ANIML SC 4050BRW - Advanced Animal Science Pt 2 (Hons)
Roseworthy Campus - Semester 1 - 2016
-
General Course Information
Course Details
Course Code ANIML SC 4050BRW Course Advanced Animal Science Pt 2 (Hons) Coordinating Unit School of Animal and Veterinary Sciences Term Semester 1 Level Undergraduate Location/s Roseworthy Campus Units 6 Contact Mixed Mode - flexible and/or intensive Available for Study Abroad and Exchange N Incompatible ANIML SC 4004ARW/BRW, ANIML SC 4010ARW/BRW Restrictions Available only to students admitted to the relevant Honours program Assessment Exams and/or assignments, Research Proposal, Literature Review Course Staff
Course Coordinator: Dr Rebecca Forder
Course Timetable
The full timetable of all activities for this course can be accessed from .
-
Learning Outcomes
Course Learning Outcomes
At the completion of the course students should be able to:1 demonstrate knowledge and understanding of principles and concepts in a particular discipline
area of research, related to Animal or Veterinary Sciences2 demonstrate an ability to recognise current gaps in our understanding and future areas for experimental investigation in a
particular area of research, related to Animal or Veterinary Science3 identify and evaluate a problem and define the important elements required for its solution 4 identify and critically evaluate appropriate and relevant information sources 5 communicate scientific information clearly and effectively both in writing and orally University Graduate Attributes
This course will provide students with an opportunity to develop the Graduate Attribute(s) specified below:
University Graduate Attribute Course Learning Outcome(s) Deep discipline knowledge
- informed and infused by cutting edge research, scaffolded throughout their program of studies
- acquired from personal interaction with research active educators, from year 1
- accredited or validated against national or international standards (for relevant programs)
1,2,3,4 Critical thinking and problem solving
- steeped in research methods and rigor
- based on empirical evidence and the scientific approach to knowledge development
- demonstrated through appropriate and relevant assessment
1,2,3,4 Teamwork and communication skills
- developed from, with, and via the SGDE
- honed through assessment and practice throughout the program of studies
- encouraged and valued in all aspects of learning
5 Career and leadership readiness
- technology savvy
- professional and, where relevant, fully accredited
- forward thinking and well informed
- tested and validated by work based experiences
1,2,3,4 Intercultural and ethical competency
- adept at operating in other cultures
- comfortable with different nationalities and social contexts
- able to determine and contribute to desirable social outcomes
- demonstrated by study abroad or with an understanding of indigenous knowledges
1,2,3,4 Self-awareness and emotional intelligence
- a capacity for self-reflection and a willingness to engage in self-appraisal
- open to objective and constructive feedback from supervisors and peers
- able to negotiate difficult social situations, defuse conflict and engage positively in purposeful debate
1,2,3,4,5 -
Learning & Teaching Activities
Learning & Teaching Modes
Learning and teaching modes will vary depending on which module the students choose. For those students choosing to complete coursework the Learning and Teaching modes will be specific to the chosen course. For students choosing the literature review and research proposal of an Animal Science topic, there are no structured activities. Students work independently to complete this activity. They are assigned an academic mentor, who supervises the process and provides assistance and feedback as required.Workload
The information below is provided as a guide to assist students in engaging appropriately with the course requirements.
The workload will depend on the module chosen by the student. Workload for coursework will be dependent on the chosen course. A student enrolled in this course should expect to spend, on average 312 hours on work related to this subject.Learning Activities Summary
The Learning Activities will depend on the module chosen by the student. The Learning Activities for coursework will be dependent on the chosen course. For students choosing the literature review / research proposal of an Animal Science topic there are no structured activities. Students work independently to complete this activity. -
Assessment
The University's policy on Assessment for Coursework Programs is based on the following four principles:
- Assessment must encourage and reinforce learning.
- Assessment must enable robust and fair judgements about student performance.
- Assessment practices must be fair and equitable to students and give them the opportunity to demonstrate what they have learned.
- Assessment must maintain academic standards.
Assessment Summary
Assessment Task Task Type Due Weighting Learning Outcome Written Literature Review / Research proposal
(unrelated topic)Summative July or December (mid-year intake) 40% 1-5 Seminar (unrelated topic) Summativew August or December (mid-year intake) 10% 1-5 Proposal seminar Formative March or September (mid-year intake) 0% 1-5 Literature Analysis and Research Proposal Siummative April or October (mid-year intake) 50% 1-5 Assessment Detail
Assessment will be dependent on the module chosen. Literature Analysis and Research Proposal (50%) Students will submit a written analysis of the Literature that forms the background to their project (max 4,000 words) and a Research proposal that outlines and justifies the project to be conducted (max 1,500 words). This task is submitted in April (February intake) or October (mid-year intake) ~10 weeks after the start of the course. Level III course of their choice OR Written Literature Review and Research Proposal on an unrelated topic (50%) For those students choosing to complete an undergraduate subject, assessment will be dependent on the chosen course. For the alternative activity, students choose a topic, in consultation with the Honours coordinator, their Honours supervisor and an academic mentor. Students then complete an analysis of the literature related to the topic, identify 1-2 original research questions, and formulate hypotheses and experimental aims to address these questions. Students present this as a written literature review and research proposal (40% of the grade (60% literature review, 40% research proposal), maximum 5500 words) and in a seminar presentation (10% of the grade, 20 minute presentation, 10 minute questions). The written document is assessed by a panel of academics and the seminar is assessed by all attending academics.Submission
If an extension is not applied for, or not granted then a penalty for late submission will apply. A mark of zero will be allocatedto late submitted assessment.Course Grading
Grades for your performance in this course will be awarded in accordance with the following scheme:
M11 (Honours Mark Scheme) Grade Grade reflects following criteria for allocation of grade Reported on Official Transcript Fail A mark between 1-49 F Third Class A mark between 50-59 3 Second Class Div B A mark between 60-69 2B Second Class Div A A mark between 70-79 2A First Class A mark between 80-100 1 Result Pending An interim result RP Continuing Continuing CN Further details of the grades/results can be obtained from Examinations.
Grade Descriptors are available which provide a general guide to the standard of work that is expected at each grade level. More information at Assessment for Coursework Programs.
Final results for this course will be made available through .
-
Student Feedback
The University places a high priority on approaches to learning and teaching that enhance the student experience. Feedback is sought from students in a variety of ways including on-going engagement with staff, the use of online discussion boards and the use of Student Experience of Learning and Teaching (SELT) surveys as well as GOS surveys and Program reviews.
SELTs are an important source of information to inform individual teaching practice, decisions about teaching duties, and course and program curriculum design. They enable the University to assess how effectively its learning environments and teaching practices facilitate student engagement and learning outcomes. Under the current SELT Policy (http://www.adelaide.edu.au/policies/101/) course SELTs are mandated and must be conducted at the conclusion of each term/semester/trimester for every course offering. Feedback on issues raised through course SELT surveys is made available to enrolled students through various resources (e.g. MyUni). In addition aggregated course SELT data is available.
-
Student Support
- Academic Integrity for Students
- Academic Support with Maths
- Academic Support with writing and study skills
- Careers Services
- Library Services for Students
- LinkedIn Learning
- Student Life Counselling Support - Personal counselling for issues affecting study
- Students with a Disability - Alternative academic arrangements
-
Policies & Guidelines
This section contains links to relevant assessment-related policies and guidelines - all university policies.
- Academic Credit Arrangements Policy
- Academic Integrity Policy
- Academic Progress by Coursework Students Policy
- Assessment for Coursework Programs Policy
- Copyright Compliance Policy
- Coursework Academic Programs Policy
- Intellectual Property Policy
- IT Acceptable Use and Security Policy
- Modified Arrangements for Coursework Assessment Policy
- Reasonable Adjustments to Learning, Teaching & Assessment for Students with a Disability Policy
- Student Experience of Learning and Teaching Policy
- Student Grievance Resolution Process
-
Fraud Awareness
Students are reminded that in order to maintain the academic integrity of all programs and courses, the university has a zero-tolerance approach to students offering money or significant value goods or services to any staff member who is involved in their teaching or assessment. Students offering lecturers or tutors or professional staff anything more than a small token of appreciation is totally unacceptable, in any circumstances. Staff members are obliged to report all such incidents to their supervisor/manager, who will refer them for action under the university's student鈥檚 disciplinary procedures.
The 成人大片 is committed to regular reviews of the courses and programs it offers to students. The 成人大片 therefore reserves the right to discontinue or vary programs and courses without notice. Please read the important information contained in the disclaimer.
