COMMGMT 1001 - Managing Organisations and People
North Terrace Campus - Semester 2 - 2021
-
General Course Information
Course Details
Course Code COMMGMT 1001 Course Managing Organisations and People Coordinating Unit Management Term Semester 2 Level Undergraduate Location/s North Terrace Campus Units 3 Contact Up to 3 hours per week Available for Study Abroad and Exchange Y Incompatible COMMGMT 2008 or COMMGMT 2501 Assessment Exam/assignments/tests/tutorial work as prescribed at first lecture Course Staff
Course Coordinator: Ankit Agarwal
Lecturer/Course Coordinator:
Mr Ankit Agarwal
Location: Room 10.51, 10 Pulteney Street
Phone: +61 8 8313 4438
Email: ankit.agarwal@adelaide.edu.au
Ms Janin Karoli Hentzen
Email: janin.hentzen@adelaide.edu.au
Dr Ayoosha Saleem
Email: ayoosha.saleem@adelaide.edu.au
Ms Richa Gulati
Email: richa.gulati@adelaide.edu.au
Dr Irfan Tariq
Email: irfantariq08@gmail.com
Ms Karolina Kaczorowska
Email: karolina.kaczorowska@adelaide.edu.au
Mr Ankit Agarwal
Email: ankit.agarwal@adelaide.edu.au
Course Timetable
The full timetable of all activities for this course can be accessed from .
-
Learning Outcomes
Course Learning Outcomes
This course is designed to develop students’ understanding of the nature and purpose of management, while fostering a spirit of critical inquiry and reflection, and the pursuit of personal development and lifelong learning.
On successful completion of this course students will be able to:
1. Demonstrate a foundational knowledge of the diversity of management thinking.
2. Autonomously and collaboratively analyse, evaluate, synthesise and apply knowledge in a timely fashion from wide inquiry of a variety of sources.
3. Demonstrate awareness of research as a source of contested and uncertain knowledge.
4. Effectively communicate their findings independently and as part of a group using an evolving variety of media.
University Graduate Attributes
This course will provide students with an opportunity to develop the Graduate Attribute(s) specified below:
University Graduate Attribute Course Learning Outcome(s) Deep discipline knowledge
- informed and infused by cutting edge research, scaffolded throughout their program of studies
- acquired from personal interaction with research active educators, from year 1
- accredited or validated against national or international standards (for relevant programs)
1-4 Critical thinking and problem solving
- steeped in research methods and rigor
- based on empirical evidence and the scientific approach to knowledge development
- demonstrated through appropriate and relevant assessment
1-4 Teamwork and communication skills
- developed from, with, and via the SGDE
- honed through assessment and practice throughout the program of studies
- encouraged and valued in all aspects of learning
1-4 Career and leadership readiness
- technology savvy
- professional and, where relevant, fully accredited
- forward thinking and well informed
- tested and validated by work based experiences
1-4 Intercultural and ethical competency
- adept at operating in other cultures
- comfortable with different nationalities and social contexts
- able to determine and contribute to desirable social outcomes
- demonstrated by study abroad or with an understanding of indigenous knowledges
1-4 Self-awareness and emotional intelligence
- a capacity for self-reflection and a willingness to engage in self-appraisal
- open to objective and constructive feedback from supervisors and peers
- able to negotiate difficult social situations, defuse conflict and engage positively in purposeful debate
1-4 -
Learning Resources
Required Resources
Samson, D. and Daft, R.L. (2018) Fundamentals of Management (6th Asia Pacific Edition) Cengage Learning: Australia.
Note:
1. It is required you have continuous access to the nominated text in order to complete the course requirements.
2. Other editions of the above text are NOT the same as our required text.Recommended Resources
You have access to numerous resources in the library including scholarly journals and alternative contemporary texts on management. You are encouraged to read widely and critically with a focus on recent work (less than 5 years old) in periodicals, refereed academic journals and books.
The Communication Skills Guide and The 成人大片 Writing Centre are helpful resources for your academic writing and observance of the protocols and conventions of the Harvard referencing style.Online Learning
This course utilises MyUni as a communication and assessment tool. Students should be actively scanning the MyUni course webpage regularly. -
Learning & Teaching Activities
Learning & Teaching Modes
This course is delivered through 12 weekly online lectures (focused on one topic per week) of one-hour duration. Lectures are supported by 12 two-hour workshops. These activities are important interactive components of your learning.
Note: Preparation and active attendance at all the 12 workshops and the completion of 10 online quizzes are expected. Participation grades are based on your weekly workshop participation. Just completing the workshop tasks would not suffice to get participation grades.Workload
The information below is provided as a guide to assist students in engaging appropriately with the course requirements.
The University expects full-time students (i.e. those taking 12 units per semester) to devote a total of 48 hours per week to their studies. Students in this three-unit course are expected to listen to the weekly lectures (1 x 1 hour), attend their allocated weekly workshop class (1 x 2 hours) and meetings with their workshop facilitators (tutors) throughout the semester. This means you are expected to commit approximately 9 hours a week to private study.
Students are expected to…
• Undertake all required readings for the course (e.g., topics from the prescribed course textbook).
• Be prepared for workshops by completing pre-reading and preparing questions and reflections
• Listen to all the online lectures and actively participate (e.g., sharing ideas, asking questions) in all the workshops.
• Complete and submit all items of assessment by the prescribed due dates.
Learning Activities Summary
Please refer to the Course Outline on MyUni.
Assessment 1:
Workshop Participation (10%)You are expected to participate in all scheduled workshops (Face-to-Face or via Zoom) and be prepared to discuss your ideas on the questions outlined in the workshop schedule. You may wish to demonstrate you are prepared by emailing your work to your Workshop Facilitator before the workshop. Nonetheless, the onus remains on you to demonstrate your preparedness to your Workshop Facilitator. Each student will be awarded 0, ½ or 1 mark for each of the workshops, and the best 10 weekly marks will be used to calculate the aggregate mark for this assessment. When determining a weekly mark, workshop facilitators will consider whether the student:• Is prepared: refers to notes, introduces ideas and questions from the week’s text• Contributes: adds new ideas, suggests new connections, raises relevant issues• Seeks clarification: re concepts, terminology, expectations• Interacts: builds on others’ ideas, uses humour positively, stays on track• Communicates clearly: demonstrates appropriate pace, volume and ideas
Permission for any absence is generally only acceptable for medical or compassionate reasons. All such requests should be accompanied by documentary evidence from a social service professional (e.g. doctor, counsellor) and will be assessed on its merits.
Assessment 2:
Weekly Quizzes (20%)Starting week 3, your online quizzes will be based on the previous week's topic. The duration of the quiz is 60 minutes and can be attempted once only. There will be a total of 25 multiple-choice questions. The online quizzes are based on your course textbook content. Each week, the quizzes will begin at 9 am Adelaide time and finish on Friday at 11.59 pm Adelaide time. It is the student's responsibility to ensure that you find time to complete the quizzes before they are due. Failure to do so will result in you losing your grade for that week's quiz. Please understand that extensions can only be given based on medical reasons. No other reasons (e.g., forgot, busy, work and so on) will be accepted as valid reasons for the extension.
Please refer to MyUni for more details about the quizzes and deadlines.
Assessment 3:
Midterm Test (10%)Mid-Term Test will be scheduled for Week 6; the week beginning 30th August 2021.
The purpose of the test is to provide you with the opportunity to ascertain how you are progressing in the course and give you an idea of the type of questions asked in the final exam (hence why the test is only 10%). The test will assess material covered in topics 1 to 3 inclusive.
Details of the test are as follows:This is an online test.This test consists of three short answer questions – you are ONLY required to answer any twoTest coverage – topics 1 to 3 (inclusive) (Q1 - topic 1, Q2 - topic 2, Q3 - topic 3)All answers should be written in the space provided.Time allowed: 50 minutes writing time + 5 minutes reading time + 5 minutes to ensure that the test is submitted properly;Weighting: constitutes 10% of course assessment.
Note: You are not allowed to copy and paste the definitions from the textbook or any other sources. The questions will test your understanding of the concepts and are not designed to test your memory.
Revision tips:Be mindful of the learning outcomes for each of the three topics;Review the lecture slides and the prescribed reading for the three topics;Revisit the workshop questions prescribed for the three topics;Make sure you understand key terms and key concepts from the three topics.
Assessment 4:
Group Assignment (30%)4.1 Group Case Study Report (15%)4.2 Group Case Study Presentations (15%)
Assessment 4.1
Group Case Study Report (15%)The case study assignment for the group report is available via MyUni. There are often multiple ways in which a case study can be analysed and interpreted. This case study assignment is about making sense of actual managerial issues, applying the theories and frameworks you have learned in this course, problem-solving and decision making in complex situations, coping with ambiguities, working in a team, and your academic writing skills, including referencing (e.g., Harvard Referencing Style).
In this assignment, students will be required to analyse a real-life case study and identify the underlying issues, possible alternative courses of action to address the issues identified, provide a recommended course of action and justification why. The comprehensive material provided in the case will need to be used to support your analysis and recommendations. Please refer to MyUni for the information on the prescribed case study.
Students will be allocated into groups of 5 in their workshops. The case study assignment can be downloaded from the MyUni course website. Each group will be required to produce a five-page (Times New Roman or Arial, 12 pt, 1.5 lines) business report using the below guideline. A key aspect of your grade will also be related to how well your group responds to the challenge of 1) including all the relevant information in a well-written, concise 5-page report, 2) skillfully applying the appropriate theories and frameworks covered in class, and 3) formulating and presenting an overall argument that is convincing and supported by case evidence.
Your report should include (guideline):- Introduction: Identify the key management issues from the case and identify your audience, i.e., who are you reporting to (shareholders, the board of directors, management, employees, etc.).
- Analysis: Conduct a brief analysis using the theories and frameworks from the class to explain the causes and outcomes of the key issues you identified in the Introduction, indicating the one main managerial problem that you find most important to cater to.
- Alternative solutions: Drawing upon the concepts learned in this course, formulate three feasible solutions that could be used to resolve the one main managerial problem that you have identified. You must identify the pros and cons of each of the three solutions.
- Recommendation: Select one single solution from the three alternative solutions that you have suggested that could solve the main managerial problem. Discussing your recommendation, you must identify and highlight the possible risks to your recommendation, and how these risks might be mitigated. It is important that you present the action plan that should be taken to implement your recommendation, and which would minimise the potential risks that you have identified.
- Desired state: From a management perspective, outline the ultimate goals that you wish to achieve and specifically relate these to your recommendation. This should reflect the future state of the organisation that would arise from implementing your recommendation.
- Reference list (not included in page count). Each report should contain at least 5 relevant scholarly references. Please refer to page 47 of the Communication Skills guide to make yourself familiar with the Harvard Referencing Style format.
- Once your group report is complete, only ONE group member will submit ONE group assignment file electronically using the link which will be made available on the MyUni course website.
Note: Please do not upload multiple copies of the group report.
Turnitin similarity software will be utilised to indicate potential plagiarism. If your similarity report is greater than 30% (not considering assignment coversheet with plagiarism policies, references, headings, subtitles, etc.), it is strongly advised that you refer to the following link: /writingcentre/resources/avoiding-plagiarismLinks to an external site. If, as a result of this process, your assignment is submitted after the due date, a late submission penalty will be applied (5% per day). Students must retain a copy of all assessments submitted. You can resubmit your assignment multiple times (with the same file name) until the due date: time, but note that it may take several hours for turnitin.com to generate your similarity report.
Assessment 4.2
Group Case Study Presentations (15%)As a part of a group, each student will need to prepare and deliver a presentation in the workshops. Case studies are an effective way to learn about complex issues. By using a real-life example, you will be able to identify multiple managerial issues to the material you learn in this course. Each case will be based on a particular weekly topic (outlined in the workshop schedule). Each week, a student team will present a (20 min) presentation on a case. This presentation will be assessed by your workshop facilitator and is worth 15% of your total grade. The grade for these presentations will be based on one’s team performance; therefore you and your teammates will share the grade. Please refer to MyUni to know the topics available for presentations.
Given that the presentations will be approximately 20 mins each, you will need to create a PowerPoint presentation. There is an element of creativity and showmanship to presenting, so the decision on how to frame your presentation is ultimately yours.
On delivering an excellent presentation, students need to specifically address the following issues...Adhere to a business dress code.
Do not directly read from slides or cardsEngage your audienceBe creative and (appropriately) entertainingAcknowledge and answer questionsFor more useful information on how to give a “killer presentation”, see: https://hbr.org/2013/06/how-to-give-a-killer-presentation/ (Links to an external site.)
It’s also important to note that there will be approximately 5 mins of questions and answers after your presentation. As a presenter, your entire group will be responsible for fielding these questions in a convincing and confident manner. As an audience member, you are responsible for posing “good” questions that respectfully critique/challenge the presenting team’s position. A good question can be defined as one that is clear, thought-provoking, and specifically related to aspects of the presentation at hand.
To summarise, we’ve outlined the “presentation rules” for both presenters and the audience below:For presentersEngage the audience. Use creative ways to make your presentation interesting and interactive.Use visual aids, e.g. prepare slides or other interesting visual materials.Be professional. Dress well and use professional language.Act as a team. Each team member must present so that no one person dominates the presentation.Mind your time. Keep within your prescribed timeframe, e.g. not too long or short.Know your topic. Be prepared to answer questions or discuss with the audience.Do not simply read your slides or notes. Use a conversational approach and keep eye contact with the audience.
For the audienceHave respect. Listen and do not interrupt the presentation.Pay attention. Make notes as interesting ideas come to you. These will inform your questions.Ask questions and offer feedback. It is your responsibility to interact with presenters. Remember, your participation grade is based on the quality of the questions you pose to your fellow classmates.
Group assignment grading mechanism: SPLAT mechanism to ensure equity for team members
Mechanism to ensure that students who are working hard get extra grades for their efforts and students who are not working towards group assignments get lower grades.The purpose of getting you to complete the SPLAT is to give you an opportunity to confidentially submit your evaluation of your contribution, as well as the contributions of your group mates, to the group assignmentPAF scores (measures of your assignment group contribution based on your feedback and that of your group members) will be released after the SPLAT deadline.If you "pulled your weight" in the group work for the assignment, your PAF will be 1.0.A PAF score of greater than 1.0 indicates that you are seen to have put in more than average, whilst scores of less than 0.8 indicate you will need to put more in future group work.Students who have PAF scores greater than 1 will be allocated an individual mark greater than the mark allocated for their group assignment. Conversely, students who have a PAF score less than 1 will be allocated an individual mark less than the mark allocated for their group assignment. The group assignment mark for students with a PAF score of 1.0 will remain unchanged.
Assessment 5:
Final Exam (30%)The purpose of the final exam is to assess your understanding of the concepts covered in this course. Specifically, the ability to utilise theories covered in this course to critically evaluate how planning, organising, leading and controlling organisational resources can be used to achieve an organisation's goals in an efficient and effective manner.The exam will be 3 hours in length. Only topics 4 to 11 will be covered in this course and will be assessable in the final exam. As we have covered topics 1 to 3 in the mid-term test, these three topics will not be covered in the final exam.The examination will be held during the scheduled exam period. The timing of the exam will be known when the Semester 2 examination timetable is released by the University.As highlighted earlier, students are required to achieve a minimum of 45% of the marks in the final exam and an aggregate of 50% in order to eligible to pass this course.More information on the exam will be provided via the MyUni course website.Small Group Discovery Experience
Workshops provide students with the opportunity to work in small groups and analyse real-life case studies with the guidance of experienced workshops facilitators.
Small-Group Discovery Experience: This activity is aimed at you, as part of a group, formed early in the semester, discovering your own meaning of management-related research activity. Your group will be expected to meet with your workshop facilitator (tutor) and/or lecturer (if needed) to discuss and explore the best way to complete this group project. You are required to actively participate in all aspects of the assignment (e.g. in research, analysis, critical thinking, group work) to provide a foundation for the development of your skills in your ongoing studies. Equal contribution from each group member is expected. - Introduction: Identify the key management issues from the case and identify your audience, i.e., who are you reporting to (shareholders, the board of directors, management, employees, etc.).
-
Assessment
The University's policy on Assessment for Coursework Programs is based on the following four principles:
- Assessment must encourage and reinforce learning.
- Assessment must enable robust and fair judgements about student performance.
- Assessment practices must be fair and equitable to students and give them the opportunity to demonstrate what they have learned.
- Assessment must maintain academic standards.
Assessment Summary
Item Description Due Date Weight LO 1 Workshop Participation Throughout semester 2 starting from week 2 onward 10% 1,4 2 Online Weekly Quizzes x 10 Throughout semester 2 starting from week 3 onward 20% 1 3 Midterm Test In week 6 (week beginning 30th August 2021) 10% 1,2,3,4 4 Group Assignment (30% total) 4.1 Group Case Study Report In week 10 (due on 15th October 2021 at 11.59 pm Adelaide time) 15% 1,2,3,4 4.2 Group Case Study Presentations Starting in Week 5 beginning 23rd August 2021 15% 1,2,3,4 5 Final Examination (45% hurdle) TBA 30% 1,3 Total 100%
For more information, please refer to the MyUni course website (inc. downloadable Course Outline).Assessment Related Requirements
- To gain a pass for this course, a mark of at least 45% must be obtained in the examination as well as an aggregate total for all assessments of at least 50%.
- Students not achieving the minimum exam mark will be awarded an aggregate course mark of no more than 49%.
- Students who receive an aggregate course mark between 45% and 49% may be offered a supplementary examination. Your performance in the replacement assessment will determine whether you are awarded a Pass grade for the course with a maximum aggregate course mark of 50%.
- Attempting online quizzes in a timely fashion is expected and recommended as that they will automatically close at the end of each week.
- Attendance at all the workshops is expected. Your attendance and participation will be recorded. You are expected to come prepared to discuss and present the questions outlined in the workshop schedule and contribute to all associated activities. Your workshop participation grades (10%) will be based on your in-workshop contributions.
Assessment Detail
Assessment 1: Workshop Participation (10%)
You are expected to attend all scheduled workshops and be prepared to discuss your ideas concerning the questions outlined in the workshop timetable. Students are encouraged to share examples from their personal, professional and/or academic experiences.
In order to encourage class discussion and give students the opportunity to demonstrate an understanding of the prescribed readings and the workshop questions, 10 percent of assessment will be based on class participation. A total of 10 workshops will be assessed (1 mark per assessed workshop x 10 assessable workshops = 10%). For each of the assessed workshops, each student will be awarded 0, ½ or 1 mark. When determining participation marks, workshop facilitators will be taking the following into account the following criteria:
Student…
• Comes prepared: refers to notes, introduces ideas and questions from the week’s text
• Contributes ideas: adds new ideas, suggests new connections, raises relevant issues
• Asks questions of clarification: re concepts, terminology, expectations
• Facilitates peer interaction: builds on others’ ideas, uses humour positively, stays on track
• Expresses ideas clearly: ideas are understood by others, pace and volume appropriate.
Permission for any absence is generally only given for medical or compassionate reasons. All such requests must be emailed to the workshop facilitator and should be accompanied by documentary evidence from a social service professional (e.g. doctor, counsellor or psychologist). Each request will be assessed on its merits.
Assessment 2: Weekly Quizzes (20%)
From Week 3 MyUni will host 10 weekly text-based multiple-choice online quizzes. Each quiz consists of 25 multiple choice questions and will assess material covered in the associated topic. These quizzes will provide you with the opportunity to test your understanding of core concepts and identify areas that require further study and assistance. You should discuss issues arising from the quiz questions with your workshop facilitator (tutor). Attempting online quizzes by the prescribed due dates is essential as the relevant quiz will close automatically after the due date.
Assessment 3: Mid-term Test (10%)
The purpose of the test is to provide you with the opportunity to ascertain how you are progressing in the course (hence only 10% assessment weighting). Students who fail the test are classified as ‘at risk’. Consequently, such students will be encouraged to make time with their workshop facilitator (tutor) to assess their approach to studying this course and strategies to put in place to ensure your the student's future success.
The Mind-term Test will be scheduled in week 6. Please refer to the MyUni Course Website to know the exact date and time for the text. The test will assess material covered in topics 1 to 3 inclusive.
More information on the test will be provided via the MyUni course website.
Assessment 4: Group Report (20%)
The case study assignment for the group report is available via MyUni. There are often multiple ways in which a case study can be analysed and interpreted. This case study assignment is about making sense of actual managerial issues, applying the theories and frameworks you have learned in this course, problem-solving and decision making in complex situations, coping with ambiguities, working in a team, and your academic writing skills, including referencing (e.e.g, Harvard Referencing Style).
In this assignment, students will be required to analyse a real-life case study and identify the underlying issues, possible alternative courses of action to address the issues identified, provide a recommended course of action and justification why. The comprehensive material provided in the case will need to be used to support your analysis and recommendations.
Students will be allocated into groups of 5 in their workshops. The case study assignment can be downloaded from the MyUni course website. Each group will be required to produce a five-page (Times New Roman or Arial, 12 pt, 1.15 lines) business report using the template provided on the course website. A key aspect of your grade will also be related to how well your group responds to the challenge of 1) including all the relevant information in a well-written, concise 5-page report, 2) skillfully applying the appropriate theories and frameworks covered in class, and 3) formulating and presenting an overall argument that is convincing and supported by case evidence.
Your report should include:- Introduction: Identify the key management issues from the case and identify your audience, i.e., who are you reporting to (shareholders, the board of directors, management, employees, etc.).
- Analysis: Conduct a brief analysis using the theories and frameworks from the class to explain the causes and outcomes of the key issues you identified in the Introduction, indicating the one main managerial problem that you find most important to cater to.
- Alternative solutions: Drawing upon the concepts learned in this course, formulate three feasible solutions that could be used to resolve the one main managerial problem that you have identified. You must identify the pros and cons of each of the three solutions.
- Recommendation: Select one single solution from the three alternative solutions that you have suggested that could solve the main managerial problem. Discussing your recommendation, you must identify and highlight the possible risks to your recommendation, and how these risks might be mitigated. It is important that you present the action plan that should be taken to implement your recommendation, and which would minimise the potential risks that you have identified.
- Desired state: From a management perspective, outline the ultimate goals that you wish to achieve and specifically relate these to your recommendation. This should reflect the future state of the organisation that would arise from implementing your recommendation.
- Reference list (not included in page count). Each report should contain at least 5 relevant scholarly references. Please refer to page 47 of the Communication Skills guide to make yourself familiar with the Harvard Referencing Style format.
Note: Please do not upload multiple copies of the group report.
Turnitin similarity software will be utilised to indicate potential plagiarism. If your similarity report is greater than 30% (not considering assignment coversheet with plagiarism policies, references, headings, subtitles, etc.), your assignment will not be graded and you will have 24 hours to resubmit. If, as a result of this process, your assignment is submitted after the due date, a late submission penalty will be applied (5% per day). Students must retain a copy of all assessments submitted. You can resubmit your assignment multiple times (with the same file name) until the due date: time, but note that it may take several hours for turnitin.com to generate your similarity report.
Assessment 4.1: Online Peer Assessment (5% + 5%) = 10%
4.1.1 Peer Assessment (5%)
Each student will be required to submit a confidential evaluation (online peer assessment) of the group work effectiveness of each member of their group via MyUni. The group must evaluate their group members based on the following three criteria:
• The group member communicated effectively with other members of the group and genuinely considered and (where relevant) took onboard other members' perspectives.
• The group member completed their fair share of the group's work in a timely manner.
• The group member was punctual and regularly attended meetings and other group activities.
4.1.2 Quality of the Peer Assessment (5%)
The workshop Facilitator will assess the quality of the peer assessment and grade the assessment accordingly. To secure high marks in the peer assessment assignment, you must provide the following:
Assessment Criteria:
• Strengths of each of the group members (i.e., what they did well).
• Areas of Improvement for each of the group members (i.e., where they could have done better).
• Possible steps that they can take to improve (i.e., what they can do in future).
Assessment 5: Final Exam (30%)
The purpose of the final exam is to assess your understanding of the concepts covered in this course. Specifically, the ability to utilise theories covered in this course to critically evaluate how planning, organising, leading and controlling organisational resources can be used to achieve an organisation's goals in an efficient and effective manner.
The exam will be 3 hours in length, conducted under ‘open-book’ conditions. Only topics 4 to 11 will be covered in this course and will be assessable in the final exam. As we have covered topics 1 to 3 in the mid-term test, these three topics will not be covered in the final exam.
The examination will be held during the scheduled exam period. The timing of the exam will be known when the Semester 2 examination timetable is released by the University.
As highlighted earlier, students are required to achieve a minimum of 45% of the marks in the final exam and an aggregate of 50% in order to eligible to pass this course.
More information on the exam will be provided via the MyUni course website.Submission
Turnitin similarity software will be utilised to indicate potential plagiarism. If your similarity report is greater than 30% (not considering assignment coversheet with plagiarism policies, references, headings, subtitles, etc.), it is strongly advised that you refer to the following link: /writingcentre/resources/avoiding-plagiarism Plagiarism is a serious violation of the Academic Honesty Policy.
If, as a result of this process, your assignment is submitted after the due date, a late submission penalty will be applied (5% per day). Students must retain a copy of all assessments submitted. You can resubmit your assignment multiple times (with the same file name) until the due date: time, but note that it may take several hours for turnitin.com to generate your similarity report.Course Grading
Grades for your performance in this course will be awarded in accordance with the following scheme:
M10 (Coursework Mark Scheme) Grade Mark Description FNS Fail No Submission F 1-49 Fail P 50-64 Pass C 65-74 Credit D 75-84 Distinction HD 85-100 High Distinction CN Continuing NFE No Formal Examination RP Result Pending Further details of the grades/results can be obtained from Examinations.
Grade Descriptors are available which provide a general guide to the standard of work that is expected at each grade level. More information at Assessment for Coursework Programs.
Markers aim to mark and return assignments to students within two (2) weeks of the due date with written feedback. Students will be able to access their marked assignments from their MyUni web site.
GRADE REVIEW/RECONSIDERATION
Students (or groups) who believe their work should receive a different grade should apply in writing within 48 hours of the publication of the grades. They must write/email directly to their workshop facilitator, and copy to the lecturer/course co-ordinator, an analytical piece, in which they give strong reasons on why they believe they have achieved the requirements. Students who choose to apply for a review or reconsideration must be logical and concise in their appeal, and provide as much detail as possible. Claims like “I believe I have done to the requirements and deserve a better grade” will not be accepted. It is at your workshop facilitator's discretion whether the work should be reviewed or reconsidered. If the application is accepted, the marker will conduct a review/reconsideration independent from the original grade, and the outcome can be a higher grade, no change, or a lower grade, and this new grade will be final.Final results for this course will be made available through .
-
Student Feedback
The University places a high priority on approaches to learning and teaching that enhance the student experience. Feedback is sought from students in a variety of ways including on-going engagement with staff, the use of online discussion boards and the use of Student Experience of Learning and Teaching (SELT) surveys as well as GOS surveys and Program reviews.
SELTs are an important source of information to inform individual teaching practice, decisions about teaching duties, and course and program curriculum design. They enable the University to assess how effectively its learning environments and teaching practices facilitate student engagement and learning outcomes. Under the current SELT Policy (http://www.adelaide.edu.au/policies/101/) course SELTs are mandated and must be conducted at the conclusion of each term/semester/trimester for every course offering. Feedback on issues raised through course SELT surveys is made available to enrolled students through various resources (e.g. MyUni). In addition aggregated course SELT data is available.
The University places a high priority on approaches to learning and teaching that enhance the student experience. Feedback is sought from students in a variety of ways including on-going engagement with staff, the use of online discussion boards and the use of Student Experience of Learning and Teaching (SELT) surveys as well as GOS surveys and Program reviews.
SELTs are an important source of information to inform individual teaching practice, decisions about teaching duties, and course and program curriculum design. They enable the University to assess how effectively its learning environments and teaching practices facilitate student engagement and learning outcomes. Under the current SELT Policy (http://www.adelaide.edu.au/policies/101/) course SELTs are mandated and must be conducted at the conclusion of each term/semester/trimester for every course offering. Feedback on issues raised through course SELT surveys is made available to enrolled students through various resources (e.g. MyUni). In addition aggregated course SELT data is available. -
Student Support
- Academic Integrity for Students
- Academic Support with Maths
- Academic Support with writing and study skills
- Careers Services
- Library Services for Students
- LinkedIn Learning
- Student Life Counselling Support - Personal counselling for issues affecting study
- Students with a Disability - Alternative academic arrangements
-
Policies & Guidelines
This section contains links to relevant assessment-related policies and guidelines - all university policies.
- Academic Credit Arrangements Policy
- Academic Integrity Policy
- Academic Progress by Coursework Students Policy
- Assessment for Coursework Programs Policy
- Copyright Compliance Policy
- Coursework Academic Programs Policy
- Intellectual Property Policy
- IT Acceptable Use and Security Policy
- Modified Arrangements for Coursework Assessment Policy
- Reasonable Adjustments to Learning, Teaching & Assessment for Students with a Disability Policy
- Student Experience of Learning and Teaching Policy
- Student Grievance Resolution Process
-
Fraud Awareness
Students are reminded that in order to maintain the academic integrity of all programs and courses, the university has a zero-tolerance approach to students offering money or significant value goods or services to any staff member who is involved in their teaching or assessment. Students offering lecturers or tutors or professional staff anything more than a small token of appreciation is totally unacceptable, in any circumstances. Staff members are obliged to report all such incidents to their supervisor/manager, who will refer them for action under the university's student鈥檚 disciplinary procedures.
The 成人大片 is committed to regular reviews of the courses and programs it offers to students. The 成人大片 therefore reserves the right to discontinue or vary programs and courses without notice. Please read the important information contained in the disclaimer.