AGRIBUS 7064 - Water Security and Governance

North Terrace Campus - Trimester 2 - 2017

This course examines the governance, future security and sustainable management of water resources with a particular focus on agricultural production and increasing demands for water by other sectors (e.g. urban growth, environmental flows). Within the course, students will be exposed to topics such as: the historical, cultural and socio-political contexts of water governance; the range of legal, policy and administrative arrangements for developing, allocating, managing and protecting water resources; raising awareness of the cross-jurisdictional, multi-level and multi-institutional processes involved; the intersecting and interrelated interests around water resource use and frameworks for stakeholder consultation; theoretical and practical frameworks for addressing increasingly complex water security issues such as allocation and trade; and recent remediation programs to counter land and water degradation.

Open All

Course Details

Course Code	AGRIBUS 7064
Course	Water Security and Governance
Coordinating Unit	Centre for Global Food & Resources
Term	Trimester 2
Level	Postgraduate Coursework
Location/s	North Terrace Campus
Units	3
Available for Study Abroad and Exchange	Y
Assessment	Case studies, group work, exam, participation

Course Staff

Course Coordinator: Associate Professor Adam Loch

Role:	Course coordinator and Lecturer
Location:	6.18, Nexus 10 (10 Pulteney Street)
Email:	Adam.Loch@adelaide.edu.au

Other Lecturer(s)

Name:	Assoc. Prof Sarah Wheeler
Role:	Lecturer
Location:	6.17, Nexus 10 (10 Pulteney Street)
Email:	Sarah.Wheeler@adelaide.edu.au


Name:	Dr Alec Zuo
Role:	Lecturer
Location:	6.20, Nexus 10 (10 Pulteney Street)
Email:	Alec.Zuo@adelaide.edu.au

Course Timetable

The full timetable of all activities for this course can be accessed from .

Course Learning Outcomes

On the successful completion of this course, students will be able to:

Describe the historical context of water governance in Australia and other contexts and identify the critical points of institutional change.
List important policy or program options for managing water scarcity and compare their effectiveness in different situations.
Explain the multi-jurisdictional governance of water and analyse reasons as to why this approach is adopted.
Critically analyse the drivers of water scarcity and demonstrate the usefulness of economic instruments such as trade, pricing and allocation.
Apply assessment tools such as cost-benefit analysis, frameworks for interrelated stakeholder consultation and water resource planning to case studies.
Evaluate the possible future outcomes of water governance decisions taken today, and debate the merits/costs of these decisions.

University Graduate Attributes

This course will provide students with an opportunity to develop the Graduate Attribute(s) specified below:

University Graduate Attribute	Course Learning Outcome(s)
Deep discipline knowledge informed and infused by cutting edge research, scaffolded throughout their program of studies acquired from personal interaction with research active educators, from year 1 accredited or validated against national or international standards (for relevant programs)	2,3,4,6
Critical thinking and problem solving steeped in research methods and rigor based on empirical evidence and the scientific approach to knowledge development demonstrated through appropriate and relevant assessment	5
Teamwork and communication skills developed from, with, and via the SGDE honed through assessment and practice throughout the program of studies encouraged and valued in all aspects of learning	1,3,6
Career and leadership readiness technology savvy professional and, where relevant, fully accredited forward thinking and well informed tested and validated by work based experiences	6
Intercultural and ethical competency adept at operating in other cultures comfortable with different nationalities and social contexts able to determine and contribute to desirable social outcomes demonstrated by study abroad or with an understanding of indigenous knowledges	4,5
Self-awareness and emotional intelligence a capacity for self-reflection and a willingness to engage in self-appraisal open to objective and constructive feedback from supervisors and peers able to negotiate difficult social situations, defuse conflict and engage positively in purposeful debate	2,4

Learning Resources
Required Resources

There are no specified learning resources required for the course. A lecture outline and recommended reading in preparation for each seminar will be made available, together with a list of additional readings for those wishing to explore issues further. However, there are a number of additional recommended resources that students might like to examine either in preparation for the course discussions or as part of their wider examination of water governance in Australia:

Recommended Resources
The following are excellent (but not required) text examples. The library does not hold a copy of these texts in its collection, but an electronic version of the individual contributions is freely available at http://www.elgaronline.com/view/9781782549642.xml :

Dinar, A. and Schwabe, K. (2015), A Handbook of Water Economics, Edward Elgar Press, Northampton MA.

Griffin, R. (2016), Water Resource Economics, 2nd Edition, MIT Press, Cambridge MA.

Legislation and planning:
- The Water Act (C’wth: 2007)
- The National Water Initiative
- The Murray–Darling Basin Agreement
- Commonwealth Environmental Watering Plans
Websites:
- The Department of Agriculture and Water Resources (DAWR) http://www.agriculture.gov.au/
- The Murray–Darling Basin Authority (MDBA) http://www.mdba.gov.au/
- The Commonwealth Environmental Water Office (CEWO) https://www.environment.gov.au/water/cewo
- The National Water Commission (archived) http://www.nwc.gov.au/
- The Victorian Environmental Water Holder (VEWH) http://www.vewh.vic.gov.au/
- New South Wales Office of Water (DPI-Water) http://www.water.nsw.gov.au/
- Council of Australian Governments (CoAG)
Academic journals frequently referred to:
- Australian Journal of Agricultural and Resource Economics (AJARE)
- Ecological Economics (Ecol Econ)
- The American Journal of Agricultural Economics (AJAE)
- Water Resources Research (WRR)
- Water Resources Management (WRM)
- Agricultural Water Management (AWM)
Cases:

All case studies will be made available on the course website or via links to relevant external sites. All cases will be freely available.

Learning & Teaching Modes

The course will be delivered intensively over five weeks: Weeks 1, 3 and 5 involve two 6-hour lecture/workshop contact session (Tuesdays and Thursdays); Weeks 2 and 4 are for preparation/reading in between each contact week. Weekly sessions will be delivered by one of the lecturers, but all lecturers will participate in the course delivery at critical stages (e.g. the debate). The course coordinator will provide a central point of contact for students.

The delivery will be a blended approach using 1.5 hour lectures, course discussion of readings to provide for flipped learning outcomes, and class activities (e.g. game-playing, case studies, debate etc.) for learning development beyond the lecture mode. Students will be required to demonstrate their capacity to locate information, absorb its detail, consider the implications of that information in the context of interest and demonstrate that in the provision of solutions or suggestions for policy/program arrangements. Useful links and tips will be provided in the course materials, and interaction will assist all students to learn from one another.

A debate will be the culmination of the learning mode toward the end of the course where students will be asked to separate into two teams of different stakeholders and debate the merits/costs of two current programs for dealing with water scarcity in Australia: buyback and efficiency improvements. Participation in these activities will form a small part of the course assessment.

Workload

The information below is provided as a guide to assist students in engaging appropriately with the course requirements.

There is no expected pre-requisite knowledge or course-work for this course. However, students are anticipated to have a basic background knowledge through their undergraduate programs that will enable them to contextualize the importance of better water governance across their own area of interest. It is also expected that the student group will thus have a diverse range of professional experience, including some students with no postgraduate work experience. Therefore, consistent with the nature of real-world water governance requirements, students will be encouraged to develop a multi-disciplinary perspective and approach to tackling problems posed in the course.

As such:

Core information will be provided to students ahead of course commencement and basic principles will be outlined and developed in the lecture component of the course. Seminar sessions will be used to more deeply develop and apply these core concepts through the use of flipped discussion, problem solving activities and interactive student engagement. Case studies will form a basis for much of this activity, where real-world issues will be discussed and solutions developed by the group on the basis of their learning to date.

The structure of these cases will be such that examples will range from relatively simple through to complex governance arrangement requirements as the course progresses, highlighting the development of skills and the scale and range of water governance requirements by the end of the course.

Students will be expected to read the assigned papers or resources ahead of the weekly sessions, and encouraged to read any additional resources supplied for further background information of knowledge. They will then be expected to use that knowledge to actively participate in the seminar discussions and activities as part of their total assessment.

Learning Activities Summary

The structure and seminar topics for each session is set out below. At the commencement of the course a more detailed structure would be made available to the student group. Note that as an intensive course it is expected that the course delivery will be broken into two six-hour sessions per week (e.g. Tuesdays and Thursdays) over a total of three weeks to accumulate the required 36 contact hours. Format for those sessions would be two 1.5-hour lectures followed with two 1.5-hour practical seminars for flipped discussion, case study analysis, debate and small-group work. Additional work outside of contact hours for course reading and planning by students would also be taken into account.

Session	Lecture Topic	Key seminar activitites
1	Introduction to global water security issues	Get to know your classmates and interests
2	Uncertainty as a growing influence in water governance complexity
3	Supply and demand solutions to water resource governance	Case study 1: Water wars!
4	Sectoral use of water resources
5	Values of water resources I
6	Values of water resources II	Case study 2: Urban water pricing
7	Property rights, allocation mechanisms and rights structures
8	Economic instruments as a tool for water governance
9	The Murray-Darling Basin water reform case: Australia leading the world	Case study 3: Basin planning as a governance approach
10	Basin Planning and reform options: buyback versus efficiency
11	The Great Water Debate	Debate: Buyback versus efficiency as water governance solutions
12	Review, key messages and course summary

All three lecturers would be involved in the course delivery through both intensive lecture sessions and assistance during seminar discussions, group work, judging the debate etc. However, the specific lecture topic load would be split as follows:
• First Session: Assoc. Prof Sarah Wheeler (topics 1-4)
• Second Session: Dr Alec Zuo (topics 5-8)
• Third Session: Dr Adam Loch (topics 9-12)

The University's policy on Assessment for Coursework Programs is based on the following four principles:

Assessment must encourage and reinforce learning.
Assessment must enable robust and fair judgements about student performance.
Assessment practices must be fair and equitable to students and give them the opportunity to demonstrate what they have learned.
Assessment must maintain academic standards.

Assessment Summary

Task	Group/Individual	Session Deadline	Weighting	Learning Outcome
Seminar attendance and Participation	Individual	NA	10%	1,2,3,4,5,6
Case study analysis	Individual	Sessions 3, 6, and 9	30%	1,4,5,6
Water debate	Group	Session 11	20%	4,5,6
Short-answer essays (3 of 6 choices)	Individual	TBA	40%	1,2,3,4,5,6
Total			100%

Assessment Detail

There will be four (4) assessment requirements in the course, as follows:

1. Attendance and participation in seminars (10%):

Students must attend 10 of the 12 seminars and actively participate in discussion. They should be familiar with the materials, and show that they have read the assigned minimum reading for each seminar session such that they can ask informed questions and contribute in an informed way. This is key assessment of flipped learning outcomes from the course; that is, we will use this to gauge the students’ development of course knowledge, critical thinking and application of knowledge to issues. Early discussion will be guided by the lecturers, but this development will be reinforced by the case-study assessments.

2. Case studies (30%):

Students will be provided the reading material for three case studies at the start of the course. These will be short readings with dense information that will then lead to a series of questions that will be discussed and debated in the relevant seminars (Sessions 3, 6 and 9). In preparation for these discussions students will be required to prepare a set of notes (e.g. expanded dot points) to help them structure their participation. These notes together with their contribution to the seminar discussion and outcomes will be used as the basis for the assessment mark.

3. The Great Water Debate (20%):

Students will be assigned to two groups (by Session 4 at the latest) and split across two topics that will then be debated. For example, one group may be assigned the argument for buyback as a water saving/recovery option, while the other group may be assigned efficiency improvements. Each group will be expected to elect main speakers for their arguments, but will each contribute to the research role that provides the basis for their arguments. Once each side has spoken the debate will ‘go public’ allowing everyone to expand the debate around the whole room (similar to a parliamentary or stakeholder consultation process). The lecturers will be an initial point of discussion (if necessary to prompt the debate) and final feedback.

4. Short-answer essay responses (40%):

As a final exam assessment, students will be provided with six questions to which they will be required to submit three short-answer essay responses. For example, students may be asked to list the critical requirements for effective water governance and site an example where they are used in the world context. They may then be required to also critically appraise reasons as to why the system in question succeeded/failed over time.

The proposed assessment is summarised in the table below, together with due dates, learning outcomes etc.

Submission

Assignments must be submitted in Softcopy through Turnitin on MyUni

All assignments must be presented professionally with clear headings, appropriate referencing and using one and a half spacing.

Extensions will only be granted if requests are received in writing to the course coordinator at least 24 hours before the final due date unless they are requested on medical or compassionate grounds and are supported by appropriate documents.

Please contact the course coordinator, preferably by email, at any time to make an appointment for assistance or guidance in relation to course work, assignments or any concerns that may arise. Assignments will normally be returned two weeks after they have been submitted

Course Grading

Grades for your performance in this course will be awarded in accordance with the following scheme:

M10 (Coursework Mark Scheme)
Grade	Mark	Description
FNS		Fail No Submission
F	1-49	Fail
P	50-64	Pass
C	65-74	Credit
D	75-84	Distinction
HD	85-100	High Distinction
CN		Continuing
NFE		No Formal Examination
RP		Result Pending

Further details of the grades/results can be obtained from Examinations.

Grade Descriptors are available which provide a general guide to the standard of work that is expected at each grade level. More information at Assessment for Coursework Programs.

Final results for this course will be made available through .

Student Feedback

The University places a high priority on approaches to learning and teaching that enhance the student experience. Feedback is sought from students in a variety of ways including on-going engagement with staff, the use of online discussion boards and the use of Student Experience of Learning and Teaching (SELT) surveys as well as GOS surveys and Program reviews.

SELTs are an important source of information to inform individual teaching practice, decisions about teaching duties, and course and program curriculum design. They enable the University to assess how effectively its learning environments and teaching practices facilitate student engagement and learning outcomes. Under the current SELT Policy (http://www.adelaide.edu.au/policies/101/) course SELTs are mandated and must be conducted at the conclusion of each term/semester/trimester for every course offering. Feedback on issues raised through course SELT surveys is made available to enrolled students through various resources (e.g. MyUni). In addition aggregated course SELT data is available.
Student Support
Policies & Guidelines
This section contains links to relevant assessment-related policies and guidelines - all university policies.
Fraud Awareness

Students are reminded that in order to maintain the academic integrity of all programs and courses, the university has a zero-tolerance approach to students offering money or significant value goods or services to any staff member who is involved in their teaching or assessment. Students offering lecturers or tutors or professional staff anything more than a small token of appreciation is totally unacceptable, in any circumstances. Staff members are obliged to report all such incidents to their supervisor/manager, who will refer them for action under the university's student鈥檚 disciplinary procedures.

The 成人大片 is committed to regular reviews of the courses and programs it offers to students. The 成人大片 therefore reserves the right to discontinue or vary programs and courses without notice. Please read the important information contained in the disclaimer.

Authorised by:	Deputy Vice-Chancellor and Vice-President (Academic)
Maintained by:	Course Outlines Administrator

成人大片