HLTH SC 2400 - Evidence Based Practice in Allied Health 2
North Terrace Campus - Semester 1 - 2023
-
General Course Information
Course Details
Course Code HLTH SC 2400 Course Evidence Based Practice in Allied Health 2 Coordinating Unit Sch of Allied Hlth Sci & Prac Term Semester 1 Level Undergraduate Location/s North Terrace Campus Units 3 Available for Study Abroad and Exchange N Restrictions Bachelor of Occupational Therapy (Hons) or Bachelor of Physiotherapy (Hons) or Bachelor of Speech Pathology (Hons) Assessment Final Examination, assignment and continuous assessment tasks Course Staff
Course Coordinator: Dr Henri (Hans) Bogaardt
Course Coordinator: Dr Hans Bogaardt
Phone: +61 8 8313 8050
Email: henri.bogaardt@adelaide.edu.au
Location Level 4, Engineering & Maths Sciences Building
Tutor: Prof Stacie Attrill
Phone: +61 8 8313 3518
Email: stacie.attrill@adelaide.edu.au
Location Level 4, Engineering & Maths Sciences Building
Tutor: Cameron Dickson
Phone: +61 8 8313 3676
Email: cameron.dickson@adelaide.edu.au
Location Level 4, Engineering & Maths Sciences BuildingCourse Timetable
The full timetable of all activities for this course can be accessed from .
Timetable information can be found in the MyUni website for this course. -
Learning Outcomes
Course Learning Outcomes
1 Apply the five steps of evidence based practice to different types of research questions. 2 Appraise the strength of evidence generated by a range of methodologies. 3 Analyse and interpret appraised evidence to a practice-related problem or issue or situation. 4 Integrate and communicate findings that use differing methodologies to explore a similar practice problem. 5 Consider research ethics and reflect on own performance in developing capacity to be an evidence-based practitioner. University Graduate Attributes
This course will provide students with an opportunity to develop the Graduate Attribute(s) specified below:
University Graduate Attribute Course Learning Outcome(s) Attribute 1: Deep discipline knowledge and intellectual breadth
Graduates have comprehensive knowledge and understanding of their subject area, the ability to engage with different traditions of thought, and the ability to apply their knowledge in practice including in multi-disciplinary or multi-professional contexts.
1, 2, 3, 4, 5 Attribute 2: Creative and critical thinking, and problem solving
Graduates are effective problems-solvers, able to apply critical, creative and evidence-based thinking to conceive innovative responses to future challenges.
1, 2, 3, 4 Attribute 3: Teamwork and communication skills
Graduates convey ideas and information effectively to a range of audiences for a variety of purposes and contribute in a positive and collaborative manner to achieving common goals.
4, 5 Attribute 4: Professionalism and leadership readiness
Graduates engage in professional behaviour and have the potential to be entrepreneurial and take leadership roles in their chosen occupations or careers and communities.
1, 2, 3, 4, 5 Attribute 5: Intercultural and ethical competency
Graduates are responsible and effective global citizens whose personal values and practices are consistent with their roles as responsible members of society.
5 Attribute 6: Australian Aboriginal and Torres Strait Islander cultural competency
Graduates have an understanding of, and respect for, Australian Aboriginal and Torres Strait Islander values, culture and knowledge.
2, 3, 5 Attribute 7: Digital capabilities
Graduates are well prepared for living, learning and working in a digital society.
4 Attribute 8: Self-awareness and emotional intelligence
Graduates are self-aware and reflective; they are flexible and resilient and have the capacity to accept and give constructive feedback; they act with integrity and take responsibility for their actions.
4, 5 -
Learning Resources
Required Resources
Hoffmann, T. Evidence-based practice across the health professions. 3rd Edition. Elsevier Australia. ISBN 97807295425558Online Learning
All notes, resource manuals and papers for lectures, practicals, tutorial sessions and assessment tasks are available on MyUni as well as lists of suitable readings, online quizzes and links to external websites. -
Learning & Teaching Activities
Learning & Teaching Modes
This course contains online learning modules, and students will be directed to specific learning resources, including video clips, web-based resources, and other readings within these modules. Students will progress through the online learning modules and will consider the differences and similarities of conductive systematic review, randomised controlled trials as well as qualitative and quantitative studies. Students will be supported in their learning through attendance at face to face workshops which will involve learning activities designed to enable practice and reflection on developing skills.Workload
The information below is provided as a guide to assist students in engaging appropriately with the course requirements.
Workshops: 12 x 2 hours = 24 hours
Examination: 1 x 2 hours = 2 hours
Preparation for Workshop Sessions: 1 hour per session = 12 hours
Preparation for Assessment Tasks = 30 hours
Weekly reading: 3 hours per week = 36 hours
Online modules: 4 hours per week = 48 hours
TOTAL = 152 hoursLearning Activities Summary
No information currently available.
-
Assessment
The University's policy on Assessment for Coursework Programs is based on the following four principles:
- Assessment must encourage and reinforce learning.
- Assessment must enable robust and fair judgements about student performance.
- Assessment practices must be fair and equitable to students and give them the opportunity to demonstrate what they have learned.
- Assessment must maintain academic standards.
Assessment Summary
Detailed information, including due dates, can be found in the MyUni wesbite for this course.Assessment Task Task Type Weighting Learning Outcome Continuous assessment Formative & Summative 40% 1, 2, 3, 4, 5 Assignment Summative 20% 1, 2, 3, 4 Examination Summative 40% 3, 4, 5 Assessment Detail
Continuous Assessment (40%): In teams of 3 to 4 students, students will work on a practice-related topic and propose a solution (research proposal) to a practice problem. During 6 timepoints in this course the group will work on different aspects (eg literature review, ethical considerations, research proposal) of this task. The final outcome of this continuous group assignment will be a coherent research proposal with supporting critical appraisal of existing literature.
Assignment (20%): Students will be required to present in a short video their appraisal of a research paper, with a focus on potential flaws in methodology. Student will be asked to reflect on methodology in general and more specifically, on the ethical aspects and identify possible research integrity issues. Students will also be required to present on possible improvements with regards to the research question. The video will be uploaded in MyUni and should be around 5 minutes.
Examination (40%): Students will have to submit a 2,000-word critical appraisal of a mixed-methods paper and discuss what possible implications for clinical practice the findings of the paper might indicate.Submission
No information currently available.
Course Grading
Grades for your performance in this course will be awarded in accordance with the following scheme:
M10 (Coursework Mark Scheme) Grade Mark Description FNS Fail No Submission F 1-49 Fail P 50-64 Pass C 65-74 Credit D 75-84 Distinction HD 85-100 High Distinction CN Continuing NFE No Formal Examination RP Result Pending Further details of the grades/results can be obtained from Examinations.
Grade Descriptors are available which provide a general guide to the standard of work that is expected at each grade level. More information at Assessment for Coursework Programs.
Final results for this course will be made available through .
-
Student Feedback
The University places a high priority on approaches to learning and teaching that enhance the student experience. Feedback is sought from students in a variety of ways including on-going engagement with staff, the use of online discussion boards and the use of Student Experience of Learning and Teaching (SELT) surveys as well as GOS surveys and Program reviews.
SELTs are an important source of information to inform individual teaching practice, decisions about teaching duties, and course and program curriculum design. They enable the University to assess how effectively its learning environments and teaching practices facilitate student engagement and learning outcomes. Under the current SELT Policy (http://www.adelaide.edu.au/policies/101/) course SELTs are mandated and must be conducted at the conclusion of each term/semester/trimester for every course offering. Feedback on issues raised through course SELT surveys is made available to enrolled students through various resources (e.g. MyUni). In addition aggregated course SELT data is available.
-
Student Support
- Academic Integrity for Students
- Academic Support with Maths
- Academic Support with writing and study skills
- Careers Services
- Library Services for Students
- LinkedIn Learning
- Student Life Counselling Support - Personal counselling for issues affecting study
- Students with a Disability - Alternative academic arrangements
-
Policies & Guidelines
This section contains links to relevant assessment-related policies and guidelines - all university policies.
- Academic Credit Arrangements Policy
- Academic Integrity Policy
- Academic Progress by Coursework Students Policy
- Assessment for Coursework Programs Policy
- Copyright Compliance Policy
- Coursework Academic Programs Policy
- Intellectual Property Policy
- IT Acceptable Use and Security Policy
- Modified Arrangements for Coursework Assessment Policy
- Reasonable Adjustments to Learning, Teaching & Assessment for Students with a Disability Policy
- Student Experience of Learning and Teaching Policy
- Student Grievance Resolution Process
-
Fraud Awareness
Students are reminded that in order to maintain the academic integrity of all programs and courses, the university has a zero-tolerance approach to students offering money or significant value goods or services to any staff member who is involved in their teaching or assessment. Students offering lecturers or tutors or professional staff anything more than a small token of appreciation is totally unacceptable, in any circumstances. Staff members are obliged to report all such incidents to their supervisor/manager, who will refer them for action under the university's student鈥檚 disciplinary procedures.
The 成人大片 is committed to regular reviews of the courses and programs it offers to students. The 成人大片 therefore reserves the right to discontinue or vary programs and courses without notice. Please read the important information contained in the disclaimer.
