Restoring the Astronomical Scale of Degraded Lands Around the World
After extensive analysis of degraded lands around the earth, Adelaide University researchers are on the path to restore vast ecosystems.
Governments and NGOs are currently committing to the restoration of degraded ecosystems on scales that would have been unimaginable 50 years ago. However, even with broad policy support and the substantial funding, questions remain about whether the methods used to undertake these pledges are dynamic enough or have sufficient oversight to achieve their ambitious targets.
Adelaide Researchers have provided strategies to improve practices by systematically embedding experiments within restoration projects. They propose building networks of such sites and projects to assist in brokering the knowledge that will be gained from these experiments and call on industry stakeholders to develop acceptable industry standards for embedding experiments into restoration programs.
Six key knowledge gaps have been identified to currently hinder restoration success on a larger scale, which include:
•
•
•
•
•
•
Networking restoration experiments, as opposed to simply embedding trials for project specific interventions, would be an optimal outcome for restoration.
Researchers propose to use the lessons from allied disciplines to generate and network embedded experiments globally. To unify a networked approach to research infrastructure they call on the restoration community to develop acceptable industry standards of experimental design.
The cost of setting up embedded experiments and networking support in restoration does not have to be prohibitively expensive. With the example of Ìý– a network set up to investigate nutrient cycling on a global scale – as a good example of a cooperative research network.
It has been identified that embedding experiments in restoration projects can bridge the key knowledge gaps of scaling up restoration. Using empirical evidence from these experiments to iteratively improve subsequent projects and creating networks to broker the knowledge more widely would therefore help tackle the unprecedented scale of restoration predicted in the 21st century.
Get involved!
Ìý(further reading) by , and Andrew LoweÌý²¹³ÙÌý adapted for the Environment Institute Blog.
UofA, CAS, World Agroforestry Centre, Frontier in Ecology and the Environment.
Paper: Nicholas JC Gellie, Martin F Breed, Peter E Mortimer, Rhett D Harrison, Jianchu Xu, and Andrew J Lowe (2018).
Networked and embedded scientific experiments will improve restoration outcomes, Frontiers in Ecology and the EnvironmentÌý
Join the conversation on Twitter:Ìý@ProfALowe and @_MBreedÌý Ìý#RestorationLogic
For further information please contact Andrew Lowe: andrew.lowe@adelaide.edu.au
Governments and NGOs are currently committing to the restoration of degraded ecosystems on scales that would have been unimaginable 50 years ago. However, even with broad policy support and the substantial funding, questions remain about whether the methods used to undertake these pledges are dynamic enough or have sufficient oversight to achieve their ambitious targets.
Adelaide Researchers have provided strategies to improve practices by systematically embedding experiments within restoration projects. They propose building networks of such sites and projects to assist in brokering the knowledge that will be gained from these experiments and call on industry stakeholders to develop acceptable industry standards for embedding experiments into restoration programs.
Six key knowledge gaps have been identified to currently hinder restoration success on a larger scale, which include:
•
•
•
•
•
•
Networking restoration experiments, as opposed to simply embedding trials for project specific interventions, would be an optimal outcome for restoration.
Researchers propose to use the lessons from allied disciplines to generate and network embedded experiments globally. To unify a networked approach to research infrastructure they call on the restoration community to develop acceptable industry standards of experimental design.
The cost of setting up embedded experiments and networking support in restoration does not have to be prohibitively expensive. With the example of Ìý– a network set up to investigate nutrient cycling on a global scale – as a good example of a cooperative research network.
It has been identified that embedding experiments in restoration projects can bridge the key knowledge gaps of scaling up restoration. Using empirical evidence from these experiments to iteratively improve subsequent projects and creating networks to broker the knowledge more widely would therefore help tackle the unprecedented scale of restoration predicted in the 21st century.
Get involved!
- Link to community projects
- Have us design your plantings
- DoÌýscience with us
Ìý(further reading) by , and Andrew LoweÌý²¹³ÙÌý adapted for the Environment Institute Blog.
UofA, CAS, World Agroforestry Centre, Frontier in Ecology and the Environment.
Paper: Nicholas JC Gellie, Martin F Breed, Peter E Mortimer, Rhett D Harrison, Jianchu Xu, and Andrew J Lowe (2018).
Networked and embedded scientific experiments will improve restoration outcomes, Frontiers in Ecology and the EnvironmentÌý
Join the conversation on Twitter:Ìý@ProfALowe and @_MBreedÌý Ìý#RestorationLogic
For further information please contact Andrew Lowe: andrew.lowe@adelaide.edu.au
Newsletter & social media
Join us for a sensational mix of news, events and research at the Environment Institute. Find out aboutÌýnew initiatives andÌýshare with your friends what's happening.
ÌýÌýÌý