成人大片

On successful completion of this course, students will be able to:

1. Analyse the foundational principles of their chosen thesis topic;
2. Undertake complex legal research with primary and secondary materials;
3. Critique the operation of law from a policy perspective;
4. Structure and sustain cohesive written arguments for a legal audience; and
5. Reflect on their abilities to effectively and independently undertake individual work.

There are no required resources for this course.

Recommended Text:

Students should ensure they have access to the Australian Guide to Legal Citation (4th ed, 2018), either in hard copy or online.

A course MyUni page will be used to provide students with announcements and the portal to upload their dissertations.

ENTRY INTO THE COURSE

The course has no designated classes, and enrolment is by application only. Successful applicants will be students with a GPA of at least 6, or with outstanding results in the particular subject area they wish to study and the recommendation of their potential supervisor based on individual past experience with that student.

Candidates wishing to enrol in the dissertation should submit an application to the Dissertation Co-ordinator in accordance with the process set for that semester. This will usually involve preparing an outline of their proposed dissertation by the deadline advised by the Adelaide Law School, and speaking with potential supervisors about their availability and choice of topic. The topic outline should be about one to two A4 pages in length and provide a brief synopsis of the scope and purpose of the proposed dissertation. This will be assessed, along with the student's GPA and past achievements as demonstrated by their unofficial transcript, in order to determine if the student has the requisite base level of knowledge required to complete a large, individual research task to a high standard. Successful candidates will be enrolled before the semester commences.

IDENTIFICATION OF SUPERVISOR

Each student who applies to the course is responsible for identifying a potential supervisor for their dissertation. The supervisor must be a member of Academic Staff at the Adelaide Law School. The student is responsible for approaching and undertaking individual discussions with their potential supervisor to develop their research proposal. This discussion must include the provision of an unofficial transcript to the potential supervisor, and discussion of their past achievements.

STRUCTURE OF THE PROGRAM

Once enrolled, students will have ongoing meetings with their allocated supervisor, on a schedule to be determined between the individual student and supervisor.

There will be a general MyUni course page, through which students will receive communication, but no course material.

There are no scheduled learning activities. It is expected that the supervisor and student will initially agree on a provisional timetable for
submission of drafts.

Being a 6 unit course, students are expected to spend up to 24 hours a week during term time in the preparation of their dissertation.

The process of writing and supervising each dissertation is unique. The process is incapable of being precisely regulated. However, for the removal of uncertainty, it is appropriate that the relationship of candidate and supervisor should be governed by a statement of the minimum expectations and responsibilities of each party in academic terms. Both candidate and supervisor are encouraged to enter into a dynamic academic process which maximises contact for critical discussion and pastoral concern.

The Supervisor
The supervisor’s role is facilitative and advisory. The supervisor must recognise that the candidate is involved in a process, namely the writing of an extensive piece of legal research of which the candidate has little or no previous experience. Accordingly, it is the supervisor’s role to respond to the candidate’s requests for reasonable assistance and to provide an encouraging environment for the critical evaluation of the candidate’s progress. However, the supervisor’s role is facilitative and advisory only. In particular, it is not the supervisor’s role to provide the candidate with a dissertation topic (although the supervisor may, and indeed generally will, offer advice in this regard). 

The particular responsibilities of the supervisor are:
- to meet with the candidate shortly after the candidate is admitted to the course;
- at this initial meeting or soon thereafter, to comment critically upon the candidate’s selection of a dissertation topic; 
- to be available to meet the candidate for a substantial discussion at least once a fortnight;
- to encourage the candidate to begin their research promptly and to prepare early drafts of the dissertation to detect any potential problems at an early stage;
- to comment promptly and critically, whether orally or in writing, upon (a) the development of the themes, arguments and structure of drafts of the dissertation and (b) the style and presentation of these drafts and the observance of the scholarly conventions of writing; and
- to comment promptly and critically in the same manner upon the final draft.

The Candidate
The candidate’s role is to produce the dissertation. The candidate has primary responsibility for the progress of the dissertation and the final decision upon any academic matter regarding the content of the dissertation rests with the candidate.

To this end, the particular responsibilities of the candidate are:
- upon being informed of the identity of their supervisor, to make contact with the supervisor as soon as possible to schedule an initial meeting;
- at this initial meeting or soon thereafter, to provide their supervisor with their topic for critical comment. Any significant variation of the topic after approval must be likewise discussed with the supervisor and approved by the Dissertation Co-ordinator;
- to arrange and attend ongoing meetings with their supervisor;
- to conduct research on their topic;
- to prepare sufficient and timely drafts for their supervisor's critical comment;
- to inform the supervisor of all significant matters affecting the progress of the dissertation and to discuss the academic impact of the same;
- to prepare a complete draft of the dissertation for critical comment not less than fourteen days before the due date of submission or any extension granted; and
- to prepare the final draft for submission and assessment by the appointed examiner by the due date.

Note:
These guidelines govern the relationship of candidate and supervisor only. In any case of difficulty or disagreement, candidates and supervisors are encouraged to discuss matters with the Dissertation Coordinator. In the event of the need for a change of supervisor during the production of the dissertation, the Dissertation Coordinator will arrange such meetings as are necessary to ensure a smooth transition between supervisors and candidate.

Assessment Item	% of final mark	Dates	Task Detail	Length	Learning Outcomes
Dissertation	100%	Due: Friday Week 12 at 2.00pm	Individual	12,000 words	1, 2, 3, 4, 5

Length of Dissertation
The word limit for the dissertation is strictly enforced. In presenting their dissertation, candidates are required to incorporate a signed statement as to the length of their dissertation. Word limits include the main text of the dissertation and substantive footnotes, while the title page, bibliography, table of contents, required declarations, and standard footnote references are excluded).

A substantive footnote is any footnote which includes sentences (full or partial), whether alongside or without a citation, but does not include the standard footnote references as set out in the AGLC in Chapters 1.2 'Introductory Signals for Citations', 1.3 'Sources Referring to Other Sources' and 1.4 'Subsequent References'.

Style 
Citations and footnotes should follow the Australian Guide to Legal Citation (4th ed, 2018). 

Dissertations must be submitted electonically on MyUni.

Upon request of the examiner(s), students may also be required to submit up to two (2) printed copies of their Dissertation to the Dissertation Coordinator. If this is needed, students can elect to bind (comb, plastic, spiral, wire or wire-o bound types are appropriate) their copies, but binding is not required.

All assessments will be submitted and monitored through text or code comparative software (e.g. Turnitin) where possible.

Finality of Assessment Grades

Students are advised that Course Coordinators will not enter into negotiations of any kind with any student regarding changes to their grades. It is irrelevant, in any given circumstance, that only a minimal number of additional marks are required to inflate a student’s grade for any individual assessment item or course as a whole. Pursuant to the University’s Assessment for Coursework Programs Policyand the Adelaide Law School Assessment Policies and Procedures, grades may only be varied through the appropriate channels for academic review (such as an official re-mark).

Moderation

In accordance with the University’s Assessment for Coursework Programs Policy, course coordinators ‘ensure that appropriate marking guidelines and cross-marking moderation processes across markers are in place’ in each course. Procedures adopted by Adelaide Law School to ensure consistency of marking in courses with multiple markers include:

• assurance of the qualifications of markers, and their knowledge of the content covered in each course;
• detailed marking guidelines and assessment rubrics to assist in the marking of items of assessment;
• sharing of example marked assessments at various grade bands across markers;
• reviewing of selected marked assessments from each marker by the course coordinator;
• comparison of the marks and their distribution across markers;
• automatic double-marking of all interim assessment receiving a fail grade, and of final assessments where a student’s overall result is a fail grade;
• the availability of re-marking of assessments in accordance with Adelaide Law School’s Assessment Policies and Procedures.

Approval of Results by Board of Examiners

Students are reminded that all assessment results are subject to approval (and possible moderation/change) by the Law School’s Board of Examiners. Assessment results at the University are not scaled. Under the Assessment for Coursework Programs Policy, students are assessed ‘by reference to their performance against pre-determined criteria and standards … and not by ranking against the performance of the student cohort in the course’. However, under that same policy, the Board of Examiners (as the relevant Assessment Review Committee for courses at Adelaide Law School) is required to ‘ensure comparability of standards and consistency’ in assessment. On occasions, the Board of Examiners will form the view that some moderation is required to ensure the comparability of standards and consistency across courses and years, and accordingly provide fairness to all law students. All assessment results are therefore subject to approval (and possible change) until confirmed by the Board of Examiners and posted on Access Adelaide at the end of each semester.

The provides academic learning and language development services and resources for local, international, undergraduate and postgraduate coursework students enrolled at the 成人大片.

The centre offers practical advice and strategies for students to master reading, writing, note-taking, time management, oral presentation skills, referencing techniques and exam preparation for success at university through seminars, workshops and individual consultations.

Lex Salus Program

Lex Salus (law and wellbeing) is an initiative of the Adelaide Law School aimed at destigmatising mental health issues; promoting physical, mental and emotional wellness; building a strong community of staff and students; and celebrating diversity within the school. It also seeks to promote wellness within the legal profession, through the involvement of the Chief Justice of the Supreme Court of South Australia, the Honourable Chris Kourakis, as the official Patron of the program.

Students can participate in the Lex Salus program by attending barbecue lunches, pancake breakfasts, knitting and crochet circles, seminars, guest speakers, conferences and other activities. Our , and regular all-student emails promote upcoming events, and have tips and information on wellness.

Our Lex Salus YouTube channel also includes videos on topics like managing stress, and interviews with LGBTQ lawyers and their supporters which celebrate diversity and individuality. Students who commit to 10 hours of volunteering with Lex Salus in one year can have their service recognised on their academic transcript and through a thank you morning tea with the Chief Justice and law school staff.

Student Life Counselling Support

The University’s service provides free and confidential service to all enrolled students. We encourage you to contact the Student Life Counselling Support service on 8313 5663 to make an appointment to deal with any issues that may be affecting your study and life.

Academic Integrity

All students must be familiar with the University’s Academic Integrity Policy. Academic Misconduct is a serious matter and is treated as such by the Law School and the University. Academic Misconduct (which goes beyond plagiarism) can be a ground for a refusal by the Supreme Court of South Australia to admit a person to practice as a legal practitioner in South Australia. Academic Integrity is an essential aspect of ethical and honest behaviour, which is central to the practice of the law and an understanding of what it is to be a lawyer.