Are biofuels really a green alternative?
There is the potential for biofuels, biodiesel and bioethanol produced from organic products, to provide all of our energy needs, but are they really a green alternative?
Traditionally biofuels are produced from farm crops like corn or soy, however biofuels from these products can have negative impacts on the environment and society the form of deforestation, and rising food prices. Using algae to produce biofuel does not have the same consequences for society or the environment. Algae are a high-yielding source of biofuels and do not compete for land or water like other biofuel sources.
However like traditional crops, algae requires fertilisation. A recent article in and Environmental Science and Technology claim that due to the costs of fertilisation, biofuels produced from algae are not a truly green option. Researchers from the University of Virginia used models to determine the environmental impacts of algal farms. Their findings found that algal farms used far more energy than growing land plants and created significantly more greenhouse gases.
Researchers from the (CET) and have been examining the technical aspects of downstream algal processing to produce biodiesel. This team has achieved the best production rates of oil from algae grown in saline ponds in the world. The CET is currently collaborating with the to undertake life cycle assessments of algae for the downstream processing developed by the CET.
In response to the findings from the University of Virginia, Peter K. Campbell from the CSIRO notes,
鈥淭hey're comparing the heat content of crops, which means the end use of everything is burning it in a boiler for heat production, which kind of misses the point of why we're growing the crop - i.e. for a vehicular fuel. Obviously if you're just looking at biomass to burn, you're going to be hard-pressed to beat grasses/weeds like hemp, bamboo, duckweed and the like. If you're just growing biomass for the purposes of heating up your house, then algae is not the way to go. On the other hand, if you want to produce a liquid fuel that is compatible with the majority of the engines in the world's transport fleet (trucks, buses, ships), then algae can be quite favourable when compared to other forms of biomass.鈥
Despite the conclusions detailed in the Environmental Science and Technology article there is a bright future for algal derived biofuels. Peter K. Campbell says "production methods look like they will be able to produce algae biofuels at a price point competitive with conventional fossil-based diesel within a few years, and with much more energy being produced than utilised in its production."
For more information about biofuels derived from algae, examine the links below.
Traditionally biofuels are produced from farm crops like corn or soy, however biofuels from these products can have negative impacts on the environment and society the form of deforestation, and rising food prices. Using algae to produce biofuel does not have the same consequences for society or the environment. Algae are a high-yielding source of biofuels and do not compete for land or water like other biofuel sources.
However like traditional crops, algae requires fertilisation. A recent article in and Environmental Science and Technology claim that due to the costs of fertilisation, biofuels produced from algae are not a truly green option. Researchers from the University of Virginia used models to determine the environmental impacts of algal farms. Their findings found that algal farms used far more energy than growing land plants and created significantly more greenhouse gases.
Researchers from the (CET) and have been examining the technical aspects of downstream algal processing to produce biodiesel. This team has achieved the best production rates of oil from algae grown in saline ponds in the world. The CET is currently collaborating with the to undertake life cycle assessments of algae for the downstream processing developed by the CET.
In response to the findings from the University of Virginia, Peter K. Campbell from the CSIRO notes,
鈥淭hey're comparing the heat content of crops, which means the end use of everything is burning it in a boiler for heat production, which kind of misses the point of why we're growing the crop - i.e. for a vehicular fuel. Obviously if you're just looking at biomass to burn, you're going to be hard-pressed to beat grasses/weeds like hemp, bamboo, duckweed and the like. If you're just growing biomass for the purposes of heating up your house, then algae is not the way to go. On the other hand, if you want to produce a liquid fuel that is compatible with the majority of the engines in the world's transport fleet (trucks, buses, ships), then algae can be quite favourable when compared to other forms of biomass.鈥
Despite the conclusions detailed in the Environmental Science and Technology article there is a bright future for algal derived biofuels. Peter K. Campbell says "production methods look like they will be able to produce algae biofuels at a price point competitive with conventional fossil-based diesel within a few years, and with much more energy being produced than utilised in its production."
For more information about biofuels derived from algae, examine the links below.
Newsletter & social media
Join us for a sensational mix of news, events and research at the Environment Institute. Find out about听new initiatives and听share with your friends what's happening.
听听听