ENGL 3052 - Prison Writing: Liberty and Language
North Terrace Campus - Semester 2 - 2025
-
General Course Information
Course Details
Course Code ENGL 3052 Course Prison Writing: Liberty and Language Coordinating Unit English, Creative Writing, and Film Term Semester 2 Level Undergraduate Location/s North Terrace Campus Units 3 Contact Up to 3 hours per week Available for Study Abroad and Exchange Y Prerequisites 18 Units of study at Levels I and II including ENGL 1101 Assessment Online textual analysis, In-class quizzes, Scaffolded collaborative research essay and preparation, Final exam Course Staff
Course Coordinator: Professor Julian Murphet
Course Timetable
The full timetable of all activities for this course can be accessed from .
-
Learning Outcomes
Course Learning Outcomes
1. Show awareness and understanding of major themes in prison literature
2. Work together with others on a specified research project
3. Analyse complex literary texts for social and political information
4. Participate responsibly and ethically in class discussion on sometimes sensitive material
5. Reflect historically on their personal reactions to literary textsUniversity Graduate Attributes
This course will provide students with an opportunity to develop the Graduate Attribute(s) specified below:
University Graduate Attribute Course Learning Outcome(s) Attribute 1: Deep discipline knowledge and intellectual breadth
Graduates have comprehensive knowledge and understanding of their subject area, the ability to engage with different traditions of thought, and the ability to apply their knowledge in practice including in multi-disciplinary or multi-professional contexts.
2, 5 Attribute 2: Creative and critical thinking, and problem solving
Graduates are effective problems-solvers, able to apply critical, creative and evidence-based thinking to conceive innovative responses to future challenges.
1, 3, 4, 5 Attribute 3: Teamwork and communication skills
Graduates convey ideas and information effectively to a range of audiences for a variety of purposes and contribute in a positive and collaborative manner to achieving common goals.
3, 4, 5 Attribute 4: Professionalism and leadership readiness
Graduates engage in professional behaviour and have the potential to be entrepreneurial and take leadership roles in their chosen occupations or careers and communities.
3, 5 Attribute 5: Intercultural and ethical competency
Graduates are responsible and effective global citizens whose personal values and practices are consistent with their roles as responsible members of society.
3, 5 Attribute 6: Australian Aboriginal and Torres Strait Islander cultural competency
Graduates have an understanding of, and respect for, Australian Aboriginal and Torres Strait Islander values, culture and knowledge.
N/A Attribute 7: Digital capabilities
Graduates are well prepared for living, learning and working in a digital society.
3, 4, 5 Attribute 8: Self-awareness and emotional intelligence
Graduates are self-aware and reflective; they are flexible and resilient and have the capacity to accept and give constructive feedback; they act with integrity and take responsibility for their actions.
2, 3, 5 -
Learning Resources
Required Resources
Oscar Wilde, De Profundis and Other Prison Writings (1897)
Alexander Berkman, Prison Memoirs of an Anarchist (1912)
Rosa Luxemburg, Selected prison letters (1914-18)
Ezra Pound, The Pisan Cantos (1943-4)
Primo Levi, If This Is a Man (1947)
Ruth First, 117 Days (1965)
Alexander I. Solzhenitsyn, One Day in the Life of Ivan Denisovich (1962)
Angela Y. Davis, If They Come in the Morning (1971) and Are Prisons Obsolete? (2003)
Bobby Sands, Writings from Prison (1981)
Ngugi wa Thiong’o, Wrestling with the Devil (1981)
Nawal El Saadawi, Memoirs from the Women’s Prison (1983)
Behrouz Boochani, No Friend but the Mountains: Writings from Manus Prison (2019)Recommended Resources
Other Primary Texts
Mumia Abu-Jamal, Live from Death Row
Dietrich Bonhoeffer, Letters and Papers from Prison
Robert E. Burns, I Am a Fugitive from a Georgia Chain Gang
George Jackson, Soledad Brother
David Lowrie, My Life in Prison
Martin Luther King Jr., Letters from Birmingham Jail
H谩禄聯脗聯 Chí Minh, The Prison Diary of Ho Chi Minh
Jacobo Timerman, Prisoner without a Name, Cell without a Number
Malcolm X, Autobiography of Malcolm X
Great Works Written in Prison
Le Morte d'Arthur, by Sir Thomas Malory
The Travels of Marco Polo, by Rustichello da Pisa
Don Quixote, by Miguel de Cervantes
History of the World Volume 1, by Sir Walter Raleigh
"To Althea, from Prison", by Richard Lovelace
A Hymn to the Pillory, by Daniel Defoe
Pilgrim's Progress, by John Bunyan
Justine, by the Marquis de Sade
Memoirs of a Woman of Pleasure, by John Cleland
Civil Disobedience by Henry David Thoreau
The Enormous Room by e.e cummings
Our Lady of the Flowers, by Jean Genet
In the Belly of the Beast by Jack Abbott
Historical and Theoretical Readings
Giorgio Agamben, Homo Sacer: Sovereign Power and Bare Life
Michel Agier, Managing Undesirables: Refugee Camps and Humanitarian Government
Michel Foucault, Discipline and Punish, pp. 3-31, 135-169, 195-308 _______, “Society Must be Defended,” pp. 239-264
Ruth Wilson Gilmore, Golden Gulag: Prisons, Surplus, and Opposition in Globalizing California
E. Goffman, Asylums: Essays on the Social Situation of Mental Patients and Other Inmates
Emma Goldman, ‘Prisons: A Social Crime and Failure’
Antonio Gramsci, Prison Notebooks, pp. 1-23
_______, Letters from Prison Vol. I, pp. 62-63, 65-72, 91-98, 107-114; Vol. II, pp. 167-170, 330-332
Joy James, Imprisoned Intellectuals: America’s Political Prisoners Write on Life, Liberation, and Rebellion
Laleh Khalili, Time in the Shadows: Confinement in Counterinsurgencies
Lorna Rhodes, Total Confinement: Madness and Reason in the Maximum Security Prison
C. W. Thomas and D. M. Petersen, D. M., Prison Organization and Inmate SubculturesOnline Learning
There will be 3 quizzes to attempt in class at random times over the semester.
Collaboration for a major assessment task will take place partly online, through discussion boards and database construction.
The final take-home examination will be conducted online.
MyUni will make some materials available online, for course reading. -
Learning & Teaching Activities
Learning & Teaching Modes
Wekly lectures are offered for the delivery of directly relevant information, background, and to model a critical approach to the set material.
Weekly seminars in smaller groups are offered to develop critical skills, test and share knowledge, allow for student presentations, and provide feedback and course information.Workload
The information below is provided as a guide to assist students in engaging appropriately with the course requirements.
12 hours of lectures across the semetser
24 hours of small-group seminars across the semetser
80 hours of reading across the semetser
34 hours of self-directed learning and assignment preparation
TOTAL = 150 hoursLearning Activities Summary
No information currently available.
-
Assessment
The University's policy on Assessment for Coursework Programs is based on the following four principles:
- Assessment must encourage and reinforce learning.
- Assessment must enable robust and fair judgements about student performance.
- Assessment practices must be fair and equitable to students and give them the opportunity to demonstrate what they have learned.
- Assessment must maintain academic standards.
Assessment Summary
TASK ONE: Online textual analysis
Weighting: 15%
This task will be written online, in relation to a specific passage taken from one of the early course texts: by either Oscar Wilde, Alexander Berkman, or Rosa Luxemburg. Students will be asked specific formal and stylistic questions about the passage; their answers should refrain from interpretation and keep very close to the text. A brief analysis of the passage is what is required.
TASK TWO: Quizzes
Weighting: 15%
This is pretty self-explanatory. There will be three quizzes held across the semester. The quizzes will be on matters pertaining to texts studied in the course to that date: matters of fact, not interpretation. They will be set in a multiple choice format. A good familiarity with the set texts and with the lecture materials should suffice as preparation.
TASK THREE: Scaffolded collaborative research essay and preparation
Weighting: 40%
This is a complex, tiered assessment task, undertaken both in groups and individually. At the beginning of semester, either in class or online, groups of 3-5 students will be formed by the tutor and assigned as a 'research group' to a particular author/topic on the course reading list. The group will be provided with a loose portfolio of ideas about what approaches they might take to their author, resources they might explore, theoretical angles they might consider, and a suite of specific research questions to pursue. Over the weeks before their presentation, the group will meet, online or in actuality, to discuss strategies, share resources, and compile a working database on their topic. They will manage a discussion board on their topic that other class members will be encouraged to visit and learn from. The group then has the responsibility of preparing a research presentation on their topic to the seminar class as a whole, on the day that their topic is due for discussion. The group will decide who presents what parts of their presentation, and in what order; they will run the seminar for the first 30-35 minutes of the 2-hour session.
Based on their collaborative research, and drawing on the database and discussion board compiled by the group as a whole, each individual member will decide on an individual research topic related to their subject, agreed to both by the other members of the group and the class tutor. This task will take the form of a 2,500-word essay due at the end of semester, and demonstrating lessons learned throughout the course of the collaborative and individual stages of the project.
In all, these components will be assessed: the discussion board (pass/fail), the database (pass/fail), the in-class presentation (group mark worth 25% of total—10 points), and the final essay (individual mark worth 75% of total—30 points).
TASK FOUR: Take-home examination
Weighting: 30%
On a set day after the teaching period, the take-home examination questions will be made available through MyUni. These will be organised into 2 sections: one on the first half of the course, the other on the second. Students must answer ONE question from EACH section. However, students MUST NOT answer any question that concerns the topic of their research presentation and essay. Each question answered is worth 50% of the whole, or 15 points. The examination will close 5 days later, and late submission will not be accepted without certified medical or other acceptable reasons. There is thus a total of FIVE working days available to complete the examination, though students may submit at any time.Assessment Related Requirements
Be sure to do ALL the course readings, attend ALL lectures, and attend ALL seminars to ensure optimal preparation for the course assessment tasks. The course assumes 150 hours of your time and effort to maximise your achievement.
You can write to your tutor or the course administrator at any time to request additional information.Assessment Detail
See above in Assessment Summary for a full explanation of the tasks required.Submission
Submission of all tasks in online through the assessment portal on the MyUni course site.Course Grading
Grades for your performance in this course will be awarded in accordance with the following scheme:
M10 (Coursework Mark Scheme) Grade Mark Description FNS Fail No Submission F 1-49 Fail P 50-64 Pass C 65-74 Credit D 75-84 Distinction HD 85-100 High Distinction CN Continuing NFE No Formal Examination RP Result Pending Further details of the grades/results can be obtained from Examinations.
Grade Descriptors are available which provide a general guide to the standard of work that is expected at each grade level. More information at Assessment for Coursework Programs.
Final results for this course will be made available through .
-
Student Feedback
The University places a high priority on approaches to learning and teaching that enhance the student experience. Feedback is sought from students in a variety of ways including on-going engagement with staff, the use of online discussion boards and the use of Student Experience of Learning and Teaching (SELT) surveys as well as GOS surveys and Program reviews.
SELTs are an important source of information to inform individual teaching practice, decisions about teaching duties, and course and program curriculum design. They enable the University to assess how effectively its learning environments and teaching practices facilitate student engagement and learning outcomes. Under the current SELT Policy (http://www.adelaide.edu.au/policies/101/) course SELTs are mandated and must be conducted at the conclusion of each term/semester/trimester for every course offering. Feedback on issues raised through course SELT surveys is made available to enrolled students through various resources (e.g. MyUni). In addition aggregated course SELT data is available.
We have solicited students' advice for improvement during the two previous iterations of this course. Changes to course content have included a partial rearangement of materials and a rotation of some new materials ointo the frame. We encourage students to complete surveys when asked, in order to make this the best course possible on the subject. -
Student Support
- Academic Integrity for Students
- Academic Support with Maths
- Academic Support with writing and study skills
- Careers Services
- Library Services for Students
- LinkedIn Learning
- Student Life Counselling Support - Personal counselling for issues affecting study
- Students with a Disability - Alternative academic arrangements
-
Policies & Guidelines
This section contains links to relevant assessment-related policies and guidelines - all university policies.
- Academic Credit Arrangements Policy
- Academic Integrity Policy
- Academic Progress by Coursework Students Policy
- Assessment for Coursework Programs Policy
- Copyright Compliance Policy
- Coursework Academic Programs Policy
- Intellectual Property Policy
- IT Acceptable Use and Security Policy
- Modified Arrangements for Coursework Assessment Policy
- Reasonable Adjustments to Learning, Teaching & Assessment for Students with a Disability Policy
- Student Experience of Learning and Teaching Policy
- Student Grievance Resolution Process
-
Fraud Awareness
Students are reminded that in order to maintain the academic integrity of all programs and courses, the university has a zero-tolerance approach to students offering money or significant value goods or services to any staff member who is involved in their teaching or assessment. Students offering lecturers or tutors or professional staff anything more than a small token of appreciation is totally unacceptable, in any circumstances. Staff members are obliged to report all such incidents to their supervisor/manager, who will refer them for action under the university's student鈥檚 disciplinary procedures.
The 成人大片 is committed to regular reviews of the courses and programs it offers to students. The 成人大片 therefore reserves the right to discontinue or vary programs and courses without notice. Please read the important information contained in the disclaimer.