CLAS 4002 - Honours Classics Common Course

North Terrace Campus - Semester 1 - 2019

This course is designed to give students a broad overview into Classics and its sub-disciplines and to provide students with advanced training in research methodology. The course is divided into four sections: introductory methods and research skills; literary studies; historical/cultural studies; archaeology. A key issue or problem relating to the Classical world will be tackled in the weekly seminar; students are expected to contribute to the seminars by doing the set readings and participating in the discussion. They will also give a presentation and submit research papers on two of the topics during the semester.

Open All

Course Details

Course Code	CLAS 4002
Course	Honours Classics Common Course
Coordinating Unit	Classics, Archaeology and Ancient History
Term	Semester 1
Level	Undergraduate
Location/s	North Terrace Campus
Units	6
Contact	2 hours per week
Available for Study Abroad and Exchange	N
Prerequisites	Completed degree (72 units) with a 24 unit major in Classics and a credit average or better result. Students doing combined Honours (eg with English or History) may be permitted to enrol in this course without a Classics major.
Restrictions	Available only to students admitted to the relevant Honours program. Students from other Honours programs may be permitted to enrol provided they have sufficient skills and experience.
Assessment	Seminar participation (10%), research and presentation on two chosen topics (10%), two seminar papers (80%)

Course Staff

Course Coordinator: Professor Han Baltussen

Course Timetable

The full timetable of all activities for this course can be accessed from .

Course Learning Outcomes

At the end of the course, the student will be able to:

1. Demonstrate understanding of a wide range of Classics related fields and the issues and problems associated with them.

2. Show proficiency in applying different research methodologies within the various sub-disciplines of Classics.

3. Present clear and coherent expositions, both verbally and in writing, of complex problems associated with the Classics discipline
and possible solutions to them.

4. Demonstrate advanced cognitive skills in analysing and synthesising knowledge and skills in presenting clear and coherent
expositions of that knowledge.

University Graduate Attributes

This course will provide students with an opportunity to develop the Graduate Attribute(s) specified below:

University Graduate Attribute	Course Learning Outcome(s)
Deep discipline knowledge informed and infused by cutting edge research, scaffolded throughout their program of studies acquired from personal interaction with research active educators, from year 1 accredited or validated against national or international standards (for relevant programs)	1, 2, 3
Critical thinking and problem solving steeped in research methods and rigor based on empirical evidence and the scientific approach to knowledge development demonstrated through appropriate and relevant assessment	2,3,4
Teamwork and communication skills developed from, with, and via the SGDE honed through assessment and practice throughout the program of studies encouraged and valued in all aspects of learning	4
Career and leadership readiness technology savvy professional and, where relevant, fully accredited forward thinking and well informed tested and validated by work based experiences	2, 4
Intercultural and ethical competency adept at operating in other cultures comfortable with different nationalities and social contexts able to determine and contribute to desirable social outcomes demonstrated by study abroad or with an understanding of indigenous knowledges	1
Self-awareness and emotional intelligence a capacity for self-reflection and a willingness to engage in self-appraisal open to objective and constructive feedback from supervisors and peers able to negotiate difficult social situations, defuse conflict and engage positively in purposeful debate	4

Learning Resources

Required Resources

An Honours coursebook with all the information, including questions and required reading will be issued at the beginning of February each year; it will also be available online.

Online Learning

Students will have a session with the subject librarian in order to develop their online research skills.

Learning & Teaching Modes

There will be a weekly two hour seminar which all students will prepare for and participate in. This will involve reading the primary and secondary sources associated with the week's question and may also involve looking for additional material, particularly if the student is presenting and writing on the question.

Workload

The information below is provided as a guide to assist students in engaging appropriately with the course requirements.

1x 2 hour seminar per week	26 hours
10 hours seminar preparation per week (mandated reading and critical evaluation of sources; writing notes for discussion)	130 hours
12 hours assessment work per week	156 hours
TOTAL	312 hours

Learning Activities Summary

The weekly seminars expose students to a wide variety of complex problems and issues associated with Classics and its sub-disciplines (literary studies, history, cultural studies and archaeology). Students’ preparation for these weekly seminars will enhance their knowledge and understanding of the various areas of Classics; their participation in the seminar discussions will develop their ability to express and defend their ideas and debate issues; their presentations on two seminar topics will hone
their skills in presenting problems and potential solutions clearly and succinctly; their research papers on two seminar topics will develop their skills in analysis and synthesis of various materials (secondary sources and a wide variety of primary source materials) and prepare them for writing postgraduate standard research papers.

The University's policy on Assessment for Coursework Programs is based on the following four principles:

Assessment must encourage and reinforce learning.
Assessment must enable robust and fair judgements about student performance.
Assessment practices must be fair and equitable to students and give them the opportunity to demonstrate what they have learned.
Assessment must maintain academic standards.

Assessment Summary

Asessment Task	Task Type	Weighting	Course Learning Outcomes
Seminar Participation	Formative and Summative	10%	1, 3, 4
Research and presentation on two chosen topics	Formative and Summative	10%	2, 3, 4
4000 word seminar paper 1	Formative and Summative	40%	2, 3, 4
4000 word seminar paper 2	Formative and Summative	40%	2, 3, 4

Assessment Detail

The main weight of assessment is on the research papers which prepare students for writing the thesis in second semester but the seminar participation mark encourages students to debate and defend their ideas in an academic forum while the presentation mark rewards them for presenting on their research topics.

Submission

No information currently available.

Course Grading

Grades for your performance in this course will be awarded in accordance with the following scheme:

M11 (Honours Mark Scheme)
Grade	Grade reflects following criteria for allocation of grade	Reported on Official Transcript
Fail	A mark between 1-49	F
Third Class	A mark between 50-59	3
Second Class Div B	A mark between 60-69	2B
Second Class Div A	A mark between 70-79	2A
First Class	A mark between 80-100	1
Result Pending	An interim result	RP
Continuing	Continuing	CN

Further details of the grades/results can be obtained from Examinations.

Grade Descriptors are available which provide a general guide to the standard of work that is expected at each grade level. More information at Assessment for Coursework Programs.

Final results for this course will be made available through .

Student Feedback

The University places a high priority on approaches to learning and teaching that enhance the student experience. Feedback is sought from students in a variety of ways including on-going engagement with staff, the use of online discussion boards and the use of Student Experience of Learning and Teaching (SELT) surveys as well as GOS surveys and Program reviews.

SELTs are an important source of information to inform individual teaching practice, decisions about teaching duties, and course and program curriculum design. They enable the University to assess how effectively its learning environments and teaching practices facilitate student engagement and learning outcomes. Under the current SELT Policy (http://www.adelaide.edu.au/policies/101/) course SELTs are mandated and must be conducted at the conclusion of each term/semester/trimester for every course offering. Feedback on issues raised through course SELT surveys is made available to enrolled students through various resources (e.g. MyUni). In addition aggregated course SELT data is available.
Student Support
Policies & Guidelines
This section contains links to relevant assessment-related policies and guidelines - all university policies.
Fraud Awareness

Students are reminded that in order to maintain the academic integrity of all programs and courses, the university has a zero-tolerance approach to students offering money or significant value goods or services to any staff member who is involved in their teaching or assessment. Students offering lecturers or tutors or professional staff anything more than a small token of appreciation is totally unacceptable, in any circumstances. Staff members are obliged to report all such incidents to their supervisor/manager, who will refer them for action under the university's student鈥檚 disciplinary procedures.

The 成人大片 is committed to regular reviews of the courses and programs it offers to students. The 成人大片 therefore reserves the right to discontinue or vary programs and courses without notice. Please read the important information contained in the disclaimer.

Authorised by:	Deputy Vice-Chancellor and Vice-President (Academic)
Maintained by:	Course Outlines Administrator

成人大片