~4ʝWW_ <'H>Eܾ\MqKڒjK7"ђH^hJ )Mx >qOse33)z6N/ri4[}.sAPNbDP"l"1EQŗ0L$R D+3%e `×glҠơB_c|gJ=c@RڜiN)і&j&*8t_oo:fUEQ&0SRk؞NJTffc*~@ :;crƵh枈7}x:1xó-ZSb<ۻn͉XUR=|:XFvb[,dH<꫉3[TՑm봉{ Z?d{qs5Ađ\b5Q+/Tx0܈ 8`Q BQQ3(iJA9 93`jC/BqNL'"“Ȁȅ8upo0G+%,#|^\RD(!B;G!\W:  ^3{=;vOF[+O('+-y7}΂|˶hSuUPxTyiKO֎Vo uȪp׫" ԑzt/B%>+Wb( 19x |CZlf Pu4հ`  YY8;;p 9  Lp f#76`(ОM,VG+T_=Eק -F 9)XWiu[^47)dzhk:~[-kmZZb*J؃Cǎ,})SNV:-4+U1漒f7M?g-k =օgViԀv+W)V X !iBG^;5>/-0+?+47!gZ?峧Ϣ>>j6;q𳾙#ò)کO9z D%~6^FjR}&2J\j5i!8 J^iвS ZUڱSU*_Rie2v>|3=ٲ3*e솴<{uC -HhYJJ5FؐMbشo%}Q[BQq1O qJ~)EUxN}\Gv{p,HLВGIBAPܓD l ޢoGz) P W aᗌ{΢0/욙bIXxa$f[dZHl&q;q!MP0Y.iJ`#@<ԗ8A=Z']Bs-Ōk޺(_ayem^]Xs9(). gӐrjlCub序 S.vmu4ȁ2w!0=.`rWzJI3`oM|Ywz€ A5_QI>x3(Ga- ݏm^RHpQfZg;ڝ==瀭/{_ ;CeC!oGUcwLVk Hȧ1YC!n |!S+$$(yEXJ p^ @n (1K xe,zf#r)!վҬ櫫Ю܈qڔߌ1Dz̀4$41R؅1Z$,ڞQ&mӹݱ(-#p*?M!98촥_\1ܴbRQbܮ@R9<$I!d|}}cTjvbϰ$;I8Y @z2f(?rM+Zb)hYBtt-]8bpޥtNz"ΊB{TG Iٺ]Y [_3طHce.e.=["HR<ۍu߶a'IHJ4q +- H"Qb܉%%Ǚ+H@ lo<ۯ h9;QJC;m)sX_PQeSw; Q09Ƞݜ)ݗZӼqrrk7>|ӿ`W.Fy4̏"2aQjñe|_]k^PZ׻!G*b?n iH}]ȑocBM}}/̾6q)JC6xz);(.u}e6!P`/{yeD" 9 *@Uѷ#$#m1)ɣԆܞ׬ɍլ%ρ*ݴNW^Dmfu%JILMKp岑 9##⁑6O#{\7E\#@j E`O_C"~,") F9M7)PΗ)Y~/A>Hi_mfxazitgwU V@nM;O3AAp?kof\ ;\Ļ׹ @z6IX)KecHL/0cnA, oI~a jXRx|/`}t"!"ɴzK,OI<)q^tZPAfU=4D^9n'PjZ׎"YZQ2q!O?tYDTZu>$-G\i<ĦU%q<{E 2IxQg8s`$QéNmC $)^f)us.* q ] bXp IRI}Z 9%Tέsf=m~/{nP(u$ ܢNs, A!1lF"eQQeGW>a6nt&Y5m5//=#E*զH_UWY}ᗁe'W ?>{}痳b'ٱsl5K_6}$mK[J-t/җLT?Vh7VݒXA*R4*iъR`E!Ṙm qyl~afcC;RȾ 1]Lw ((ZtZÂ^#N@G y:!2mm6uzWKW;n,7nߍrW c;bt(H S`Юi#&lz?սh-k&ud6-.ڿ|?ʱ歷<4|\o9Y Ϲp״5aգ̐gH,z3u(  2GJuNX'' cz"ıaCB}}!E3'"A f- Ae q t_`\Q{łxA\iG}'{~+.qgt" Mƈm:fk4y=wpWWmHbT8 UgGFov{~:n9z,auc5'=.nf^C̔뉹fAH ,Q,}W}p,guQW wS^?̱Lg%]6k5RXGS|r"4Ll>&Vڈjws/MhnۻTZ&\QK01 /m2#&IrRKN &1Q위@N א(8f0L]qf6 h҃YkE*v/Pdf߼|kɜ͘gRUDeSbUL1\l3p!|xC#g|I-UJʛbpNO!g+<&KˣC.~| I_R)ǑFNRZ$"4DN,!i&t|j,u>I͍myZ%t]{h`M#Q׻v}?/+ƯHjk__:Jb j<gN\cr Kq M}LSOSi,rh_14#"IӬM_ +㲜⤕\OʷaG1:]Qw*̕LWhΆL{F7F6t`8|o"|àg]F /KIC Uez;2t }X^y`Aw38}..K7~|ͼ^, j,<k]ybk(Wc'u!(!ѻŴc1)/D?}  }CB"`X-* KuHmԊFo盙'^L{qшy!|iPIRnW|ڨj(*3mln ttA6i&Ֆ4Μ}E7_?Z[[=`ԡi qE_'Od*qFnMZ?$ !d&d-$G(Q!R] A! X   E BJAb+>EZJ[LmEZ,ϐwvls>9̙9$tP٦&! 9y-zJ9~Xʓzx1W>\穱Qӆ+0nYK2BMjYeQ?*GI7GfEnnEE ҽgU:,}wD{_Ģ'kq'g4ZL* \yaFZeCRIвyPWBM/Xf4KBSi]lTB%,W鳆"sN^P.8SvGQ9"2M-٣{ĭۻ\z5aRyղf5WmbW RMBC)ZV!uE SqdNL*M*-U!3uأm 2K˞-VVLQ^ {Ut4\ ].c. ]C|Xog aE + "be>=EΒSgH/K՜]rb_8wrf[뇍GwVΝckV-2=&ʥZ@ӽbY$ ~;v{EsGlxa7fYkڏP$sζؔ_]L 7vʟ`z UWj: YJ2ycx~58D6ћP'QJL& b+脲,b$Re*PB܌rSp^u\NjcRO{d V b=1_*1D.>,tf_dCy>b)I)I*]H+Q(u4:qVczv7ft{1Fނ7)[xmj =rfzJks[iᏰnQw-qpD[nCu-J!_ethx:glR'0z1غք ]@ǯ-X\mD &eZrᴥTĞ^L3E]}^9ۧ!|jRObD];?zq]^Q;kv(WB7β#FsC <Y u7nTAsA^7T7^=z(ysuo,*LxP^a6x9'B(#x k:%uGVj=_p%Wf:&N)+c/+`F>rMV{]Ǿgq1k˹댥&\ή7vZ=ƬYdu䁛q3c =]6P~pSs;urL)X𩗻3n1Ka9W XU:ob5`-L`6bc6flw]lxS' {Oc? ZpC3 x/I2ecx~ /:8x oi68'!.{ j_}yy>6Ź&;x8N!:+D NEEEǓWEٛ1GGUu/ /N<Lr5&2:6M AߔeO jAij362u*YBXAaug`Jkݔ{ ڢnt~{w|]*Wz.T1͟Gn{͂(-EnR)VnIYhe*|z|7EAGsnWy7PFTBi=D^?T_T7+qMK+2^qUp ~߲s98n{Ĺp_ Ϊ Nw`r Vf29ZSl!O1K:[,P ZֆF 4A LZxw0 O&#~IHC8Er58DC~ޫW|6 KFpDFxƒ!@#"+%7_#Ik— E Zo ; C|NNmOvǼ|)߂YI,\0aiب' {u;#9n*dqDfU^=*rJx +>?0oǛD3*q;܂wo:ƛ`ce/? /.s n7)Vʱ~VXP:{&`ѻ!?Ns}Nmc^2ٔ5g.\vk-T3#sHHJq"ψWy/2WP.WmZ|e|zȇ{ ?&|{^7 ys'}ԓ~ؓ>Iɓ>I?Y~BmRյNՕjZV UUe*WJ;"b&Vy VmwGmxNe`Nd$-~؝AY})䥱I?o ⻾6C74G|#tə&gZ:Eg]u.ޑ^hHZԐ[Ɏ}˧cY| %8\7Nj4$aJҪ2\JIK3ĝ:WPu<%]uuI[=&H7zu,nK]0bѬiHM^Y^Jmxm&=\to-u$(f&kfbGTeGǛl.;#68488448q~=>-iC$;b}h)#uhOS,t5Y=CG$A$Ѧl‡ւtY۝.v?8Mβ Dcxv1-bT>rLFL%tgdIqRF̄2b+aW"HrǾ";xߜG?G}{s eVLZKCMMa*cf_Uwb{?Kjlj ?*l,NW endstream endobj 103 0 obj 24142 endobj 105 0 obj 31931 endobj 104 0 obj 0 endobj 106 0 obj 0 endobj 10 0 obj << /Type /Font /Subtype /TrueType /Name /F2 /BaseFont /EOIJCF+BookAntiqua,BoldItalic /FirstChar 32 /LastChar 255 /Widths [ 250 333 500 606 500 889 833 250 333 333 444 606 250 389 250 315 500 500 500 500 500 500 500 500 500 500 250 250 606 606 606 444 833 722 667 685 778 611 556 778 778 389 389 722 611 944 778 833 667 833 722 556 611 778 667 1000 722 611 667 333 606 333 606 500 333 556 537 444 556 444 333 500 556 333 333 556 333 833 556 556 556 537 389 444 389 556 556 833 500 556 500 333 606 333 606 750 500 750 250 500 500 1000 556 556 333 1000 556 333 944 750 667 750 750 278 278 500 500 606 500 1000 333 1000 444 333 778 750 500 611 250 333 500 500 606 500 606 556 333 747 333 500 606 389 747 500 400 549 361 361 333 576 556 250 333 361 333 500 889 889 889 444 722 722 722 722 722 722 944 685 611 611 611 611 389 389 389 389 778 778 833 833 833 833 833 606 833 778 778 778 778 611 667 556 556 556 556 556 556 556 738 444 444 444 444 444 333 333 333 333 556 556 556 556 556 556 556 549 556 556 556 556 556 556 556 556 ] /Encoding /WinAnsiEncoding /FontDescriptor 11 0 R >> endobj 11 0 obj << /Type /FontDescriptor /FontName /EOIJCF+BookAntiqua,BoldItalic /Flags 16482 /FontBBox [ -250 -281 1201 1000 ] /MissingWidth 333 /StemV 143 /StemH 143 /ItalicAngle -11 /CapHeight 922 /XHeight 461 /Ascent 922 /Descent -281 /Leading 203 /MaxWidth 1001 /AvgWidth 447 /FontFile2 107 0 R >> endobj 107 0 obj << /Filter /FlateDecode /Length 108 0 R /Length1 110 0 R >> stream HU X~߻͝{&R 1P1m]uHBJDE c 1c61n0s83R|sΙqfZ@3@!kx_@>,DZk$K賢͍Ւ)Խ0#F~4jO7iSN>cCBgGDFE̙7/~~B₅I,Y,5mYVg[.6oZm{񎝟~o/W_hɱ'N_(-xr]7nު}燻c\ڃb6Y`i1!E F1YmW5M5SLj)9IZI'yH=~4P*-vHAJ4nuZAkm׶ԶvҺhikڠBg ȶF ;ˮr/KST9]Βm^|T>&/W;nn_ օW[U>q(b/6#HebƪfrRJRkIj@)׈jr1Z7  ӈ G.4"n3~ta`!EQ^99՚j+kڽN4s~UsZhmN0 f;s[U/S)頩2r{e&P~IS9r&&xHqq30<3Tׯ20.XwS | ʹ>  rKxy„(!1ooW ߌ&?Y*5E^#i&,jdb3>"2)a#DT `xe} R\U\F9oװ!F.nn"+G$""Dcb08c>,@"bp۰ɬ%4Ɠ,ȒP:@ɏ&A!PD4>)4tfԜZ _fQRSl pHhDْKG@(% @=uDZ@ )Q2u$'ԉ$5)!-u&gZBKQW I&uwhR-N+)\+u#Wʤ,ZE)rPBɍ36p7#̸0+|7aR [<lHHQ4|4|#d:goIEc BP(lT߄:vb9kXR_"TR$P^[_3>ѱʴڶ%3)%̶S F9p|+J.1qYm^\'7pZ 0>&|NS0WZ7j/tA[՗u#TlgLb#f3ۖ܅5Jr@1rQE?^1ϚҠ@N k)~eMbebflМ>bcxDTFPe(Gxi#En"0O e&3Jp^~YLͦ":EOG-UsJsV=Z?\'r^c'-qt{E'cFꋞLBFAX*֨l(P:*\md[q<3.ݹq?8L9+gXC}ٿea&,&s|ycro ǥ-֧sf5˗uX]'%/H9dPmmw7q]{jʖ%!QZcYa 55 `l,@eijZ 4532 I[2 m2LҔ@D aIÀK(x>@cI=2+9{η߽/oI>) ˈT/M^!GodZIEo~JRGiATaՕÌ;ӕ9`_7Z`d/y9E EDx|p _C߅RΗ"#p 7Aq.{w43@&y/ w1oP@YRT\l].ʹϫc`%WAΏp'~ :z@7o Uz(a|PN>7S|]/̋4k"k2H#UP“,L[䟔(e=ABfj+R'Qԟ m =Fӿgzca1!sGb Y =֪ujv<`upE׈}@Dm& 0s ߢ^bERQ۳nt>ڲ)yñٴܰ4'Ӯ(ǁFDZճѵ]骳梼(/-YZ̦"i5bISǷm:눱sWK>7JHҬb?شSiah>2c!x^R ~%:0u`Impb mbK V%u !QB$!m֭!uWJ8UKHX-廔)(TAUr8hOVN&8 HT_TapIk2H` 9ԙMvBQ[A02t-L$xvFpWFWD-X' _^Ď$˚P3p6NOtG Ѿв%;+!trI_S,elA @J"DMr߄[`\Q ~"'qL"$2](l**dAH-Ui׻+G0R C"pSrS4>k(+*<2hG}4p{L:|Ij/3-68>"Gb]ٗ9cQHMD%bTv4.HÉa1(Tvr&D0*А F9(M\[҈NȐUw%:wN > 7Pp0Q1)<4AxH o :O" 2>.{E<59`ӓ;&wˡd86Z-0h5Gu?ilA:e2gѬ"Ό}yu_;L&}Ko>{v ]>A,s>TX nX"l{IY\Z̮O6wVč۸)^q#yp4N0J&wiNwYzNMY ͈NeTYCC̆#Ddw_8vӛ_cه M؞j\_ZKRO~kTyó*^{<<^yz}^Uij"o_Z!*}5/9U`OHs׵Θ@ޯ;13c(07CYiٖ,\9Cbr&du3XWk\XLcS)(^aXUlcS͍}TYya1 ;.비hYۼp2Ǖ|m{d2][^;B3XjEu'uߘ%֔s+ћ 5P6᫩٨5+ZQ4bbYp%`!JgZ9 /bwv8UսUc\Oa@j1܃BogϦgeF1уٓ殺FZX1G3/GCcaA:GL[Դ(V`tJ1eSZNL:Unخ O{_rg[qx#gvh,?vφ/};w;?αgbs~wqHb' P k!bkA-S5!MG)tjYYAAe馶!i#ZZ|wC6?9,F` YV.Sp<5jJ_ve㱎jI[YCCOCS.I*qHDȓ ԨD]j,jXlH%YDŶ T&J$fHЭ>3y$EȀPb+R3%J'8';$wIf '~tb%Spo4+Zd >lXz}8h0ڌ_EW*աǮ?Ij5r`:1TL}ɨ _ʐ>C@Ufْ +ϳP)'B"@ sh<0bjf<}UPR֛߮s]7d6>?tVٳ׿yvmJ v!lOJ-wAqz]˨(=Xr82p>& &2,GlC,u@ט1/-:9{Iz4=S ӐG_~aA6A N 03r ((3O*#FH+a[`"p!o7R-im]Bo%QE W| nz۰Mƪ U *Y n3]K$$_}+@Y#IZ VMϭLJ'C0Lv+K7.naJ N&u#]O9Jweq)r5WcKـ\b Ϩ  uhǟ?4 L/efY@Q:VYp!x;Uw0dmֱq #7N D U <'@X'r^S&"dIM$Vk2J-ҡFe-Pӎ02ZfGf &( -;b (('p!1:E:QjpĞj yMWAGWhtEjIkL00`;7.#A]˻ly`i2dvH/h҉]eXWJ"̯ K$yPQROľCwر d;_Ðz[1 3vZ)Ap8H-U%L R>gAU ^$ 80Y% *2em EqLy+92.;ǫ8@Z6bPAӋ><]UWEmJunY$]]7]۷~nu9[;+Gse)vt7vyRaږ؆;T=j$ *ĕ_nvaP:dq8-S3$q /?ݛF8Am t޲" hpخ?' :Ə>?//ɼMc:>ΰōݺUAzþ=6&1<KuZlಥ4NyDZ U^&ȨsJ̲dllg#1]zs45(\<+! s-alZX&\ lQw }dޚcl̨|g czbg~hr\bMy8SCos>c-)lڿo}~h lu= ;qb`3ÿvi7$z|h{Q1#X\cY_c,IWPӥֈ5Ʋ3cdkbQH;d҉[B\păyfwPg`J}w{kn{qo;SC\Det-6F[#&i5I8GZmcXΐtҴM[ㄱ͘Nvvnw;"]P,XL c/9E_ @LċK w{Kp=aܲ5;W?8;tӱD{U_=&ǘʕ{*]#<w3.dx~1|ձ|h䓌ْXY= gpGc 2^`9@22]f rA٠ .,Se!t4ў!{7.EW7Hf]&XďHJ7gXPӳW >`ML7((Jpʾ(pEOhpzxr1wDkQx IOƞfouq/uro^S,[(xO}>zTD߾ճݵ44ϼ߇<ň-mG+Vd3qv,vX0 ȔWBq]a)mw˥jtrL_\qVù\m v<ˬ ۪(%_OGMa>͛fLR݃_gP:O#_eAA#VkR\B1XQcSX:I>Neh심NϜuEMk_~jUz QdA%nh~ªQީљYo{wU;zwºp1FKּ݁닗>Pn~@?İLaظPO?WD% \U*PVT5*QRP){2BNQYI0#~rE!b_i}q x"ڴ"E9<CN@IE\a"2KCBЀAf;kL-7ۄL'\> c'^ϱ+njIJ?߯ڳ賢6܀5Rno'kBhNFhr}2**'a{vRIVo6|l#a&\OOI>EUc8k˂TA58G 1O6%x;*XB{=!u.o)#!$!Q>E% @|^ZPKBiD,nӤKsaA{N#͛Αm(沣"? k]f, :|w(e_ګKkNpsݞ 'G C1/6$vl; )|^Eoge}-SiojF4w40$zK~%Ux)/68А:Ú óE"8Iנ(bHQ(,83AQe}+?iˆK]{3?Yz}P@&2_}uZU  n̿EKaO uFI %a-Ԝ*O+F} -^6h{ʁ=9&͒/)dǫD;ϊʈfEMRh~8rO8E@wMP\z3K ([#jBr{G,76<~Fasؐݚz&*4ZMjێ=:3{K5T@(T4r  b"erZϩqoXEeY* N0Y`8: SjQ' # $X-:1P]r0QwE[2}(%.+00(Ho@x.6;ΔS$.@%)KqJdbOߔw}.CP x咸'oPPVT,SOZ7V9pzf ?v ߴiMʀ9_=ߝ_l}8b8~%N%! 8ڄWXZBXPJZʣ*t:Ʀn*Q-ĶJfl/_%V!쿅~`^iج^գbr"A%AvÉ$r@"P" C0AZ( Dk 伃q^ ^(2'Tĵ%Y8 P"_?Cwl' }?euAmwY`aܝqw~b8_.S<54ԉTϮ]Jq`x;] u!. S0 >xJ"^i*.. qQQ3^Fon[Wxtg% PYDU/415x=پL< _kV&X0GXRv_t_Wfc.Wk3 a]ߊUL^GO]gMT>_|WB_0`9W?hk>O9[(JT{4MJ4OOӇh)ziM֨5z .4F**Y"*L04EDÃ7C%j4b}Kv}5m]-OnXFGruzݝԦ,ϊ?,,||["qyi^ΏjP nl3Ј0<<;#}6 >VʼnrH!5b"}`m[#x#7[!BF =d)1O3ͅ5U \Eo#S=|o7e+W3 O*npVB\Va%*["E8axFvz̔G)3%]c͔=\ MFNZ+_6k%" ޖuW yN\98N? 5xҟbɆ6O"u$7KPT˗[?$~O7> ȱ9*d9 49EhVt/ @@IL$_OBҰI"'N$0 /`@_ K-[σp]7ڽ,X5-|jUZf4̺&NPyM;j,@5p..dkYRQfc|hI eOtC%~'%Zpӡ1gT4>S.nyxYH )*| `GFf.w^),4PJ `)Y+'RwfO#Bim=1znchn7O0xrl0 ]?~.-t-}i o~_X z$̼\gM`"p0&o;Q3w9N-Kqao!~i$W313]M֪2X#' pՅ;K6E%p1g1]@L.nhn{7{_=™nSll{!EY}v[co?Ư|g/C=ìṊ`f~bo{[ߝ8v6dOwC`rUX hRt3fVR = #2C\n f*5B VDuY5: (GH..J}Z,J>jhr(eTjB.4[ Fw%,C6[ l5ȋ_ 'M_M+Ӆ*aF4@!!$!1 :3!N`h%n,6h7(+T$1$PLr[T9Pg o@h, IN@&19"/^=`ŅZ Ġ`YeVzW9ᕖi>NOGB=yh:Ww5zȎ:pn?dC`U6JcKqjCN]nQh0A ݘA,,ofĵ9M/ʼZ eA!-x3aJ r8LeEƗv贴 3>|PTȏk ʫS$Ǟ2-)%=}sM|51>*2E]*qkQ qiwo=pkZ--۽cT+;GC{FT:tQ15b&M*0p`]upV닯*o{@\gU *5idpӘq׍hPAc칾ĕ^tዣ ? 6>۽ܢ1ٳ䊦)α5#2P9NΆE뎲)O6֡b%)}^90,kU/ ̈,;p:y (v#NgB+f<31_  oen+JY4Ŀ,;s6Zz^B(ҞDa]e?QS-lIѢ |7ZSkWׅV7J3(r/Eh 3XBFÀC@*0< y \U/?Sn͚[Ѩwjnڍ špYoC'U܍OD#Ǹo+Zh+D]`'X>[0S2dP/ (zQjYON0.^`_<ؕSN\`ƾ7o=`YOuR@n;lg Dc/꿨S4+~4qoVQ5\~\yacP*R{ITvPG12ZܥDS$E\1?flgǷmZd7m^a]C;^EEw] agv|d1fb@L`h.@&ʬ{xnd[QaKП;ҰnV_BXa .;7lmǔ=5ɭ QjmTg#ۙ)v_ ; h_nsM~Jk'ASSߢ>ݐ~^)Mnz6ish@sŏhYۨ64o+xGӶ.ċqSJCpAci8C ?IH>ۨ^sۏrWH 3sc;<##"&uT< a/[?T`mEwWKF< ٣<#p?i װMsC>PSv6Hջ)b~QNo3f.Xg֕ 0ZLNNC}n54chMa^Yhrf?1 M<=TQ Z[4GFw(_lғMh!nSOKzA=7Tۻ~}+FRsrգ~ceZ~j6$󅱚7\{Uqr"h_ZW\y1F4'\6@%rZ4<̃zS(=#iH5Qxye<_7j9Id!WLXm P85@YirY`{}`Ӽ@>QCytS~H Mk_F-tkR7c+ ą CNֿRO;0}eH},}-z|--<`)_LK:hZ%iY1qy2ml8;%"o.6 ]1`p$̟1ccb effݟ/*9Rԇ4JVT5m U}}[EV{fg%k\;ڙo{nXitmv[^lp^wsOZMoon-'Rm?k"\ :P)Τ~`P:դ Ni U3lܠz`u&),'8]$U|&uVwI0ѳ!]Dz{HO52ހN[?|R qn~N>^h h7}&@p7^t1Qn4&ftiBm#gLo`62}A0;Z"}gYD/0B6xO0 6oX͌<ĸ@0ȸ]Iή76_&@zGn3HK^d~_0Kx=۹_1˿`3f}Dgy=J0{Fܜm+t+U|7d罢VJ[u`^CсgOi=T [eҡoΌOk/psy73VEO9/`nQg?y컁fh|wzbZP;l=Z7c/}}W? y<ȁ;M娜*KiQe| fPcVj:5SjHqnXK2lI< % -8>fU̢vvnsƟRIM?W:nש~.sq󢽍_#_y*(;ʳ.tySGLw9 ^jêC(A1|:eihd^s;,5Um5O{Z$d!l7%6(͌={sҖuVe:[3\b02 VtrYmCPdr5dY"/H^e-NkF1,W Qz~?3FDuٶNo'ެ`85+ p9ǫ-HyJ-lϱS], Z]Lr-IzGPm5"uA/֨Ĝ")xmn"5[5\,>]D㫏-̣>5ô=8|屫׾ûш-u.հ͹?)G~駑T+`֝2G2SgW'zy19zQ5*1b ҝbK<*WOIյ;\uVx OwTS-ĖueW{kŢĺTld㺗.{D{ܣ-e[$7fo&.#=mK>|賦ԭDZղ+У4㳦u"ȲI?s8~2,sʢ<#~&'ىE9[Gc-A5 \1#YKl\V^eDFcUW!:gQ|xiqy#G@ڀ: #R=8erY!J\,=J݈A=M]5oNJ:ilSlMe,]loU^Vls#VsWT7⬉Xlw&rg'PKs֒\*Hetm.%+hdNmě^i3 Ќ|⵶9SD#}^bOڧ)gcɌL5ø]0H|IsE)$DUֻ(OdyiUsr&ghke?GH\l@9*)@Wr[[b5,)i/Qs,ݒfy5GB?\-< L^~j:=DOe:c*>Q4'xvg1ԍybpJw?*Wiz^CÜj}Uf1:FMzv9QGj瞌^Oc ۦw_NOO_JNw!dziV!*C jy*mlSuU8>TXܫWfKnz2$kEɻյN/>{¯:HAzhM@lv ] ۡ9 _]e x@/>A8 QcpNK2|Na0 g0<\ % p5:|ހM` 2`YA\ P(%>ڲ԰mބΪ*0#vȱֲԩI6)ꤽ;:"03Vݰ;vh-ZJgtKt]Ht ]Jt]IWt ]KtH7t JtIwtK=H=J=IO =KH/ JIoK}H }J}I_ }KH? JI@)a ,rȣ&C,"VXb55&Xb= !6b3l-%b;l0;b']+v{b/}/hAhЊ!8m8CюCqa8Fp48DlPFN@'\TG  D]n`,NI8Tq8L$LL4L ,<,",,Y8\q.ER\qUZ\qnMV܆q]^܇CxQ<SxY<^KxU[x]>G೧İڴOij)Ϻ&yW䕳Wճܰ䵳泾氨ހ7䍳泦ބ7ͳނxކxށ̻ε|A`>[>a41'I2§򾱴:8"<43x&<< x!/żÚi Ct[Y͎HE7բBf^3R M.(pxeWjf ;#;dV cafa  Me۪7EqGc>uP_C>P54XC>иrY-ÓIXM2uE4IVUQv Y~G<-fЙVd޲d}44Y+9W/s #j=j< ӵR)a$AfjoV#MFI݂%MRJ*23*LYDM:mׯY_v,ӕAgdBj\_v`֤nV@TecpQ7VA ujFjѬ{ծ[KxU[Kb_} Vjt(Mm"cWG6P#8[͢Fj4Mz$DI +hĚ, UX e+,ӍfŐ\K-,jڇ LƴkL2LZ6ƕCwqסNvң0t}>TM+t1c3'aJtE7Ublq5H>D9};Ӗ)mPpj1JJqw O*n*,1R%#*~Ɂ|իVc7rjnOA cՆ ~]罹}RJ[лӒe Ve%R26b;7vP ub'͇8iVl_}nR*iz.CTDJ[H u{wiUS@ Uovgٙ7oG'@xHrLX7V0;ŞfsjW, yOa٩|}'wnrIxc_?lTD> kzBDҗ)K,Qx9,whT9ݲ J_b,dyarEHÚ6xÉnhH_Mћu`#{8!gD֞!{1@vtX찴dgX w3 =3b@8_Fl_qvDցl]i^,@"Ώw#^#@ N^ǡ^ۡW]Ÿ*`WYNmb<د9Gm5;Q'p>ޑa;LVʟAM57sNul\jcZ Golq w U#%B]vG;:&Ny..s?v>l{6xGHF]p f 7Όe3&ݗ:ҾkTI% ׁL₴߾J^.G:v?uE7=w&y` ((Z>j#tVf, npC~pX4u+ ,: ݜr!i_Cf[E8v;`ADM]Ib:@v41<*(rDMфpU# `ׄ?.(H*,kU; ˺GǸe] bh?sdPB˴l .WvJlNқ7ߥ6*C뭖ڬN;[uaJBΗ/ٕ.CγLx9l*g*B̈́\rx6&O33pfjgQt`BGMdKo|b/VPDVSdUL$'V5nCdQ3~A}=YmJXnmP}FSb.2uut܀GXt}Z٠,!Cz5-6oR \xn6A_+R(hJkXCӀuwkM:jnQ:kס-j_jT?}T"]dvBޮTZZm7rYcR$LK\^Od0t3I嗹\.\ʩޅՅoBBB-҃R. \1I_y.pKއz$\sy˗r5@,[KBV+*[Q+Ԥs>nsfPKY0Y |0;~Y>b9x@fvmJS걌'ׁ9oAwY}Q] u -0¢jB4 kV՝JoK ĨzbxJ&G/N@O e<FޒmUc_+uLR{zCʙVK> CӌQ{`mḙw!U:(z,I//>>)I>*c}v[z]f} mfԇzP0뷫~i˰Rw>RKf62[%_p/ٿοG~ì3]$>iq2[4GvV Q`:A6}`.RΠ16If+ják&P=fU` `MʟjS~:̦3g\l5e=Rm\L)_/oRy-TPdT!ܹ:PkSj|n|ҹeƦuV>?MQVfmBYc"BB"bvք fWR$c'1t !AnL7/^ʹ !ټy;=U'RvmA`)g`o>*;Fɣ|4G7>y6G,a3MV&%4x#J҆ G{yzqih7*Bpcي]0ͷf}(hu޼Oh&aٓf_:En˕u&:>#: -\^ZN(l?Me~HxEuH.III x t%]' %l* +P¹meӚys3$ @S!-4*`*JIlW\RoGaբTd["@!w Z&VZT}r%ZrIN+7Ϩ&W[S?mg-[/sp靖hmhtx2/XjI-xwWr| :{e mC1֜8FN"-TPL'R _'D '; .W55e2q=t vtH0A⋉A=t'@v +$?R7OH*oRҧ`[#'c endstream endobj 108 0 obj 21400 endobj 110 0 obj 37588 endobj 109 0 obj 0 endobj 111 0 obj 0 endobj 17 0 obj << /Type /Font /Subtype /TrueType /Name /F3 /BaseFont /FOIJCF+BookAntiqua,Italic /FirstChar 32 /LastChar 255 /Widths [ 250 333 500 606 500 889 778 333 333 333 389 606 250 333 250 296 500 500 500 500 500 500 500 500 500 500 250 250 606 606 606 500 747 722 611 667 778 611 556 722 778 333 333 667 556 944 778 778 611 778 667 556 611 778 722 944 722 667 667 333 606 333 606 500 333 444 463 407 500 389 278 500 500 278 278 444 278 778 556 444 500 463 389 389 333 556 500 722 500 500 444 333 606 333 606 750 500 750 278 500 500 1000 500 500 333 1000 556 333 1028 750 667 750 750 278 278 500 500 500 500 1000 333 1000 389 333 669 750 444 667 250 333 500 500 606 667 606 500 333 747 333 500 606 333 747 500 400 549 310 310 333 576 500 250 333 310 333 500 787 787 787 500 722 722 722 722 722 722 941 667 611 611 611 611 333 333 333 333 778 778 778 778 778 778 778 606 778 778 778 778 778 667 611 500 444 444 444 444 444 444 638 407 389 389 389 389 278 278 278 278 444 556 444 444 444 444 444 549 444 556 556 556 556 500 500 500 ] /Encoding /WinAnsiEncoding /FontDescriptor 18 0 R >> endobj 18 0 obj << /Type /FontDescriptor /FontName /FOIJCF+BookAntiqua,Italic /Flags 98 /FontBBox [ -250 -280 1226 1000 ] /MissingWidth 331 /StemV 73 /StemH 73 /ItalicAngle -11 /CapHeight 922 /XHeight 461 /Ascent 922 /Descent -280 /Leading 202 /MaxWidth 1022 /AvgWidth 401 /FontFile2 112 0 R >> endobj 112 0 obj << /Filter /FlateDecode /Length 113 0 R /Length1 115 0 R >> stream HV xM׾fB&AqsM!(1)2L"! D"1E%j!son"׾UTO=]|{׳Pa/ . W{7@(l#}-!"4(*7zD}{DD'$S]BTlpPiCtPR5@@bC4s>'.v~BB@|#-1.>4.*TvHCö6k|#k Z gR FhT;+ϨؘXBSQwA|hc KQ1zAe??rǿɲS_>s /]rkq;wXiZH8( HaT-SerUUWԍc3k3ݟH$wI'%oW`)E%햊mSmsNvn Aksӵuu Bۉv2d!7eUn-{Ȟrw_S 9KΕbD.ȗ=;~~>X[kSPC#McwA#Xک&zz:=B,|^ vTm~'FR,]cE]F׀ TY F(J ( xYdv175;Luu:C]q͉ҳ*jcmUf5=J:#UNUVw7EUzl*1UnQTʤW9{ަѦ&c18888mh / O O _n* g# 1 88vӜ鄅nI?D{zWLz kKOѵOW64[cV#[ v٬X_yxYB%c_Oqq|BQ˨07G-6n"#UE4"bHD`!$,",R$#˘~F)ҐY `@z&D(%;jDDh2M4ScjB@3h&4h6SRS͡HKQM1pɉh|J gjJ\5xrȍZQkZDi %RZFm%&vA) /-ɤԁ)2i,ZEԑ:Qgʥ84|x&c4>B zWdHEE&ٸx4NMb@so,hᦺ\}|[RE<6OMy~n=7׿qQ/Xs^ds[/8 (l机Fj1exaޜ[x^pH9ˌ*9xN L1xb([HLC.n(1Ly<Іlbrnn%HgO3/\EGGEY̬2\m*;޻ce>sЅJKx6l y7/F҃};B8Yd?._+{]G? dLd0³8,{̄:De(F]5{BSʔKJ%㴇vxu_>`F^O p:G-D:oٍH/p ͤ")| 2K9G?@MFBxF`B}JRTbF;i@ߠJALSȔ3 3$K5͖nFҬGEF(hmH.I|#c:9ۛxKܱZ䋃$eQ8TU.(BbjBK]xLp~-dV4\b mSt4DqyFA0h$hob i7 J<)BIt"v R{Gwv^{5!$uDD]( vTu&:˝pd BI1O~6BMFK f4{}ܚ|qg_Ω\؟/b")-&`,1&TD"Xc$_I$,πd>295Pv \)>{Cs@ΣIz !} hP2P(UY~.'r w7P$UsWZF6U(& -NѰgU`q].M\W޻J,v%ܕl#ɲeaЂd,P<\cyL4@11'0 5!iP@Hg&ɔ{we팤w٫|\`8ƍT1eá%+#lNQ0' +K :,W;zǔ]onkcm[hbC}[&M=vdI1㹆Uͦrs6Tn6g 4놧?0++Iinm5H[OK:lN{]t!0=¨\FڥEDUq`'kFIZQ bVEEkɂqq& (ooXxCN#qӔ,m]"R!C CCfm(6H%AJTDpdx+'Pї;6Cw<[5,K>+ٚ*<r`u?-NGU|z!t(828,d S[u ) cxMgƠS zS_GfHqFPGHI<[ ?60JkFud ՟!8Oqu!\4=!y͏맵cPox1q1ۋH9RyA{ 2IP]]*cDݬ(7[@SpQjBsY'"BuqnPRn^Sa+1+p1y<7n"$vh)FpS) 8L#dpRyi)y !ve0%dp h=cNHPXcNb܅jA %JrNNZڳcuYIVvա5cgc{à+\k uh=%. Fc?ބ|^`F,K]f\cmvY2VMBi JÎbrY1f5#j*dX?lH[Fr8nCQ@nP ѐ{PSɆ>!H-iUG ,^ySOH^}ooՃUW^r'c`p5Sd|~OA y]wIGc~nװ܄Z,J BFmTV8lejJ5VY5 xVL2Z &fTW2aaAh{2ހ|2O^>dS4X B𠒧- 40r(\$8O^o .S9GsCWozSwb86B6fPR;Gq${t4}( ,6:fzDҫ$/A֭)ĺ]~l86:˜u*T:'6Ѧ 0V#(1w=/@0rQ[!;L I ?.BDyD!CX?V DUډJ8#ů\ׄb]_l|39^(JL ~1lk6?8}oK&=9akPPd3o:`ܺ2t3纹mݥ3 :e-&VzpZj9fjd7}{58!/ @QJʘ:+@㕬C>o`Ǵy6M?N>?o;T: 넽j9VcxT/}$>߉$ĉ;%!糦Bɣ%ջG%سվL**˪>ԡԸ46ئ󳾿6ɒ羱쳦77\ɢ@e%6SczN?.ɕj/ 90a4N(hC!,Njp-o2#;ڝ*=w*jEhC0g3ϫO+?+ F@'6,㳷߬*^B V)E)Β6qt89jqu# CB!\F%W8!5@^fwn`UusNup"\ͯ&d \(ݧ'uJ,d'>3`v,91-iӳ6dSʅaZKp'4F% BjahBm[Y5jrkSvVJ(?xtJ8egr2hSÄEbȭԜUz}ޘ뙬!kRYS;nnz9o:c\qxB;≶m4_ >z}iqQ(;MRw \W b`L^E O0S?Դ?6*ŬԷɴǺϳՙ;嚲a,&/lǴʱʱ!T<.a )fӤ)4YdY Dc.9n@k:؟R?c&JYOŏVBOCFRx%yL.]`%)@L}wBVvv?u*jҗ4=m}YcQo(t񷜵+_X8TɿK3 tYo8t R)-cQh\˭$һ%Μ9p Iq[䖹s9|҆1iP\]3*"1;#ˬ=<#DkPe޲:N{xb m5vٙ. w82y\d߶Qo[#SݵW_b[L)]!n6,#!8L*3ʇJRw{I (1\A]&##wX^\"1{D<9 7`Lmu%RJRQBȏ`D,(&Ay=!-[f]q7]J,m@|jVsj[q<vWF!Z, M j}S xi )$/2E:= 0QXcCL,O_THrkKʏc7zMvgLmk YU ]@ٗAljV/Su];Asp}{~}$Je QK vK4#>g1bX& "j?) }}*gc_S9-/&z8&eQƒJa]"%#Y\2E$=e-y ]JE@ D]U]9VO4Ysxg6e/٦`-ԝX]M-U_~mX hYCvT,ܰVVMպ6˟5hZoe"TcxG䏩,:tQM#p<mާL7jG&4ПhFp!_h\.6*@uZRegpI \Zd8J.ԕ<ϠͶgMVV+!༵c\RUc^i"DŖ 'vpE$mC}!u0+ %Ƥo?H`\b=I,1Y!FHT,PDoH80[Ss7>vιExhnntwGّ\&wϞMvYA4u\WVDS-/tey{w~={r~N q8R@Ȁ ^65k n @ kKI Uu+C#ԩVZ(ݴٝKXis=7;.XkhU.KOec:̳w'?7sSt+oV- wGNE EDPW#hZYn EFQe`+c1w,p|9k 6N$za U(bB9Lt0k2R4nh3tG3i]]EDfP&Z @ QD ńRdYB,-nѝ2"#G#N+\k%Ȓi]tb#/*4JHdҵ6A71rr֦.#~UtX\eOOe:Aǯ@tR_e l,|u̩ x/Aw`7u~]\ +s Co0b&u} M&i;MS.W/EStZS"Ed$BNEvqϦIHy/9c&2;kQ1v tdH~ZESno zLMaYrβQo7r6n&v[WFM1O \wG\ }@BK}+NCŐ1RP H2Ef$/I9)vK" H+J*IRg5_i33B.B1mjAAˤ.L (|g=6ݷ&P! Z[ɩk*#>w1Tdn!Ap\*`mPhAgMy%R6"i4aŰr8cƋz6K˗+ ٚ6zeRhexZrF@$rMV;BB AEZ3òdrZn= r}$p/Z"D139"ɱSI&x_㴸PWU,j[ -.osj z/5/F*xj ?aeljݾU;!AAU ld.Zl}vM o䒻u/ 醈U'뎨'O'NOǒɉW^K&jSk{[{{o[A$|guR"MTJGO|OVb+eYK:e--"La̻ %#g,ǐ`6kN6-U BSm)N[Jus Dy],(rXq^\u-XvY<Ƌ-~2,GՃ&E˼f2/Q'\Fka68@Iqܚ sNC/j؊kOhh'u챣'ԝa'qŸsB.\*?kZZdE lQdwO*\P2h˘])-~1Uo1 ]Xp[Rhx*5jMMZpV6 OkB/#BB7%V;6 _ 55E&"F(*SF"qB)xՖIjV\щ2o%Y*i=~f]a02?0vrufL_pOtDrsѪ,\i=gQB{ on3g8ɀי̃hê Awn%iZ䨐:  QZΨ8$J IYu"@y՜g43_q}<$2OPwATKғRXςi1ĊVJPQXUV/MEp\3覮-7^SCF|ud`KREa(A#w+JX}'ȷB.9.qBb7UnRzQ씝WnO6z []' @GMJ0n";Ո;J}+xfjqXr?o ]r7e};wb;yC!B^ d%%]h#Hl ]* Bl-N˺6TU4{TiߝB=Ma0*} J:=Rmk=&qED P\*E\c&D*Enu"/ K5byq|Tz^Vyѕ&l,b_cDh]Kvm`la7NG9F*+6ԘLEisLrO4@ }/5oq]fCFUjױ{/m+nkι9 8G^e1,&T "cp9Bi!'>\]&X r%6ϊ(.keBvX2$lxXT<3D'2-F"J1mw *)YM@}ҭL56Hw_hF&^{էS¿Ռ>C )Ty7 80& 4:C|9AYC4"L΀?4"@ģE<9"B$XW$XC0;^bY)'~LS&s:G)lB)jZX-, -sBkx_)%T[ dr)" Py^_ @ =VeС|%qlܱs4|?W$-7}mfͰt~=goF,1scfM%YAMG NjRFeny?mv#S8~8W":?Lp1z&ɫđFBCP&putFA=R~p̀>~8Ɛ._SU$`~(i:B2k5jEl6d@nvOp4gǍ㾣Q) 2sup+qqeVx6͢? vO>_ Mgq '9%wI9&UMR4[f௥Nc\Y)2L"p{az^@ui_ZJW(`2s\ /?4LQh),•Q%Q?!HvlӐ \aUNBcH2,xө/4y<|>βyaj\ hVSKafzU۞H4 h 0 oI!{3-F \iuh]i^i^LP,6&J e0c55zׅtYdc> UoY_NCyEs>b*)%/]!W [# g͛7v?gTSԮmvjΦ;'B&+B% ܳJ}BaЉoR"#bMT:_d3bBHQY KkjZRcm]ۊkZVjH_\\LPo sR l]+,`0V5:sl:- & ]ıG-}(ȻB5]X !D E_l)+"|uVDȋ9DLT^Y&bwLU1G[6w`3>6v4ؚo߹}:9ky3je~fvA/Xwno|lŽY_YKW;klz ϦYȜP茺.lCE.+vs+cULϜ1|3̌k>󴳯0-ky<*z}6ͳaYZa>tY:rفz*R*:7  x=w~GY]v7Bd7/kQ y$iCA .Bb'z%Ჵ27mճѰ,?< :K'??_Y|dje1ks=̋܍}ؐ"2F;'U-Y7pVemd귣{n޵ƈ-g_NDD7֫5TGC~n袟뤤g^'*vf(ڥ$oe2U<DN]f|@*A`?5w H0>YFy\@5NPolVف" /uB6clKe/x3ޢwF:bi*`똵V*tvPVF ,jQ#xvExȬ8x5O\xØ xTٰ}38;2 .U0e̿-u5§[>Cawo! š i)d7k :E`o@ޕ"wuȏWcCSѦ?gҮ4e9:(zREu#22(Vk7OcE\jmLJG` +^4P.瞋! x}OJMt8j (4,;*/G⃶dXwr6;Q_6t. y00 <4& Ur)ȹ9y9q>4vғ'A>|VliVL9GmiFJ 3P潟 i>ׁlEiťE]LJ~G &w1XwDOi\_`ܰ/dk[<k!#U;2 =qaq_<<åv>r}4>׈~F59R6@=kk>gs,g^3ohQ/_cFEu3Mߩ:MWB]fvmTZU=*EQ}=i{ZZhR;`vis!m&AئBSDsHK|҉Z'гs{q;bM2e\3*Bs~xlc[6H1;aKđXɻfD},bŶ/W9F;p`ON^Oydߊg? '=5q^7A G'Re'c}XrA퐜ވ䬿,xLɡO|Nd)$g}@$)9 ̱J9#9=TЧ%Wil'Crw !ƿ#9$x&OK1jYov,I&9OHz+sɡO\>?<.9(ofpU5@Նִ[} yPkۚoF(&C;l[|@K X.W 57 ְ.7B+`m[U@}prp.X[rWT( |`'@](){ „1S9ͧ %2D 4Wu|Kpw(h)MShIzKbe;I&&mwww/R^܊?{gw" %9s}G^Ɋ6Ɋ넒E^Ws we% K/YP2CZ#?_\W{zbYU+Ԙ7Iȷr=JykgsD"_{+`Nفrޤ֘֞lPRel֤ͩp˽Ag,%Zy6Қ^ƾ՚S+-b)J( gԸIī%T4Nl9A~bvKX{[&SFp ic4Dyfy'~WN_(j9ƯfT{BUS{J:#k·ji$fr, ?鷑 @}V˽N9zh̴I#Leyl1'qEd]KB=ʪ?=PJ6biaSlHbZqpI9YrooErmgz +:*w\sݼt51NXW%ahH&5=c' fW)<arB(W+K 1J_#n4"Zs%^|ָfYߘiiFACy]&4W5*ɶiN%[#acd՘]WA2ӏl+_2H_ MzVWȤ"@jѤUi*u}:gAPTc|!6NwTەjQVM]mIbsvGMDZI7^tv,˯nmaslK#d=)țьa_.̸6+U*7PkW4i_Ì(̣B~PG.f&nqP roJ6etHzvjuXTKPIV5kG = aSPn"ɠAy W!3[ȽV(mCVTl^! o/8֏h7;}Nw5A=ewf\.|3-֩]5ֻhwNM˵JѴYڨW;5:jo˫Zggu~6<5cc:T;nϩgvxh~fkۙj3>mƱ-չ+;ܸ})V䴡=ri9ܰ#ސs4U⥍=涳<>;X$`AM_ZDV$ӎRYf^Q{XY݃sjO.S]Yw}ɒZ6+Rm"YaO\NZ)a{zv'(Hωkuwul5fQ˯ԚtNjK'{HzzL\4S.ӳXxX³K ZZ =(?D`:"\J+Kw+\:_ַx47g[KuL7CuBٕ+./ߵן%;Xb9,"VXb55&Xb= b#lM)b c l5c2B9zClPA;ag]cwTbbcHhXxLI)0 {c?QQ"1uGd1 C#0 ьqaqQ8XqNI8TqY8\q.ER\qUZ\qn\܄q n<܆wN܅`!}A<cxOI< sx/E ^kxoM{xC,GS|W`1w?G7'?/~o%,2\qyW*\qu5:\q}nnܐqcnMfܜ[pKnŭٝ۰eOٛ}ؗs{ @܉;s8C88{pGrGs rsDNdNTiܛp_90*&jְ)c=0˙l`Yf Cx(#x$<8x"O<43x&<< x!/ż2^+x%ռ:^x#&[x+6w. y/|!>G(|O)>g,|/%W*_|o-w.r?3~/%-?9q#pDRv.{*uke-{rTDxIBfٖrI{o3r=H3 3HO֟XfO_ֿXK Mm\2x^'*x5^ &x3 o;.x7 !0BzЇ> ac|>O'S0n> pfp n< w`w3pYx%20XpXBN!ǐB9ppp_,| ߂y6| ߃#1~ ?/+5~ va>w9Q+)%O3N@FK O}QXq&uĽ KyUZ*adYS66Qپc愗'2ea㊧d!?v7VH+q!vxbs崑H&^cFij 3Tx X,1^?[COu~mB"U$n/SnSv_ {;WdiK4RK#" 7 Oq3{7|0hR$nmBOy.y,u_ihEb{&KC},Ĝ\ k>$J`\!u#MZ@ɚ{TV*ƴH[sŭGڛ*L 5>Pԡْb6,4MמԳܲ+ě鴡ͶV3dz<'/jp = ehՖs^H1_P- d"Xc#">eΑ.('2<̌xhĕHW'HU0Cy<0z}4ABW+qb]/+1mdJ_\ Yj2MA9lwuZ 3ny6Lh&_ 70;ɳÝX覣*gb`lˌtn7҈FS3˵f,92EFHшϹcUE;aěyibj#ӨĔˌlxiLMrSe}Xy:Tk8UK}&ϙ1/(EL,´ͬadV޼]qZ1֩ݓXͣj:; L5ˀd$hޫ֥UǵZ'*\%(ML‹Q_IxQ&\ ߯y?jeұYKj1R݉ys/o:F[%6NuQkZOK ,XgjO?nNr~&K3,jƭy /5V)' a&o-Ȑe Na=#ߺ+^(cEp Vw3a:Z4Kjb ^OW*'.5JlD斾SNL9OubI,..֦N 6 i(M][ @tKx@&8N/ʎXQ?0IW^ii{6$mDڸwI# ; ]%/]#/=ңH{_(yy>y>A0'>a Oƀ01 c@lVӊ}ZO+iŐR,CeH <<<(acD#ƈ0F1"1a cLcƘ0Ƅ1RaNZ4>iH'mHڈ46mn#,87y:7a+>3K-># .(|i ?P(+|] ㌍H TeFbC x<^5!$DJhiȔ&r"(npΆZ5QR~TKMRJҷ{ݙK+{w}칭;퓹f7T? K</ؚ?9r± vs b7^C}6=Q4aމ3lc[hvcD1v:v-qℝ-N-Nf'NM؉ 5∛a{Osp"NMNag؉q)ˉq'X=?rl45p\PMx2mӘ:z7&ߩ5鮐9:45QIx4YRAB,ۧ`~t`łK/Ib&;:f&s1 ^uǦ4P Za5_VvDL~F%~X8059ulE_QٴyΚrW,@[Pϒ.|gk@Dje7m-|t^/e}WA9,c53CWEd. &L,cgi'd36AfWsngaؚYv?Ra - ~ zP>ԫG xtvBWC".;9 +2G!ycw9Ns<>_m!qsqű#0r1x9w9kusx#7Eߟ~y>xz>xx>R7"HMm?:Sck*\pHK rv}XC̪gU%<"̘Z+S r  $<í:W _凳: PV}dVU#OdSo$Sԏ{Z ?&l|$jάreBR!װcjC"Fg7|gQvM~%usHTe}ՂQoBeA$*`EW^|Z=SzR\EKy,MHgoeS҃\:EuBR_kYtƔK}6PTVUJ9d*kR3F$Trl-u=DeA-\0|릲 I7-_33fG~#PT$t4BlSa9FA $afjI'Xwłl> )5cߔ?,_R&G۩\2 WS ])bѻ/HYqo+D :Lq,ʂAK>&裂>,~D?/Xl> 9u٥?u&ZC(nC$2q}(nUc+Nm7$~ڸ]kPmq/ x7\s:\(UߌwW%03q;EF ,'P6e$wMc27K36KLf.V}Hl-Es[+"$}I4F,R$yI@5;k:;ζ'V:Ko>-,$G#`ibhaG`H{-p}x0+kmRg){T.ߐ0|mj(4l- %a5ӕnquA1cUn«VԮ ]SUe^/||)A;-]FlQ]n0۱oN & endstream endobj 113 0 obj 22350 endobj 115 0 obj 38353 endobj 114 0 obj 0 endobj 116 0 obj 0 endobj 25 0 obj << /Type /Font /Subtype /TrueType /Name /F4 /BaseFont /Symbol /FirstChar 30 /LastChar 255 /Widths [ 600 600 250 333 713 500 549 833 778 439 333 333 500 549 250 549 250 278 500 500 500 500 500 500 500 500 500 500 278 278 549 549 549 444 549 722 667 722 612 611 763 603 722 333 631 722 686 889 722 722 768 741 556 592 611 690 439 768 645 795 611 333 863 333 658 500 500 631 549 549 494 439 521 411 603 329 603 549 549 576 521 549 549 521 549 603 439 576 713 686 493 686 494 480 200 480 549 600 600 600 600 600 600 600 600 600 600 600 600 600 600 600 600 600 600 600 600 600 600 600 600 600 600 600 600 600 600 600 600 600 600 620 247 549 167 713 500 753 753 753 753 1042 987 603 987 603 400 549 411 549 549 713 494 460 549 549 549 549 1000 603 1000 658 823 686 795 987 768 768 823 768 768 713 713 713 713 713 713 713 768 713 790 790 890 823 549 250 713 603 603 1042 987 603 987 603 494 329 790 790 786 713 384 384 384 384 384 384 494 494 494 494 600 329 274 686 686 686 384 384 384 384 384 384 494 494 494 600 ] /FontDescriptor 26 0 R >> endobj 26 0 obj << /Type /FontDescriptor /FontName /Symbol /Flags 6 /FontBBox [ -250 -220 1250 1005 ] /MissingWidth 333 /StemV 109 /StemH 109 /ItalicAngle 0 /CapHeight 1005 /XHeight 503 /Ascent 1005 /Descent -220 /Leading 225 /MaxWidth 1042 /AvgWidth 600 >> endobj 2 0 obj [ /PDF /Text ] endobj 5 0 obj << /Kids [4 0 R 14 0 R 19 0 R 22 0 R 27 0 R 30 0 R ] /Count 6 /Type /Pages /Parent 117 0 R >> endobj 34 0 obj << /Kids [33 0 R 37 0 R 40 0 R 43 0 R 46 0 R 49 0 R ] /Count 6 /Type /Pages /Parent 117 0 R >> endobj 53 0 obj << /Kids [52 0 R 56 0 R 59 0 R 62 0 R 65 0 R 68 0 R ] /Count 6 /Type /Pages /Parent 117 0 R >> endobj 72 0 obj << /Kids [71 0 R 75 0 R 78 0 R 81 0 R 84 0 R 87 0 R ] /Count 6 /Type /Pages /Parent 117 0 R >> endobj 91 0 obj << /Kids [90 0 R 94 0 R ] /Count 2 /Type /Pages /Parent 117 0 R >> endobj 117 0 obj << /Kids [5 0 R 34 0 R 53 0 R 72 0 R 91 0 R ] /Count 26 /Type /Pages /MediaBox [ 0 0 596 842 ] >> endobj 1 0 obj << /Creator /CreationDate (D:20030901102425) /Title /Author /Producer (Acrobat PDFWriter 4.05 for Windows NT) >> endobj 3 0 obj << /Pages 117 0 R /Type /Catalog >> endobj xref 0 118 0000000000 65535 f 0000304167 00000 n 0000303496 00000 n 0000304632 00000 n 0000001260 00000 n 0000303527 00000 n 0000201198 00000 n 0000202301 00000 n 0000229544 00000 n 0000230639 00000 n 0000255247 00000 n 0000256356 00000 n 0000000019 00000 n 0000001239 00000 n 0000007074 00000 n 0000001402 00000 n 0000007053 00000 n 0000278241 00000 n 0000279346 00000 n 0000008272 00000 n 0000007229 00000 n 0000008252 00000 n 0000015484 00000 n 0000008403 00000 n 0000015463 00000 n 0000302172 00000 n 0000303238 00000 n 0000022935 00000 n 0000015627 00000 n 0000022914 00000 n 0000031207 00000 n 0000023066 00000 n 0000031186 00000 n 0000038706 00000 n 0000303636 00000 n 0000031362 00000 n 0000038685 00000 n 0000045677 00000 n 0000038838 00000 n 0000045656 00000 n 0000052562 00000 n 0000045809 00000 n 0000052541 00000 n 0000061185 00000 n 0000052694 00000 n 0000061164 00000 n 0000069247 00000 n 0000061341 00000 n 0000069226 00000 n 0000076610 00000 n 0000069379 00000 n 0000076589 00000 n 0000084316 00000 n 0000303747 00000 n 0000076754 00000 n 0000084295 00000 n 0000085906 00000 n 0000084460 00000 n 0000085885 00000 n 0000093912 00000 n 0000086038 00000 n 0000093891 00000 n 0000101818 00000 n 0000094056 00000 n 0000101797 00000 n 0000109562 00000 n 0000101974 00000 n 0000109541 00000 n 0000117192 00000 n 0000109718 00000 n 0000117171 00000 n 0000134605 00000 n 0000303858 00000 n 0000117336 00000 n 0000134583 00000 n 0000144957 00000 n 0000134737 00000 n 0000144935 00000 n 0000152148 00000 n 0000145101 00000 n 0000152127 00000 n 0000167972 00000 n 0000152304 00000 n 0000167950 00000 n 0000182537 00000 n 0000168104 00000 n 0000182515 00000 n 0000189745 00000 n 0000182681 00000 n 0000189724 00000 n 0000197342 00000 n 0000303969 00000 n 0000189901 00000 n 0000197321 00000 n 0000201066 00000 n 0000197486 00000 n 0000201045 00000 n 0000202594 00000 n 0000229462 00000 n 0000229507 00000 n 0000229484 00000 n 0000229525 00000 n 0000230924 00000 n 0000255163 00000 n 0000255209 00000 n 0000255186 00000 n 0000255228 00000 n 0000256660 00000 n 0000278157 00000 n 0000278203 00000 n 0000278180 00000 n 0000278222 00000 n 0000279641 00000 n 0000302088 00000 n 0000302134 00000 n 0000302111 00000 n 0000302153 00000 n 0000304052 00000 n trailer << /Size 118 /Root 3 0 R /Info 1 0 R /ID [] >> startxref 304683 %%EOF