PATHOL 3104 - Investigative Cell Biology
North Terrace Campus - Semester 2 - 2022
-
General Course Information
Course Details
Course Code PATHOL 3104 Course Investigative Cell Biology Coordinating Unit Medical Sciences Term Semester 2 Level Undergraduate Location/s North Terrace Campus Units 3 Contact Up to 3 hours per week Available for Study Abroad and Exchange Y Prerequisites HLTH SC 2104 or PATHOL 2200 or PATHOL 3101 Incompatible ANAT SC 3104 Assessment MCQ tests (x3), literature review, final exam. As no longer hosting lab projects through the course directly, students will no longer do SGRP proposal or presentation Course Staff
Course Coordinator: Associate Professor Tania Crotti
Course Timetable
The full timetable of all activities for this course can be accessed from .
-
Learning Outcomes
Course Learning Outcomes
This course has been designed to support you to achieve course learning outcomes and develop broad skills that can be used in your academic and professional work.- Identify current and emerging research techniques in human health and disease
- Generate, illustrate and interpret experimental results in a medical research setting
- Explain how the structures at the level of cells, tissues and organs relate to their overall function in both health and disease states
- Critically evaluate scientific literature used in medical research
- Assemble and record a range of medical scientific literature
- Communicate self-generated medical research findings in written/oral format
University Graduate Attributes
This course will provide students with an opportunity to develop the Graduate Attribute(s) specified below:
University Graduate Attribute Course Learning Outcome(s) Attribute 1: Deep discipline knowledge and intellectual breadth
Graduates have comprehensive knowledge and understanding of their subject area, the ability to engage with different traditions of thought, and the ability to apply their knowledge in practice including in multi-disciplinary or multi-professional contexts.
1, 2, 4 Attribute 2: Creative and critical thinking, and problem solving
Graduates are effective problems-solvers, able to apply critical, creative and evidence-based thinking to conceive innovative responses to future challenges.
1, 2, 4, 5 Attribute 3: Teamwork and communication skills
Graduates convey ideas and information effectively to a range of audiences for a variety of purposes and contribute in a positive and collaborative manner to achieving common goals.
1,2, 3, 4,5, 6 Attribute 4: Professionalism and leadership readiness
Graduates engage in professional behaviour and have the potential to be entrepreneurial and take leadership roles in their chosen occupations or careers and communities.
1, 2, 6 Attribute 5: Intercultural and ethical competency
Graduates are responsible and effective global citizens whose personal values and practices are consistent with their roles as responsible members of society.
6 Attribute 8: Self-awareness and emotional intelligence
Graduates are self-aware and reflective; they are flexible and resilient and have the capacity to accept and give constructive feedback; they act with integrity and take responsibility for their actions.
1, 2, 3, 4,5, 6 -
Learning Resources
Required Resources
No text book required. All lecture material is examinable and where possible URL links and references will be provided for additional information to support the content.Online Learning
Please bring laptop/ipad to workshops for active participation and online quizes
Lectures will be uploaded as PDFs and recorded in Echo360 and available through CANVAS -
Learning & Teaching Activities
Learning & Teaching Modes
Course structure and expectations
Lectures – this course benefits from the real-time delivery of content. Research active academic staff and affiliates from disciplines within the Adelaide Medical School deliver lectures specific to cell biology, pathology and current research techniques for investigations. These lectures are supported by workshops/tutorials, whereby smaller groups of students will learn more about techniques and their application. Lecture recordings are released in line with the timetable to offer synchronous learning opportunities and reduce cognitive overloading. Review of the lecture material and support notes is critical to understanding complex descriptions and terminology.
As much of the content for this course is NOT supported by textbooks, and in line with University expectations, we support the audio and video capture of lecture content not only to aid in revision but in support of those unable to attend or with additional learning requirements.
Workshops/Tutorials – weekly sessions will enable research discovery through teacher - peer and peer-peer interaction as we explore the application and limitations of techniques.
Discussion board – constructive use of the course discussion board is encouraged in order to provide an interactive portal for students to post questions that may be of common interest to the group.
Workload
The information below is provided as a guide to assist students in engaging appropriately with the course requirements.
This is a 3 unit course, and we expect that students should be spending;
2 hours per week attending/listening to lectures
1 hour in class workshops/tutorials (including reading and writing)
2 hours per week on revision for tests and examinations and prep for workshops.
1-2 hrs per week on semester long assignmentLearning Activities Summary
Investigative Cell Biology has been designed to enable students to develop and improve various skills such as critical thinking, critical
evaluation and analysis as well as academic writing, time management andan understanding of planning and conducting research.
Lectures:This will be followed by review and discussion of research techniques and findings in their research fields and laboratories.
Several themes and will be presented by internationally recognised researchers from the Faculty of Health and Medical Sciences.
Each theme will have a biology and pathology background component introducing students to the lecturers' field of research.
Tutorials/workshops:
Will be smallar group activities with an emphasis on the theory and process of current techniques/models, including the application of
the method, via videos and examples from scientific ppr.
In workshops students may be asked to critically evaluate the information gained from and limitations of the use of particular technique to answer research questions in scientific publications/examples.
Students are expected to come along to workshops and be encouraged to interact with the lecturer/tutors and other students.
Online tests throughout the course will be an opportunity to revise and inteegrate information from the lecture and workshop material presented in previous few week. They are designed to break down learning in preparation for the end of semester test,
This course will stimulate an interest in biological and pathological processes and how scientific research and methodology investigates
these.
Each of the different assessment components is aimed at
developing and improving each student's research skills. -
Assessment
The University's policy on Assessment for Coursework Programs is based on the following four principles:
- Assessment must encourage and reinforce learning.
- Assessment must enable robust and fair judgements about student performance.
- Assessment practices must be fair and equitable to students and give them the opportunity to demonstrate what they have learned.
- Assessment must maintain academic standards.
Assessment Summary
Assessment Task Assessment Task Weighting
Learning Outcome(s)
being addressedOnline tests Summative 3X 10% 1,3 Proposal/review
(SGDE)Summative 20% 4,5,6 End-of-Semester Examination Summative 50% 1, 2, 3 Assessment Detail
Open Book Online Test through CANVAS- To encourage revision and break down learning of key concepts
These will be completed during your workshop
Bring electronic device to be able to log on
Extended Review (small group assignment)
Investigative Cell Biology runs semester-long small group project. Students will work in small groups of two or three and self-select from a range of topics that align with themes delivered by experienced research-active senior academics during the course.
This enables students to research literature around the pathology and research findings in the field with theoretical concepts and provide additional opportunities to clarify complex procedures, descriptions and terminology.
The review will extend skills by encouraging students to identify gaps in research areas and propose aims and ways to investigate these. This develops skills in line with those required for grant and manuscript writing.
End of Semester Exam (50% of final grade)
There will be a two-hour theory examination for this subject.
Important information about exams that all students should be aware of can be found at
www.adelaide.edu.au/student/current/exams/
Tests and examinations will be graded using marks.
All lecture and workshop content is assessable. The examination aims to examine and integrate a student’s understanding of the topics that have been covered during the semester. The total possible mark for the exam will be specified on the test/ examination. Marks for individual questions in the examination will be stated on the question paper to provide a guide as to how much you should write in your answer relative to each question.
Course Learning outcome:
Identify current and emerging research techniques in human health and disease
Explain how the structures at the level of cells, tissues and organs relate to their overall function in both healthy and disease states
University attributes
Deep discipline knowledge:
Critical thinking and problem solvingSubmission
Submission of a dot plan of the review via CANVAS to encourage early collaboration within groups and enable feedback and clarification around the topic and content.
Submission of Research review via TurnIT in CANVASCourse Grading
Grades for your performance in this course will be awarded in accordance with the following scheme:
M10 (Coursework Mark Scheme) Grade Mark Description FNS Fail No Submission F 1-49 Fail P 50-64 Pass C 65-74 Credit D 75-84 Distinction HD 85-100 High Distinction CN Continuing NFE No Formal Examination RP Result Pending Further details of the grades/results can be obtained from Examinations.
Grade Descriptors are available which provide a general guide to the standard of work that is expected at each grade level. More information at Assessment for Coursework Programs.
Final results for this course will be made available through .
-
Student Feedback
The University places a high priority on approaches to learning and teaching that enhance the student experience. Feedback is sought from students in a variety of ways including on-going engagement with staff, the use of online discussion boards and the use of Student Experience of Learning and Teaching (SELT) surveys as well as GOS surveys and Program reviews.
SELTs are an important source of information to inform individual teaching practice, decisions about teaching duties, and course and program curriculum design. They enable the University to assess how effectively its learning environments and teaching practices facilitate student engagement and learning outcomes. Under the current SELT Policy (http://www.adelaide.edu.au/policies/101/) course SELTs are mandated and must be conducted at the conclusion of each term/semester/trimester for every course offering. Feedback on issues raised through course SELT surveys is made available to enrolled students through various resources (e.g. MyUni). In addition aggregated course SELT data is available.
Comments from 2019 SELTS
Overall satisfaction with the course was 92% broad agreement.
Overall Content“Gave me an understanding of why specific tests are used and how they answer certain research questions. Prior to this course, I didn't know really anything about the different types of tests used in scientific research ......”“I liked the focus on clinical investigations, like bone imaging and biomarkers.”“Very interesting and detailed information on valuable pathology tools”“I retained a lot of information in this course and it was interesting to learn about topics including prostate cancer, stem cell therapy through the eyes of really a lab-based perspective. I loved the special guests for the lectures and asking them questions was very helpful. ““useful for those pursuing research in the future”WorkshopsPro“We applied the information learnt in lectures to answer specific research questions.”“They put things into context”“Learning about laboratory techniques was helpful”To improve“needed a bit more help creating hypotheses in regards to the workshop content”
Response: We will review our time allocation and workshop content to align“Would've preferred if tutorials were to solidify information for lectures and onlinequizzes, not to introduce new information.”Response: Workshops have been designed to complement, expand upon and solidify lecture content. Lecturers provide an overview of thetechniques in their areas of research and pathology but do not have the opportunity to point out other techniques that could havebeen used and why/not they would have been chosen.Staff“Helpful, knowledgeable and approachable”“Welcomed any questions about any of the content”“Felt comfortable asking questions in workshops, which I usually feel too shy to do in other courses.”AssessmentPro“Open book quizzes”Need improvement“Rubric and what was wanted from the dot point plan and essay were a bit vague.”Response- The dot plan was introduced in 2019 to gauge interpretation of the topic and give feedback early. We havefurther refined it in light of feedbackResearchreview-“The word count on the needed to be far longer, 4 people writing a 1000 word review”Response: This had been revised to 1500 in 2019. Part of research writing is also the skill of clarity and brevity.Exam“Maybe introduce some short answer questions in the online tests, so students can have experience with them before the final exam.”Response-The online MCQs were introduced to break down revision of content so not “crammed” in at the very end during SWOT. The same concepts are assessed in an extended integrated form in the exam. The online tests during the semester provide a balance between different modes of assessment and reduce weighting and pressure of exam conditions.Although not assessed, we have designed the workshops to provide the opportunity to practise handwritten responses that align to the
exam. That said, we will review the design of the tests within CANVAS to better align with the exam design.
Background:
In 2018, the Bachelor of Health/Medical Sciences Program changed to incorporate research projects for all students to be run centrally. As such, course design and assessments were required to undergo major modifications as we could no longer offer a lab-based project as part of the experience in PATHOL3104.
Assessment tasks have been revised in response to feedback on load and in response to changes in the program and research experience management.
The workshops were introduced in 2018. They are designed to complement lecture material across the course and expand on a student's understanding of ethical practise, application and information gained by current research techniques as well as the limitations of techniques.
·
Ethics workshop-relates to all research discussed over the course of the semester
Animal well being and behaviour-relates to all studies using animals in all fields of research
Imaging analysis-relates to not only musculoskeletal but cancer research
Protein analysis and biomarkers- optimal biomarkers design and implementation is critical to reliable diagnosis and prognosis in the clinic
-
Student Support
- Academic Integrity for Students
- Academic Support with Maths
- Academic Support with writing and study skills
- Careers Services
- Library Services for Students
- LinkedIn Learning
- Student Life Counselling Support - Personal counselling for issues affecting study
- Students with a Disability - Alternative academic arrangements
-
Policies & Guidelines
This section contains links to relevant assessment-related policies and guidelines - all university policies.
- Academic Credit Arrangements Policy
- Academic Integrity Policy
- Academic Progress by Coursework Students Policy
- Assessment for Coursework Programs Policy
- Copyright Compliance Policy
- Coursework Academic Programs Policy
- Intellectual Property Policy
- IT Acceptable Use and Security Policy
- Modified Arrangements for Coursework Assessment Policy
- Reasonable Adjustments to Learning, Teaching & Assessment for Students with a Disability Policy
- Student Experience of Learning and Teaching Policy
- Student Grievance Resolution Process
-
Fraud Awareness
Students are reminded that in order to maintain the academic integrity of all programs and courses, the university has a zero-tolerance approach to students offering money or significant value goods or services to any staff member who is involved in their teaching or assessment. Students offering lecturers or tutors or professional staff anything more than a small token of appreciation is totally unacceptable, in any circumstances. Staff members are obliged to report all such incidents to their supervisor/manager, who will refer them for action under the university's student鈥檚 disciplinary procedures.
The 成人大片 is committed to regular reviews of the courses and programs it offers to students. The 成人大片 therefore reserves the right to discontinue or vary programs and courses without notice. Please read the important information contained in the disclaimer.
