成人大片

Course Coordinator: Associate Professor Laura Grenfell: laura.grenfell@adelaide.edu.au


Lecturers:

Associate Professor Laura Grenfell: laura.grenfell@adelaide.edu.au

Dr Anna Olijnyk, anna.olijnyk@adelaide.edu.au

There will be a three-hour introductory session in late July, followed by four days of intensive classes in August and September.

On successful completion of this course, student will be able to:

1. Understand the source and extent of the powers of executive government in their constitutional context.

2. Develop an understanding of the law related to holding government accountable for its actions and decisions.

3. Critically analyse principles of administrative law and their application.

4. Use a close reading of legal and theoretical texts in relation to particular case studies to understand a range of legal and policy mechanisms involved in constraining government action;

5. Discuss and debate orally and collaboratively the theoretical propositions and legal problems related to the legal and political accountability of the Executive government.

6. Identify scenarios that raise complex issues of government accountability and prepare an essay that combines independent research and an incorporation of the principles discussed in the course to explore those scenarios.

There is no textbook for the course. Students will be provided with a comprehensive teaching plan with required readings that follows the list of issues for discussion.

Students may find it useful to refer to the following textbooks to improve their understanding of the legal concepts covered in the course.

Janina Boughey et al, Public Law and Statutory Interpretation (Federation Press, 2nd ed, 2021) (for students who are newer to law)

Gabrielle Appleby, Alex Reilly, and Laura Grenfell, Australian Public Law (Oxford University Press, 3rd ed, 2018) (for students who are newer to law)

Judith Bannister, Anna Olijnyk, and Stephen McDonald, Government Accountability; Australian Administrative Law (Cambridge University Press, 2nd ed, 2018) (for students with some legal background)

Mark Aronson, Matthew Groves and Greg Weeks, Judicial Review of Administrative Action and Government Liability (Thomson Reuters, 7th ed, 2021) (for students who have at least an undergraduate law degree)

The MyUni website is crucial to the course. It will be used to provide information and structure the learning activities in the course via the course map.

MyUni will be used to post announcements, post additional materials (including lecture slides and audio recordings of lectures) and announce assignment tasks. It will also contain electronic copies of the Course Profile, Lecture and Seminar Guides, and Course Materials.

There will be a three hour session on Friday 28 July 10am -1pm to introduce the key concepts and course structure, and to form groups for the group assessment.

The course will then be taught from 10.00am - 4.00pm on Friday 11 August, Friday 18 August, Friday 25th August and Friday 8th September.

Each session will be interactive, combining presentation of material by academic staff with seminar style discussion. Each session will incorporate a student presentation which will be followed by a question and answer session.

In addition to attending formal classes it is anticipated that students will do substantial independent work to prepare for classes and to complete the course assignments.

1. The introductory session  will (a) introduce the key themes in the course; (b) explain how the course will be taught and assessed; and (c) allow students to meet each other and form groups for the group assessment.

2. The required readings, to be completed before the intensive classes begin, will cover the key themes of the course in more depth and explain the structures of government and mechanisms of government accountability.

3. Mini-lecture videos outline key legal concepts.

4. Intensive classes will apply the legal and theoretical concepts taught in the course to recent case studies. These will be interactive sessions, with students expected to prepare and participate.

There are no additional requirements for completion of this course other than described elsewhere in this document.

Assessment Task	Task Type	Length	Due	Weighting	Redeemable	Learning Outcome
Participation	Individual	Throughout the course	During intensive classes	10	No	1, 2, 3, 4, 5
Group Presentation	Group; Summative	30 mins (max)	During intensive classes	20	No	1,2,3,4,5
Research proposal	Individual, Summative	1500 words (max)	Friday 22nd September at 2pm	10	No	1,2,3,4,6
Research essay	Individual, Summative	4000 words (max)	Friday, 27 October at 2pm	60	No	1,2,3,4,6

Participation (10%)

Class participation counts for 10% of the overall grade. The course will spend considerable time discussing legal and political issues associated with government, law and policy. There will be ample opportunity for students to engage both individually and within groups on the issues covered. Students are expected to attend the introductory session and at least 3 out of 4 following intensive days. 

Group Presentation (20%)

Group presentations will be 20 minutes in length followed by 10-20 minutes in which the presenters will field questions from the course coordinator and the class. All members of the group are required to speak during the presentation.

Presentations will be marked against the following criteria:

a. Organisation and intrinsic interest of the presentation.
b. Ability of group members to work collaboratively.
c. Level of understanding of the topic as demonstrated through the quality of observations and comments.
d. Use of external sources and the set readings.
e. Understanding of how the presentation topic fits into the course as a whole.
f. Ability of the group to answer questions from the course coordinator and engage in class discussion in relation to the topic.
g. Time Management Skills.

Research proposal (10%) (1500 words (max))

The research proposal is the basis for the research essay. It must include a specific research question; a synopsis of the core argument of the paper and a preliminary list of research resources.

You can choose the research essay question on MyUni, or you can develop a question of your own. If developing your own question, you must discuss it with the course coordinator and have it approved as an essay question.

Research essay proposals will be expected to engage with relevant course readings as well as drawing on additional research.

You are encouraged to discuss your research proposal with the course staff prior to submission. As well as assessing your proposals, course coordinators will provide direction on how the proposals could be amended for the purpose of completing the research essay.

Research essay (60%) (4000 word (max))

For the 4000 word (max) essay, students will undertake independent research that builds on from their research proposal. You are encouraged to discuss with the course coordinators any ideas or concerns you have about your essay.

Essays are to be no more than 4000 words in length, excluding references in footnotes but including substantive material in footnotes.

In addition to the relevant course readings, students must make reference to at least three additional significance sources. Examples of significant sources are peer-reviewed journals, major research reports of international organisations or government departments. This is a minimum requirement, and many essays will make use of more sources.

Assessment criteria for the Research Essay:

Marks will be awarded for the following:
• Written communication skills: including spelling, grammar, punctuation;
• Logical and coherent structure;
• Accurate and appropriate referencing of sources used in the essay, using the AGLC referencing guide;
• Depth of understanding of the issues discussed in the paper;
• Quality of research;
• Quality of analysis, including;
o Ability to apply the core concepts and ideas from class discussions, set reading and external sources to answer the question.
o Use of critical analysis in the answer to the question
o Demonstration of balance in the answer, constructing arguments for and against the central propositions in the question.

Essays will be assessed in their own right. It is fine if they deviate from the original research proposal. However, it is expected that essays will be an extension of those proposals and will respond to the feedback provided.


All written work in the law school is required to comply with The Australian Guide to Legal Citation available on:

Please read the AGLC before submitting your paper and make sure you comply with it.

The Research Proposal and Research Essay are to be submitted via the assignments link on the course MyUni website. Assignments do not have to be handed up in hard copy.

Extensions:

Extensions beyond the due date will only be granted in the case of serious and unforeseen incapacity. Extensions will be granted only for unexpected illness, hardship or on compassionate grounds in accordance with University Policy. Work commitments, travel, holidays or sporting engagements are NOT unexpected circumstances. If you require an extension, you will need to use the on-line application form available on the law school website (http://www.law.adelaide.edu.au/intranet/forms-downloads ) as soon as you are aware of the need for an extension, and before the due date of the assignment.

The course coordinator or an extensions officer will reply by email, determining whether an extension is warranted, what evidence is required to verify the student’s incapacity, and the length of the extension. Evidence of the incapacity must be submitted with the assignment, and must be consistent with details in the email requesting the extension. If the details of the request for an extension, and the medical or other evidence verifying the extension are not consistent in all respects, the extension is nullified, and the assignment may be penalised.

Penalties:

1. Late Submission: 5% of the total mark possible will be deducted for every 24 hours or part thereof that submission is late, including each day on a weekend. For example, an essay that is submitted after the due date and time but within the first 24 hour period, and that has been graded at 63%, will have 5% deducted, for a final grade of 58%. An assignment that is more than 24 hours late will lose 10%, etc.
2. Word Length: Assignments which exceed the allocated length (word length) will be subject to a penalty of 5% of total marks possible per 100 words or part thereof (ie with a word limit of 1,000, an essay graded 63% will have 5% deducted if it is 1,001 words long, for a final grade of 58%, 10% if it is 1,101 words long, etc). Words are calculated including all footnotes and headings within the text but excluding cover page information. Quotations and all referencing information are included in the word count.

Finality of Assessment Grades

Students are advised that Course Coordinators will not enter into negotiations of any kind with any student regarding changes to their grades. It is irrelevant, in any given circumstance, that only a minimal number of additional marks are required to inflate a student’s grade for any individual assessment item or course as a whole. Pursuant to the University’s Assessment for Coursework Programs Policyand the Adelaide Law School Assessment Policies and Procedures, grades may only be varied through the appropriate channels for academic review (such as an official re-mark).

Moderation

In accordance with the University’s Assessment for Coursework Programs Policy, course coordinators ‘ensure that appropriate marking guidelines and cross-marking moderation processes across markers are in place’ in each course. Procedures adopted by Adelaide Law School to ensure consistency of marking in courses with multiple markers include:

• assurance of the qualifications of markers, and their knowledge of the content covered in each course;
• detailed marking guidelines and assessment rubrics to assist in the marking of items of assessment;
• sharing of example marked assessments at various grade bands across markers;
• reviewing of selected marked assessments from each marker by the course coordinator;
• comparison of the marks and their distribution across markers;
• automatic double-marking of all interim assessment receiving a fail grade, and of final assessments where a student’s overall result is a fail grade;
• the availability of re-marking of assessments in accordance with Adelaide Law School’s Assessment Policies and Procedures.

Approval of Results by Board of Examiners

Students are reminded that all assessment results are subject to approval (and possible moderation/change) by the Law School’s Board of Examiners. Assessment results at the University are not scaled. Under the Assessment for Coursework Programs Policy, students are assessed ‘by reference to their performance against pre-determined criteria and standards … and not by ranking against the performance of the student cohort in the course’. However, under that same policy, the Board of Examiners (as the relevant Assessment Review Committee for courses at Adelaide Law School) is required to ‘ensure comparability of standards and consistency’ in assessment. On occasions, the Board of Examiners will form the view that some moderation is required to ensure the comparability of standards and consistency across courses and years, and accordingly provide fairness to all law students. All assessment results are therefore subject to approval (and possible change) until confirmed by the Board of Examiners and posted on Access Adelaide at the end of each semester.

The provides academic learning and language development services and resources for local, international, undergraduate and postgraduate coursework students enrolled at the 成人大片.

The centre offers practical advice and strategies for students to master reading, writing, note-taking, time management, oral presentation skills, referencing techniques and exam preparation for success at university through seminars, workshops and individual consultations.

Lex Salus Program

Lex Salus (law and wellbeing) is an initiative of the Adelaide Law School aimed at destigmatising mental health issues; promoting physical, mental and emotional wellness; building a strong community of staff and students; and celebrating diversity within the school. It also seeks to promote wellness within the legal profession, through the involvement of the Chief Justice of the Supreme Court of South Australia, the Honourable Chris Kourakis, as the official Patron of the program.

Students can participate in the Lex Salus program by attending barbecue lunches, pancake breakfasts, knitting and crochet circles, seminars, guest speakers, conferences and other activities. Our , and regular all-student emails promote upcoming events, and have tips and information on wellness.

Our Lex Salus YouTube channel also includes videos on topics like managing stress, and interviews with LGBTQ lawyers and their supporters which celebrate diversity and individuality. Students who commit to 10 hours of volunteering with Lex Salus in one year can have their service recognised on their academic transcript and through a thank you morning tea with the Chief Justice and law school staff.

Student Life Counselling Support

The University’s service provides free and confidential service to all enrolled students. We encourage you to contact the Student Life Counselling Support service on 8313 5663 to make an appointment to deal with any issues that may be affecting your study and life.

Academic Integrity

All students must be familiar with the University’s Academic Integrity Policy. Academic Misconduct is a serious matter and is treated as such by the Law School and the University. Academic Misconduct (which goes beyond plagiarism) can be a ground for a refusal by the Supreme Court of South Australia to admit a person to practice as a legal practitioner in South Australia. Academic Integrity is an essential aspect of ethical and honest behaviour, which is central to the practice of the law and an understanding of what it is to be a lawyer.