MANAGEMT 7224 - Knowledge Management
North Terrace Campus - Trimester 1 - 2016
-
General Course Information
Course Details
Course Code MANAGEMT 7224 Course Knowledge Management Coordinating Unit Adelaide Business School Term Trimester 1 Level Postgraduate Coursework Location/s North Terrace Campus Units 3 Contact Up to 3 hours per week Available for Study Abroad and Exchange Y Prerequisites MANAGEMT 7087, MANAGEMT 7100 & MANAGEMT 7104 Assessment Exam/assignments/tests/tutorial work as prescribed at first lecture Course Staff
Course Coordinator: Mr David Pender
Lecturer's Biography
My name is David Pender, I am a management practitioner and an adjunt senior lecturer at the 成人大片 Business School. I have had a very wide range of business experience over the past 35 years or so.
I prefer to be called "David".
I spent 13 years practising on my own account as a Chartered Accountant. Until 2006, I held senior management positions in distribution management and general management within the financial services industry (12 years). Since then, I have practised as principal of Knowledge Perspectives, a counsulting collaborative that applies the principles of knowledge and intellectual capital managemnet in a variety of fields: for instance, change and orgaisational development, performance improvement, M&A, marketing and sales in knowledge intensive industries and strategic direction and mapping. Clients cover both private and public sectors in Australia, Asia and North America. Complex negotiation issues are also addressed (eg community engagement).
I hold a degree in Economics and a MBA from the 成人大片 and I am a member of the Institute of Chartered Accountants in Australia.
Apart from this course, I also teach courses in Negotiation and Fundamentals of Leadership int he Business School's MBA program in Adelaide and Singapore. I teach extensively in the University's Executive Education program.Course Timetable
The full timetable of all activities for this course can be accessed from .
-
Learning Outcomes
Course Learning Outcomes
This course is designed to …
1. Develop an understanding of the theory and practice of knowledge and intellectual capital management;
2. Apply that theory to a wide range of scenarios;
3. Formulate action plans for knowledge intensive organisations;
4. Distinguish aspects of industrial era management that may be inappropriate for knowledge intensive organisations and provide alternatives;
5. Formulate a framework for thinking about knowledge intensive organisations;
6. To understand and become comfortable in dealing with intangibles.University Graduate Attributes
This course will provide students with an opportunity to develop the Graduate Attribute(s) specified below:
University Graduate Attribute Course Learning Outcome(s) Deep discipline knowledge
- informed and infused by cutting edge research, scaffolded throughout their program of studies
- acquired from personal interaction with research active educators, from year 1
- accredited or validated against national or international standards (for relevant programs)
1, 3 & 4 Critical thinking and problem solving
- steeped in research methods and rigor
- based on empirical evidence and the scientific approach to knowledge development
- demonstrated through appropriate and relevant assessment
2-6 Teamwork and communication skills
- developed from, with, and via the SGDE
- honed through assessment and practice throughout the program of studies
- encouraged and valued in all aspects of learning
2-6 Career and leadership readiness
- technology savvy
- professional and, where relevant, fully accredited
- forward thinking and well informed
- tested and validated by work based experiences
2-6 Intercultural and ethical competency
- adept at operating in other cultures
- comfortable with different nationalities and social contexts
- able to determine and contribute to desirable social outcomes
- demonstrated by study abroad or with an understanding of indigenous knowledges
2-6 Self-awareness and emotional intelligence
- a capacity for self-reflection and a willingness to engage in self-appraisal
- open to objective and constructive feedback from supervisors and peers
- able to negotiate difficult social situations, defuse conflict and engage positively in purposeful debate
2-6 -
Learning Resources
Required Resources
Text Books (s): There is no prescribed textRecommended Resources
Preliminary reading (on myUni): please browse these articles before the first session.
Eustace C (Ed) (2003), The Prism Report 2003: Research findings and policy recommendations European Commission Society Technologies program
Hall, Richard, Knowledge Management in the New Business Environment, acirrt, University of Sydney, 2003 (Executive Summary)
Hull D & Read R (2003) Simply the best workplaces in Australia, accirt working paper no 88, University of Sydney
ReadingsTopic Topic description Readings and Cases 1 Setting the scene Browse the KM articles at www.vernaallee.com 2 What are knowledge management and intellectual capital management? Unknown (1999) Do We Know How to Do That? Harvard Management Update, February Fahey & Prusak (1998) The Eleven Deadly Sins of Knowledge Management, California Management Review, Vol 40 No 3 3 The Knowledge Creation Process Nonaka I (1991) The Knowledge Creating Company, Harvard Business Review, November-December pp 96-104
Nonaka I & Konno N (1998) The Concept of “Ba”: Building a foundation for knowledge creation, California Management Review, Vol 40 No 3 3.5 Ichio, K, From Managing to Enabling Knowledge in Takeuchi & Nonaka (Eds), Hitotsubashi on Knowledge Management, Wiley, 20044 Knowledge as a Strategic Asset Executive Summary from R Hall, Knowledge Management in the New Business Environment, acirrt, University of Sydney, 2003 5 A knowledge based theory of the firm Sveiby K-E, (2001), A knowledge-based theory of the firm to guide strategy formulation, Journal of Intellectual Capital 2 (4) pp 344-358 V Allee V (2000) The Value Evolution: Addressing larger implications of an intellectual capital and intangibles perspective Journal of Intellectual Capital 1(1) pp 17-32 6 Developing a knowledge strategy Zack M (1999) Developing a knowledge strategy, California Management Review, 41(3) pp 125-144 Hansen MT, Nohria N & Tierney T (1999) What’s your strategy for managing knowledge? Harvard Business Review, March-April pp 55-69 7 Best practice transfer Probably for self study O’Dell C & Grayson CJ (1998) If only we knew what we know: Identification and transfer of internal best practices, California management Review Vol 40 No 3 8 Social Network Analysis and Social Capital Parker A, Cross R & Walsh D, (2001) Improving Collaboration with Social Network Analysis, Knowledge Management Review pp 24-28
Cross R, Parker A & Borgatti S, (2002) A bird’s eye view: Using Social Network analysis to improve knowledge creation and sharing, IBM Institute for Business Value Cross R, Liedtka J & Weiss L (2005) A practical Guide to Social Networks, Harvard Business Review, March pp 124-1329 Collaboration Sveiby K-E & Simons R, (2002) Collaborative Climate and Effectiveness of Knowledge Work – an Empirical Study Journal of Knowledge Management Vol 6 No 5 pp 420-433
American Management Association, AMA 2002 Survey on Internal Collaboration, AMA Research 2002
American management Association, AMA 2003 Survey on Leadership Challenges, AMA Research 2003
Hansen MT & Nohira N (2004) How to build collaborative advantage, MIT Sloan management Review, Fall
Inkpen AC (1996) Creating knowledge through collaboration, California Management Review, Vol 39 No 1
Sveiby KE (2007) Disabling the context for knowledge work: the role of managers’ behaviours, Management Decision Vol 45 No 10 Pender DSD (2007) Emerging Themes in Inter-Firm Collaboration, Conference Paper - 1st International Workshop for Knowledge Management in Space Exploration, NASA/Caltech, July 200710 Value Network Analysis Allee V (2008), Value network analysis and value conversion of tangible and intangible assets, Journal of Intellectual Capital, Vol 9 No 1 pp 5-24
Allee V & Taug J (2006), Collaboration, innovation and value creation in a global telecom, The Learning Organization Vol 13 No 6 pp 569-578
Refer to the e-book available at
www.valuenetworksandcollaboration.com
Browse the articles and blogs at
www.vernaallee.com www.valuenetworks.com11 Communities of Practice Lesser & Storck (2001), Communities of practice and organizational performance, IBM Systems Journal, Vol 40 No 4
Breu & Hemingway (2002), Collaborative Processes and Knowledge Creation in Communities-of-Practice, Creativity and Innovation management, Vol 11 No 3
Burk (2004), Using communities to collaborate across boundaries at the FHWA, KM Review, Vol 7 Issue 3 Vestal (2003), Ten traits for a successful Community of Practice, KM Review, Volume 5, Issue 612 Knowledge Audits and Knowledge Maps Self study Koulopoulos T & Frappaolo C (2002) Why do a knowledge audit? The Knowledge management Year Book Boston: Butterworth Heinemann Ch 7 pp 418 – 424
Liebowitz J et al (2000) The Knowledge Audit Knowledge and Process Management Jan/Mar pp 3-10 Skyrme DJ (1999) Knowledge Networking: Creating the collaborative enterprise Oxford: Butterworth Heinemann pp 177 – 21113 Technologies for Knowledge Management
Readings will be advised and distributed during the previous session(s).
With student approval, mini group presentations may be used to cover this aspect of the course with an appropriate re-weighting of assessment percentages.14 Scorecards, Monitors & Measurement Sveiby KE (1996-2003) Creating value with The Intangible Assets Monitor Working Paper
13.2 Sveiby K-E (2001) The Balanced Scorecard (BSC) and the Intangible Assets Monitor – a comparison Working Paper
There are many references on The Balanced Scorecard. Refer to those you are familiar with. Danish Agency for Trade & Industry, A Guideline for Intellectual Capital Statements – a key to knowledge management, (2000), pp1 – 3015 Innovation Darroch J & McNaughton R (2002) Examining the link between knowledge management practices and types of innovation Journal of Intellectual Capital Vol 3 No 3 pp 210-222
Tushman M & Nadler D (1986) Organising for Innovation California Management Review Vol XXVIII No 3 pp 74-92 Leonard D & Sensiper S (1998) Tacit Knowledge in Group Innovation California management Review Vol 40 No 3 pp 112-13216 Leadership TBA 17 Managing Knowledge Workers Manville B & Ober J (2002) Beyond Empowerment: Building a company of citizens, Harvard Business Review, January pp 2-7
Pfeffer J & Sutton RI (1999) The Smart Talk Trap Harvard Business Review May-June pp 134-143
Hansen MT &von Oetinger B, (2001) Introducing T-Shaped Managers: Knowledge Management’s Next Generation Harvard Business Review March pp 106 – 116 Quinn JB, Anderson P & Finkelstein S, (1996) Leveraging Intellect Academy of Management Executive Vol 10 No 3 pp7-2718 Global Issues Self study Chatzel, Establishing a Global KM Initiative: the Wipro Story, Journal of Knowledge Management, Vol 8 No 2, 2004, pp6-18 Pearce II,JA & Doh JP (2005) The High Impact of Collaborative Social Initiatives, MIT Sloan Management Review Spring
Further readings may be distributed during class. Some are loaded on myUni.
Recommended Resources
Students may wish to read more widely in specific subject areas, something that I wholeheartedly encourage. There are a myriad of websites that provide useful information. Be careful that what you find is validated and not just an attempt to “sell” a particular idea or product. Like wise, there are many texts written in the past few years on the subject (and related issues). I have found Google Scholar to be useful in locating information.
Relevant journals include:
· Academy of Management Journal (USA),
· Administrative Science Quarterly (USA),
· California Management Review,
· European Management Journal
· Harvard Business Review (USA),
· Journal of Knowledge Management (Europe)
· Journal of Intellectual Capital (Europe)
· Journal of Workplace Learning (Europe)
· Journal of the Learning Organisation (Europe)
Full texts of a great many of the articles that appear in these journals can be accessed via the 成人大片’s library databases.Online Learning
MyUni is used extensively in this course. Please keep watch. -
Learning & Teaching Activities
Learning & Teaching Modes
No information currently available.
Workload
No information currently available.
Learning Activities Summary
No information currently available.
-
Assessment
The University's policy on Assessment for Coursework Programs is based on the following four principles:
- Assessment must encourage and reinforce learning.
- Assessment must enable robust and fair judgements about student performance.
- Assessment practices must be fair and equitable to students and give them the opportunity to demonstrate what they have learned.
- Assessment must maintain academic standards.
Assessment Summary
No information currently available.
Assessment Detail
No information currently available.
Submission
No information currently available.
Course Grading
Grades for your performance in this course will be awarded in accordance with the following scheme:
M10 (Coursework Mark Scheme) Grade Mark Description FNS Fail No Submission F 1-49 Fail P 50-64 Pass C 65-74 Credit D 75-84 Distinction HD 85-100 High Distinction CN Continuing NFE No Formal Examination RP Result Pending Further details of the grades/results can be obtained from Examinations.
Grade Descriptors are available which provide a general guide to the standard of work that is expected at each grade level. More information at Assessment for Coursework Programs.
Final results for this course will be made available through .
-
Student Feedback
The University places a high priority on approaches to learning and teaching that enhance the student experience. Feedback is sought from students in a variety of ways including on-going engagement with staff, the use of online discussion boards and the use of Student Experience of Learning and Teaching (SELT) surveys as well as GOS surveys and Program reviews.
SELTs are an important source of information to inform individual teaching practice, decisions about teaching duties, and course and program curriculum design. They enable the University to assess how effectively its learning environments and teaching practices facilitate student engagement and learning outcomes. Under the current SELT Policy (http://www.adelaide.edu.au/policies/101/) course SELTs are mandated and must be conducted at the conclusion of each term/semester/trimester for every course offering. Feedback on issues raised through course SELT surveys is made available to enrolled students through various resources (e.g. MyUni). In addition aggregated course SELT data is available.
-
Student Support
- Academic Integrity for Students
- Academic Support with Maths
- Academic Support with writing and study skills
- Careers Services
- Library Services for Students
- LinkedIn Learning
- Student Life Counselling Support - Personal counselling for issues affecting study
- Students with a Disability - Alternative academic arrangements
-
Policies & Guidelines
This section contains links to relevant assessment-related policies and guidelines - all university policies.
- Academic Credit Arrangements Policy
- Academic Integrity Policy
- Academic Progress by Coursework Students Policy
- Assessment for Coursework Programs Policy
- Copyright Compliance Policy
- Coursework Academic Programs Policy
- Intellectual Property Policy
- IT Acceptable Use and Security Policy
- Modified Arrangements for Coursework Assessment Policy
- Reasonable Adjustments to Learning, Teaching & Assessment for Students with a Disability Policy
- Student Experience of Learning and Teaching Policy
- Student Grievance Resolution Process
-
Fraud Awareness
Students are reminded that in order to maintain the academic integrity of all programs and courses, the university has a zero-tolerance approach to students offering money or significant value goods or services to any staff member who is involved in their teaching or assessment. Students offering lecturers or tutors or professional staff anything more than a small token of appreciation is totally unacceptable, in any circumstances. Staff members are obliged to report all such incidents to their supervisor/manager, who will refer them for action under the university's student鈥檚 disciplinary procedures.
The 成人大片 is committed to regular reviews of the courses and programs it offers to students. The 成人大片 therefore reserves the right to discontinue or vary programs and courses without notice. Please read the important information contained in the disclaimer.