LAW 6501 - Foundations of the GDLP
North Terrace Campus - Summer - 2017
-
General Course Information
Course Details
Course Code LAW 6501 Course Foundations of the GDLP Coordinating Unit Adelaide Law School Term Summer Level Postgraduate Coursework Location/s North Terrace Campus Units 6 Contact Intensive Available for Study Abroad and Exchange N Restrictions Available to GDLP students only. Not available for Study Abroad & Exchange. Assessment Assessment in this course will include a combination of two or more of the following: letters of advice, drafting, interviewing and advising, practical legal research, demonstration of advocacy skills, online quizzes, multiple choice questions and discus Course Staff
Course Coordinator: Sally Browne
As course staff work in the South Australian legal profession all communication should be directed to the GDLP Coordinator, Shin-Yi Ong in the first instance: gdlp.enquiries@lawsocietysa.asn.au
The GDLP Coordinator will contact the appropriate course staff as necessary.
Course Supervisors:
Alison Bradshaw: Interviewing and Advising
Claire Clutterham: Legal Writing and Drafting
Lorna Hartwell: Practical Legal Research
Greg Rooney: Negotiation and ADR
Elizabeth Griffith: Advocacy
Julie Van der Velde: Taxation
Course Coordinator (UA Law School): Margaret CastlesCourse Timetable
The full timetable of all activities for this course can be accessed from .
-
Learning Outcomes
Course Learning Outcomes
A student successfully completing the course will be able to:
1. Identify the purpose, audience and structure and construct concise and cohesive written letters, arguments, and submissions etc for a client/legal/professional /general /mixed audience in the context of social and cultural diversity.
2. Prepare, conduct and analyse real or simulated client interviews clarify instructions and provide follow-up and advice, if
applicable, having regard to the circumstances, good practice and the requirements of the law.
3. Structure and sustain concise and cohesive written arguments about case analysis, statutory interpretation and relevant law using plain English principles.
4. Conduct practical, workplace based legal research, and present results on the basis of that research.
5. Prepare and analyse appropriate strategy and tactics to be used in the effective negotiation of client matters as required by law or good practice in the circumstances of the case.
6. Reflect on their abilities to effectively undertake work as an individual.
University Graduate Attributes
This course will provide students with an opportunity to develop the Graduate Attribute(s) specified below:
University Graduate Attribute Course Learning Outcome(s) Deep discipline knowledge
- informed and infused by cutting edge research, scaffolded throughout their program of studies
- acquired from personal interaction with research active educators, from year 1
- accredited or validated against national or international standards (for relevant programs)
1 Critical thinking and problem solving
- steeped in research methods and rigor
- based on empirical evidence and the scientific approach to knowledge development
- demonstrated through appropriate and relevant assessment
2 Teamwork and communication skills
- developed from, with, and via the SGDE
- honed through assessment and practice throughout the program of studies
- encouraged and valued in all aspects of learning
3 Career and leadership readiness
- technology savvy
- professional and, where relevant, fully accredited
- forward thinking and well informed
- tested and validated by work based experiences
4 Intercultural and ethical competency
- adept at operating in other cultures
- comfortable with different nationalities and social contexts
- able to determine and contribute to desirable social outcomes
- demonstrated by study abroad or with an understanding of indigenous knowledges
5 -
Learning Resources
Required Resources
No textbooks are assigned for GDLP courses.
Seminar resources and readings are available on MyUni ONLY. Students must bring electronic devices to seminars to access seminar materials.
Due to an emphasis on current legal practice other materials may be added after the course outline has been posted. Students are required to check MyUni regularly (at least weekly) to keep up to date.Recommended Resources
Most course resources are provided to students ONLINE via MyUni. Relevant law can be accessed online via:
Due to the emphasis on current legal practice, other materials may be added after the course outline has been posted. Students are required to check MyUni regularly (at least weekly) to keep up to date.Online Learning
The course is supported by the MyUni course website. The website contains the following resources:
1. Course information – including seminar schedule and assessment outline.
2. Course materials – such as lecture presentations, seminar materials, readings and resources.
3. Assessment – items of assessment and online submission.
4. Grade centre – where students’ results for assessments are entered.
MyUni will also be used to post announcements. Students are expected to check MyUni regularly (at least weekly) to keep up to date.
Students should regularly check their 成人大片 email. -
Learning & Teaching Activities
Learning & Teaching Modes
The course will be taught intensively. Online lectures are supported by activities such as face to face interactive problem-solving seminars and practical exercises.
Students MUST come prepared for seminars, namely having listened to online lectures where applicable, undertaken prior reading and developed draft responses to the seminar questions. If students have not prepared and / or arrive more than 10 minutes late they may be asked to leave the seminar group.
A reminder that students MUST bring along electronic devices to the seminar so they can access the seminar materials electronically.
Attendance at seminars is necessary to ensure that students are part of the interactive and reflective learning environment (which enhances learning outcomes) and provides students with the ability to develop their skills of oral presentation, teamwork and persuasion (valuable to the professional environment). Students are expected to behave in an ethical and professional manner as would be expected in the workplace environment (compliant with the professional conduct rules and standards).
Students, who due to disability, compelling medical or compassionate reasons, or in exceptional circumstance, are unable to attend seminars, may complete alterative work in lieu of attendance. The precise nature of this make-up work will depend on the seminar missed and will be negotiated with the GDLP Coordinator. Students MUST inform the GDLP Coordinator at the earliest opportunity of their absence and where they require this make-up work option.
This course will be taught intensively. Full details of seminars and activities are made available on the MyUni course website prior to the course commencing. Note: In most cases assessment tasks are linked to seminars activities.
Attendance at all seminars is highly advisable. Where assessment tasks are conducted in seminars non-attendance will, in most cases, require alterative assessment.
By the end of this course students should be able to competently:
1. Writing Letters
- identified the need for, and purpose of, the letter.
- written the letter in plain English that conveys its purpose clearly and could be understood by the person to whom it is sent, acting reasonably.
2.1 Communicating effectively
- identified the purpose of a proposed communication, the most effective way of making it, and the content of the proposed communication.
- presented thoughts, advice, and submissions in a logical, clear, succinct and persuasive manner, having regard to the circumstances and the person or forum to whom they are made.
- identified and appropriately dealt with verbal and non-verbal aspects of cross-cultural communication
- prepared for the interview properly, having regard to relevant information available before the interview and all known, relevant circumstances.
- conducted, participated in conducting or observed, the interview, using communication techniques appropriate to both the client and the context.
- ensured that the client and lawyer have both obtained all the information which they wanted from the interview in a timely, effective and efficient way, having regard to the circumstances.
- ensured that the lawyer and client left the interview with a common understanding of the lawyer’s instructions (if any) and any future action that the lawyer or client is respectively to take.
- made a record of the interview that satisfies the requirements of law and good practice.
- taken, or participated in taking, any follow-up action in a timely manner.
- identified the need for, and purpose, of the document.
- devised an effective form and structure for the document having regard to the parties, the circumstances, good practice, plain English principles and the relevant law.
- drafted the document effectively having regard to the parties, the circumstances, good practice, plain English principles, and the relevant law.
- considered whether the document should be settled by counsel.
- taken every action required to make the document effective and enforceable in a timely manner and according to law (such as execution by the parties, stamping, delivery and registration).
- establish a strategy to undertake systematic legal research
- use paper and electronic resources to efficiently research legal and factual problems involved in a matter
- keep your research up to date
- present the results of your research
- prepared, or participated in the preparation of the client’s case properly having regard to the circumstances and good practice.
- identified the strategy and tactics to be used in negotiations and discussed them with and obtained approval from the client, or been involved in or observed that process.
- carried out, been involved in or observed, the negotiations effectively having regard to the strategy and tactics adopted, the circumstances of the case and good practice.
- documented any resolution as required by law or good practice and explained it, or been involved in the process of explaining it, to the client in a way a reasonable client could understand.
- identified the advantages and disadvantages of available dispute resolution options and explained them to, or been involved in explaining them to, the client.
- performed in the lawyer’s role, or been involved in or observed that performance, in the dispute resolution process effectively, having regard to the circumstances.
- documented any resolution as required by law or good practice and explained it, or been involved in explaining it, to the client in a way a reasonable client could understand.
- observed the etiquette and procedures of the forum.
- organised and presented in an effective, strategic way:
- factual material;
- analysis of relevant legal issues; and
- relevant decided cases.
- prepare and present a submission to a senior member of the legal profession taking into account the instructions given and advocacy skills to examine the use of a case concept and presentation styles
- made submissions effectively and coherently in accordance with law and good practice.
- develop an understanding of the taxation areas which underpin other GDLP courses: Capital Gains Tax (CGT), Stamp Duty (SD) and Goods and Services Tax (GST).
Workload
The information below is provided as a guide to assist students in engaging appropriately with the course requirements.
In addition to attending seminars it is anticipated that students will do substantial independent work to prepare for seminars and to complete the course assessments. Students are expected to spend about 8 hours per week in private study which includes reading the materials, listening to lecture presentations, conducting research and preparing for seminars. In addition students will need to dedicate time for the completion of assessments.Learning Activities Summary
A detailed seminar schedule will be posted to MyUni prior to the course commencing.Specific Course Requirements
The course is based on the rules of the Legal Practitioners Education and Admission Council (LPEAC) 2004 and Law Admissions Consultative Committee 2015 which specifies the expected competency standards for entry level lawyers at the point of admission. In order to pass this course you are expected to demonstrate competence in these standards.
The national competency standards include underpinning knowledge and skills in:
• Ethics and professional responsibility
• Lawyers skills
• Problem solving
• Work management and business skills
For further information see: -
Assessment
The University's policy on Assessment for Coursework Programs is based on the following four principles:
- Assessment must encourage and reinforce learning.
- Assessment must enable robust and fair judgements about student performance.
- Assessment practices must be fair and equitable to students and give them the opportunity to demonstrate what they have learned.
- Assessment must maintain academic standards.
Assessment Summary
Assessments will be made available to students, prior to the nominated deadline.
Note: Competence must be demonstrated in all assessment tasks and activities.Assessment item Due date* Learning Objectives Letter of advice Second week from course commencement 1 - 3 Legal drafting Third week from course commencing 2 - 4 ADR reflection Third week from course commencing 6-7 Legal research report Fourth week from course commencing 5 Advocacy presentation and case notes Fourth week from course commencing 8 Participation N/A 1-9
* Assessment deadlines will be posted on MyUni prior to the course commencing.Assessment Related Requirements
Detailed information regarding assessment tasks will be provided on MyUni .
In this course, students will also be assessed on the following:
- Attendance
- Punctuality
- Workload management and ability to adhere to deadlines
- Display active development of personal professionalism
- Display active engagement in practical activities
- Demonstrate respectful behaviour towards others
- Maintaining a high level of confidentiality at all times
- Satisfactory completion of prescribed exercises
- Underpinning national competency standards (as noted in ‘Specific course requirements’)
However, in the majority of assessments guidelines will be provided.
The quality of English expression is considered to be an integral part of the assessment process.
Assessment competence will take into consideration: expressions, structure, correct grammar, typography, etc.
Note: In most cases assessment tasks are linked to seminars activities. Attendance at all seminars is highly advisable. Where assessment tasks are conducted in seminars non-attendance will, in most cases, require alterative assessment.
Assessments will be returned to students within 3 weeks from the due date, unless otherwise notified by the GDLP Program Coordinator through a Course Announcement.Assessment Detail
No information currently available.
Submission
Students must retain a copy of all assessments submitted.
Students are to submit assessments online via Turnitin.
Please note: where forms or documents have been outlined in assessment activities for completion these should be downloaded from original sources and completed in an electronic format, if not supplied.
Students will be marked in accordance with the marking rubric.
Resubmission
Students are required to demonstrate competency in all elements of the national competency standards and failure to do so will result in the relevant assessment being marked as non-competent. If the assessment is deemed non-competent students may be offered the opportunity to revise and resubmit the assessment. Students granted a resubmission will have up to 4 days from the time they are informed by email from the LSSA GDLP Office to resubmit the assessment. In most cases only the parts of the assessment that do not attain competence will be required to be resubmitted. Only ONE opportunity is provided for resubmission.
Note: Attendance and participation in seminars, and/or the completion of online activities will be considered as determining factors in the offer of a resubmission.
Assessments that do not attain competence on resubmission (fail), per University policy, are double-marked before the results are released back to the student. The first and second markers discuss what the final result will be.
Extensions
Students MUST apply for an extension prior to the deadline to the LSSA GDLP Team.
Extensions on medical and compassionate grounds will be considered in accordance with University policy.
Late Submission
NOTE: in this course, students are assessed against the national competency standards and professional workplace standards; namely
• Ethical and professional responsibility
• Lawyers skills
• Problem solving
• Work management and business skills
• Punctuality
• Workload management and ability to adhere to deadlinesCourse Grading
Grades for your performance in this course will be awarded in accordance with the following scheme:
GS8 (Coursework Grade Scheme) Grade Description CN Continuing FNS Fail No Submission NFE No Formal Examination F Fail NGP Non Graded Pass P Pass C Credit D Distinction HD High Distinction RP Result Pending Further details of the grades/results can be obtained from Examinations.
Grade Descriptors are available which provide a general guide to the standard of work that is expected at each grade level. More information at Assessment for Coursework Programs.
Final results for this course will be made available through .
Approval of Results by Board of Examiners
Students are reminded that all assessment results are subject to approval (and possible moderation/change) by the Law School’s Board of Examiners. Assessment results at the University are not scaled. Under the Assessment for Coursework Programs Policy, students are assessed ‘by reference to their performance against pre-determined criteria and standards … and not by ranking against the performance of the student cohort in the course’. However, under that same policy, the Board of Examiners (as the relevant Assessment Review Committee for courses at Adelaide Law School) is required to ‘ensure comparability of standards and consistency’ in assessment. On occasions, the Board of Examiners will form the view that some moderation is required to ensure the comparability of standards and consistency across courses and years, and accordingly provide fairness to all law students. All assessment results are therefore subject to approval (and possible change) until confirmed by the Board of Examiners and posted on Acess Adelaide at the end of each semester. -
Student Feedback
The University places a high priority on approaches to learning and teaching that enhance the student experience. Feedback is sought from students in a variety of ways including on-going engagement with staff, the use of online discussion boards and the use of Student Experience of Learning and Teaching (SELT) surveys as well as GOS surveys and Program reviews.
SELTs are an important source of information to inform individual teaching practice, decisions about teaching duties, and course and program curriculum design. They enable the University to assess how effectively its learning environments and teaching practices facilitate student engagement and learning outcomes. Under the current SELT Policy (http://www.adelaide.edu.au/policies/101/) course SELTs are mandated and must be conducted at the conclusion of each term/semester/trimester for every course offering. Feedback on issues raised through course SELT surveys is made available to enrolled students through various resources (e.g. MyUni). In addition aggregated course SELT data is available.
The University places a high priority on approaches to learning and teaching that enhance the student experience. Feedback is sought from students in a variety of ways including on-going engagement with staff, the use of online discussion boards and the use of Student Experience of Learning and Teaching (SELT) surveys as well as CEQ surveys and Program reviews.
SELTs are an important source of information to inform individual teaching practice, decisions about teaching duties, and course and program curriculum design. They enable the University to assess how effectively its learning environments and teaching practices facilitate student engagement and learning outcomes. Under the current SELT Policy (http://www.adelaide.edu.au/policies/101/) course SELTs are mandated and must be conducted at least once every 2 years. Feedback on issues raised through course SELT surveys is made available to enrolled students through various resources (e.g. MyUni). In addition aggregated course SELT data is available. -
Student Support
- Academic Integrity for Students
- Academic Support with Maths
- Academic Support with writing and study skills
- Careers Services
- Library Services for Students
- LinkedIn Learning
- Student Life Counselling Support - Personal counselling for issues affecting study
- Students with a Disability - Alternative academic arrangements
The University Writing Centre provides academic learning and language development services and resources for local, international, undergraduate and postgraduate coursework students enrolled at the 成人大片.
The centre provides practical advice and strategies for students to master reading, writing, note-taking, time management, oral presentation skills, referencing techniques and exam preparation for success at university through seminars, workshops and individual consultations.
For more information please check out the Writing Centre website at
Lex Salus Program
Lex Salus was founded in 2013 by Adelaide Law School Wellbeing officers Ms Corinne Walding, Ms Kellie Toole and Dr Mark Giancaspro. Lex Salus is an initiative of the Adelaide Law School aimed at raising law student awareness of the importance of mental, physical and nutritional health across all year levels of the degree, and of the various counselling, disability and equity services both within and outside the University that can provide help. Research shows that law students, both in Australia and in many jurisdictions around the world, experience the highest levels of stress, anxiety and depression out of any other discipline. Many do not get enough sleep, maintain a healthy diet or achieve a realistic work/life balance. Making matters worse, they are unwilling or afraid to speak up for fear of feeling 'weak' or because of the negative stigma that attaches to seeking help. Lex Salus is dedicated to tackling these problems head-on.
Counselling Service
The University Counselling Service provides a free and confidential service to all enrolled students. We encourage you to contact the Counselling service on 8313 5663 to make an appointment to deal with any issues that may be affecting your study and life. More information is available at /counselling_centre/. -
Policies & Guidelines
This section contains links to relevant assessment-related policies and guidelines - all university policies.
- Academic Credit Arrangements Policy
- Academic Integrity Policy
- Academic Progress by Coursework Students Policy
- Assessment for Coursework Programs Policy
- Copyright Compliance Policy
- Coursework Academic Programs Policy
- Intellectual Property Policy
- IT Acceptable Use and Security Policy
- Modified Arrangements for Coursework Assessment Policy
- Reasonable Adjustments to Learning, Teaching & Assessment for Students with a Disability Policy
- Student Experience of Learning and Teaching Policy
- Student Grievance Resolution Process
Plagiarism and other forms of cheating
Plagiarism is a serious act of academic misconduct. All students must be familiar with the Adelaide Law School Enrolment Guide, and should note in particular the sections relating to plagiarism, grievance procedures and academic conduct within the Law School and the University.
Plagiarism is a serious matter and is treated as such by the Law School and the University. Please be aware that “academic dishonesty” (which goes beyond plagiarism) can be a ground for a refusal by the Supreme Court of South Australia to admit a person to practice as a legal practitioner in South Australia.
Academic honesty is an essential aspect of ethical and honest behaviour, which is central to the practice of the law and an understanding of what it is to be a lawyer. -
Fraud Awareness
Students are reminded that in order to maintain the academic integrity of all programs and courses, the university has a zero-tolerance approach to students offering money or significant value goods or services to any staff member who is involved in their teaching or assessment. Students offering lecturers or tutors or professional staff anything more than a small token of appreciation is totally unacceptable, in any circumstances. Staff members are obliged to report all such incidents to their supervisor/manager, who will refer them for action under the university's student鈥檚 disciplinary procedures.
The 成人大片 is committed to regular reviews of the courses and programs it offers to students. The 成人大片 therefore reserves the right to discontinue or vary programs and courses without notice. Please read the important information contained in the disclaimer.