MINING 7073 - Mine Planning
North Terrace Campus - Semester 2 - 2017
-
General Course Information
Course Details
Course Code MINING 7073 Course Mine Planning Coordinating Unit School of Civil, Environmental & Mining Eng Term Semester 2 Level Postgraduate Coursework Location/s North Terrace Campus Units 3 Contact Up to 4 hours per week Available for Study Abroad and Exchange N Assessment Quiz (20%), Design Project (20%), FTM (20%), Final Exam (40%) Course Staff
Course Coordinator: Adjunct Associate Pr Emmanuel Chanda
Assoc Professor Emmanuel Chanda
Chair - Program Leaders Committee, Mining Education Australia
School of Civil, Environmental and Mining Engineering
Email: emmanuel.chanda@adelaide.edu.au
Phone: (08) 83137410
Consulting Hours:
Tuesdays: 3-5pm
Wednesdays: 2-4pm
Thursdays: 12 - 2pmCourse Timetable
The full timetable of all activities for this course can be accessed from .
DAY TIME VENUE ACTIVITY Tuesdays 12-1pm IW 218 Tutorial Wednesdays 9-11am CAT Suite 5 (G22) Computer Lab Wednesdays 11-12pm G28 (Lower Napier) Lecture -
Learning Outcomes
Course Learning Outcomes
On successful completion of this course students will be able to:
1 Explain the process of the mine planning & evaluation 2 Calculate the time value of money, and the impact on mine planning 3 Develop optimal strategic mine plans including ultimate pit limit analysis, production scheduling and cut-off grade analysis 4 Apply algorithms and computer software to compliment the strategic mine optimisation process 5 Create realistic, integrated financial models of mining projects
The above course learning outcomes are aligned with the Engineers Australia .
The course is designed to develop the following Elements of Competency: 1.2 1.3 1.4 1.5 1.6 2.1 2.2 2.3 2.4 3.1 3.2 3.3 3.4 3.5 3.6
University Graduate Attributes
This course will provide students with an opportunity to develop the Graduate Attribute(s) specified below:
University Graduate Attribute Course Learning Outcome(s) Deep discipline knowledge
- informed and infused by cutting edge research, scaffolded throughout their program of studies
- acquired from personal interaction with research active educators, from year 1
- accredited or validated against national or international standards (for relevant programs)
1-5 Critical thinking and problem solving
- steeped in research methods and rigor
- based on empirical evidence and the scientific approach to knowledge development
- demonstrated through appropriate and relevant assessment
1-5 Teamwork and communication skills
- developed from, with, and via the SGDE
- honed through assessment and practice throughout the program of studies
- encouraged and valued in all aspects of learning
3-5 Career and leadership readiness
- technology savvy
- professional and, where relevant, fully accredited
- forward thinking and well informed
- tested and validated by work based experiences
3-5 Intercultural and ethical competency
- adept at operating in other cultures
- comfortable with different nationalities and social contexts
- able to determine and contribute to desirable social outcomes
- demonstrated by study abroad or with an understanding of indigenous knowledges
3-5 Self-awareness and emotional intelligence
- a capacity for self-reflection and a willingness to engage in self-appraisal
- open to objective and constructive feedback from supervisors and peers
- able to negotiate difficult social situations, defuse conflict and engage positively in purposeful debate
3-5 -
Learning Resources
Required Resources
- On-line Course Resources (MyUni) MEA
- Mine Planning Course Notes (2012) - available on Myuni.
Recommended Resources
Hustrulid, WA and Kuchta, M, 2006. Open Pit Mine Planning & Design, Volume 1 – Fundamentals, 2nd Edition, 735p (Balkema: Rotterdam/Taylor and Francis: London).
Camus, Juan P., 2002, Management of Mineral Resources: Creating Value in the Mining Business, Society
for Mining, Metallurgy, and Exploration, Inc. Englewood, CO, USA.
Rudenno, V, 2004 The Mining Valuation Handbook – Australian Mining and Energy Valuation for Investors and management, 430p (WrightBooks: Victoria). Lane,
Kenneth F. 1988. The Economic Definition of Ore - Cut-Off Grades in Theory and Practice. Mining Journal Books Limited, London.
Runge, Ian C., 1998 Mining Economics and Strategy. Society for Mining, Metallurgy, and Exploration, Inc. Englewood, CO, USA.Online Learning
- Myuni Course - Mine Planning Active
-
Learning & Teaching Activities
Learning & Teaching Modes
- Lecture Presentation
- Tutorial Sessions
- Group discussions
Workload
No information currently available.
Learning Activities Summary
This course uses a number of different teaching and learning activities including:
- Lectures
- Tutorials (Problem-solving)
- Computer labs (hands-on software applications)
- Self-directed activities
- Group discussions
- Project-based learning
- Analysis of case studies
- Discussions with guest lecturers
Specific Course Requirements
- Peer Review using SPARK is mandatory in this Course for group work
- Students will be expected to complete a project on open pit mine planning and design with emphasis on pit optimisation, long term production scheduling and financial technical evaluation
- Postgraduate students will have additional tasks assigned in addition to those for undergraduate students
Small Group Discovery Experience
Students will work in groups of 4 to investigate the optimal mining plan for an open pit mining project and to develop a financial technical model of an underground mining project. -
Assessment
The University's policy on Assessment for Coursework Programs is based on the following four principles:
- Assessment must encourage and reinforce learning.
- Assessment must enable robust and fair judgements about student performance.
- Assessment practices must be fair and equitable to students and give them the opportunity to demonstrate what they have learned.
- Assessment must maintain academic standards.
Assessment Summary
* The specific due date for each assessment task will be available on MyUni.Assessment Task Weighting (%) Individual/ Group Formative/ Summative Due (week)* Hurdle criteria Learning outcomes Weekly Tutorials 5 Individual Summative Weeks 2-12 1. 2. 3. 4. 5. Quiz 15 Individual Summative week 7 2. 3. 4. Pit Optimisation and Financial Technical Modelling Project 40 Group Formative / Summative weeks 3-10 3. 4. 5. Final Examination 40 Individual Formative / Summative Week 13 0.2 3. 4. 5. Total 100
This assessment breakdown is registered as an exemption to the University's . The exemption is related to the Procedures clause(s): 1. a. i
This course has a hurdle requirement. Meeting the specified hurdle criteria is a requirement for passing the course.Assessment Related Requirements
Hurdle Requirement:
- To be able to pass this course you must obtain 50% or more in the Final Examination
Assessment Detail
No information currently available.
Submission
Submission:
All assessment to be submitted on-line as required via MyUni. Reports to be submitted both as hard and soft copy.
Late Submission:
Late submissions will in most cases receive a zero mark. A late submission will only be allowed when a deferred deadline has been approved by the course coordinator prior to due date because of medical or extenuating circumstances. This will require documented evidence, e.g. Medical Certificate, etc.Course Grading
Grades for your performance in this course will be awarded in accordance with the following scheme:
M10 (Coursework Mark Scheme) Grade Mark Description FNS Fail No Submission F 1-49 Fail P 50-64 Pass C 65-74 Credit D 75-84 Distinction HD 85-100 High Distinction CN Continuing NFE No Formal Examination RP Result Pending Further details of the grades/results can be obtained from Examinations.
Grade Descriptors are available which provide a general guide to the standard of work that is expected at each grade level. More information at Assessment for Coursework Programs.
Tutorials
Type: Formative
In-Class Assessment Learning
Objectives Assessed: All
Due Date: Weekly
Weight: 5%
Duration: 30 minutes to 2 hours
Format: Class activity; submit at end of class Marking Criteria: As per model answers.
Closed Book Quiz
Type: Formative
In-Class Assessment Learning
Objectives Assessed: 1- 3
Due Date: Quiz(Week 7)
Weighting: 15%
Duration: 90 Minutes
Format: Multiple-choice Questions – includes calculation type questions, true/false.
Marking Criteria: As per model answers.
Closed Book:
Group Project(Pit Optimisation)
Type: Summative AssessmentLearningObjectives Assessed: 3, 4
Due Date: Week 10
Weighting: 20%
Format: Formal report (in Word format only, submission through MyUni according to MEA Report Writing Guidelines)Marking
Criteria: As described in project guidelines
Group Assignment (Financial Modelling)
Type: Summative Assessment Learning
Objectives Assessed: 2,5
Due Date: Week 9 & 12
Weighting: 20%Format: Submit (in Word or pdf and xls format only, submission through the MyUni according to MEA report writing guidelines)
Marking Criteria: As described in project guidelines
Final Examination 40%
Type: Summative Assessment
Learning Objectives Assessed: 3-5
Marking Criteria: As per Examiner’s Guidelines & model answers
Exam Type: Calculations Closed book- No materials permitted. Permitted Materials: Calculator - Non programmable calculators are allowed (UNSW approved calculators only) Other – No electronic aids are permitted (e.g. laptops, phone), do dictionaries permitted
Weighting/Marks:
This Examination is worth 40% of the total mark for the course. Each question's mark will be indicated on the question sheet.
Special Instructions:
Students must comply with each University’s examinations regulations outlining the responsibilities of students during an examination.Final results for this course will be made available through .
- Please, submit all work via Myuni.
- The Lecturer will assess your submissions usign the electronic copy
- You will receive feedback through MyUni system
-
Student Feedback
The University places a high priority on approaches to learning and teaching that enhance the student experience. Feedback is sought from students in a variety of ways including on-going engagement with staff, the use of online discussion boards and the use of Student Experience of Learning and Teaching (SELT) surveys as well as GOS surveys and Program reviews.
SELTs are an important source of information to inform individual teaching practice, decisions about teaching duties, and course and program curriculum design. They enable the University to assess how effectively its learning environments and teaching practices facilitate student engagement and learning outcomes. Under the current SELT Policy (http://www.adelaide.edu.au/policies/101/) course SELTs are mandated and must be conducted at the conclusion of each term/semester/trimester for every course offering. Feedback on issues raised through course SELT surveys is made available to enrolled students through various resources (e.g. MyUni). In addition aggregated course SELT data is available.
-
Student Support
- Academic Integrity for Students
- Academic Support with Maths
- Academic Support with writing and study skills
- Careers Services
- Library Services for Students
- LinkedIn Learning
- Student Life Counselling Support - Personal counselling for issues affecting study
- Students with a Disability - Alternative academic arrangements
-
Policies & Guidelines
This section contains links to relevant assessment-related policies and guidelines - all university policies.
- Academic Credit Arrangements Policy
- Academic Integrity Policy
- Academic Progress by Coursework Students Policy
- Assessment for Coursework Programs Policy
- Copyright Compliance Policy
- Coursework Academic Programs Policy
- Intellectual Property Policy
- IT Acceptable Use and Security Policy
- Modified Arrangements for Coursework Assessment Policy
- Reasonable Adjustments to Learning, Teaching & Assessment for Students with a Disability Policy
- Student Experience of Learning and Teaching Policy
- Student Grievance Resolution Process
-
Fraud Awareness
Students are reminded that in order to maintain the academic integrity of all programs and courses, the university has a zero-tolerance approach to students offering money or significant value goods or services to any staff member who is involved in their teaching or assessment. Students offering lecturers or tutors or professional staff anything more than a small token of appreciation is totally unacceptable, in any circumstances. Staff members are obliged to report all such incidents to their supervisor/manager, who will refer them for action under the university's student鈥檚 disciplinary procedures.
The 成人大片 is committed to regular reviews of the courses and programs it offers to students. The 成人大片 therefore reserves the right to discontinue or vary programs and courses without notice. Please read the important information contained in the disclaimer.
