MINING 7073 - Mine Planning

North Terrace Campus - Semester 2 - 2021

This course deals with the theoretical principles and practical methodologies associated with mine planning. The course presents principles of surface and underground mine planning and valuation applicable to metalliferous and coal mining projects. Students will be introduced to basic manual procedures, computer applications or algorithms/methods, and mathematical modelling. Students will be expected to complete a mine planning project with emphasis on pit optimisation, long term production scheduling and financial technical modelling.

Open All

Course Details

Course Code	MINING 7073
Course	Mine Planning
Coordinating Unit	School of Civil, Environmental & Mining Eng
Term	Semester 2
Level	Postgraduate Coursework
Location/s	North Terrace Campus
Units	3
Contact	Up to 4 hours per week
Available for Study Abroad and Exchange	N
Assessment	Quiz, Design Project, Financial Model, Final Exam )

Course Staff

Course Coordinator: Dr Abbas Taheri

Dr Abbas Taheri
School of Civil, Environmental and Mining Engineering

Email: abbas.taheri@adelaide.edu.au

Phone: (08) 83137410

Course Timetable

The full timetable of all activities for this course can be accessed from .

Course Learning Outcomes

On successful completion of this course students will be able to:

1	Explain the process of the mine planning & evaluation
2	Understand the principles of surface and underground mine planning
3	Understand geological considerations in mine planning
4	Calculate the time value of money, and the impact on mine planning
5	Develop optimal strategic mine plans including ultimate pit limit analysis, production scheduling and cut-off grade analysis
6	Apply algorithms and computer software to compliment the strategic mine optimisation process
7	Create realistic, integrated financial models of mining projects

The above course learning outcomes are aligned with the Engineers Australia .
The course is designed to develop the following Elements of Competency: 1.2 1.3 1.4 1.5 1.6 2.1 2.2 2.3 2.4 3.1 3.2 3.3 3.4 3.5 3.6

University Graduate Attributes

This course will provide students with an opportunity to develop the Graduate Attribute(s) specified below:

University Graduate Attribute	Course Learning Outcome(s)
Deep discipline knowledge informed and infused by cutting edge research, scaffolded throughout their program of studies acquired from personal interaction with research active educators, from year 1 accredited or validated against national or international standards (for relevant programs)	1-5
Critical thinking and problem solving steeped in research methods and rigor based on empirical evidence and the scientific approach to knowledge development demonstrated through appropriate and relevant assessment	1-5
Teamwork and communication skills developed from, with, and via the SGDE honed through assessment and practice throughout the program of studies encouraged and valued in all aspects of learning	3-5
Career and leadership readiness technology savvy professional and, where relevant, fully accredited forward thinking and well informed tested and validated by work based experiences	3-5
Intercultural and ethical competency adept at operating in other cultures comfortable with different nationalities and social contexts able to determine and contribute to desirable social outcomes demonstrated by study abroad or with an understanding of indigenous knowledges	3-5
Self-awareness and emotional intelligence a capacity for self-reflection and a willingness to engage in self-appraisal open to objective and constructive feedback from supervisors and peers able to negotiate difficult social situations, defuse conflict and engage positively in purposeful debate	3-5

Learning Resources
Required Resources
- On-line Course Resources (MyUni) MEA
- Mine Planning Course Notes (2012) - available on Myuni.
Recommended Resources

Hustrulid, WA and Kuchta, M, 2006. Open Pit Mine Planning & Design, Volume 1 – Fundamentals, 2nd Edition, 735p (Balkema: Rotterdam/Taylor and Francis: London).

Camus, Juan P., 2002, Management of Mineral Resources: Creating Value in the Mining Business, Society
for Mining, Metallurgy, and Exploration, Inc. Englewood, CO, USA.

Rudenno, V, 2004 The Mining Valuation Handbook – Australian Mining and Energy Valuation for Investors and management, 430p (WrightBooks: Victoria).      Lane,

Kenneth F. 1988. The Economic Definition of Ore - Cut-Off Grades in Theory and Practice. Mining Journal Books Limited, London.

Runge, Ian C., 1998 Mining Economics and Strategy. Society for Mining, Metallurgy, and Exploration, Inc. Englewood, CO, USA.

Online Learning
- Myuni Course - Mine Planning Active
Learning & Teaching Activities
Learning & Teaching Modes
- Lecture Presentation
- Tutorial Sessions
- Group discussions
Workload

The information below is provided as a guide to assist students in engaging appropriately with the course requirements.

The information below is provided as a guide to assist students in engaging appropriately with the course requirements.

Lecturer = 1 hour per week;
Tutorials/Labs = 2-3 hours per week,
Self-study = 6 hours per week

Learning Activities Summary
This course uses a number of different teaching and learning activities including:
- Lectures
- Tutorials (Problem-solving)
- Computer labs (hands-on software applications)
- Self-directed activities
- Group discussions
- Project-based learning
- Analysis of case studies
- Discussions with guest lecturers
Specific Course Requirements
- Peer Review using SPARK is mandatory in this Course for group work
- Students will be expected to complete a project on open pit mine planning and design with emphasis on pit optimisation, long term production scheduling and financial technical evaluation
- Postgraduate students will have additional tasks assigned in addition to those for undergraduate students
Small Group Discovery Experience

Students will work in groups of 4 to investigate the optimal mining plan for an open pit mining project and to develop a financial technical model of an underground mining project.

The University's policy on Assessment for Coursework Programs is based on the following four principles:

Assessment must encourage and reinforce learning.
Assessment must enable robust and fair judgements about student performance.
Assessment practices must be fair and equitable to students and give them the opportunity to demonstrate what they have learned.
Assessment must maintain academic standards.

Assessment Summary

Assessment Task	Weighting (%)	Individual/ Group	Formative/ Summative	Due (week)*	Hurdle criteria	Learning outcomes
Assignments	10	Individual	Summative	Weeks 3, 5 & 8		1. 2. 3. 4. 5.
Quiz	20	Individual	Summative	week 6		2. 3. 4.
Pit Optimisation and Financial Technical Modelling Project	40	Group	Formative / Summative	weeks 12		3. 4. 5.
Final Examination	30	Individual	Formative / Summative	Week 13	0.2	3. 4. 5.
Total	100

* The specific due date for each assessment task will be available on MyUni.

This assessment breakdown is registered as an exemption to the University's . The exemption is related to the Procedures clause(s): 1. a. i

This course has a hurdle requirement. Meeting the specified hurdle criteria is a requirement for passing the course.

Assessment Related Requirements

Hurdle Requirement:

To be able to pass this course you must obtain 40% or more in the Final Examination

Assessment Detail

Closed Book Quiz
Type: Formative
In-Class Assessment LearningObjectives Assessed: 1- 3
Due Date: Quiz (Week 6)
Weighting: 20%
Duration: 90 Minutes
Format: Multiple-choice Questions, descriptive questions, true/false.
Marking Criteria: As per the model answers.
Closed Book.

Individual Assignments
Type: Summative Assessment Learning Objectives Assessed: 1-2, 6-7
Due Date: Week 3, 8, 11
Number of assignments: three
Weighting: 10%
Format: Formal report (in Word format or PDF format, submission through MyUni)
Marking Criteria: As described in the guidelines

Group Project (Pit Optimisation and Financial Modelling)
Type: Summative Assessment Learning Objectives Assessed: 4-7
Due Date: Week 12
Weighting: 40%
Format: Formal report (in Word format or PDF and Xls format, submission through MyUni)
Marking Criteria: As described in project guidelines

Final Examination
Type: Summative Assessment
Learning Objectives Assessed: 3-5
Marking Criteria: As per Examiner’s Guidelines & model answers
Weighting/Marks: This Examination is worth 30% of the total mark for the course. Each question's mark will be indicated on the question sheet.
Special Instructions: Students must comply with each University’s examinations regulations outlining the responsibilities of students during an examination.

Submission

Submission:

All assessment to be submitted on-line as required via MyUni.

Late Submission:

Late submissions will in most cases receive a zero mark. A late submission will only be allowed when a deferred deadline has been approved by the course coordinator prior to due date because of medical or extenuating circumstances. This will require documented evidence, e.g. Medical Certificate, etc.

Course Grading

Grades for your performance in this course will be awarded in accordance with the following scheme:

M10 (Coursework Mark Scheme)
Grade	Mark	Description
FNS		Fail No Submission
F	1-49	Fail
P	50-64	Pass
C	65-74	Credit
D	75-84	Distinction
HD	85-100	High Distinction
CN		Continuing
NFE		No Formal Examination
RP		Result Pending

Further details of the grades/results can be obtained from Examinations.

Grade Descriptors are available which provide a general guide to the standard of work that is expected at each grade level. More information at Assessment for Coursework Programs.

Final results for this course will be made available through .

Please, submit all work via Myuni.
The Lecturer will assess your submissions usign the electronic copy
You will receive feedback through MyUni system

Student Feedback

The University places a high priority on approaches to learning and teaching that enhance the student experience. Feedback is sought from students in a variety of ways including on-going engagement with staff, the use of online discussion boards and the use of Student Experience of Learning and Teaching (SELT) surveys as well as GOS surveys and Program reviews.

SELTs are an important source of information to inform individual teaching practice, decisions about teaching duties, and course and program curriculum design. They enable the University to assess how effectively its learning environments and teaching practices facilitate student engagement and learning outcomes. Under the current SELT Policy (http://www.adelaide.edu.au/policies/101/) course SELTs are mandated and must be conducted at the conclusion of each term/semester/trimester for every course offering. Feedback on issues raised through course SELT surveys is made available to enrolled students through various resources (e.g. MyUni). In addition aggregated course SELT data is available.
Student Support
Policies & Guidelines
This section contains links to relevant assessment-related policies and guidelines - all university policies.
Fraud Awareness

Students are reminded that in order to maintain the academic integrity of all programs and courses, the university has a zero-tolerance approach to students offering money or significant value goods or services to any staff member who is involved in their teaching or assessment. Students offering lecturers or tutors or professional staff anything more than a small token of appreciation is totally unacceptable, in any circumstances. Staff members are obliged to report all such incidents to their supervisor/manager, who will refer them for action under the university's student鈥檚 disciplinary procedures.

The 成人大片 is committed to regular reviews of the courses and programs it offers to students. The 成人大片 therefore reserves the right to discontinue or vary programs and courses without notice. Please read the important information contained in the disclaimer.

Authorised by:	Deputy Vice-Chancellor and Vice-President (Academic)
Maintained by:	Course Outlines Administrator

成人大片