CHEM ENG 4056 - Process Design IV

North Terrace Campus - Semester 1 - 2024

This course involves a small group of students working as a team to design a nominated chemical or bioprocessing manufacturing plant. The tasks include the study of the available processes (or the development of innovative systems), process and utility selection, calculation of material and energy balances, preparation of flow sheets and drawings of the plant layout, and simple economic analysis. A thorough synthesis of the literature is included and involves communication of the pre-feasibility study and front end design in a design report and oral presentation.

Open All

Course Details

Course Code	CHEM ENG 4056
Course	Process Design IV
Coordinating Unit	Chemical Engineering
Term	Semester 1
Level	Undergraduate
Location/s	North Terrace Campus
Units	3
Contact	Minimum of 4 hours per week
Available for Study Abroad and Exchange	N
Prerequisites	CHEM ENG 2010, CHEM ENG 2014, CHEM ENG 2018, CHEM ENG 3030, CHEM ENG 3033, CHEM ENG 3034
Corequisites	CHEM ENG 4034
Assumed Knowledge	Successful completion of CHEM ENG 2014, CHEM ENG 2011, CHEM ENG 3033, CHEM ENG 3034, CHEM ENG 3035
Assessment	Reports, oral presentations

Course Staff

Course Coordinator: Dr Diana Tran

Course Timetable

The full timetable of all activities for this course can be accessed from .

Course Learning Outcomes

At the completion of this course, students should be able to:

1	Demonstrate understanding of research ethics, and health & safety in the research context;
2	Understand the scientific method and its' rational;
3	Form well-posed research questions and hypothesis;
4	Identify efficiently and effectively the literature relevant to a research question;
5	Design a plausible approach to addressing a research question;
6	Develop a suitable plan to address a research question;
7	Prepare a sound and engaging research proposal;
8	Prepare an effective poster reporting a literature review; and
9	Maintain appropriate research records.

University Graduate Attributes

This course will provide students with an opportunity to develop the Graduate Attribute(s) specified below:

University Graduate Attribute	Course Learning Outcome(s)

Learning Resources

Required Resources

Not Applicable

Recommended Resources

Reference Books

Bock P 2001, Getting It Right, Academic Press.

Booth WC, Colomb GG, Williams JM 2008, The Craft of Research, 3rd edition, The University of Chicago Press.

Online Learning

A range of online resources will be provided via MyUni.

Learning & Teaching Modes

This course uses a number of different teaching and learning approaches including lectures, workshops, and one-on-one or small group tutoring by academic & industry staff.

Workload

The information below is provided as a guide to assist students in engaging appropriately with the course requirements.

Activity	Contact Hours	Non-contact Hours*
Workshops sessions	<10
1-on-1/Small Group Mentoring	<12	12
Technology/literature search & calculations*		<80
Report writing		30
Oral preparation		5
TOTAL	22	127

* Variable; can be more or less depending on stage of project, availability of data and subject to group/individual performances.

Learning Activities Summary

Refer to Assessment Tasks

The University's policy on Assessment for Coursework Programs is based on the following four principles:

Assessment must encourage and reinforce learning.
Assessment must enable robust and fair judgements about student performance.
Assessment practices must be fair and equitable to students and give them the opportunity to demonstrate what they have learned.
Assessment must maintain academic standards.

Assessment Summary

Assessment Task	Weighting (%)	Individual/ Group	Formative/ Summative	Due date(s)*	Hurdle criteria	Learning outcomes
Reporting (3x)	85^a	Group/Individual	Summative	5/04; 26/04; 31/05	To be confirmed	1. 2. 3. 4. 5. 6. 7
Oral Presentation	10^a	Group/individual	Summative	June		1. 2. 3. 4. 5. 6. 7
Compliances	5	Individual	Formative	throughout the semester		5. 6. 7
Total	100

* Subject to minor changes.
^aTotal individual weighting for the assessment tasks in the course is 60%.

In accordance with the Assessment for Coursework Programs Policy, Procedure 1a. i: An exemption from the stated requirement that group assessment activities total no more than 50% has been granted.

Assessment Detail

The assessment will contain:

Two group reports (containing individual and group components) will be submitted to the project academic supervisor and assessors for review. It will contain a comprehesive, in-depth literature review and technology analysis of the design processing plant. A complete mass balance (and heat/energy balance - subject to availability of data/detail), block, process and utlity flow diagrams, and initial economic evaluation of the front end engineering design (FEED) of the plant will be required. Engagement with a professional industry mentor throughout the project will be required to ensure the practical and realistic design of the plant.

The pre-feasibility study of the FEED of the plant will be presented at the semester in the form of a group oral presentation to your peers, academic supervisor, industry mentor and other stakeholders.

Submission

Course Grading

Grades for your performance in this course will be awarded in accordance with the following scheme:

M10 (Coursework Mark Scheme)
Grade	Mark	Description
FNS		Fail No Submission
F	1-49	Fail
P	50-64	Pass
C	65-74	Credit
D	75-84	Distinction
HD	85-100	High Distinction
CN		Continuing
NFE		No Formal Examination
RP		Result Pending

Further details of the grades/results can be obtained from Examinations.

Grade Descriptors are available which provide a general guide to the standard of work that is expected at each grade level. More information at Assessment for Coursework Programs.

Final results for this course will be made available through .

Student Feedback

The University places a high priority on approaches to learning and teaching that enhance the student experience. Feedback is sought from students in a variety of ways including on-going engagement with staff, the use of online discussion boards and the use of Student Experience of Learning and Teaching (SELT) surveys as well as GOS surveys and Program reviews.

SELTs are an important source of information to inform individual teaching practice, decisions about teaching duties, and course and program curriculum design. They enable the University to assess how effectively its learning environments and teaching practices facilitate student engagement and learning outcomes. Under the current SELT Policy (http://www.adelaide.edu.au/policies/101/) course SELTs are mandated and must be conducted at the conclusion of each term/semester/trimester for every course offering. Feedback on issues raised through course SELT surveys is made available to enrolled students through various resources (e.g. MyUni). In addition aggregated course SELT data is available.
Student Support
Policies & Guidelines
This section contains links to relevant assessment-related policies and guidelines - all university policies.
Fraud Awareness

Students are reminded that in order to maintain the academic integrity of all programs and courses, the university has a zero-tolerance approach to students offering money or significant value goods or services to any staff member who is involved in their teaching or assessment. Students offering lecturers or tutors or professional staff anything more than a small token of appreciation is totally unacceptable, in any circumstances. Staff members are obliged to report all such incidents to their supervisor/manager, who will refer them for action under the university's student鈥檚 disciplinary procedures.

The 成人大片 is committed to regular reviews of the courses and programs it offers to students. The 成人大片 therefore reserves the right to discontinue or vary programs and courses without notice. Please read the important information contained in the disclaimer.

Authorised by:	Deputy Vice-Chancellor and Vice-President (Academic)
Maintained by:	Course Outlines Administrator

成人大片