PROJMGNT 7058OL - Project Management Research Project
Online - Quadmester 2 - 2017
-
General Course Information
Course Details
Course Code PROJMGNT 7058OL Course Project Management Research Project Coordinating Unit Entrepreneurship, Commercialisation & Innov Centre Term Quadmester 2 Level Postgraduate Coursework Location/s Online Units 6 Contact Approximately 4 hours per week over 15 weeks (interaction and preparation) Available for Study Abroad and Exchange N Assumed Knowledge Completion of all core courses for this Masters Program Assessment Assignments Course Staff
Course Coordinator: Associate Professor Indra Gunawan
Project Management
Name: Associate Professor Indra Gunawan
Email: indra.gunawan@adelaide.edu.au
Teaching Staff:
Term 2 Online
Name: Professor Vernon Ireland
BE, BA, MEngSc, PhD, FIEAust, EngExec
Short Bio:
From 1991-1996 Vernon was Corporate Development Director of Fletcher Challenge Construction, responsible for people and
business systems improvement in the USA, NZ, Australia, the Pacific and Asian businesses. He then became CEO of the Australian Graduate School of Engineering Innovation, an advanced engineering centre.
Prior to this he was Dean of the Faculty of Design, Architecture and Building at the University of Technology, Sydney. He was also Chair of the Building Services Corporation of NSW from 1987 to 1990 reporting to both Labor and Coalition Ministers. While an academic he completed his PhD in project management. After graduation he practised as a structural engineer for seven years.
Vernon initiated and completed the proposal to Congress and Council of Engineers Australia to establish CELM and was Deputy
Chair of the National Board for five years.
He was also President of the Sydney Division of Engineers Australia in 2004.
Vernon Ireland is currently Director of Project Management and Industry Programs for the Entrepreneurship, Commercialisation
and Innovation Centre of The 成人大片. He is based in Sydney.
Vernon has received three medals:
· The Silver Magnolia Medal awarded by the Shanghai Government for contributions to Chinese overseas relations;
· The Rotary International Gold Medal for contribution to vocational Education;
· Engineers Australia’s Medal for contribution to engineering.
Vernon has conducted four sets of international benchmarking studies, comparing Australia’s project management performance with that of the USA, the UK, Canada, Germany, Sweden and New Zealand for two Royal Commissions.
He has recently edited a volume of the Australian Journal of Civil Engineering on the business, leadership and management of
civil engineering.
He has been named by the Shanghai Government as one of the world 100 experts on Infrastructure.
Email: vernon.ireland@adelaide.edu.au
Phone: +61 411 153 861
Term 4 Online:
TBACourse Timetable
The full timetable of all activities for this course can be accessed from .
Monday 10th April to Sunday 18-June 2017 -
Learning Outcomes
Course Learning Outcomes
The overall objective of this course is to introduce students to research project activities.
Research topics must be negotiated with the lecturer in charge.On successful completion of this course, students will be able to:
1 Research a topic of interest in the project management; 2 Recognize, select and critically analyse relevant information for your report; 3 Synthesise the key points/findings and communicate them in a clear, concise and professional report; 4 Identify the benefits of continuing personal and professional development in the rapidly developing and increasingly complex field of project management research; 5 Clasify ethical, social and cultural issues and an understanding of the implication of these issues in the pursuit of project management research. University Graduate Attributes
This course will provide students with an opportunity to develop the Graduate Attribute(s) specified below:
University Graduate Attribute Course Learning Outcome(s) Deep discipline knowledge
- informed and infused by cutting edge research, scaffolded throughout their program of studies
- acquired from personal interaction with research active educators, from year 1
- accredited or validated against national or international standards (for relevant programs)
1-3 Critical thinking and problem solving
- steeped in research methods and rigor
- based on empirical evidence and the scientific approach to knowledge development
- demonstrated through appropriate and relevant assessment
1-3 Teamwork and communication skills
- developed from, with, and via the SGDE
- honed through assessment and practice throughout the program of studies
- encouraged and valued in all aspects of learning
1-3 Career and leadership readiness
- technology savvy
- professional and, where relevant, fully accredited
- forward thinking and well informed
- tested and validated by work based experiences
4 Intercultural and ethical competency
- adept at operating in other cultures
- comfortable with different nationalities and social contexts
- able to determine and contribute to desirable social outcomes
- demonstrated by study abroad or with an understanding of indigenous knowledges
4 Self-awareness and emotional intelligence
- a capacity for self-reflection and a willingness to engage in self-appraisal
- open to objective and constructive feedback from supervisors and peers
- able to negotiate difficult social situations, defuse conflict and engage positively in purposeful debate
5 -
Learning Resources
Required Resources
M. Saunders, P. Lewis and A. Thornhill, Research Methods for Business Students, 2016, Pearson.Recommended Resources
Weeks Readings + Activities (prescribed textbook + online readings) Books and notes PowerPoints 1 Complex adaptive systems Stacey 1995, Uhl-Bien, Marion & McKelvey 2007 1-17 2 McChrystal in Iraq in Team of Teams McChrystal, S. Team of Teams, 2016,Portfoli/Penguin 18-40 3 Alex Pentland A. Pentland, Social Physics, 2015, Penguin 41-87 4 Introduction: Taking on a Research Project -how to approach the challenges of project work
Choosing a Research Topic.Chapter 1: M. Saunders, P. Lewis and A. Thornhill, Research Methods for Business Students, 2016, Pearson. Chapter 1 (section 1.2) 88-121
5 Research questions versus hypotheses:
Interesting research
Prescribed Test. Chapter 2. Table 1.1 PDF (Beins, B 2014)122-153 6 Identifying the research topic Prescribed Test. Chapter 3. 7 Researching the Literature Textbook Chapter 3. 8 Research Proposal Design
Prescribed Book Chapter 5
Summative Assessment (for PROJMGNT 7058):
Research proposal 10%.
Reading 5.1 and 5.2 ref. course materials / course resource folder)
Reading Buckley, J. W., M. H. Buckley and H. Chiang. 1976.Research Methodology
& Business Decisions9 Research philosophy
Understanding your philosophy and approach.
Qualitative or Quantitative?Prescribed Book. Chapter 4 154-185 10 Research Formulation & Process: How to structure a
formal research or business plan. Ethics ProcessPrescribed Book Chapter 5.
Formative Assessment: One page proposal 5%
186-22711 Research Proposal
Writing a Research Proposal @See Text C2, 3, & 5 228-301 12 Communication Plan: Project proposal &
Presentation. How to report on your project research using standard structureSee course Notes 13 How to organise your work effectively
Citation is more than referencing14 Writing with Argument Reading 11.1 Complex project conceptualisation and argument mapping Journal article (Metcalfe. PDF) 15 16 Submit Research Project
Readings
Bakhshi, Ireland & Gorod Clarifying the Project Complexity 3 July 2016.pdf
Buckley, Buckley & Chaing Research Methods
Calman Grounded Theory PDF
Research model from engineering.pdf
Saunders_ReschMethod6e_wm copy.pdf (Downloadable)
-
Learning & Teaching Activities
Learning & Teaching Modes
This course is offered in online mode.Workload
The information below is provided as a guide to assist students in engaging appropriately with the course requirements.
As a guide, a 3 unit course comprises a total of 156 hours.Learning Activities Summary
No information currently available.
-
Assessment
The University's policy on Assessment for Coursework Programs is based on the following four principles:
- Assessment must encourage and reinforce learning.
- Assessment must enable robust and fair judgements about student performance.
- Assessment practices must be fair and equitable to students and give them the opportunity to demonstrate what they have learned.
- Assessment must maintain academic standards.
Assessment Summary
An overview of the course assessment appears in the following Table. Details appear in the following section:
# Assessment Length Weighting Due Date Learning Outcomes 1
Online discussion group
Approx. 400 words 20% Weekly 1-5 2 Research Proposal 2000 words 15% Week 4 1-5 3 Partial final report 7,000 words 15% Week 12 1-5 4 Final Research Report 15,000+ words 50% Week 12 1-5 Total 100% Assessment Detail
No information currently available.
Submission
All text based assignments must be submitted via MyUni.
Please refer to step by step instructions:
There are a few points to note about the submission of assignments:
Assignment Submission: Assignments should not be emailed to the instructor; they must be lodged via the MyUni Course site (unless specified to do both). Note that assignments may be processed via TURNITIN, which is an online plagiarism prevention tool.
Cover Sheet: Please submit, separate to your assignment, the completed 成人大片 Assessment Cover Sheet providing details of yourself and your team members (if applicable), your assignment, the course, date submitted, etc. as well as the declaration signed by you that this is your (your team’s) work. Note that the declaration on any electronically submitted assignment will be deemed to have the same authority as a signed declaration.
Backup Copy of Assignments: You are advised to keep a copy of your assignments in case the submitted copy goes missing. Please ensure that all assignment pages are numbered. If your assignment contains confidential information, you should discuss any concerns with the Course Lecturer prior to submission.
Extensions of Time: Any request for an extension of time for the submission of an assignment should be made well before the due date of the assignment to the Course Lecturer. Normally, extensions will only be granted for a maximum of two weeks from the original assignment submission date. Extensions will only be granted in cases of genuine extenuating circumstances and proof, such as a doctor’s certificate, may be required.
Failure to submit: Failure to submit an assignment on time or by the agreed extension deadline may result in penalties and may incur a fail grade. Note that a late penalty of 5% of the total available marks for that assessment item will be incurred each day an assignment is handed in late (Unless otherwise stated in 'Assessment Related Requirements' or 'Assessment Detail' above). Assignments handed in after 14 days from the due submission date will fail even if a 100% mark is granted for the work.
Resubmission & Remarking
Resubmission of an assignment for remarking after reworking it to obtain a better mark will not normally be accepted. Approval for resubmission will only be granted on medical or compassionate grounds.Course Grading
Grades for your performance in this course will be awarded in accordance with the following scheme:
M10 (Coursework Mark Scheme) Grade Mark Description FNS Fail No Submission F 1-49 Fail P 50-64 Pass C 65-74 Credit D 75-84 Distinction HD 85-100 High Distinction CN Continuing NFE No Formal Examination RP Result Pending Further details of the grades/results can be obtained from Examinations.
Grade Descriptors are available which provide a general guide to the standard of work that is expected at each grade level. More information at Assessment for Coursework Programs.
Final results for this course will be made available through .
-
Student Feedback
The University places a high priority on approaches to learning and teaching that enhance the student experience. Feedback is sought from students in a variety of ways including on-going engagement with staff, the use of online discussion boards and the use of Student Experience of Learning and Teaching (SELT) surveys as well as GOS surveys and Program reviews.
SELTs are an important source of information to inform individual teaching practice, decisions about teaching duties, and course and program curriculum design. They enable the University to assess how effectively its learning environments and teaching practices facilitate student engagement and learning outcomes. Under the current SELT Policy (http://www.adelaide.edu.au/policies/101/) course SELTs are mandated and must be conducted at the conclusion of each term/semester/trimester for every course offering. Feedback on issues raised through course SELT surveys is made available to enrolled students through various resources (e.g. MyUni). In addition aggregated course SELT data is available.
-
Student Support
- Academic Integrity for Students
- Academic Support with Maths
- Academic Support with writing and study skills
- Careers Services
- Library Services for Students
- LinkedIn Learning
- Student Life Counselling Support - Personal counselling for issues affecting study
- Students with a Disability - Alternative academic arrangements
-
Policies & Guidelines
This section contains links to relevant assessment-related policies and guidelines - all university policies.
- Academic Credit Arrangements Policy
- Academic Integrity Policy
- Academic Progress by Coursework Students Policy
- Assessment for Coursework Programs Policy
- Copyright Compliance Policy
- Coursework Academic Programs Policy
- Intellectual Property Policy
- IT Acceptable Use and Security Policy
- Modified Arrangements for Coursework Assessment Policy
- Reasonable Adjustments to Learning, Teaching & Assessment for Students with a Disability Policy
- Student Experience of Learning and Teaching Policy
- Student Grievance Resolution Process
-
Fraud Awareness
Students are reminded that in order to maintain the academic integrity of all programs and courses, the university has a zero-tolerance approach to students offering money or significant value goods or services to any staff member who is involved in their teaching or assessment. Students offering lecturers or tutors or professional staff anything more than a small token of appreciation is totally unacceptable, in any circumstances. Staff members are obliged to report all such incidents to their supervisor/manager, who will refer them for action under the university's student鈥檚 disciplinary procedures.
The 成人大片 is committed to regular reviews of the courses and programs it offers to students. The 成人大片 therefore reserves the right to discontinue or vary programs and courses without notice. Please read the important information contained in the disclaimer.