ENGL 3053 - All the Feelings: Affect and Contemporary Writing
North Terrace Campus - Semester 1 - 2023
-
General Course Information
Course Details
Course Code ENGL 3053 Course All the Feelings: Affect and Contemporary Writing Coordinating Unit English, Creative Writing, and Film Term Semester 1 Level Undergraduate Location/s North Terrace Campus Units 3 Contact Up to 3 hours per week Available for Study Abroad and Exchange Y Prerequisites 9 units of undergraduate study Biennial Course Offered in Odd Years Assessment Online quizzes, Close reading, Research essay, Participation (online forums) Course Staff
Course Coordinator: Professor Andrew van der Vlies
Course Timetable
The full timetable of all activities for this course can be accessed from .
-
Learning Outcomes
Course Learning Outcomes
1. Demonstrate an ability to engage in critical analysis of the formal qualities of modern and contemporary writing across a number of genres
2. Demonstrate awareness of contextually appropriate methodologies, theories, and vocabularies for engaging with affect in relation to contemporary literatures
3. Engage thoughtfully and in a self-reflexive manner with literary and cultural texts from a range of geographical locations
4. Communicate, orally and in writing, the findings of analysis and research with clarity and precision
5. Demonstrate communication skills appropriate to career readiness, including use of online learning technologies and peer-group collaborationUniversity Graduate Attributes
This course will provide students with an opportunity to develop the Graduate Attribute(s) specified below:
University Graduate Attribute Course Learning Outcome(s) Attribute 1: Deep discipline knowledge and intellectual breadth
Graduates have comprehensive knowledge and understanding of their subject area, the ability to engage with different traditions of thought, and the ability to apply their knowledge in practice including in multi-disciplinary or multi-professional contexts.
1, 2, 3 Attribute 2: Creative and critical thinking, and problem solving
Graduates are effective problems-solvers, able to apply critical, creative and evidence-based thinking to conceive innovative responses to future challenges.
1, 2, 3, 5 Attribute 3: Teamwork and communication skills
Graduates convey ideas and information effectively to a range of audiences for a variety of purposes and contribute in a positive and collaborative manner to achieving common goals.
4, 5 Attribute 4: Professionalism and leadership readiness
Graduates engage in professional behaviour and have the potential to be entrepreneurial and take leadership roles in their chosen occupations or careers and communities.
3, 4, 5 Attribute 5: Intercultural and ethical competency
Graduates are responsible and effective global citizens whose personal values and practices are consistent with their roles as responsible members of society.
3, 4 Attribute 6: Australian Aboriginal and Torres Strait Islander cultural competency
Graduates have an understanding of, and respect for, Australian Aboriginal and Torres Strait Islander values, culture and knowledge.
2, 3 Attribute 7: Digital capabilities
Graduates are well prepared for living, learning and working in a digital society.
4, 5 Attribute 8: Self-awareness and emotional intelligence
Graduates are self-aware and reflective; they are flexible and resilient and have the capacity to accept and give constructive feedback; they act with integrity and take responsibility for their actions.
2, 3, 4, 5 -
Learning Resources
Required Resources
Some primary material will need to be acquired by students, either by borrowing from a library, or by sourcing primary texts in person from bookstores or online. A final reading list will be communicated on the MyUni site in due course, but is likely to include the following:
J. M. Coetzee, Diary of a Bad Year (2006)
Maggie Nelson, Bluets (2009)
Claudia Rankine, Citizen (2014)
Rachel Cusk, Outline (2014)Recommended Resources
Recommended secondary material is likely to include:
Sigmund Freud, ‘Mourning and Melancholia’ (1917)
Susan Sontag, ‘Against interpretation’ (1964)
Eve Kosofsky Sedgwick, with Adam Frank, ‘Shame in the Cybernetic Fold’ (2003)
Sianne Ngai, Ungly Feelings (2005)
Sara Ahmed, The Promise of Happiness (2010)
Lauren Berlant, Cruel Optimism (2011)
Terence Cave, Thinking with Literature (2016)
Cathy Park Hong, Minor Feelings (2020)
Online Learning
There will be a MyUni / Canvas site, with integrated Course Reading list offering a selection of materials accessible online through the University Library. There will be regular tasks in the online learning environment to support self-directed and classroom learning. -
Learning & Teaching Activities
Learning & Teaching Modes
Lecture (1 hour)
Seminar (2 hours)Workload
The information below is provided as a guide to assist students in engaging appropriately with the course requirements.
The standard undergraduate workload for a full-time student is 12 hours per week per 3 unit course.
Formal learning activities: lecture (1 hour) / seminar (2 hours)
Recommended preparation: rreading of primary material for seminar (7 hours) / reading of secondary material for seminar (2 hours)
Total preparation: 108 hours
Totatl contact: 36 hours
Assessment preparation: 12 hours
Total: 156 hours
Learning Activities Summary
Lecture Schedule
Week 1: Affect and the Everyday
Week 2: Ordinary Forms, Ordinary Feelings
Week 3: Political Feelings
Weel 4: Loneliness in the Digital Age
Week 5: Blue Moods
Week 6: Grievable Lives and the Colony
Week 7: All About Love
Week 8: Affective Citizenship
Week 9: Anti-Social Feelings
Week 10: The Promises of Literature
Week 11: The Promises of Romance
Week 12: The Promises of the Political
Lecture and seminar activities weeks 1-12
4 Quizzes (summative and formative)
One close reading (formative and summative)
One final essay (summative)
Discussion Board participation (formative) -
Assessment
The University's policy on Assessment for Coursework Programs is based on the following four principles:
- Assessment must encourage and reinforce learning.
- Assessment must enable robust and fair judgements about student performance.
- Assessment practices must be fair and equitable to students and give them the opportunity to demonstrate what they have learned.
- Assessment must maintain academic standards.
Assessment Summary
Online quizzes (summative, 10%)
Close Reading (formative and summative 30%)
Research Essay (summative 50%)
Participation (online forums) (formative and summative 10%)Assessment Detail
Online quizzes
Students will answer multiple choice questions in an online quiz to test engagement and understanding four times in the semester
Close Reading
Students are required to write a 1,500-word close analysis of a text chosen from a number of nominated options (drawn from the course)
Research Essay
Students will be required to write an essay of up to 2,500 words (including references), making reference to two or more primary texts studied on the course, in answer to a question chosen from a number of options
Participation (online forums)
Students will be required to offer a set number of posts to prompts on MyUni, and to respond to a set number of other students’ posts, during the course of the semesterSubmission
Quizzes
Four quizzes will be released on MyUni for completion by a deadline advertised in advance
Close Reading
Due date: 24th March, 2023, 11.59pm ACST
30% of grade
1,500 words +/- 10% (e.g. 1,350-1,750 words)
Write a 1,500-word close analysis of ONE of the extracts provided. Identify which extract you have chosen at the top of your document. Do NOT include the entirety of the extract in your document.
In your analysis, consider both the content and the form of the work, and pay particular attention to how style and substance interact. Identify the affective structures at work in the extract, and consider what affective responses the extract elicits in the reader. Consider the feeling of the text, and how this is generated. Address how the extract engages with broader cultural structures of feeling and affects, and what this reveals about the role of literature in generating emotional attachment, response, and vocabularies.
You may want to consider the following:
Political/historical/cultural context of the piece
Voice/point of view
Address to the reader
Structure
Rhetorical devices
Literary/poetic techniques, including but not limited to:
mood
tone
imagery
diction
syntax
rhythm/rhyme
alliteration/assonance
any other literary/poetic techniques you think are relevant
You are required to do your own analysis. While you are welcome to refer to any of Course Readings or other scholarly reseach in your analysis, it is NOT a requirement of the assignment (however if you do, you must cite correctly using MLA 8).
You are encouraged to read the entire essay that the extracts are taken from, and to briefly contextualise the extract within the broader work in your writing. However, this is not a strict requirement of the assignment, and you may choose to focus primarily on the extract.
You must propose an argument about how affect is operating in the extract, and how form contributes to the generation of the 'feeling' of the text in your close analysis. You will be assessed on your argument, your analysis, the textual evidence that you provide (e.g. quotations and paraphrasing from the source), your written expression (both accuracy and style), and your engagement with course discussions more broadly.
Research Essay
Due: 9th June, 2023, 11.59pm ACST
Up to 2,500 words (with a minimum of 2,000 words; includes in-text referencing, does not include Works Cited list)
50% of semester grade
Instructions
Write a research essay of up to 2,500 words (see above for word count parameters) in response to ONE of the essay questions advertised. You must analyse at least two of the primary texts from the course. In your analysis, compare and contrast your chosen texts. Consider both form and content in your argument.
You must refer to at least six scholarly sources (this can include texts from the Required and Recommended Course Readings). If you choose poetry as one of your texts, you must to refer to at least 3 poems by one poet to count as ‘one text.’ You may not write about the same text you analysed in your Close Reading. Write your essay in formal, academic prose. Do not use subheadings or dot points. Use MLA 8 as your citation system. Please see this Library Guide about AI and writing for information.
Discussion Board Participation
Due: throughout the semester (4 posts and 4 responses by the end of the semester)
Word count: equivalent 1,000 words over the semester (approx. 150-200 words per post, 50-100 words per response)
10% of semester grade (grades over all 8 posts/responses averaged to one grade for the assignment as a whole)
There is a thread in the Discussion Board (see ‘Discussions’ tab on MyUni) for the topic each week. The thread will become available on the Monday morning of each week and will close on the Sunday at the end of the week. There will be prompts in each thread to begin a conversation among your peers about the topic for that week.
Over the semester, you will write 4 responses to the set prompts. You may choose any four weeks you want to write about. Each post you make should be about 150-200 words long. Consider the text under consideration that week, the affect you think is represented in that text, the course readings, the lecture, and anything else you think of relevance. You also must reply to 4 posts by your peers over the semester. Your responses should be about 50-100 words long. (Collectively, all 4 of your posts and all 4 responses should be equivalent to 1,000 words).
While you must write clearly and appropriately for university study, you may be more casual in these posts than in standard academic writing. Feel free to include personal reflections, although this should not be the bulk of your writing (e.g. don’t review the text for the week!). If you want to explore or examine the affect or text more creatively, feel free to do so. If you want to bring in visuals (screenshots, memes etc) or links to music or articles that are relevant, you are also welcome to do so (provided anything you link is appropriate for university study - nothing explicit or blocked by uni servers, please).
These discussion board posts are moderated, so please be considered, thoughtful, and generous in your responses – this is an opportunity to learn together and not an opportunity for reductive or aggressive critique. In your responses, you may want to talk about how someone else's post made you change your thinking, or what it prompted you to think about in turn. We are collaboratively extending our learning through these discussions - your responses do not have to always agree with the original poster but you have to be prepared to say why you didn't, and do so in a productive manner
Course Grading
Grades for your performance in this course will be awarded in accordance with the following scheme:
M10 (Coursework Mark Scheme) Grade Mark Description FNS Fail No Submission F 1-49 Fail P 50-64 Pass C 65-74 Credit D 75-84 Distinction HD 85-100 High Distinction CN Continuing NFE No Formal Examination RP Result Pending Further details of the grades/results can be obtained from Examinations.
Grade Descriptors are available which provide a general guide to the standard of work that is expected at each grade level. More information at Assessment for Coursework Programs.
Final results for this course will be made available through .
-
Student Feedback
The University places a high priority on approaches to learning and teaching that enhance the student experience. Feedback is sought from students in a variety of ways including on-going engagement with staff, the use of online discussion boards and the use of Student Experience of Learning and Teaching (SELT) surveys as well as GOS surveys and Program reviews.
SELTs are an important source of information to inform individual teaching practice, decisions about teaching duties, and course and program curriculum design. They enable the University to assess how effectively its learning environments and teaching practices facilitate student engagement and learning outcomes. Under the current SELT Policy (http://www.adelaide.edu.au/policies/101/) course SELTs are mandated and must be conducted at the conclusion of each term/semester/trimester for every course offering. Feedback on issues raised through course SELT surveys is made available to enrolled students through various resources (e.g. MyUni). In addition aggregated course SELT data is available.
-
Student Support
- Academic Integrity for Students
- Academic Support with Maths
- Academic Support with writing and study skills
- Careers Services
- Library Services for Students
- LinkedIn Learning
- Student Life Counselling Support - Personal counselling for issues affecting study
- Students with a Disability - Alternative academic arrangements
-
Policies & Guidelines
This section contains links to relevant assessment-related policies and guidelines - all university policies.
- Academic Credit Arrangements Policy
- Academic Integrity Policy
- Academic Progress by Coursework Students Policy
- Assessment for Coursework Programs Policy
- Copyright Compliance Policy
- Coursework Academic Programs Policy
- Intellectual Property Policy
- IT Acceptable Use and Security Policy
- Modified Arrangements for Coursework Assessment Policy
- Reasonable Adjustments to Learning, Teaching & Assessment for Students with a Disability Policy
- Student Experience of Learning and Teaching Policy
- Student Grievance Resolution Process
-
Fraud Awareness
Students are reminded that in order to maintain the academic integrity of all programs and courses, the university has a zero-tolerance approach to students offering money or significant value goods or services to any staff member who is involved in their teaching or assessment. Students offering lecturers or tutors or professional staff anything more than a small token of appreciation is totally unacceptable, in any circumstances. Staff members are obliged to report all such incidents to their supervisor/manager, who will refer them for action under the university's student鈥檚 disciplinary procedures.
The 成人大片 is committed to regular reviews of the courses and programs it offers to students. The 成人大片 therefore reserves the right to discontinue or vary programs and courses without notice. Please read the important information contained in the disclaimer.